{"id":321181,"date":"2024-05-01T19:00:53","date_gmt":"2024-05-01T13:30:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=321181"},"modified":"2024-05-03T16:54:08","modified_gmt":"2024-05-03T11:24:08","slug":"delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi HC quashes FIR against a man accused of fraud, forgery and fabrication of documents considering amicable settlement between parties"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a petition instituted under Section 482<\/a> of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (‘CrPC’) seeking quashing of FIR registered under Sections 420<\/a>, 467<\/a>, 406<\/a>, 471<\/a> of the Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (‘IPC’) at Police Station Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes, Manoj Kumar Ohri, J.<\/span>, observed that during the proceedings, petitioner also showed remorse for his conduct and undertook not to repeat the same in future. Respondent 2 also stated that he had settled the disputes with the petitioner out of his own free will, volition and without any coercion. Thus, the Court opined that no useful purpose would be served in continuance of the proceedings and accordingly quashed the FIR and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.<\/p>\n

In the present case, allegations in the FIR were related to fraud, forgery and fabrication of documents with respect to an immovable property. Petitioner submitted that the present FIR was registered due to misunderstanding and the parties had amicably settled their disputes vide Memorandum of Understanding dated 07-03-2024. As per the settlement, complainant was now left with no claim or grievance against petitioner.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that during the proceedings, petitioner also showed remorse for his conduct and undertook not to repeat the same in future. Respondent 2 also stated that he had settled the disputes with the petitioner out of his own free will, volition and without any coercion. Further, he had no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings were quashed. The Court opined that parties should remain bound by the statements made in the Court. The Court relied on Parbatbhai Aahir<\/span> v. State of Gujarat<\/span>, (2017) 9 SCC 641<\/a> and State of Madhya Pradesh<\/span> v. Laxmi Narayan<\/span>, (2019) 5 SCC 403<\/a> and opined that no useful purpose would be served in continuance of the proceedings and accordingly quashed the FIR and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.<\/p>\n

[Surinder Singh Taneja v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2024 SCC OnLine Del 2981<\/a>, Order dated 25-04-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Petitioner:<\/span> Gurmukh Singh Arora and Vansh Bajaj, Advocates;<\/p>\n

For the Respondent:<\/span> Aashneet Singh, APP for State with WSI Sangeeta PS Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi; Manoj Singh, Advocate.<\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Petitioner has shown remorse for his conduct and undertakes not to repeat the same in future. Respondent 2 also states that he has settled the disputes with the petitioner out of his own free will, volition and without any coercion.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[68201,2543,68200,3067,33586,10141,14261,68203,68202],"class_list":["post-321181","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-amicable-settlement-between-parties","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-fabrication-of-documents","tag-FIR","tag-forgery","tag-fraud","tag-penal-code","tag-section-467-of-ipc","tag-section-sections-420-of-ipc"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi HC quashes FIR against a man accused of fraud and forgery considering amicable settlement between parties| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court opined that no useful purpose would be served in continuance of the proceedings and accordingly quashed the FIR and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi HC quashes FIR against a man accused of fraud, forgery and fabrication of documents considering amicable settlement between parties\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court opined that no useful purpose would be served in continuance of the proceedings and accordingly quashed the FIR and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-05-01T13:30:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-05-03T11:24:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi HC quashes FIR against a man accused of fraud, forgery and fabrication of documents considering amicable settlement between parties\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC quashes FIR against a man accused of fraud and forgery considering amicable settlement between parties| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-01T13:30:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-03T11:24:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court opined that no useful purpose would be served in continuance of the proceedings and accordingly quashed the FIR and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi HC quashes FIR against a man accused of fraud, forgery and fabrication of documents considering amicable settlement between parties\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC quashes FIR against a man accused of fraud and forgery considering amicable settlement between parties| SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court opined that no useful purpose would be served in continuance of the proceedings and accordingly quashed the FIR and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi HC quashes FIR against a man accused of fraud, forgery and fabrication of documents considering amicable settlement between parties","og_description":"Delhi High Court opined that no useful purpose would be served in continuance of the proceedings and accordingly quashed the FIR and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-05-01T13:30:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-05-03T11:24:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi HC quashes FIR against a man accused of fraud, forgery and fabrication of documents considering amicable settlement between parties","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/","name":"Delhi HC quashes FIR against a man accused of fraud and forgery considering amicable settlement between parties| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-05-01T13:30:53+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-03T11:24:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Delhi High Court opined that no useful purpose would be served in continuance of the proceedings and accordingly quashed the FIR and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-against-man-accused-of-fraud-forgery-considering-amicable-settlement-between-parties-scctimes\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi HC quashes FIR against a man accused of fraud, forgery and fabrication of documents considering amicable settlement between parties"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":333016,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-case-fraud-rape-forgery-after-amicable-settlement-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":321181,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court quashes FIR in 7-Year-Old Case of fraud, rape, and forgery after amicable settlement","author":"Arunima","date":"October 15, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The complainant, who is a foreign national, wishes to give complete quietus to all cases which are pending before the Courts in Delhi arising from the present FIR to live her life in peace in the USA.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209003,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/utt-hc-fir-for-offences-under-sections-467-468-and-471-ipc-can-be-quashed-if-parties-enter-into-a-compromise-willingly-and-amicably\/","url_meta":{"origin":321181,"position":1},"title":"Utt HC | FIR for offences under Sections 467, 468 and 471 IPC can be quashed if parties enter into a compromise willingly and amicably","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: The Bench of Narayan Singh Dhanik J. disposed a compounding application along with a criminal writ petition and quashed the First Information Report filed against the accused applicant on the ground of amicable settlement of the dispute between the parties. The instant application had been filed for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":328382,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-based-settlement-section376-section363-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":321181,"position":2},"title":"Delhi HC quashes FIR in Rape, Kidnapping, and POCSO case based on Settlement without imposing costs","author":"Arunima","date":"August 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court has quashed an FIR registered under Sections 376 (rape), 363 (kidnapping), and 6 of the POCSO Act (aggravated penetrative assault). The decision was based on an amicable settlement between the parties, with no costs imposed on either side. This case underscores the court's recognition of mutually agreed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274110,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/21\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-lodged-with-economic-offences-wing-delhi-in-view-of-deposition-made-by-complainant-regarding-settlement\/","url_meta":{"origin":321181,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court quashes FIR lodged with Economic Offences Wing Delhi in view of deposition made by complainant regarding settlement","author":"Editor","date":"September 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a petition filed by Jaideep Singh (\u2019Petitioner\u2019) for quashing of FIR registered by Shaildendra Singh (\u2018Respondent 2\u2019) with Economic Offences Wing, New Delhi under Sections 120-B r\/w 406 and 420 Penal Code, 1860 (\u2019IPC\u2019), Anu Malhotra, J. quashed FIR filed by, EOW under Sections\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":243234,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/02\/del-hc-offences-like-rape-forgery-having-a-bearing-on-vital-societal-interest-cannot-be-construed-to-be-merely-private-or-civil-disputes\/","url_meta":{"origin":321181,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | Offences like rape & forgery having a bearing on vital societal interest cannot be construed to be merely private or civil disputes","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Subramonium Prasad, J., with regard to the settlement of disputes stated that: \u201cIn crimes which seriously endangers the well being of the society, it is not safe to leave the crime doer only because he and the victim have settled the dispute amicably. \u201c The instant petition\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":146101,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/compromise-or-amicable-settlement-of-dispute-between-parties-brings-peace-and-harmony-in-society\/","url_meta":{"origin":321181,"position":5},"title":"Compromise or amicable settlement of dispute between parties brings peace and harmony in society","author":"Saba","date":"July 31, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: In two subsequent cases decided by the Bench of\u00a0 Inderjit, J., dealing with offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471\u00a0 IPC (pertaining to cheating and forgery) and Sections 365, 343, 506 IPC (pertaining to wrongful confinement), the Court decided to quash the FIRs under Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321181","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=321181"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321181\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=321181"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=321181"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=321181"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}