{"id":321481,"date":"2024-05-06T09:00:02","date_gmt":"2024-05-06T03:30:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=321481"},"modified":"2024-05-07T17:46:54","modified_gmt":"2024-05-07T12:16:54","slug":"meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Male member made scapegoat for mistake of both\u2019; Meghalaya HC upholds conviction under POCSO, mitigates life sentence to 10 yrs imprisonment"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Meghalaya High Court:<\/span> In a criminal appeal filed against the judgment and order of sentence, passed by the Special Judge (POCSO), District and Sessions Court, Shillong, imposing life imprisonment sentence on the present convict for offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550519\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Protection of Children from Sexual Offenders Act, 2012<\/a> (POCSO), the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">S. Vaidyanathan<\/span>* CJ, and W. Diengdoh, J. modified the convict&#8217;s sentence to ten years of imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs 10,000.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">A missing complaint was filed by the minor victim girl&#8217;s father on 05-04-2013 alleging that his daughter aged 14 years was missing on 04-04-2013. The minor victim girl and convict were located in Tripura with the help of a provided mobile number. A case was registered against the accused under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561688\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">366-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;). Charges were framed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550519\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">POCSO Act<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561688\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">366-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>. The convict was found guilty under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550528\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">6<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">POCSO Act<\/a> by the Trial Court, sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000, and undergo imprisonment for ten years under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561688\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">366-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000 in default to undergo imprisonment for one month for each default.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The convict&#8217;s case was that the relationship between him and the minor victim was consensual and that she willingly left her home to marry the convict in a temple ceremony. They also highlighted inconsistencies in the medical assessment of the victim&#8217;s age and the lack of documentary evidence such as a birth certificate to conclusively prove her age.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that the minor victim&#8217;s consent was irrelevant due to her age, confirmed through school records to be 14 at the time of the incident. However, the Court clarified that at the most, it can be considered as a mitigating factor, while deciding the question of sentence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Regarding the question of sexual assault, the Court noted that the medical reports indicated a torn hymen, which pointed towards sexual penetration.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the contention that the minor victim girl&#8217;s father had withdrawn the complaint, the Court said that once an FIR is registered, the matter escalates to a crime against the State which renders the withdrawal of the complaint irrelevant to the proceedings. Further, the Court added that withdrawal of the complaint cannot be a ground to plead that the convict is entitled for acquittal, as the Court may not be aware of the circumstances leading to the withdrawal of the complaint. However, the Court considered the possibility of reducing the sentence by taking into account the victim&#8217;s current marital status and the nature of their past relationship.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court stated that it was purely a case of love affairs and nowhere, the minor victim girl deposed that it was the convict, who forcibly took her to Tripura and committed sexual assault, so as to attract Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550519\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">POCSO Act<\/a>, and she has also conceded that she is married now and happily living in Bihar with two children. The Court reiterated that the Trial Court should not be mechanical in imposition of the punishment and must the totality of circumstances coupled with the material evidence must be considered before imposing the maximum punishment prescribed under the Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, in the interest of justice, the Court directed to modify the life sentence imposed by the Trial Court for offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550519\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Act<\/a> to ten years of imprisonment by acknowledging both the gravity of the offense and the mitigating circumstances surrounding the case. The order of sentence imposed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561688\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">366-A<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> was confirmed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Rinku Kumar Tyagi v. State of Meghalaya, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Fd56mb09\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Megh 308<\/a>, Decided on: 26-04-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgement authored by- Justice S. Vaidyanathan<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the appellant: Advocate S. Nongsiej<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the respondent: AAG K. Khan, Additional Public Prosecutor S. Sengupta, Adv. J. N. Rynjah<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1309\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1309\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294600\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;A case involving love affair and unfortunately, the male member was made as a scapegoat to undergo imprisonment for the mistakes committed by the two. It is no doubt true that the offence under POCSO Act, 2012 has been made out to impose punishment on the accused, while the so-called victim girl is leading a happy life.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":316898,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3491,68332,2833,13711,23524,2572,46641],"class_list":["post-321481","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-consent","tag-conviction-under-pocso","tag-Meghalaya_High_Court","tag-mitigating-circumstances","tag-pocso-act","tag-Rape","tag-victims-age"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Meghalaya HC mitigates life sentence to 10 years imprisonment in POCSO case | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Meghalaya HC upholds conviction under POCSO, mitigates life sentence to 10 years imprisonment\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Male member made scapegoat for mistake of both\u2019; Meghalaya HC upholds conviction under POCSO, mitigates life sentence to 10 yrs imprisonment\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Meghalaya HC upholds conviction under POCSO, mitigates life sentence to 10 years imprisonment\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-05-06T03:30:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-05-07T12:16:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Male member made scapegoat for mistake of both\u2019; Meghalaya HC upholds conviction under POCSO, mitigates life sentence to 10 yrs imprisonment\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/\",\"name\":\"Meghalaya HC mitigates life sentence to 10 years imprisonment in POCSO case | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-06T03:30:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-07T12:16:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Meghalaya HC upholds conviction under POCSO, mitigates life sentence to 10 years imprisonment\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Meghalaya High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Male member made scapegoat for mistake of both\u2019; Meghalaya HC upholds conviction under POCSO, mitigates life sentence to 10 yrs imprisonment\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Meghalaya HC mitigates life sentence to 10 years imprisonment in POCSO case | SCC Times","description":"Meghalaya HC upholds conviction under POCSO, mitigates life sentence to 10 years imprisonment","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Male member made scapegoat for mistake of both\u2019; Meghalaya HC upholds conviction under POCSO, mitigates life sentence to 10 yrs imprisonment","og_description":"Meghalaya HC upholds conviction under POCSO, mitigates life sentence to 10 years imprisonment","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-05-06T03:30:02+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-05-07T12:16:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Male member made scapegoat for mistake of both\u2019; Meghalaya HC upholds conviction under POCSO, mitigates life sentence to 10 yrs imprisonment","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/","name":"Meghalaya HC mitigates life sentence to 10 years imprisonment in POCSO case | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-05-06T03:30:02+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-07T12:16:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Meghalaya HC upholds conviction under POCSO, mitigates life sentence to 10 years imprisonment","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Meghalaya High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Male member made scapegoat for mistake of both\u2019; Meghalaya HC upholds conviction under POCSO, mitigates life sentence to 10 yrs imprisonment"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":343558,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/13\/conviction-pocso-ipc-higher-punishment-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":321481,"position":0},"title":"Law with &#8216;greater degree&#8217; of punishment applies when convicted under IPC and POCSO both: Supreme Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe provisions of Section 42A of POCSO Act, cannot be interpreted so as to override the scope and ambit of enabling provision, i.e., Section 42 of POCSO Act.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Conviction under POCSO and IPC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Conviction-under-POCSO-and-IPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Conviction-under-POCSO-and-IPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Conviction-under-POCSO-and-IPC.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Conviction-under-POCSO-and-IPC.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":355246,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/01\/sc-constitutional-bar-against-retrospectively-imposing-harsher-penalty\/","url_meta":{"origin":321481,"position":1},"title":"Constitutional bar against retrospectively imposing harsher penalty is clear and absolute: Supreme Court modifies sentence in POCSO case","author":"Arushi","date":"August 1, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Since the offence was committed on 20-5-2019, the amended provision of Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act, 2019, which came into force on 16-8-2019, could not have been applied to his case.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"retrospectively imposing harsher penalty","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/retrospectively-imposing-harsher-penalty.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/retrospectively-imposing-harsher-penalty.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/retrospectively-imposing-harsher-penalty.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/retrospectively-imposing-harsher-penalty.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276211,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/pocso-sexual-assault-medical-examination-forensic-science-laboratory-sexual-assault-legal-updates-legal-news-legal-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":321481,"position":2},"title":"Meghalaya High Court| Penetration has to be medically established and doesn&#8217;t have to be deep or complete to be considered penetration under the POCSO Act","author":"Editor","date":"October 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Meghalaya High Court: In a criminal appeal filed by the convict\/appellant, convicted under Section 5(m) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (\u2018POCSO\u2019) and sentenced to 15 years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 10,000\/ , the division bench of Sanjib Banerjee, C.J.,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Meghalaya High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":375484,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/12\/bom-hc-pocso-convict-life-sentence-commuted-12-years\/","url_meta":{"origin":321481,"position":3},"title":"Bombay HC commutes POCSO convict&#8217;s life sentence to 12 years; cites his constructive participation in education and Gandhian thoughts","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"February 12, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe accused was only 20 years of age at the time when the offence took place, as reflected in the FIR, and was not released on bail even during Covid-19.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"POCSO convict life term commuted","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/POCSO-convict-life-term-commuted.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/POCSO-convict-life-term-commuted.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/POCSO-convict-life-term-commuted.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/POCSO-convict-life-term-commuted.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":174594,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/09\/occurrence-penetrative-sexual-assault-proved-conviction-s-6-pocso-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":321481,"position":4},"title":"Occurrence of penetrative sexual assault to be proved for conviction under S. 6, POCSO Act","author":"Saba","date":"December 9, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Vipin Sanghi and P.S. Teji, JJ, modified the conviction of the appellant to a conviction under Section 18 of the POCSO Act (hereinafter the Act) instead of Section 6 of the Act. The appellant made only one submission that the offence proved\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":279340,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/09\/pocso-sexual-assault-minor-victim-sentence-reduced-twin-object-sentencing-policy-deterence-correction-mitigating-circumstances-bombay-high-court-legal-research-updates-criminal-trial-law-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":321481,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Sentencing policy&#8217;s twin objective is deterrence and correction\u2019; Bombay High Court reduces POCSO convict&#8217;s sentence in a 7-year-old&#8217;s sexual assault case","author":"Editor","date":"December 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court observed that the convict was a young boy of 20 years, who has no father, and was shouldering the responsibility of his widowed sister and her son, hence, imprisonment for a term of 14 years would be adequate, to teach him a lesson.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321481","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=321481"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321481\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/316898"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=321481"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=321481"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=321481"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}