{"id":320388,"date":"2024-04-19T15:00:29","date_gmt":"2024-04-19T09:30:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=320388"},"modified":"2024-04-23T12:16:39","modified_gmt":"2024-04-23T06:46:39","slug":"objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;Objections under S. 47 CPC are applicable only to execution of decrees not maintainable against arbitral awards\u2019; Allahabad HC imposes Rs 5 lakhs cost on State"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Allahabad High Court<\/span>: In a writ petition filed by the State, challenging orders passed by the Trial Court and the Commercial Court related to disputes arising from a contract for construction of a cross drainage under Madhya Ganga Canal Phase-II Project in Bijnor, Shekhar B. Saraf, J., while dismissing the petition as frivolous, vexatious, motivated and being an abuse of the process of Court, imposed a cost of Rs. 5 Lakhs on the State. Further, the Court said the following:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>\n<p>Jurisdiction of an executing Court under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">47<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Code of Civil Procedure, 1908<\/a> (&#8216;CPC&#8217;), is limited to matters pertaining to execution of the decree. Validity of a decree cannot be looked into by the executing court unless the decree suffers from inherent lack of jurisdiction.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>The Courts should ensure that objections raised under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">47<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC<\/a> relate strictly to matters concerning the execution, discharge, or fulfilment of the decree and do not overstep into substantive rights or legal matters beyond the decree&#8217;s boundaries<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Plain meaning rule is not an absolute principle and must be used in light of the broader context and purpose of the statute.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Once objections are dismissed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Arbitration &amp; Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> (&#8216;the Act&#8217;), and appeal under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544942\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">37<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the Act<\/a> also stands adjudicated, an arbitral award attains finality. Any objections regarding the validity of an arbitral award are impermissible under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544941\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">36<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Writ jurisdiction under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">226<\/a> and Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574971\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">227<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a> cannot be invoked to challenge an arbitral award. Only under exceptional circumstances, a writ court can interfere with an arbitral award or execution proceedings.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Parties&#8217; failure to raise timely objections under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544942\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">37<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the Act<\/a> will not entitle them to raise these grounds at a later stage by invoking the writ jurisdiction under Constitution of India<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Disputes arose between the State and the respondent in connection with a contract for construction of a cross drainage. Accordingly, in terms with the clauses of the contract, the disputes were referred to arbitration.Against the arbitral award, the State preferred an application under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the Act<\/a> before the District Judge. The said application was rejected by the District Judge.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thereafter, the State filed a first appeal before this Court against the order of the District Judge. However, this appeal was dismissed by the Court. A Special Leave Petition under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574865\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">136<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a> was also preferred by the State before the Supreme Court which was dismissed on the ground of delay. Thereafter, a Review petition was filed by the State against the said order, which was dismissed by the Supreme Court as well.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thereafter, an execution application was filed by the respondent under Section 36 of the Arbitration Act. Meanwhile, the Trial Court passed an order in the said execution application directing the State Bank of India to cease the bank account of Executive Engineer, and not to permit withdrawal from the said account. Subsequently, the execution application filed by the respondent was transferred to the Commercial Court. The Commercial Court, vide its order directed the State to ensure the payment of the awarded amount along with interest. The petitioners preferred an objection in under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">47<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC, 1908<\/a> before the Commercial Court, which was further rejected. Aggrieved by the said order passed by the Trial Court, and the orders passed by the Commercial Court, the State have filed the instant writ petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis and Decision:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the purpose of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">47<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC, 1908<\/a> defines the jurisdiction of the court executing a decree, and further, limits the scope of matters subject to determination by the executing court to those related to parties, execution, discharge, or satisfaction of the decree.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court has emphasized upon the interpretation of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">47<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the CPC<\/a> by the Supreme Court in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Dhurandhar Prasad Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Jai Prakash University<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/U1R8g6uB\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2001) 6 SCC 534<\/a> , wherein the Court has observed that the executing Court&#8217;s authority is limited to execution matters and that its role is akin to a <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;microscopic inspection hole&#8221; focusing solely on executability. The Court has further remarked that caution should be urged in adjudicating objections under Section 47 due to far-reaching implications and the need to maintain finality of decrees.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that the Courts must exercise caution and diligence when adjudicating objections under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">47<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC, 1908<\/a>. The consequences of erroneously allowing or disallowing objections can have far-reaching implications for the parties involved and may undermine the integrity of the execution process.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Remarking on the limited scope of the executing Court&#8217;s jurisdiction under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">47<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC, 1908<\/a>, the Court said that it requires a precise delineation of the issues that fall within its purview.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also suggested that the Courts must also be mindful of the principle of finality of decrees when adjudicating objections under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">47<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC, 1908<\/a>. Decrees represent the final determination of the rights and liabilities of the parties, and objections seeking to reopen issues already decided may undermine the principle of finality.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also said that the Courts need to balance the need for expeditious resolution of execution proceedings with the principles of fairness and due process. Further, it remarked that while efficiency is essential in the administration of justice, Courts must afford parties a reasonable opportunity to present their case and be heard on matters relevant to the execution process. The Court also added that rushing through objections without adequate consideration of the parties&#8217; submissions may result in miscarriage of justice and undermine the credibility of the judicial process.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, as per the Court there is also a need to guard against the misuse of objections under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">47<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC, 1908<\/a> to delay or obstruct the execution process. The Court remarked that the parties may resort to frivolous or dilatory objections to prolong proceedings or gain tactical advantage. Further, it suggested that the Courts must exercise vigilance in identifying and dismissing such objections to ensure expeditious and effective enforcement of decrees.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While dealing with the applicability of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">47<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC, 1908<\/a> to execution of arbitral awards under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544941\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">36<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the Act<\/a>, the Court said that while Section 36 of the Arbitration Act treats arbitral awards as if they were Court decrees for enforcement purposes, it is essential to recognize the legal fiction established by this provision. The phrase &#8220;as if it were&#8221; signifies a hypothetical condition, implying that something is being treated in a manner akin to a particular situation, even if it&#8217;s not factual. Despite this treatment, arbitral awards retain their distinct nature and origin as decisions arising from private contractual agreements between parties and issued by private arbitrators. While they may have the same legal effect as Court decrees once enforced, they are fundamentally different.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further added that the Arbitral awards are distinct from Court judgments in that they arise from private contractual agreements between the parties and are issued by private arbitrators rather than state-appointed judges. Allowing objections under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">47<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC, 1908<\/a> to be raised against arbitral awards would undermine the finality and binding nature of arbitration awards. It would subject arbitral awards to same procedural complexities and delays associated with court proceedings, defeating the purpose of choosing arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, objections under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">47<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC, 1908<\/a>, applicable specifically to execution of decrees, are not maintainable against arbitral awards. This understanding upholds the self-contained nature of Arbitration Act and preserves the finality and binding nature of arbitration awards.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court held that the objections which were sought to be raised by the State under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">47<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC, 1908<\/a> before the Commercial Court were not maintainable and the rejection of the State&#8217;s objections filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">47<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC, 1908<\/a> by the Commercial Court, on grounds of maintainability warrants no interference by this Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Concerning the question that whether writ jurisdiction can be invoked to challenge arbitral award, the Court emphasized that Parties must exhaust all statutory remedies before seeking collateral challenges through writ petitions under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">226<\/a> or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574971\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">227<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court remarked that parties&#8217; failure to raise timely objections under Section 34 and Section 37 of the Arbitration Act will not entitle them to raise these grounds at a later stage by invoking the writ jurisdiction under the Constitution. Writ jurisdiction is extremely limited and cannot be treated as a second chance at the cherry.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court while dismissing the instant writ petition termed it as frivolous, and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,00,000\/- upon the State. Further, it directed the State to file an affidavit of compliance after making the payment in aforesaid terms within five weeks from date of this Judgment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">State of UP v. Raj Veer Singh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/mO7Q8XAD\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine All 1094<\/a>, decided on 16-04-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Advocates for the Petitioners:<\/span> Manish Goyal, AAG, Ashok Kumar Goyal, ACSC<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Advocates for the Respondents:<\/span> Anurag Khanna, Sr. Adv., Punit Kumar Gupta,<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=382\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=382\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-191x300.png\" alt=\"arbitration and conciliation act, 1996\" width=\"191\" height=\"300\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294803\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-191x300.png 191w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-38x60.png 38w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996.png 620w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 191px) 100vw, 191px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Imposition of costs in cases of frivolous litigation is essential to maintain the integrity, efficiency, and fairness of the judicial system. By deterring abuse of the legal process, promoting judicial efficiency, and upholding the principles of fairness and justice, cost imposition serves to safeguard the rights of individuals, protect the integrity of the legal system, and bolster public confidence in the administration of justice.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314936,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2633,40741,2713,30650,67747,37623,67746],"class_list":["post-320388","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitral_award","tag-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996","tag-decree","tag-execution-proceedings","tag-objections-under-s-47-cpc","tag-section-47-cpc","tag-writ-jurisdiction-for-arbitral-awards"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Objections under Section 47 CPC only applicable to execution not maintainable against arbitral award| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Allahabad HC imposed Rs 5 lakhs cost on State, and said that objections under S. 47 CPC are applicable only to execution of decrees not maintainable against arbitral awards\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"&#039;Objections under S. 47 CPC are applicable only to execution of decrees not maintainable against arbitral awards\u2019; Allahabad HC imposes Rs 5 lakhs cost on State\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad HC imposed Rs 5 lakhs cost on State, and said that objections under S. 47 CPC are applicable only to execution of decrees not maintainable against arbitral awards\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-04-19T09:30:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-04-23T06:46:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"&#039;Objections under S. 47 CPC are applicable only to execution of decrees not maintainable against arbitral awards\u2019; Allahabad HC imposes Rs 5 lakhs cost on State\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Objections under Section 47 CPC only applicable to execution not maintainable against arbitral award| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-04-19T09:30:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-04-23T06:46:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Allahabad HC imposed Rs 5 lakhs cost on State, and said that objections under S. 47 CPC are applicable only to execution of decrees not maintainable against arbitral awards\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Allahabad High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"&#8216;Objections under S. 47 CPC are applicable only to execution of decrees not maintainable against arbitral awards\u2019; Allahabad HC imposes Rs 5 lakhs cost on State\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Objections under Section 47 CPC only applicable to execution not maintainable against arbitral award| SCC Times","description":"Allahabad HC imposed Rs 5 lakhs cost on State, and said that objections under S. 47 CPC are applicable only to execution of decrees not maintainable against arbitral awards","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"'Objections under S. 47 CPC are applicable only to execution of decrees not maintainable against arbitral awards\u2019; Allahabad HC imposes Rs 5 lakhs cost on State","og_description":"Allahabad HC imposed Rs 5 lakhs cost on State, and said that objections under S. 47 CPC are applicable only to execution of decrees not maintainable against arbitral awards","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-04-19T09:30:29+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-04-23T06:46:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"'Objections under S. 47 CPC are applicable only to execution of decrees not maintainable against arbitral awards\u2019; Allahabad HC imposes Rs 5 lakhs cost on State","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/","name":"Objections under Section 47 CPC only applicable to execution not maintainable against arbitral award| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-04-19T09:30:29+00:00","dateModified":"2024-04-23T06:46:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Allahabad HC imposed Rs 5 lakhs cost on State, and said that objections under S. 47 CPC are applicable only to execution of decrees not maintainable against arbitral awards","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Allahabad High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"&#8216;Objections under S. 47 CPC are applicable only to execution of decrees not maintainable against arbitral awards\u2019; Allahabad HC imposes Rs 5 lakhs cost on State"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":348539,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/22\/telangana-hc-imposes-rs-5-lakhs-cost-on-hmda-for-filing-vexatious-pleas-avoid-rs-179-cr-award\/","url_meta":{"origin":320388,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Blatant disregard of law, desperation to avoid payment\u2019; Telangana HC imposes Rs 5 Lakhs cost on HMDA for filing vexatious pleas to avoid Rs. 179 Cr award","author":"Editor","date":"May 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWe find the conduct of HMDA not only to be in blatant disregard of the law but also evincing desperation to avoid the processes of law by pushing back their obligation to make payment to CEL by filing one vexatious proceeding after another.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Telangana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":336109,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/27\/calcutta-high-court-restrains-wb-govt-wbidc-property-disposal-essex-award-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":320388,"position":1},"title":"Calcutta HC injuncts West Bengal Govt. from creating any 3rd party interest during pendency of proceedings over \u20b92171 crore Essex arbitral award","author":"Arunima","date":"November 27, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: A petition was filed by Essex Development Investments (Mauritius) Limited (award-holder) seeking the execution of an arbitral award amounting to \u20b92171,87,68,877 against the award-debtors, Government of West Bengal (award-debtor 1) and WBIDC (award-debtor 2); the bench of Shampa Sarkar, J., while considering the prima facie case, balance\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":380935,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sc-executing-court-cannot-go-beyond-decree\/","url_meta":{"origin":320388,"position":2},"title":"Executing Court Bound to Execute Decree as Passed; Can\u2019t Modify Its Terms: Supreme Court","author":"Ritu","date":"April 12, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMerely for the reasons that exchange of some portions of the land may not be practicable for the reason that constructions on it are not as per the sanctioned map or that part of it has been sold off, are all immaterial.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Executing court cannot go beyond decree","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Executing-court-cannot-go-beyond-decree.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Executing-court-cannot-go-beyond-decree.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Executing-court-cannot-go-beyond-decree.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Executing-court-cannot-go-beyond-decree.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335560,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/20\/arbitral-award-enforceable-wherever-it-can-be-executed\/","url_meta":{"origin":320388,"position":3},"title":"Arbitral Award treated as deemed decree; Execution can be initiated anywhere such decree can be executed: Allahabad HC","author":"Editor","date":"November 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court reiterated that Arbitration Act transcends all territorial barriers.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":348037,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/16\/objections-u-s-47-cpc-not-allowed-in-enforcement-proceedings-of-arbitration-award-as-it-undermines-s-34-ac-act-dhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":320388,"position":4},"title":"Objections under S. 47 CPC not allowed in enforcement proceedings of arbitral award, allowing such objection undermines S.34 A&amp;C Act: Delhi HC","author":"Arushi","date":"May 16, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe provisions of CPC are only applicable to the extent of \u2018enforcement\u2019 of an award which are reflected in Order 21 of CPC. The legislature did not intend to permit a challenge an award during enforcement proceedings again on merits as it would be contrary to the objectives of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324891,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/21\/executing-court-must-ascertain-stamp-duty-payment-issue-before-enforcement-of-arbitral-award-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":320388,"position":5},"title":"Executing Court must ascertain stamp duty payment issue before enforcement of Arbitral Award: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"June 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that unilateral appointment of the Arbitrator without the petitioner's consent could render the award void under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/320388","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=320388"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/320388\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314936"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=320388"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=320388"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=320388"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}