{"id":321908,"date":"2024-05-11T10:00:19","date_gmt":"2024-05-11T04:30:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=321908"},"modified":"2024-05-14T12:12:11","modified_gmt":"2024-05-14T06:42:11","slug":"allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Review is not an appeal in disguise\u2019: Allahabad HC dismisses review application against Order of Remand"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Allahabad High Court<\/span>: In an application filed under Section 114<\/a> of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908<\/a> (‘CPC’) to seek a review of the judgment and order dated 07-08-2023 passed in by the High Court, wherein the Courtallowed the appeal and remanded the matter to the Trial Court for fresh consideration of the injunction application with certain direction, Kshitij Shailendra, J. while upholding the maintainability of the application, dismissed it on grounds of merits leaving all contentions on rival claims open to be argued by both the sides in first appeal.<\/p>\n

Background<\/p>\n

In the initial judgment dated 07-08-2023, an appeal was allowed in which the matter was remanded to the Trial Court for a fresh consideration of the injunction application, along with specific directions provided by the court. Following this order of remand, the Trial Court proceeded to decide the injunction application afresh and issued an order dated 30-01-2024. Subsequently, the applicants filed the first appeal seeking review against the order of remand.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision<\/p>\n

The Court said that there weretwo main aspects concerning the present review application, first,the question of its maintainability or entertainability given the subsequent order by the trial court, and second, the merits of grounds upon which review has been sought.<\/p>\n

The Court, regarding the first aspect, saidthat the substantive provision of review of any judgment or order is contained under Section 114<\/a> of the CPC<\/a> and is governed by the procedure laid down under Order XLVII. It emphasized that there is no such provision in the Code, either explicitly or implicit, that would take away the right of a party aggrieved by an order of remand to raise a challenge to the same, either before a superior Court or before the same Court by means of a review application, merely because the remand order has been given effect in terms of a subsequent order. The only prohibition against consideration of an application at an advanced stage of proceedings can be found in a case where an ex-parte decree drawn by the Trial Court merges into a decree of the Appellate Court and, in that event, application for setting aside the ex-parte decree would not lie before the Trial Court.<\/p>\n

The Court took note of Smt. Yasmeen Zia<\/span> v. Smt. Haneefa Khursheed<\/span> 2024 (2) ADJ 709 and Nagesh Datta Shetti<\/span> v. The State of Karnataka<\/span>, (2005) 10 SCC 383<\/a>, wherein it was stated if there is a challenge to the remand order and the case concludes or a decree is issued in the meantime, the challenge to the remand order should still be valid. The Court emphasized that regardless of these judgments arising from challenges made before Appellate Courts through appeals or reviews, the right to challenge, whether by appeal, review, or otherwise, is equal. Therefore, the execution of the remand order in a subsequent decision does not render the challenge ineffective or legally unsustainable.<\/span><\/p>\n

Thus, the Court held that an instant review application is maintainable.<\/p>\n

The Court, addressing the second aspect, clarified that it isn’t dealing with an appeal against the 30-01-2024 order, as it’s already being contested in the first appeal. Therefore, arguments related to these documents are open for both sides in the appeal, while the review is limited to grounds specified in Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that Section 114<\/a> of the CPC<\/a> is the substantive provision for review, which empowers the Court to make orders on review applications at its discretion based on the facts and circumstances of each case.<\/p>\n

The Court took note of Tungabhadra Industries<\/span> v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh<\/span>, AIR 1964 SC 1372<\/a>, where it was stated that a review is not an appeal in disguise but is permitted only for correcting patent errors, and of Aribam Tuleshwar Sharma<\/span> v. Aribam Pishak Sharma<\/span> 1979 (4) SCC 389<\/a>, wherein the Court observed the power of review has definitive limits. It can only be exercised on specific grounds like new evidence or errors apparent on record but not to challenge a decision’s merits which falls under the Appellate Court’s purview. Review proceedings are strictly confined to the scope and ambit of Order 47 Rule 1<\/a> CPC<\/a> and cannot be equated with appellate powers.<\/p>\n

The Court referred to various judgments where the Court observed that mere disagreement with the view of the judgment cannot be the ground for invoking review jurisdiction.<\/p>\n

The Court found out that the reason for remanding the matter was the cryptic nature of the order dated 10-10-2022, by which, the injunction application had been allowed by the Trial Court without recording any finding on three basic ingredients necessary for grant or refusal of temporary injunction.<\/p>\n

The Court reiterated that injunction application is decided based on stand taken in the affidavits as well as documents annexed thereto and focus is on prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable loss only. The consideration of an injunction application cannot be equated with holding of full-fledged trial of the suit itself where decision is made on the basis of primary and secondary evidence led by the parties during the course of trial.<\/p>\n

The Court refrained from expressing final opinions., despite both parties presented strong document-based arguments during the appeal, defending their trade mark rights and product claims.<\/p>\n

Further,the Court noted that both parties also submitted additional evidence after the remand order, and said that whether this evidence was properly considered by the trial court in its subsequent order is for the pending appeal to scrutinize, not for reviewing the remand order.<\/p>\n

The Court heldthat there was no apparent error on the face of the record or any other grounds to review the remand order. Furthermore, the Court said that, since the appeal against the order dated 30-01-2024 is already pending, it is not deemed appropriate to exercise jurisdiction under Section 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1<\/a> of the CPC<\/a> to review the order of remand.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court held that the review application, although deemed maintainable, is dismissed on its merits, leaving all arguments on rival claims open to be presented by both sides in the first appeal.<\/p>\n

[M.M.I. Tobacco Pvt. Ltd. v. Iftikhar Alam, 2024 SCC OnLine All 1266<\/a>, Order dated 26-04-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Counsel for Applicant:<\/span> Advocate Arvind Srivastava<\/p>\n

Counsel for Opposite Party:<\/span> Advocate Santosh Kumar Tripathi<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

There are substantive differences between review and appeal. A decision’s cryptic nature alone does not warrant a review.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314936,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2822,8991,11211,15391,2897,68568,7181],"class_list":["post-321908","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Allahabad_High_Court","tag-appeal","tag-application","tag-remand","tag-Review","tag-section-114-of-cpc","tag-trial-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAllahabad High Court dismisses review petition against order of remand| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court dismissed review petition against the order of remand as a review cannot be substituted for an appeal\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Review is not an appeal in disguise\u2019: Allahabad HC dismisses review application against Order of Remand\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court dismissed review petition against the order of remand as a review cannot be substituted for an appeal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-05-11T04:30:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-05-14T06:42:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Review is not an appeal in disguise\u2019: Allahabad HC dismisses review application against Order of Remand\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/\",\"name\":\"Allahabad High Court dismisses review petition against order of remand| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-11T04:30:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-14T06:42:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Allahabad High Court dismissed review petition against the order of remand as a review cannot be substituted for an appeal\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Allahabad High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Review is not an appeal in disguise\u2019: Allahabad HC dismisses review application against Order of Remand\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Allahabad High Court dismisses review petition against order of remand| SCC Times","description":"Allahabad High Court dismissed review petition against the order of remand as a review cannot be substituted for an appeal","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Review is not an appeal in disguise\u2019: Allahabad HC dismisses review application against Order of Remand","og_description":"Allahabad High Court dismissed review petition against the order of remand as a review cannot be substituted for an appeal","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-05-11T04:30:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-05-14T06:42:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Review is not an appeal in disguise\u2019: Allahabad HC dismisses review application against Order of Remand","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/","name":"Allahabad High Court dismisses review petition against order of remand| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-05-11T04:30:19+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-14T06:42:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Allahabad High Court dismissed review petition against the order of remand as a review cannot be substituted for an appeal","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Allahabad High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Review is not an appeal in disguise\u2019: Allahabad HC dismisses review application against Order of Remand"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":286738,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/11\/can-power-of-review-be-used-to-re-write-a-settled-judgement-appeal-in-disguise-supreme-court-denies\/","url_meta":{"origin":321908,"position":0},"title":"Review application cannot be used as an Appeal in disguise, reiterates Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"March 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAn erroneous order may be subjected to appeal before the higher forum but cannot be a subject matter of review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC\u201d, stated the Supreme Court","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-703.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-703.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-703.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-703.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":359490,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/09\/supreme-court-restates-principles-for-review-jurisdiction-grounds\/","url_meta":{"origin":321908,"position":1},"title":"SC restates principles on power, scope & grounds for Review Jurisdiction; Sets aside Madras HC review order on daughter\u2019s status as co-parcener","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 9, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cTo wit through a review application, an apparent error of fact or law is intimated to the court, but no extra reasoning is undertaken to explain the said error\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Review Jurisdiction grounds","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Review-Jurisdiction-grounds.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Review-Jurisdiction-grounds.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Review-Jurisdiction-grounds.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Review-Jurisdiction-grounds.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":349458,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/03\/stridhan-recovery-must-be-under-hindu-marriage-act-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":321908,"position":2},"title":"Return of ‘Stridhan’ must be decided within matrimonial proceedings, not via separate application under Section 27 HMA: Allahabad High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court emphasied that the proceedings under Section 27 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 cannot be treated as independent or standalone proceedings to result in a decree.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297940,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/28\/judicial-powers-and-duties-of-permanent-and-additional-judges-are-same-allahabad-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":321908,"position":3},"title":"Permanent Judges and Additional Judges equally duty bound to perform judicial work: Allahabad HC","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The primary duty of the office of a Judge is to render justice to the litigants by deciding the cases that are assigned to him and a Judge appointed under Article 224 of the Constitution of India is as much under oath to perform this duty, as a Judge appointed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293469,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/30\/krishna-janmbhoomi-shahi-eidgah-dispute-allahabad-high-court-transfers-all-pending-suits-from-mathura-court-to-itself\/","url_meta":{"origin":321908,"position":4},"title":"[Krishna Janmbhoomi -Shahi Eidgah Dispute] Allahabad High Court transfers all pending suits from Mathura Court to itself","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that the High Court has to remain conscious of the fact that being the highest Court of the State, it is guardian of the people and being 3rd pillar of the Constitution, it safeguards interest of the people as a whole, the small sub-sects, tribe then\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":371073,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":321908,"position":5},"title":"Remand after reversal of Rejection of Plaint creates entitlement to refund of Court fees: Delhi High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"December 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOrder XLI Rule 23 of the CPC envisages remand in a situation in which the suit was decreed by the Court of first instance on a preliminary point and the decree is reversed in appeal by the appellate court.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"refund of Court fees","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/refund-of-Court-fees.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/refund-of-Court-fees.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/refund-of-Court-fees.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/refund-of-Court-fees.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321908","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=321908"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321908\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314936"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=321908"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=321908"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=321908"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}