{"id":321748,"date":"2024-05-09T11:00:24","date_gmt":"2024-05-09T05:30:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=321748"},"modified":"2024-05-17T17:59:00","modified_gmt":"2024-05-17T12:29:00","slug":"pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Pepper Spray could not be used as private defence in absence of any prima facie imminent threat to life: Karnataka HC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Karnataka High Court:<\/span> While considering the instant dispute wherein the petitioners challenged the registration of crime against them under Sections 323<\/a>, 324<\/a>, 341<\/a>, 427<\/a>, 504<\/a>, 506<\/a> and 34<\/a> of Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (IPC) for use of pepper spray during a verbal and physical fight involving the respondents, the Bench of M. Nagaprasanna, J.*<\/span>, took note of the facts in the instant case and relying upon precedents laid down by the Supreme Court, held that the 2nd<\/span> Petitioner could not have used pepper spray as private defence, as prima facie<\/span> there was no imminent threat or danger caused to her life. Therefore, it was pointed out that the case at hand would require investigation in the least.<\/p>\n

The dispute between the parties arose when Respondent 2, who is a security guard, along with other security personnel, attempted to interfere in the physical and verbal altercation over a property dispute between the petitioners and a third person. During the quarrel, Petitioner 2 used pepper spray on the Respondent 2 as private defence.<\/p>\n

A crime was registered against the petitioners after the afore-stated incident, aggrieved by which they approached the Court with the instant petition.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the petitioners contended that the petitioners were forced to use pepper spray in their defence and the same is protected under Section 100<\/a> of IPC<\/a> and that it was not used as a dangerous weapon. It was stated that on account of interference by the respondents, 2nd<\/span> Petitioner was injured. It was argued that respondents registered the impugned crime after the petitioners had already registered their complaint. Crime registered by the petitioners is under investigation. It was stated that if the complaint is registered on mala fides<\/span>, it must not be permitted to be investigated into.<\/p>\n

Per contra<\/span>, the respondents contended that right to private defence has been misused in the instant case, as there was no threat or danger to the life of the petitioners, but pepper spray was used only to cause injury to the respondent and others. The counsel argued that pepper spray is a dangerous weapon which would clearly come within the ingredients of Section 324<\/a> of the IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Upon perusing the facts and contentions, the Court had to consider whether or not use its inherent power under S. 482, CrPC to quash the impugned crime registered by the respondents notwithstanding the fact that a counter case filed by the petitioners is being investigated into.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that Section 324<\/a> of the IPC<\/a> directs that whoever voluntarily causes hurt by means of any instrument for shooting, stabbing or any instrument of weapon which is likely to cause death would be committing the offence. The Court pointed out that pepper spray is undoubtedly a dangerous weapon, however, there is no determination by any law being laid down in India with regard to usage of pepper spray being dangerous weapon. However, the Court referred to a US Court decision in People v. Sandel<\/span>1<\/sup><\/a> where it was held that noxious chemical sprays, like pepper sprays are dangerous weapons.<\/p>\n

Regarding private defence, the Court stated that the right to private defence, as was projected by the petitioners to defend their action, is a matter of evidence.<\/p>\n

Based on the afore-stated assessment and relying on several precedents of the Supreme Court on private defence, the Court stated that the instant case requires investigation and any interference at this stage will run afoul of the Supreme Court’s decision in Kaptan Singh v. State of UP<\/span>, (2021) 9 SCC 35<\/a>. Therefore, the Court rejected the petition.<\/p>\n

[C. Ganesh Narayan v. State of Karnataka, 2024 SCC OnLine Kar 48<\/a>, decided on 22-04-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Order by Justice M. Nagaprasanna<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For petitioners-<\/span> Sandesh J Chouta, Sr Advocate along with Krutika Raghavan, Advocate<\/p>\n

Fore respondents-<\/span> S.A. Ahmed, AAG A\/W., Manjunath K., HCGP FOR R1; D.R. Ravishankar, Senior Advocate A\/W., Manjunath K. V., Advocate FOR R2 <\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

1.<\/a> 84 N.Y.S. 3d 340 (N.Y. Sup.Ct.2018)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Court noted that pepper spray is undoubtedly a dangerous weapon and refused to quash crime registered against the petitioners for using pepper spray as private defence on respondents during a quarrel.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":316069,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[68490,68491,28334,68489,49777,9661,33705],"class_list":["post-321748","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-dangerous-weapons","tag-imminent-threat","tag-karnataka-high-court","tag-pepper-spray","tag-private-defence","tag-property-dispute","tag-quarrel"],"yoast_head":"\nPepper Spray can\u2019t be used as private defence in absence of any imminent threat to life: Karnataka HC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Karnataka HC refused to quash crime registered against the petitioners for using pepper spray as private defence on respondents during a quarrel.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pepper Spray could not be used as private defence in absence of any prima facie imminent threat to life: Karnataka HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka HC refused to quash crime registered against the petitioners for using pepper spray as private defence on respondents during a quarrel.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-05-09T05:30:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-05-17T12:29:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court-2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Pepper Spray could not be used as private defence in absence of any prima facie imminent threat to life: Karnataka HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Pepper Spray can\u2019t be used as private defence in absence of any imminent threat to life: Karnataka HC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-09T05:30:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-17T12:29:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"Karnataka HC refused to quash crime registered against the petitioners for using pepper spray as private defence on respondents during a quarrel.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Karnataka High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pepper Spray could not be used as private defence in absence of any prima facie imminent threat to life: Karnataka HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pepper Spray can\u2019t be used as private defence in absence of any imminent threat to life: Karnataka HC","description":"Karnataka HC refused to quash crime registered against the petitioners for using pepper spray as private defence on respondents during a quarrel.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pepper Spray could not be used as private defence in absence of any prima facie imminent threat to life: Karnataka HC","og_description":"Karnataka HC refused to quash crime registered against the petitioners for using pepper spray as private defence on respondents during a quarrel.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-05-09T05:30:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-05-17T12:29:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court-2.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Pepper Spray could not be used as private defence in absence of any prima facie imminent threat to life: Karnataka HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","name":"Pepper Spray can\u2019t be used as private defence in absence of any imminent threat to life: Karnataka HC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-05-09T05:30:24+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-17T12:29:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"Karnataka HC refused to quash crime registered against the petitioners for using pepper spray as private defence on respondents during a quarrel.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Karnataka High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/pepper-spray-private-defence-imminent-threat-crime-quashment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pepper Spray could not be used as private defence in absence of any prima facie imminent threat to life: Karnataka HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":280313,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/karnataka-high-court-exclusion-private-sector-employees-new-bh-series-vehicle-registration-cannot-be-upheld-having-regard-to-the-mandate-of-law-legal-news-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":321748,"position":0},"title":"Karnataka HC | Private sector employees cannot be specifically excluded from registration of their vehicles under new BH- Series","author":"Editor","date":"December 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court was deliberating over petitions filed by two private sector employees, who were denied BH-Series vehicle registration in pursuance of a communication issued by the State Government dt. 20-12-2021, which excluded private sector employees in the first phase","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-424.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":299447,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/intern-iis-alleged-data-theft-sale-dark-web-light-combat-aircraft-karnataka-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":321748,"position":1},"title":"Karnataka HC refuses to quash charges against former intern of IIS allegedly involved in data theft of Light Combat Aircraft and selling it on Dark Web","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that necessity to regulate the usage of dark web has become the need of the hour and persons involved in acts of uploading sensitive data of defence of the nation on to the dark web should be dealt with iron hands.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"karnataka high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267779,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/02\/kar-hc-addressed-whether-offence-under-s-376-ipc-can-be-compounded-in-case-of-settlement-arrived-between-the-parties\/","url_meta":{"origin":321748,"position":2},"title":"[Rape] Kar HC addressed whether offence under S. 376 IPC can be compounded in case of settlement arrived between the parties","author":"Editor","date":"June 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: M Nagaprasanna, J., quashed the proceedings against the petitioners in Crime No.87 of 2022 of Byadarahalli Police Station pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore. The facts are that the respondent 2 is the complainant who filed made an FIR for the offence punishable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258053,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/03\/model-code-of-conduct\/","url_meta":{"origin":321748,"position":3},"title":"[Model Code of Conduct] Kar HC | Mere display of any stickers and flags on vehicles of any particular party will not attract\/invoke S. 171 H IPC","author":"Editor","date":"December 3, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: H P Sandesh J. allowed the petition and quashed the proceedings initiated against the petitioners. This petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code i.e. Cr.P.C., praying this Court to quash the order of the Civil Judge and JMFC, Muddebihal, dated 13.07.2018 passed in C.C.No.167\/2018\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":240319,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/08\/kar-hc-land-falling-within-the-category-of-212-a-karnataka-land-revenue-rules-1996-is-not-a-government-land-but-has-private-ownership-compensation-granted\/","url_meta":{"origin":321748,"position":4},"title":"Kar HC | Land falling within the category of 21(2) (a) Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1996 is not a government land but has private ownership; Compensation Granted","author":"Editor","date":"December 8, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Sachin Shankar Magadum J., disposed off the petition granting compensation to the petitioners as the defaulting land fell under the provisions of Rule 21(2) (a) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1996. The facts of the case are such that the respondents issued a preliminary notification under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":213175,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/03\/bom-hc-conviction-for-rash-driving-and-causing-injury-not-maintainable-where-driver-facing-real-threat-of-imminent-death\/","url_meta":{"origin":321748,"position":5},"title":"Bom HC | Conviction for rash driving and causing injury not maintainable where driver facing real threat of imminent death","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 3, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Sarang V. Kotwal, J., held that conviction for the offences punishable under Section 279\u00a0(rash driving in a public way)\u00a0and 337\u00a0(causing hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others)\u00a0IPC is not maintainable\u00a0where the driver (convict-applicant) was facing the real threat of imminent \u00a0death at the hands of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321748","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=321748"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321748\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/316069"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=321748"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=321748"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=321748"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}