{"id":320414,"date":"2024-04-20T10:00:06","date_gmt":"2024-04-20T04:30:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=320414"},"modified":"2024-05-02T09:33:09","modified_gmt":"2024-05-02T04:03:09","slug":"s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/","title":{"rendered":"S. 269-SS of Income Tax Act not applicable to receipt of sale consideration of immovable property in cash but only on loan or deposit: ITAT, Delhi"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi:<\/span> In an appeal filed by the assessee against an order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (‘CIT (A)’), wherein the CIT (A) dismissed an appeal against the order of the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (JCIT), levying penalty of Rs. 28,13,000\/- under Section 271-D<\/a> of the Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a> (‘the Act’) for the violation of Section 269-SS<\/a> of the Act<\/a>, the two-member Bench of Yogesh Kumar U.S. (Judicial Member) and Dr. B. R. R. Kumar (Accountant Member), allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order imposing penalty. The Tribunal held that Section 269-SS<\/a> of the Act<\/a> does not deal with the receipt of ‘sale consideration of immovable property’ in cash, and only deals with loan or deposit.<\/p>\n

The Assessing Officer said that the assessee had received the sale consideration in cash an amount exceeding Rs.20,000, which is in violation of the provisions of Section 269-SS<\/a> of the Act<\/a>. Thereafter, the matter was referred to the JCIT to consider levy of penalty under Section 271-D<\/a> of the Act<\/a> for violation of provisions of Section 269-SS<\/a> of the Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a>. 15 more cash transactions against sale of property were done by the assessee, thus, a total cash transaction of Rs. 1,40,65,000\/- was done, resulting in the assessee’s share at Rs. 28,13,000\/-.<\/p>\n

The JCIT recorded that the assessee failed to prove that the said transactions were declared in the income tax returns and that there was any reasonable cause for receiving the cash payment. Therefore, the JCIT levied penalty of Rs. 28,13,000\/- under Section 271-D<\/a> of the Act<\/a> for violation of Section 269-SS<\/a> of the Act<\/a>, vide order dated 20-09-2019. The assessee preferred an appeal against the JCIT’s order before the CIT(A), which came to be dismissed. Hence, the present appeal was filed on the grounds that the impugned penalty order passed by the JCIT was illegal, arbitrary, bad in law and without jurisdiction. The assessee was also aggrieved by non-consideration of the fact that he is an uneducated person and was not aware of the provision of Section 269-SS, which was newly amended.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal perused Section 271-D<\/a> and 269-SS<\/a> of the Act<\/a> and said that Section 269-SS<\/a> of the Act<\/a> has a specific bar to receive a sum more than 20,000\/- from any other persons by way of loan or deposit. The Tribunal explained that Section 269-SS<\/a> of the Act<\/a> does not deal with the receipt of ‘sale consideration of immovable property’ in cash, but only deals with loan or deposit. Therefore, the Tribunal said that Section 269-SS<\/a> of the Act<\/a> was wrongly interpreted by the Authorities below, while imposing the penalty in the matter at hand, wherein the subject matter was receipt of sale consideration in cash in respect of selling the immovable properties.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court allowed the assessee’s appeal and held that the Assessing Officer had committed an error in invoking Section 269-SS<\/a> read with Section 271-D<\/a> of the Act<\/a> and imposing of the penalty. Accordingly, the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer, confirmed by the CIT(A) was quashed.<\/p>\n

[Wahid Ali v. JCIT, 2024 SCC OnLine ITAT 259<\/a>, Order Dated: 08-01-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Section 269-SS of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has a specific bar on receiving a sum more than 20,000\/- from any other persons by way of loan or deposit.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67517,"featured_media":316075,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[67758,67760,13081,9013,30953,67759],"class_list":["post-320414","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-applicability-of-s-269-ss","tag-immovable-property-in-cash","tag-income-tax-act","tag-income-tax-appellate-tribunal","tag-itat","tag-receipt-of-sale-consideration"],"yoast_head":"\nS. 269-SS of Income Tax Act not applicable to receipt of sale consideration in cash: ITAT, Delhi | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"S. 269-SS of Income Tax Act not applicable to receipt of sale consideration of immovable property in cash but only to loan or deposit: ITAT, Delhi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"S. 269-SS of Income Tax Act not applicable to receipt of sale consideration of immovable property in cash but only on loan or deposit: ITAT, Delhi\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"S. 269-SS of Income Tax Act not applicable to receipt of sale consideration of immovable property in cash but only to loan or deposit: ITAT, Delhi\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-04-20T04:30:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-05-02T04:03:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"S. 269-SS of Income Tax Act not applicable to receipt of sale consideration of immovable property in cash but only on loan or deposit: ITAT, Delhi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/\",\"name\":\"S. 269-SS of Income Tax Act not applicable to receipt of sale consideration in cash: ITAT, Delhi | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-04-20T04:30:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-02T04:03:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"description\":\"S. 269-SS of Income Tax Act not applicable to receipt of sale consideration of immovable property in cash but only to loan or deposit: ITAT, Delhi\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"S. 269-SS of Income Tax Act not applicable to receipt of sale consideration of immovable property in cash but only on loan or deposit: ITAT, Delhi\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"S. 269-SS of Income Tax Act not applicable to receipt of sale consideration in cash: ITAT, Delhi | SCC Times","description":"S. 269-SS of Income Tax Act not applicable to receipt of sale consideration of immovable property in cash but only to loan or deposit: ITAT, Delhi","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"S. 269-SS of Income Tax Act not applicable to receipt of sale consideration of immovable property in cash but only on loan or deposit: ITAT, Delhi","og_description":"S. 269-SS of Income Tax Act not applicable to receipt of sale consideration of immovable property in cash but only to loan or deposit: ITAT, Delhi","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-04-20T04:30:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-05-02T04:03:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"S. 269-SS of Income Tax Act not applicable to receipt of sale consideration of immovable property in cash but only on loan or deposit: ITAT, Delhi","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/","name":"S. 269-SS of Income Tax Act not applicable to receipt of sale consideration in cash: ITAT, Delhi | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp","datePublished":"2024-04-20T04:30:06+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-02T04:03:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"description":"S. 269-SS of Income Tax Act not applicable to receipt of sale consideration of immovable property in cash but only to loan or deposit: ITAT, Delhi","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"S. 269-SS of Income Tax Act not applicable to receipt of sale consideration of immovable property in cash but only on loan or deposit: ITAT, Delhi"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":287188,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/18\/rpc-fee-paid-by-formula-one-is-not-liable-to-be-disallowed-under-clause-i-of-s-40a-itat-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":320414,"position":0},"title":"RPC fee paid by Formula One not liable to be disallowed; Second proviso to S. 40(a)(i) be given retrospective effect: ITAT","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"ITAT held that the second proviso to Clause (i) of Section 40(a) just like second proviso to clause (ia) of Section 40(a) was inserted to remove an anomaly and were therefore curative and declaratory in nature. Hence, it had to be given retrospective effect.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294312,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/11\/revenue-can-bring-expenditure-incurred-earlier-years-taxed-subsequent-years-itat\/","url_meta":{"origin":320414,"position":1},"title":"Can revenue bring expenditure incurred in earlier years to be taxed in subsequent years? ITAT answers","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"After examining the expenses payable and the detailed order of the CIT,the ITAT held that the CIT has correctly examined the invoices, period and purpose for the expenses which have not been paid for the last six years","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"income tax appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":289103,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/10\/it-act-reopening-of-assessment-unsustainable-in-law-lack-of-evidence-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":320414,"position":2},"title":"Reopening of the assessment is indemonstrable in law as reasons inserted in Section 147 IT Act were not considered as evidence: ITAT","author":"Editor","date":"April 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"It is a trite law that the reasons, as recorded for reopening the reassessment, are to be examined on a standalone basis to determine the validity of proceedings under section 147 IT Act.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":284739,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/22\/in-view-of-moratorium-declared-by-nclt-all-the-proceedings-in-court-tribunal-cannot-continue-on-account-of-amendment-to-s-1786-it-act-itat-dismissed-appeals-filed-by-assess\/","url_meta":{"origin":320414,"position":3},"title":"In view of moratorium declared by NCLT, all the proceedings in Court, Tribunal cannot continue on account of Amendment to S. 178(6) IT Act: ITAT","author":"Apoorva","date":"February 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"ITAT reiterated that IBC has overriding effect on all the acts including Income Tax Act (\u2018IT Act\u2019) which has been specifically provided under Section 178(6) of the IT Act as amended w.e.f. 01-11-2016.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":231882,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/07\/itat-bar-council-of-delhis-dominant-purpose-is-advancement-of-general-public-utility-held-entitled-for-registration-under-s-12-aa-and-consequent-exemption-under-s-80-g-income-tax-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":320414,"position":4},"title":"ITAT | Bar Council of Delhi’s dominant purpose is advancement of general public utility: Held entitled for registration under S. 12-AA and consequent exemption under S. 80-G, Income Tax Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT):\u00a0A Division Bench of R.K. Panda (Accountant Member) and Kuldip Singh (Judicial Member), while addressing a matter held, \"Bar Council of Delhi being engaged in safeguarding the rights, privileges and interest of the advocates, its dominating purpose is the advancement of general public utility within the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270293,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/itat-can-incorrect-entries-hybrid-system-of-account-lead-to-rejection-of-books-of-accounts-labor-charges\/","url_meta":{"origin":320414,"position":5},"title":"ITAT| Can incorrect entries; hybrid system of account lead to rejection of books of Accounts & Labor Charges?","author":"Editor","date":"July 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai: Dealing with the issue pertaining to rejection of books of accounts, sustainability of disallowance of labour charges, and disallowance of outstanding labour charges, the Gagan Goyal, Accountant Member has held that CIT(A) was correct and justified in rejecting the books of account by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/320414","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=320414"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/320414\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/316075"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=320414"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=320414"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=320414"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}