{"id":321365,"date":"2024-05-04T09:00:57","date_gmt":"2024-05-04T03:30:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=321365"},"modified":"2024-05-07T15:54:12","modified_gmt":"2024-05-07T10:24:12","slug":"allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Magistrate failed to conduct preliminary inquiry to ascertain roles and duties of individuals before mechanically summoning them\u2019: Allahabad HC quashes criminal cases against officials of Larsen and Toubro"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Allahabad High Court<\/span>: In an application filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;) to quash the complaint case under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561632\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">323<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561858\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">504<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">506<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561742\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">406<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561758\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">420<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;) and also to quash the summoning order and the order passed in the Criminal Revision, Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J. while quashing the impugned orders, said that the Magistrate failed to conduct even a basic preliminary inquiry in order to ascertain the roles and duties of the individuals before mechanically summoning all the persons arrayed as accused in the complaint.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"> The applicants are the Director and Chief Financial Officer, Vice president, Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director in Larsen and Toubro Ltd (L&amp;T) and are responsible for policymaking and overseeing the company&#8217;s projects on a day-to-day basis. There was a complaint filed against them alleging criminal breach of trust and provocation. In response, they filed the present applications seeking to quash the proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Contentions:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The applicants contended that the alleged incident took place in Lucknow, but they were neither posted nor present there at that time. The incident revolves around issuing cheques to the company on different dates, which the complainant alleges were kickbacks and losses compensated by him. The applicants contended that the allegations against them lacked substance and were based on fabricated claims. They maintain that they were not involved in the alleged incident and that the complaint does not establish any criminal liability on their part.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was also argued that the summons were issued without complying with the mandatory Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519452\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">202(1)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a>, despite the applicants living beyond the Court&#8217;s jurisdiction, rendering the summoning order void.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the other hand, the opposite party contended that they were manipulated into providing the cheques under false pretenses. Moreover, they highlight discrepancies in the petitioner&#8217;s affidavits and cited inconsistencies in the identities of the deponents, which they argue deviate from standard criminal procedure.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Decision:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that summoning the accused in a criminal case is a serious matter and the proceedings without proper examination of the allegations and evidence should be quashed.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court highlighted that the failure of the Magistrate to comply substantially with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519452\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">202(1)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a>, led to failureof justice.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After referring to Abhijit Pawar, the Court noted that the Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519452\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">202<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> was amended in the year 2005 by the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2005, with effect from 22-06-2006 by adding the words &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">and shall, in a case where the accused is residing at a place beyond the area in which he exercises his jurisdiction<\/span>&#8221; . The Court said that the amended provision casts an obligation on the Magistrate to conduct enquiry or direct investigation before issuing the process, so that false complaints are filtered and rejected. The aforesaid purpose is specifically mentioned in the note appended to the Bill proposing the said amendment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that the Magistrate failed to conduct even a basic preliminary inquiry to ascertain the roles and duties of the individuals before mechanically summoning all the persons arrayed as accused in the complaint.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court quashed the impugned orders.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">R. Shankar Raman v. State of U.P. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5MdRwRdK\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine All 1328<\/a>, Order dated 26-04-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Counsel for Applicant<\/span> : Advocate Rajendra Kumar Dwivedi, Advocate Devika Singh, Advocate Harish Pandey, Advocate Jitendra Kumar, Advocate Sima Gulati, Advocate Subhash Gulati<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Counsel for Opposite Party<\/span> : Govt. Advocate, Manish Kumar Tripathi ,Rajiv Kumar Srivastava<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Magistrate had issued summons without meeting the requirement of Section 202 CrPC., even though the applicants were residing outside the territorial jurisdiction of the Trial Court.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314936,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2822,24554,68278,2538,11331],"class_list":["post-321365","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Allahabad_High_Court","tag-criminal-cases","tag-larsen-and-toubro","tag-Magistrate","tag-preliminary-inquiry"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Allahabad HC quashes criminal cases against officials of Larsen and Toubro as Magistrate failed to conduct preliminary inquiry | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Allahabad HC quashed criminal cases against officials of Larsen and Toubro as Magistrate failed to conduct preliminary inquiry\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Magistrate failed to conduct preliminary inquiry to ascertain roles and duties of individuals before mechanically summoning them\u2019: Allahabad HC quashes criminal cases against officials of Larsen and Toubro\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad HC quashed criminal cases against officials of Larsen and Toubro as Magistrate failed to conduct preliminary inquiry\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-05-04T03:30:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-05-07T10:24:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Magistrate failed to conduct preliminary inquiry to ascertain roles and duties of individuals before mechanically summoning them\u2019: Allahabad HC quashes criminal cases against officials of Larsen and Toubro\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry\/\",\"name\":\"Allahabad HC quashes criminal cases against officials of Larsen and Toubro as Magistrate failed to conduct preliminary inquiry | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-04T03:30:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-07T10:24:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Allahabad HC quashed criminal cases against officials of Larsen and Toubro as Magistrate failed to conduct preliminary inquiry\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Allahabad High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Magistrate failed to conduct preliminary inquiry to ascertain roles and duties of individuals before mechanically summoning them\u2019: Allahabad HC quashes criminal cases against officials of Larsen and Toubro\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Allahabad HC quashes criminal cases against officials of Larsen and Toubro as Magistrate failed to conduct preliminary inquiry | SCC Times","description":"Allahabad HC quashed criminal cases against officials of Larsen and Toubro as Magistrate failed to conduct preliminary inquiry","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Magistrate failed to conduct preliminary inquiry to ascertain roles and duties of individuals before mechanically summoning them\u2019: Allahabad HC quashes criminal cases against officials of Larsen and Toubro","og_description":"Allahabad HC quashed criminal cases against officials of Larsen and Toubro as Magistrate failed to conduct preliminary inquiry","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-05-04T03:30:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-05-07T10:24:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Magistrate failed to conduct preliminary inquiry to ascertain roles and duties of individuals before mechanically summoning them\u2019: Allahabad HC quashes criminal cases against officials of Larsen and Toubro","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry\/","name":"Allahabad HC quashes criminal cases against officials of Larsen and Toubro as Magistrate failed to conduct preliminary inquiry | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-05-04T03:30:57+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-07T10:24:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Allahabad HC quashed criminal cases against officials of Larsen and Toubro as Magistrate failed to conduct preliminary inquiry","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Allahabad High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/allahabad-hc-quashes-criminal-cases-officials-larsen-and-toubro-magistrate-failed-to-conduct-preliminary-inquiry\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Magistrate failed to conduct preliminary inquiry to ascertain roles and duties of individuals before mechanically summoning them\u2019: Allahabad HC quashes criminal cases against officials of Larsen and Toubro"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":216168,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/27\/all-hc-power-under-s-482-crpc-to-be-used-for-limited-purpose-as-frequent-and-uncalled-interference-at-preliminary-stage-may-obstruct-the-progress-of-inquiry\/","url_meta":{"origin":321365,"position":0},"title":"All HC | Power under S. 482 CrPC to be used for limited purpose as frequent and uncalled interference at preliminary stage may obstruct the progress of inquiry","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Dinesh Kumar Singh, J. disposed of the petition on the ground that no substantial ground was made for exercising the power under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. A petition was filed in order to quash the summoning order passed by 1st Additional Chief Judicial\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":291187,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/03\/no-name-in-fir-chargesheet-magistrate-can-summon-accused-if-involvement-found-allahabad-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":321365,"position":1},"title":"In case of prima facie involvement, summon can be issued even in absence of name in police report or FIR: Allahabad HC reiterates","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that the Magistrate is not bound in such a situation to follow the procedure laid down in Sections 200 and 202 of CrPC for taking cognizance of a case under Section 190(1)(a), though, it is open to him to act under Section 200 or Section 202\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240253,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/07\/chh-hc-whether-writ-of-mandamus-be-filed-under-art-226-of-the-constitution-of-india-directing-the-jurisdictional-police-to-register-an-offence-under-s-1541-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":321365,"position":2},"title":"Chh HC | Whether writ of mandamus be filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India directing the jurisdictional police to register an offence under S. 154(1) CrPC?","author":"Editor","date":"December 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Sanjay K. Agrawal J. dismissed the petition based on settled position of law. \u00a0The facts of the case are such that the respondents 5 to 12 and investigate the matter against them through Special Investigation team. Hence, The question for consideration is whether a writ of mandamus\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":282925,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/magistrate-cannot-summon-accused-on-a-printed-proforma-without-assigning-any-reason-nor-can-take-cognizance-on-police-report-without-applying-judicial-mind-allahabad-high-cour\/","url_meta":{"origin":321365,"position":3},"title":"Magistrate cannot summon accused on a printed proforma without assigning any reason nor can take cognizance on police report without applying judicial mind, Allahabad High Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"February 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court remitted back the matter to the Magistrate and directed him to decide afresh the issue for taking cognizance and summoning the applicants and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":280517,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/28\/allahabad-high-court-reiterates-that-the-courts-should-urge-the-police-to-investigate-in-sexual-offences-against-women-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":321365,"position":4},"title":"Courts should urge the police to investigate in sexual offences against women; Allahabad High Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"December 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The legislation in its own wisdom have planned to use the state machinery to investigate into all those offences, in which the women are poor victims of the atrocities committed by male.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":313213,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/06\/cal-hc-sets-aside-magistrates-orders-emphasises-mandatory-compliance-with-section-202-of-crpc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":321365,"position":5},"title":"Securities Misappropriation | Calcutta High Court sets aside Magistrate\u2019s orders on non-compliance of mandatory provision of Section 202 CrPC","author":"Ritu","date":"February 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe compliance of provision under Section 202 of the CrPC, 1973, is compulsory and unavoidable for a Magistrate before issuance of summons in case of alleged offender who resides outside his territorial jurisdiction.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321365","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=321365"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321365\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314936"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=321365"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=321365"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=321365"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}