{"id":321597,"date":"2024-05-07T16:00:13","date_gmt":"2024-05-07T10:30:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=321597"},"modified":"2024-05-14T13:13:50","modified_gmt":"2024-05-14T07:43:50","slug":"party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Party not contacting counsel for 6 years, cannot seek condonation of delay alleging that counsel did not inform about disposal of case: Allahabad HC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Allahabad High Court:<\/span> In an appeal filed against the orders passed by the Single Judge, wherein<\/span> the writ petition filed by the petitioners aggrieved of the order passed by Additional Commissioner has been rejected, the division bench of Arun Bhansali, C.J. and Vikas Budhwar, J., while dismissing the appeal, said that the party, which does not contact the counsel for six years, cannot seek condonation of delay based on the allegations that the counsel did not inform about the disposal of the case.<\/p>\n

Background:<\/span> The petitioners had filed for revision under Section 219<\/a> of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901<\/a> but their application was dismissed ex parte by the revisional authority in 2016, unknown to them. They later sought to recall this dismissal in 2022, citing their lawyer’s failure to inform them of the initial decision. However, both the revisional authority and the Single Judge dismissed their applications, citing the unexplained six-year delay. The appellants are now appealing these decisions, arguing that the delay was due to sufficient cause.<\/p>\n

Court’s Analysis & Decision:<\/p>\n

The Single Judge concluded that as the inordinate delay of six years was not properly explained, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.<\/p>\n

The Court said that even though the application seeking condonation was rejected by the revisional authority against which the writ petition was rejected by this Court, the present appeal is also barred by limitation. The affidavit accompanying the condonation application fails to provide a satisfactory reason for the delay.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that while the appellants alleged their counsel failed to inform them about the case’s dismissal, there’s no evidence they actively sought updates from the counsel during the six-year period.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court said that the appellants cannot solely rely on their counsel’s alleged negligence to justify the delay in filing the appeal. Given these considerations, the Court found no merit in the appeal and accordingly dismissed it.<\/p>\n

[Jagdish v. State of U.P., 2024 SCC OnLine All 1480<\/a>, Order dated 25-04-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

Counsel of Appellants:<\/span> Advocate Awashesh Kumar, Advocate Imtyaz Ahmad<\/p>\n

Counsel of Respondents:<\/span> Chief Standing Counsel<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court noted that while the appellants alleged their counsel failed to inform them about the case’s dismissal, there’s no evidence they actively sought updates from the counsel during the six-year period.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314936,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[68416,2552,68417,3065,68418,32319],"class_list":["post-321597","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-condonation-application","tag-Condonation_of_delay","tag-delay-of-6-years","tag-negligence","tag-s-219-of-u-p-land-revenue-act","tag-sufficient-cause"],"yoast_head":"\nParty not contacting counsel for 6 years, cannot seek condonation of delay alleging that counsel did not inform about disposal: Allahabad HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Allahabad HC held that party not contacting counsel for 6 years, cannot seek condonation of delay alleging that counsel did not inform about disposal\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Party not contacting counsel for 6 years, cannot seek condonation of delay alleging that counsel did not inform about disposal of case: Allahabad HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad HC held that party not contacting counsel for 6 years, cannot seek condonation of delay alleging that counsel did not inform about disposal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-05-07T10:30:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-05-14T07:43:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Party not contacting counsel for 6 years, cannot seek condonation of delay alleging that counsel did not inform about disposal of case: Allahabad HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Party not contacting counsel for 6 years, cannot seek condonation of delay alleging that counsel did not inform about disposal: Allahabad HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-07T10:30:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-14T07:43:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Allahabad HC held that party not contacting counsel for 6 years, cannot seek condonation of delay alleging that counsel did not inform about disposal\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Allahabad High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Party not contacting counsel for 6 years, cannot seek condonation of delay alleging that counsel did not inform about disposal of case: Allahabad HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Party not contacting counsel for 6 years, cannot seek condonation of delay alleging that counsel did not inform about disposal: Allahabad HC | SCC Times","description":"Allahabad HC held that party not contacting counsel for 6 years, cannot seek condonation of delay alleging that counsel did not inform about disposal","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Party not contacting counsel for 6 years, cannot seek condonation of delay alleging that counsel did not inform about disposal of case: Allahabad HC","og_description":"Allahabad HC held that party not contacting counsel for 6 years, cannot seek condonation of delay alleging that counsel did not inform about disposal","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-05-07T10:30:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-05-14T07:43:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Party not contacting counsel for 6 years, cannot seek condonation of delay alleging that counsel did not inform about disposal of case: Allahabad HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/","name":"Party not contacting counsel for 6 years, cannot seek condonation of delay alleging that counsel did not inform about disposal: Allahabad HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-05-07T10:30:13+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-14T07:43:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Allahabad HC held that party not contacting counsel for 6 years, cannot seek condonation of delay alleging that counsel did not inform about disposal","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Allahabad High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Party not contacting counsel for 6 years, cannot seek condonation of delay alleging that counsel did not inform about disposal of case: Allahabad HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":207127,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/21\/appeal-filed-along-with-application-for-condonation-of-delay-when-dismissed-is-a-decree-within-section-22-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":321597,"position":0},"title":"Appeal filed along with application for condonation of delay when dismissed is a decree within Section 2(2) CPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 21, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J., dismissed a writ petition challenging the order passed by the Additional District Judge, whereby the Appellate Court had dismissed the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay.\u00a0 The petitioners were aggrieved by this\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":246656,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/07\/legislature\/","url_meta":{"origin":321597,"position":1},"title":"Chh HC | Legislature does not prescribe limitation with the object of destroying the rights of parties; Word \u201csufficient cause\u201d to be given liberal construction","author":"Editor","date":"April 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant, J., allowed the petition and set aside the impugned order. The facts of the case are such that the respondents were Malgujars of Malkharauda Jagirdari, who were holders of the land in question and the petitioners are the persons in possession of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":211230,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/raj-hc-delay-in-filing-the-appeal-due-to-ongoing-vacation-of-navratri-and-non-availability-of-counsel-in-jodhpur-not-enough-reason-for-condonation\/","url_meta":{"origin":321597,"position":2},"title":"Raj HC | Delay in filing appeal due to ongoing vacation of \u2018Navratri\u2019, and non-availability of counsel in Jodhpur: Not enough reason for condonation","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: The Bench of Dinesh Mehta and Sangeet Lodha, JJ. dismissed the appeal filed against the order passed by the Single Judge of the Court whereby writ petition preferred by the writ-petitioner\/appellant seeking a direction to respondents to rectify the inventory after an inordinate delay of 54 years\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":219017,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/02\/mp-hc-petitioners-allowed-to-file-fresh-application-for-setting-aside-abatement-before-the-trial-court-on-account-of-them-being-rustic-and-illiterate-villagers\/","url_meta":{"origin":321597,"position":3},"title":"MP HC | Petitioners allowed to file fresh application for setting aside abatement before the trial Court on account of them being \u201crustic and illiterate villagers\u201d","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Nandita Dubey, J., allowed the petitioner to file a fresh application for bringing in legal representatives along with an application for condonation of delay and an application for setting aside abatement before the trial court. The plaintiffs filed an application under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":219005,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/02\/pat-hc-limitation-to-file-revision-application-denied-condonation-on-grounds-of-unexplained-delay\/","url_meta":{"origin":321597,"position":4},"title":"Pat HC | Limitation to file revision application denied condonation on grounds of unexplained delay","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. disposed of the revision petition saying that the Court did not find any ground to condone such delay of over eleven years as there was absolutely no explanation that came from the petitioners. The petitioners approached the Court under Sections 397 and 401 of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":266901,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/a-138-ni-complaint-filed-was-barred-by-limitation\/","url_meta":{"origin":321597,"position":5},"title":"A 138 NI complaint filed was barred by limitation but such issue was raised for the first time before the Appellate Court and not Trial Court; Read to know what Kar HC observed","author":"Editor","date":"May 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: HP Sandesh J. dismissed the petition and upheld the judgment by the Appellate Court and further directed the complainant to file necessary application to condone the delay. The factual matrix of the case of the respondent\/complainant is that the complainant was running an industry in the name\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321597","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=321597"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321597\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314936"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=321597"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=321597"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=321597"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}