{"id":32161,"date":"2016-01-09T13:55:39","date_gmt":"2016-01-09T08:25:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=32161"},"modified":"2016-02-09T14:50:12","modified_gmt":"2016-02-09T09:20:12","slug":"granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/09\/granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Granting relief in a 40 year old case, Supreme Court directed High Court to not to interfere with the findings of fact recorded by first appellate court"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court<\/strong>: While setting aside the impugned judgment of the High Court with respect to eviction of tenant on the ground of unauthorized construction in violation of the rent agreement, T.S. Thakur, CJ. and Kurian Joseph, J. held that the strained effort made by the High Court in second appeal to arrive at a different finding is wholly unwarranted apart from being impermissible under law.<\/p>\n

Relying on a plethora of judgments passed by the Supreme Court in this regard including Kulwant Kaur v. Gurdial Singh Mann (Dead) by Lrs. (2001) 4 SCC 262<\/a>, S.R. Tiwari v. Union of India (2013) 6 SCC 602<\/a> and Rajinder Kumar Kindra v. Delhi Administration, Through Secretary (Labour) \u00a0(1984) 4 SCC 635<\/a>, the Court held that the first appellate court under Code of Civil Procedure is the last court of facts. The High Court in second appeal cannot interfere with the findings of fact recorded by the first appellate court unless the said findings are based on no evidence or are perverse which is not the case in the current matter.<\/p>\n

Observing that \u201cthe facts unfold the plight of a poor landlord languishing in courts for over forty years\u201d and that \u201cthe saddest part is that the High Court in second appeal, went against him on a pure question of fact\u201d the court allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court and restored that of the trial court as confirmed by the appellate court. [Damodar Lal v. Sohan Devi, 2016 SCC OnLine SC 5<\/a>, Decided on January 5, 2016]<\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: While setting aside the impugned judgment of the High Court with respect to eviction of tenant on the ground of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":27341,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32161","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt"],"yoast_head":"\nGranting relief in a 40 year old case, Supreme Court directed High Court to not to interfere with the findings of fact recorded by first appellate court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/09\/granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Granting relief in a 40 year old case, Supreme Court directed High Court to not to interfere with the findings of fact recorded by first appellate court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: While setting aside the impugned judgment of the High Court with respect to eviction of tenant on the ground of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/09\/granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-01-09T08:25:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-09T09:20:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/09\/granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/09\/granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court\/\",\"name\":\"Granting relief in a 40 year old case, Supreme Court directed High Court to not to interfere with the findings of fact recorded by first appellate court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/09\/granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/09\/granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-01-09T08:25:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-09T09:20:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/09\/granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/09\/granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/09\/granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1280},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/09\/granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Granting relief in a 40 year old case, Supreme Court directed High Court to not to interfere with the findings of fact recorded by first appellate court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Granting relief in a 40 year old case, Supreme Court directed High Court to not to interfere with the findings of fact recorded by first appellate court | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/09\/granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Granting relief in a 40 year old case, Supreme Court directed High Court to not to interfere with the findings of fact recorded by first appellate court","og_description":"Supreme Court: While setting aside the impugned judgment of the High Court with respect to eviction of tenant on the ground of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/09\/granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-01-09T08:25:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-09T09:20:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1280,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/09\/granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/09\/granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court\/","name":"Granting relief in a 40 year old case, Supreme Court directed High Court to not to interfere with the findings of fact recorded by first appellate court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/09\/granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/09\/granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","datePublished":"2016-01-09T08:25:39+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-09T09:20:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/09\/granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/09\/granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/09\/granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","width":1920,"height":1280},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/09\/granting-relief-in-a-40-year-old-case-supreme-court-slams-high-court-for-interfering-with-the-findings-of-fact-recorded-by-first-appellate-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Granting relief in a 40 year old case, Supreme Court directed High Court to not to interfere with the findings of fact recorded by first appellate court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":254219,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/15\/scope-of-interference-under-article-226-of-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":32161,"position":0},"title":"Scope of Interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in Contractual Matters \u2013 Need for Certainty in Jurisprudence","author":"Editor","date":"September 15, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Ashwini Chawla\u2020 and Aditya Pratap Singh Rathore\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-124.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-124.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-124.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-124.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-124.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":356187,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/10\/ancestral-property-latest-supreme-court-judgments-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":32161,"position":1},"title":"Ancestral Property: Key Supreme Court Rulings You Should Know","author":"Editor","date":"August 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAncestral property is a rightful heritage, not a personal asset.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Law made Easy"","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Ancestral Property","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Ancestral-Property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Ancestral-Property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Ancestral-Property.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Ancestral-Property.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":377109,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/01\/2026-scc-vol-2-part-1-latest-supreme-court-cases\/","url_meta":{"origin":32161,"position":2},"title":"2026 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1: Key Supreme Court Cases on Constitution, Disabilities Act, & Surrogacy","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"March 1, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Explore the latest Supreme Court Cases in 2026 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1 on power of Parliament to enact a statute, reservation, and surrogacy age restrictions.","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"2026 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/2026-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/2026-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/2026-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/2026-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":380615,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/09\/criminal-law-roundup-march-2026-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":32161,"position":3},"title":"Criminal Law March 2026 Roundup: Supreme Court and High Courts on Advocate Assault, Acquittal in 23-Year-old Family Murder, Misuse of POCSO in teenage relationships; and More","author":"Malika Bhola","date":"April 9, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick legal roundup to cover important stories of March 2026 on Criminal Law from Supreme Court and all High Courts","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Criminal Law Roundup March 2026","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Criminal-Law-Roundup-March-2026-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Criminal-Law-Roundup-March-2026-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Criminal-Law-Roundup-March-2026-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Criminal-Law-Roundup-March-2026-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":198318,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/09\/review-petition-of-the-nirbhaya-gangrape-convicts-dismissed-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":32161,"position":4},"title":"Review petition of the \u2018Nirbhaya\u2019 Gangrape convicts dismissed: Supreme Court [Judgment]","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 9, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThere has to be an error apparent on the face of\u00a0record\u00a0leading to miscarriage of justice to exercise the review jurisdiction under Article 137.\u201d Supreme Court:\u00a0While envisaging the essence of Article 137 of the Constitution of India by stating that\u00a0\u201cArticle 137 empowers the Supreme Court to review any judgment pronounced or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":175994,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/14\/supreme-court-cannot-entertain-objections-original-court-solely-appointed-arbitrator\/","url_meta":{"origin":32161,"position":5},"title":"Supreme Court cannot entertain objections as the original court solely because it has appointed the arbitrator","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 14, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Deciding the question relating to the entertainability of an application by this Court for making an award passed by the arbitral tribunal, when it retains seisin over arbitral proceeding, as Rule of the Court, the 5-judge bench of Dipak Misra, CJ and Dr. AK Sikri, AM Khanwilkar, Dr.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32161","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32161"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32161\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/27341"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32161"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32161"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32161"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}