{"id":321442,"date":"2024-05-04T16:30:08","date_gmt":"2024-05-04T11:00:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=321442"},"modified":"2024-05-10T09:57:45","modified_gmt":"2024-05-10T04:27:45","slug":"dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi HC denies parole to a convicted terrorist; Permits one time video call to see and talk to his parents"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> Petition was filed under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> seeking issuance of direction to the respondent for releasing the petitioner on parole for a period of six weeks to reconnect social ties with the society and his family. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Swarana Kanta Sharma J.*<\/span>, opined that petitioner being convicted in a heinous offence and there being an actual apprehension regarding his presence in the area being detrimental to the larger security interest, coupled with the fact that one of his co-accused had again joined a terrorist organisation after being released on parole, were the factors which would come in the path of the petitioner&#8217;s application for parole. Therefore, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the Court did not find it a fit case for grant of parole.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, conscious of the fact that petitioner had expressed his desire to meet his parents, who could not travel to Delhi, the Court directed that in case petitioner desires, the Superintendent Jail would make one-time arrangement for the video call of petitioner with his parents, in order to provide him an opportunity to at least talk to his parents and see them virtually, if not in person. This might to some extent bring solace to him as a son that he could see his parents and could speak to them, even if virtually and accordingly dismissed the present petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Petitioner was convicted for committing an offence under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001534383\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3(3)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001534383\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3(5)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001534394\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001534373\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">20<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002875769\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Prevention of Terrorism Act,2002<\/a> and Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561376\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">121<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561377\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">121-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561378\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">122<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561379\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">123<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> and Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001524689\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001524690\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">5<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002927389\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Explosive Substances Act, 1908<\/a>. Petitioner was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and had been in judicial custody since 11-09-2003.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Petitioner stated that he had been in judicial custody for more than 20 years and was presently about 44 years of age. He further stated that he wanted to get married, and since his parents were looking for a bride for him, he should be released on parole, as he also wished to meet his old, aged parents. Petitioner also argued that he had never been released on bail\/interim bail\/parole\/furlough in last more than twenty years and he had been continuously in prison from the date of his arrest. t. However, even then, his conduct had been exemplary in the prison, and he was fully entitled to grant of parole.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that as per Rule 1211 of the Delhi Prison Rules,2018, the prisoners who were convicted for sedition and terrorist activities should not be granted parole except in discretion of the competent authority and in special circumstances. The Court noted that the co-accused in the present case was released on parole, but instead of returning to jail after expiry period of his parole, he had joined terrorist organization regarding which an FIR was registered under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">18<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554036\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">20<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554060\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">38<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808781\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967<\/a>. Thereafter, co-accused was neutralized in an encounter with security forces on 25-12-2017.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that a report received from Police Department, Avantipura, Jammu and Kashmir, where the present petitioner wanted to reside, also mentioned that there was a reasonable apprehension that in case petitioner was released, he would abscond and join terrorist ranks. Further his release on parole would be detrimental to the overall security of the area in the larger security interest.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Asfaq v. State of Rajasthan<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=KDIwMTcpIDE1IFNDQyA1NSYmJiYmNDAmJiYmJlNlYXJjaFBhZ2U=\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2017) 15 SCC 55<\/a>, and opined that petitioner being convicted in a heinous offence and there being an actual apprehension regarding his presence in the area being detrimental to the larger security interest, coupled with the fact that one of his co-accused had again joined a terrorist organisation after being released on parole, were the factors which would come in the path of the petitioner&#8217;s application for parole. Therefore, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the Court did not find it a fit case for grant of parole.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, conscious of the fact that petitioner had expressed his desire to meet his parents, whom he had not met and who could not travel to Delhi, the Court opined that it did not overlook the fact that as per nominal roll, his conduct in the jail had been satisfactory over the last twenty years, except one punishment in 2010. Thus, the Court directed that in case petitioner desires, the Superintendent Jail would make one-time arrangement for the video call of petitioner with his parents, to provide him an opportunity to at least talk to his parents and see them virtually, if not in person. This might to some extent bring solace to him as a son that he could see his parents and could speak to them, even if virtually.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Feroz Ahmed Bhatt v. State (NCT of Delhi), <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/e7u9tsx4\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Del 3235<\/a>, decided on 02-05-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by- Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Naiem Jahan Heena and Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocates;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> Rahul Tyagi, ASC.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court opined that it is faced with a situation where it has to balance the interest of the State and the Country on the one hand, and the longing of an accused to see his parents, who are unable to travel to Delhi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[36505,25254,68307,2543,52887,68309,3128,14261,68310,35116,68308],"class_list":["post-321442","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-36505","tag-25254","tag-convicted-terrorist","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-explosive-substances-act","tag-larger-security-interest","tag-Parole","tag-penal-code","tag-prevention-of-terrorism-act","tag-terrorist-organization","tag-video-call-with-parents"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>DHC denies parole to a convicted terrorist; permits one time video call with his parents| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court directed the Superintendent Jail to make one-time arrangement for the video call of petitioner with his parents to provide him an opportunity to see and talk to his parents.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi HC denies parole to a convicted terrorist; Permits one time video call to see and talk to his parents\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court directed the Superintendent Jail to make one-time arrangement for the video call of petitioner with his parents to provide him an opportunity to see and talk to his parents.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-05-04T11:00:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-05-10T04:27:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi HC denies parole to a convicted terrorist; Permits one time video call to see and talk to his parents\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes\/\",\"name\":\"DHC denies parole to a convicted terrorist; permits one time video call with his parents| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-04T11:00:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-10T04:27:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court directed the Superintendent Jail to make one-time arrangement for the video call of petitioner with his parents to provide him an opportunity to see and talk to his parents.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi HC denies parole to a convicted terrorist; Permits one time video call to see and talk to his parents\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"DHC denies parole to a convicted terrorist; permits one time video call with his parents| SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court directed the Superintendent Jail to make one-time arrangement for the video call of petitioner with his parents to provide him an opportunity to see and talk to his parents.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi HC denies parole to a convicted terrorist; Permits one time video call to see and talk to his parents","og_description":"Delhi High Court directed the Superintendent Jail to make one-time arrangement for the video call of petitioner with his parents to provide him an opportunity to see and talk to his parents.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-05-04T11:00:08+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-05-10T04:27:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi HC denies parole to a convicted terrorist; Permits one time video call to see and talk to his parents","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes\/","name":"DHC denies parole to a convicted terrorist; permits one time video call with his parents| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-05-04T11:00:08+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-10T04:27:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Delhi High Court directed the Superintendent Jail to make one-time arrangement for the video call of petitioner with his parents to provide him an opportunity to see and talk to his parents.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/dhc-denies-parole-to-convicted-terrorist-permits-one-time-video-call-with-parents-scctimes\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi HC denies parole to a convicted terrorist; Permits one time video call to see and talk to his parents"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":311461,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/dhc-denies-parole-to-ravi-kapoor-in-soumya-jigisha-murder-cases-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":321442,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court denies parole to Ravi Kapoor serving life imprisonment in Soumya Vishwanathan and Jigisha Ghosh murder cases","author":"Simranjeet","date":"January 15, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThere is a need to respect the rights of convicts and need to acknowledge the importance of being released on parole for several purposes, including for maintaining social ties with family. However, the Courts are bound to consider counterbalancing public interest while deciding issue of grant of parole.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209055,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/del-hc-delhi-prison-rules-2018-disentitles-convicts-under-ndps-act-for-grant-of-furlough\/","url_meta":{"origin":321442,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Delhi Prison Rules, 2018 disentitles convicts under NDPS Act for grant of furlough","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 31, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0The Bench of Mukta Gupta, J. dismissed a petition for grant of furlough holding that convicts under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 are not entitled to the same. The petitioner was convicted for an offence punishable under the NDPS Act and was undergoing a sentence of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":310687,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/04\/delhi-hc-grants-four-weeks-parole-to-convict-for-filing-slp-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":321442,"position":2},"title":"Filing SLP to challenge dismissal of criminal appeal is crucial right of convict; Delhi High Court grants four-weeks parole to convict for filing SLP","author":"Editor","date":"January 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cExcept the two incidents wherein punishment was awarded to the petitioner, the nominal roll does not find mention of any misconduct on the part of the petitioner, after May, 2017 till date i.e. for the last more than six years.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281227,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/07\/right-avail-legal-remedy-supreme-court-cannot-denied-delhi-high-court-grants-parole-rape-convict-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":321442,"position":3},"title":"Right to avail legal remedy in Supreme Court cannot be denied; Delhi High Court grants parole to rape convict","author":"Editor","date":"January 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court granted four weeks parole to a rape convict and held that right of a citizen to avail a legal remedy in the final court of country cannot be denied.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":364978,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/article-21-encompasses-right-to-observe-ones-religious-duties-custody-parole-uapa\/","url_meta":{"origin":321442,"position":4},"title":"&#8216;Article 21 encompasses right to observe one&#8217;s religious duties&#8217;: Delhi High Court grants custody parole in UAPA case","author":"Editor","date":"October 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe purpose of custody parole is to allow a prisoner to attend to pressing humanitarian or personal obligations such as funerals, last rites, or significant family functions, under strict supervision of the authorities. It is a temporary measure, humane in character, that ensures a balance between the interests of justice\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"right to observe one's religious duties","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/right-to-observe-ones-religious-duties.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/right-to-observe-ones-religious-duties.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/right-to-observe-ones-religious-duties.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/right-to-observe-ones-religious-duties.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316159,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/raj-hc-orders-pocso-convict-to-serve-parole-at-a-place-away-from-victims-residence-scctimes\/","url_meta":{"origin":321442,"position":5},"title":"Raj HC orders POCSO convict to serve parole at a place away from victim\u2019s residence to balance victim\u2019s safety and accused\u2019s rights","author":"Arushi","date":"March 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court is mindful of the legislative intent of the POCSO Act which provides that the contact between the accused and the victim should be prevented to minimise the trauma experienced by the child.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321442","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=321442"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321442\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=321442"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=321442"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=321442"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}