{"id":321515,"date":"2024-05-06T14:00:14","date_gmt":"2024-05-06T08:30:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=321515"},"modified":"2024-05-07T17:49:09","modified_gmt":"2024-05-07T12:19:09","slug":"grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Grounds of detention incapable of being intelligently understood, can be termed as vague: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC reiterates"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Jammu &amp; Kashmir and Ladakh High Court:<\/span> While considering the instant petition wherein the petitioner challenged the impugned detention order against him contending that the grounds for his detention were vague in nature hence no prudent man can make an effective representation against said grounds, the Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Rajesh Sekhri, J.*<\/span>, reiterated if grounds of detention furnished by the detaining authority are not capable of being intelligently understood and sufficiently definite, so as to enable a detenue to make an effective representation, then such grounds of detention may be termed as vague. In other words, the detenue may be able to make an effective representation if the details of the facts, on the basis of which conclusion is drawn by the detaining authority are furnished to him.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The detenue challenged the impugned detention order dated 15-09-2022 contending that grounds of detention were unreasonable and the impugned order suffers from non-application of mind; that he had not been apprised of his right to make representation; that he was neither served with detention order nor with the material referred to in the grounds of detention; that grounds of detention were supplied to him in a language not understandable or intelligible to him and that there is no nexus between the alleged prejudicial activity attributed to him and the security of the State sought to be achieved by his detention.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The respondents rebutted the contentions stating that the detaining authority had complied with the requisite constitutional safeguards while issuing the impugned detention order. The respondents further submitted that the detenue through his fiery speeches at every available opportunity exhorted the public to raise voice against the Government duly established by law. He was mainly responsible for organising anti-Government protests and is instigating the youth of Baramulla town to create an atmosphere of fear among the peace-loving people of the area. It was contended that the detenue had been nurturing the secessionist ideology and in-fact is motivating others to follow the suit; therefore, the detaining authority found it necessary and imperative to invoke the provisions of J&amp;K Public Security Act to detain the detenue in order to preclude him from indulging in activities prejudicial to the security of the State.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#8217;s Assessment:<\/span> Perusing the rival contentions, the Court noted that the detaining authority had strictly complied with the mandate of the J&amp;K Public Security Act along with other important requirements such as use of languages in the detention order that are fully understood by the detenue.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Vis-&agrave;-vis the allegations concerning vague grounds for detention, the Court noted that a plain reading of Art. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574961\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">22(5)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a> reveals that it consists of two parts. While first part gives a right to a detenue to be furnished with grounds on which the order has been made as soon as may be, the second part provides a right to the detenue to be afforded earliest opportunity of making representation against the order of detention.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Examining the grounds as stated in the impugned detention order, the Court pointed out that as regards to fiery speeches by the detenue, the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">detaining authority failed to provide relevant details<\/span>, as to when and where the detenue made such speeches and organised anti-Government protests. Furthermore, the Court pointed out that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">detaining authority also failed to provide specific details<\/span> of separatists&#8217; organisation, outfit or the grid, with which detenue is allegedly associated. It was also pointed out that the impugned detention order was conspicuously silent about the anti-social\/anti-national elements, with which detenue is allegedly connected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Upon plain reading of the grounds of detention, the Court noted that not even a single FIR had been registered against detenue for any activity alleged to have been committed by him in the past.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Since allegations against the detenue are general in nature, therefore, the Court found legal force in the submission that the detenue was prevented from making an effective representation against his detention. &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">The allegations against the detenue, being devoid of specific details, he was left with no option but to make general denial of the allegations that he is not involved in any such activity alleged to have been committed by him<\/span>&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The detaining authority had not furnished any detail on the basis of which it formulated the opinion that normal law of land did not prove sufficient to dissuade the detenue from indulging in activities prejudicial to the security of the State.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court pointed out that it appeared that the grounds of detention furnished to the detenue in the instant case are mere conclusions drawn by the detaining authority based on some material or reports received from the field agency, however, detaining authority has withheld said details for the reasons best known to it, but it prevented the detenue from making an effective representation, which is violative of Art. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574961\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">22(5)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court found that the impugned detention order had mentioned grounds that were vague, therefore the same cannot sustain in the eyes of law. The impugned detention order was thus set aside, and the respondents were directed to release the detenue.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Tariq Ahmad Napa v. UT of J&amp;K, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/lZ0QQA5H\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine J&#038;K 283<\/a>, decided on 30-04-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Rajesh Sekhri<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For petitioner\/ detenue-<\/span> N. H. Shah, Sr. Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For respondent-<\/span> Jahangir Ahmad Dar, GA<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;In other words, a detenue may be able to make an effective representation if the details of the facts, on the basis of which conclusion is drawn by the detaining authority, are furnished to him&#8221;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":318485,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3365,33966,68352,17961,49821,46667,3117,68353],"class_list":["post-321515","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-detention","tag-detenue","tag-effective-representation","tag-grounds-of-detention","tag-jk-and-ladakh-hc","tag-jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court","tag-Preventive_Detention","tag-vagueness"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Grounds of detention incapable of being intelligently understood, are vague: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"J&amp;K and Ladakh HC held that it is easier for a detenue to make an effective representation if the grounds of detention are clearly and specifically provided.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Grounds of detention incapable of being intelligently understood, can be termed as vague: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC reiterates\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"J&amp;K and Ladakh HC held that it is easier for a detenue to make an effective representation if the grounds of detention are clearly and specifically provided.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-05-06T08:30:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-05-07T12:19:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Grounds of detention incapable of being intelligently understood, can be termed as vague: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC reiterates\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Grounds of detention incapable of being intelligently understood, are vague: J&K and Ladakh HC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-06T08:30:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-07T12:19:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"J&K and Ladakh HC held that it is easier for a detenue to make an effective representation if the grounds of detention are clearly and specifically provided.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Grounds of detention incapable of being intelligently understood, can be termed as vague: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC reiterates\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Grounds of detention incapable of being intelligently understood, are vague: J&K and Ladakh HC","description":"J&K and Ladakh HC held that it is easier for a detenue to make an effective representation if the grounds of detention are clearly and specifically provided.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Grounds of detention incapable of being intelligently understood, can be termed as vague: J&K and Ladakh HC reiterates","og_description":"J&K and Ladakh HC held that it is easier for a detenue to make an effective representation if the grounds of detention are clearly and specifically provided.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-05-06T08:30:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-05-07T12:19:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Grounds of detention incapable of being intelligently understood, can be termed as vague: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC reiterates","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/","name":"Grounds of detention incapable of being intelligently understood, are vague: J&K and Ladakh HC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-05-06T08:30:14+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-07T12:19:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"J&K and Ladakh HC held that it is easier for a detenue to make an effective representation if the grounds of detention are clearly and specifically provided.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Grounds of detention incapable of being intelligently understood, can be termed as vague: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC reiterates"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":302263,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":321515,"position":0},"title":"[Preventive Detention] | Unreasonably belated consideration of representation is equivalent to non-compliance of Art. 22(5) of the Constitution: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The detenue specifically alleged that he made a representation against impugned detention order, however, the same was not considered by the detaining authority.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jammu and kashmir and ladakh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298347,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/02\/fundamentalist-muslim-cannot-equated-extremist-preventive-detention-jammu-and-kashmir-ladakh-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":321515,"position":1},"title":"A fundamentalist Muslim cannot be equated with an extremist; J&#038;K and Ladakh HC observes","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court also observed that fundamentalism pertaining to a Muslim is merely someone who believes in the fundamentals of Islam and the same cannot have a negative bearing.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jammu and kashmir and ladakh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":365166,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/30\/jk-hc-quashes-detention-order-executed-after-45-days-delay\/","url_meta":{"origin":321515,"position":2},"title":"Know why J&amp;K and Ladakh HC quashed preventive detention order executed after 45-days delay","author":"Editor","date":"October 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf a detenue satisfied the Court that there was an unexplained delay in execution of the detention order, then such an order would be interpreted as breaking the live-proximity link in between the event of detention and passing of the detention order.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Detention order executed after 45-days delay","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Detention-order-executed-after-45-days-delay.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Detention-order-executed-after-45-days-delay.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Detention-order-executed-after-45-days-delay.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Detention-order-executed-after-45-days-delay.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":307117,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/14\/detention-order-quashed-daily-diary-report-vague-illicit-activities-drugs-narcotics-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":321515,"position":3},"title":"J&amp;K and Ladakh HC quashes detention order over snapped live link to illicit activities and vague Daily Diary Reports","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The High Court reiterated precedents highlighting that the detaining authority must not make undue and long delay between the prejudicial activities and the passing of detention order, and that Daily Diary Reports must not be vague and bereft of necessary details.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jammu and kashmir and ladakh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238262,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/j-petition-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":321515,"position":4},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Order of detention cannot be a mere reproduction of the dossier, without any judicial application of mind; Petition allowed","author":"Editor","date":"October 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sanjay Dhar J., while allowing the present petition held, \u201cThe service of the grounds of detention on the detenue is a very precious constitutional right and the object behind the same is to enable the detenue to file an effective representation. It will be an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":247740,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/30\/jamat-i-islami\/","url_meta":{"origin":321515,"position":5},"title":"J&#038;K HC | [Jamat-i-Islami] HC quashes preventive detention order holding opportunity to effective representation an essential pre-requisite","author":"Editor","date":"April 30, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sanjeev Kumar, J., heard the instant petition presented by the wife of the Petitioner to assail his detention ordered by District Magistrate, Pulwama under Preventive Detention law. The Bench opined, \u201cTwo FIRs, pertain to the offences under NDPS Act and, therefore, if the petitioner was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321515","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=321515"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321515\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/318485"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=321515"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=321515"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=321515"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}