{"id":322413,"date":"2024-05-18T10:00:37","date_gmt":"2024-05-18T04:30:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=322413"},"modified":"2024-05-22T17:24:25","modified_gmt":"2024-05-22T11:54:25","slug":"can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers\/","title":{"rendered":"Can charges be altered under S. 216 CrPC, or is it solely a judicial prerogative? Kerala HC answers"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Kerala High Court:<\/span> While deciding a petition under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;), challenging an order of the Additional District &amp; Sessions Court (For the trial of cases relating to Atrocities &amp; Sexual Violence against Women and Children), (&#8216;Sessions Court&#8217;) for alteration of charges framed, t <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bechu Kurian Thomas, J.<\/span>, observed that alteration or addition of charges must be based on the Court&#8217;s satisfaction and not on a party&#8217;s application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The present case relates to a petition filed by the State, challenging an order of the Sessions Court. The petition was filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a>, seeking to alter the charges already framed by incorporating an additional offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561694\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">370<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In 2006, the accused promised the victims to provide cleaning jobs at a Hospital in Dubai. After reaching Dubai, they were confined in an apartment and were served with a beverage containing intoxicating substances and were repeatedly raped. The victims were forcibly taken to other apartments and, after wrongly confining them, were compelled to have sexual intercourse with several strangers. Upon escaping with the assistance of the Indian Embassy and returning to India, they lodged an FIR. Following the investigation, the final report charged the accused under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561758\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">420<\/a> (cheating), <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">376<\/a> (rape), and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561655\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">342<\/a> (wrongful confinement) read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561375\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">120-B<\/a> (criminal conspiracy) of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After the trial commenced and the testimonies of the victims were recorded, the prosecution filed an application under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519467\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">216<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a>, seeking to add Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561694\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">370<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> to the charges. The Sessions Judge dismissed this application, reasoning that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561694\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">370<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>, pertaining to the trafficking of persons, was incorporated into IPC by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act of 2013, which came into effect on 3-02-2013. Since the alleged offenses occurred in 2006, the provision was deemed inapplicable. This dismissal led to the current petition under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The prosecution contended that the evidence indicated the elements of trafficking, justifying the addition of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561694\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">370<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>, as it stood before the 2013 amendment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Decision and Analysis<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"> The Court examined the definition of slavery as implied in Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561694\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">370<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> before its amendment, which criminalized the buying, selling, or disposing of any person as a slave.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to the decision in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Dhanurjaya Putel<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Orissa<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/6te8hl5Y\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2002 SCC OnLine Ori 225<\/a>, which interpreted slavery as the deprivation of freedom of movement and the right of expression concerning a person or property, and said that this supported the prosecution&#8217;s claim that the accused&#8217;s actions constituted slavery under the pre-2013 Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561694\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">370<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, despite agreeing with the prosecution&#8217;s interpretation, the Court noted that the power to alter charges under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519467\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">216<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> lies exclusively with the Court and cannot be invoked through an application by any party. The Court further referred to the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">P. Kartikalakshmi<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sri Ganesh<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/xVSj76h6\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2017) 3 SCC 347<\/a>, and noted that alteration or addition of charges must be based on the Court&#8217;s satisfaction and not on a party&#8217;s application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition and upheld the impugned order, noting that the same was not due to the reasons stated by the Sessions Judge, but because the application by the prosecution to alter the charges was procedurally improper. The Court emphasized that while the prosecution&#8217;s application could not be entertained, the Trial Court retained the discretion to independently alter or add charges if it deemed necessary based on the evidence presented.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">State of Kerala v. Azeez, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ZB3sWzOl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Ker 2059<\/a>, Order dated 12-04-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Advocate for the State: M.C. Ashi, Public Prosecutor<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Advocate for the Respondents: I.V. PRAMOD, Ashik K. Mohammed Ali, Jessy George, K.V. Sasidharan, P. K. Jayasreethankachi, Saira Souraj P.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Request for the addition of the charge under section 370 IPC, as it stood prior to 2013, cannot be made at the instance of the prosecution. An addition of charge has to be done by the Court based upon its own satisfaction and not at the behest of any of the parties to the trial&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":316393,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[68812,31844,11941,42088,13961,2523,2572,38494],"class_list":["post-322413","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-alteration-charge","tag-chargesheet","tag-crpc","tag-framing-of-charge","tag-ipc","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-Rape","tag-section-216-crpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Can charges be altered under Section 216 CrPC or is it solely judicial prerogative? Kerala HC answers | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Kerala High Court held that alteration or addition of charges must be based on the Court&#039;s satisfaction and not on a party&#039;s application\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Can charges be altered under S. 216 CrPC, or is it solely a judicial prerogative? Kerala HC answers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court held that alteration or addition of charges must be based on the Court&#039;s satisfaction and not on a party&#039;s application\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-05-18T04:30:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-05-22T11:54:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Can charges be altered under S. 216 CrPC, or is it solely a judicial prerogative? Kerala HC answers\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers\/\",\"name\":\"Can charges be altered under Section 216 CrPC or is it solely judicial prerogative? Kerala HC answers | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-18T04:30:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-22T11:54:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Kerala High Court held that alteration or addition of charges must be based on the Court's satisfaction and not on a party's application\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Kerala High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Can charges be altered under S. 216 CrPC, or is it solely a judicial prerogative? Kerala HC answers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Can charges be altered under Section 216 CrPC or is it solely judicial prerogative? Kerala HC answers | SCC Times","description":"Kerala High Court held that alteration or addition of charges must be based on the Court's satisfaction and not on a party's application","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Can charges be altered under S. 216 CrPC, or is it solely a judicial prerogative? Kerala HC answers","og_description":"Kerala High Court held that alteration or addition of charges must be based on the Court's satisfaction and not on a party's application","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-05-18T04:30:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-05-22T11:54:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Can charges be altered under S. 216 CrPC, or is it solely a judicial prerogative? Kerala HC answers","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers\/","name":"Can charges be altered under Section 216 CrPC or is it solely judicial prerogative? Kerala HC answers | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp","datePublished":"2024-05-18T04:30:37+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-22T11:54:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Kerala High Court held that alteration or addition of charges must be based on the Court's satisfaction and not on a party's application","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Kerala High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/can-charges-be-altered-under-section-216-crpc-or-solely-judicial-prerogative-kerala-hc-answers\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Can charges be altered under S. 216 CrPC, or is it solely a judicial prerogative? Kerala HC answers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":222543,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/26\/all-hc-during-the-course-of-trial-it-is-open-to-complainant-or-prosecution-to-apply-for-alteration-of-charges\/","url_meta":{"origin":322413,"position":0},"title":"All HC | During the course of trial it is open to complainant or prosecution to apply for alteration of charges","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Dinesh Kumar Singh, J. while disposing of this petition gave liberty to the petitioner to move an application for altering the charge against the accused. This instant petition was filed under Section 482 CrPC challenging the order of Additional District and Sessions Judge (Ex-cadre), Pratapgarh. The charges\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":250071,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/21\/alteration-of-charges\/","url_meta":{"origin":322413,"position":1},"title":"HP HC | Can an application for addition\/ alteration of charges be made by State at the stage when the matter is fixed for arguments? Court explains","author":"Editor","date":"June 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J., dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are such that the accused persons had connived with each other to hatch a conspiracy and misappropriated public funds. The State moved an application for addition of charge under Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":329755,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/31\/accused-right-s216-crpc-application-discharge-supreme-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":322413,"position":2},"title":"Section 216 CrPC does not give any right to accused to file fresh application seeking his discharge post framing of charges: Supreme Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Without mincing any words, the Court stated that the accused had miserably failed to get himself discharged when he had filed the application under S. 227 CrPC; still however, he filed another vexatious application seeking modification of charge under Section 216 of CrPC to derail the criminal proceedings.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"discharge application under S. 216 CrPC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/discharge-application-under-S.-216-CrPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/discharge-application-under-S.-216-CrPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/discharge-application-under-S.-216-CrPC.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/discharge-application-under-S.-216-CrPC.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276930,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/kerala-high-court-upholds-sessions-court-order-dismissing-application-of-accused-for-joint-trial-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":322413,"position":3},"title":"\u201cSection 219 CrPC directory in nature\u201d; Kerala High Court upholds order for dismissing accused&#8217;s application for joint trial","author":"Editor","date":"November 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Kerala High Court: In a criminal miscellaneous petition challenging the order passed by the Sessions Court, wherein the Court dismissed the accused's application for joint trial of his two criminal cases, Kauser Edappagath, J. upheld the said order stating that the victims are different, and the offences are\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293105,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/25\/legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":322413,"position":4},"title":"No relief for actor Unni Mukundan in sexual harassment case; Kerala High Court directs Trial Court to proceed with trial","author":"Ridhi","date":"May 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court observed that \u201cThe materials placed by the prosecution prima facie disclosed the existence of all ingredients constituting the alleged offences.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-764.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-764.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-764.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-764.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324594,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/18\/can-offence-under-498a-crpc-committed-outside-india-tried-before-indian-courts-kerala-hc-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":322413,"position":5},"title":"Can an offence under S. 498A IPC committed outside India, be tried before Indian Courts? Kerala HC answers","author":"Editor","date":"June 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf any part of the offence or even one instance of the overt act is committed in India, the sanction under Section 188 CrPC is not required\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"kerala high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/322413","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=322413"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/322413\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/316393"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=322413"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=322413"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=322413"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}