{"id":319992,"date":"2024-04-13T11:00:56","date_gmt":"2024-04-13T05:30:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=319992"},"modified":"2024-04-19T09:59:06","modified_gmt":"2024-04-19T04:29:06","slug":"nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/13\/nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"NCLAT upholds Resolution plan and affirms parties\u2019 right to seek redress for \u2018reliefs and concessions\u2019 in Competent Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi:<\/span> In an appeal against the approval of Resolution Plan including the provisions for the use of shared utilities and services, a division bench comprising of Ashok Bhushan,* J., (Chairperson)<\/span> and Mr. Barun Mitra (Technical Member), upheld the approval of the Resolution Plan and all reliefs and concessions granted to facilitate the smooth and successful implementation of the Resolution Plan. The NCLAT emphasised that the same does not restrict the parties’ rights to settle their disputes regarding shared utilities and equipment through appropriate legal channels. The NCLAT stated that<\/p>\n

“…grant of said reliefs and concessions cannot fetter the right of Appellant to enter into a fresh arrangement with SRA with regard to use of shared utilities, nor it can fetter the rights of the Appellant to seek appropriate relief in a competent Court with regard to shared utilities.”<\/p>\n

Brief Facts<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the appellant, the holding company of Corporate Debtor, SARGA Hotel (P) Ltd., leased a parcel of land for a five-star hotel, Westin Hotel, to the Corporate Debtor. A Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated against the Corporate Debtor on Section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (IBC), filed by Yes Bank Ltd. Several interim orders and extensions were granted during the CIRP. The Resolution Plan submitted by respondent 3 was approved by 100% vote share of the Committee of Creditors (CoC). Various applications were filed by the parties, including one by the appellant seeking dismissal of the Resolution Plan. The Adjudicating Authority passed an order dated 04-01-2024 approving the Resolution Plan submitted by respondent 3. Aggrieved by the impugned order passed by the Adjudicating Authority, the appellant, the shareholder of the Corporate Debtor, preferred the present appeal challenging the same. The Resolution Plan included provisions for shared utilities and services, which the appellant contested.<\/p>\n

Moot Point<\/p>\n

Whether the reliefs and concessions granted by the Adjudicating Authority, including access to shared utilities and services situated on land owned by the appellant, were valid?<\/p>\n

Parties’ Contentions<\/p>\n

The appellant contended that the reliefs and concessions granted exceed the scope of the Resolution Plan and adversely affect its rights. It was also argued that the appellant has the right to challenge the Resolution Plan. The Resolution Professional argued that the reliefs and concessions were necessary for the smooth functioning of the Corporate Debtor and were not conditional to the Resolution Plan. The Resolution Professional also disputed the appellant’s standing to challenge the Plan. The CoC supported the Resolution Professional’s arguments and emphasised on the commercial wisdom of the CoC in approving the Plan. The Successful Resolution Applicant stressed that shared services were utilized by both the Corporate Debtor and the appellant, and that the Plan was necessary for the Corporate Debtor’s continuation as a going concern.<\/p>\n

NCLAT’s Decision<\/p>\n

The NCLAT referred to K. Sashidhar<\/span> v. Indian Overseas Bank<\/span>, (2019) 12 SCC 150<\/a> and Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Ltd.<\/span> v. Satish Kumar Gupta<\/span>, (2020) 8 SCC 531<\/a>, where the Supreme Court emphasised the primacy of the CoC’s commercial wisdom in approving Resolution Plans. The Supreme Court held that “the Adjudicating Authority and the Appellate Tribunal are not to sit in appeal over the commercial wisdom of the CoC, which is paramount and non-justiciable and under the scheme of the Code, every dissatisfaction does not partake the character of a legal grievance.”<\/span> The NCLAT emphasised on the necessity of granting reliefs and concessions for the successful implementation of the plan and noted that the said approval did not violate any provisions of Section 30(2) of the IBC.<\/p>\n

The NCLAT upheld the order of the Adjudicating Authority approving the Resolution Plan including provisions for shared utilities and services, citing the commercial wisdom of the CoC. However, the NCLAT clarified that the approval of the Resolution Plan does not restrict the parties from entering fresh arrangements regarding shared utilities and equipment, nor does it prevent them from settling their rights and obligations in a competent court. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with each party bearing its own costs.<\/p>\n

[Shristi Infrastructure Development Corpn. Ltd.<\/span> v. Avishek Gupta<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine NCLAT 451<\/a>, order dated 04-04-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment by Justice Ashok Bhushan<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shyam Aggarwal, Ms. Sugandh Kochhor, Ms. Srishti, Counsel for the Appellant<\/p>\n

Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Pooja Mahajan, Ms. Mahima Singh, Ms. Advocates. Shreya Mahalwan, Ms. Namrata Saraogi, Ms. Shruti Pandey, Counsel for the R1.<\/p>\n

Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raunak Dhillon, Ms. Madhavi Khanna, Mr. Nihaad Dewan, Ms. P. Singh, Counsel for the R2.<\/p>\n

Mr. Joy Saha & Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, Sr. Advocates, Mr. Sidhartha Sharma, Ms. Namrata Basu, Mr. Arjun Asthana, Ms. Shalini Basu, Ms. Trisha Dhera, Counsel for the SRA.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The NCLAT upheld the grant of reliefs and concessions regarding shared utilities and services in Resolution Plan to facilitate the smooth and successful implementation of the Resolution Plan.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":315817,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[43781,18451,46429,30182,22014,67532,30228,67531],"class_list":["post-319992","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-cirp","tag-competent-court","tag-justice-ashok-bhushan","tag-national-company-law-appellate-tribunal","tag-nclat","tag-reliefs-and-concessions","tag-resolution-plan","tag-right-to-seek-redress"],"yoast_head":"\nNCLAT affirms parties\u2019 right to seek redress regarding \u2018reliefs and concessions\u2019 in Competent Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"NCLAT affirmed parties' right to seek redress regarding 'reliefs and concessions' in Competent Court and upheld Resolution Plan's approval.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/13\/nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NCLAT upholds Resolution plan and affirms parties\u2019 right to seek redress for \u2018reliefs and concessions\u2019 in Competent Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"NCLAT affirmed parties' right to seek redress regarding 'reliefs and concessions' in Competent Court and upheld Resolution Plan's approval.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/13\/nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-04-13T05:30:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-04-19T04:29:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"NCLAT upholds Resolution plan and affirms parties\u2019 right to seek redress for \u2018reliefs and concessions\u2019 in Competent Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/13\/nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/13\/nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"NCLAT affirms parties\u2019 right to seek redress regarding \u2018reliefs and concessions\u2019 in Competent Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/13\/nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/13\/nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-04-13T05:30:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-04-19T04:29:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"NCLAT affirmed parties' right to seek redress regarding 'reliefs and concessions' in Competent Court and upheld Resolution Plan's approval.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/13\/nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/13\/nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/13\/nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/13\/nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NCLAT upholds Resolution plan and affirms parties\u2019 right to seek redress for \u2018reliefs and concessions\u2019 in Competent Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCLAT affirms parties\u2019 right to seek redress regarding \u2018reliefs and concessions\u2019 in Competent Court | SCC Times","description":"NCLAT affirmed parties' right to seek redress regarding 'reliefs and concessions' in Competent Court and upheld Resolution Plan's approval.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/13\/nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NCLAT upholds Resolution plan and affirms parties\u2019 right to seek redress for \u2018reliefs and concessions\u2019 in Competent Court","og_description":"NCLAT affirmed parties' right to seek redress regarding 'reliefs and concessions' in Competent Court and upheld Resolution Plan's approval.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/13\/nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-04-13T05:30:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-04-19T04:29:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"NCLAT upholds Resolution plan and affirms parties\u2019 right to seek redress for \u2018reliefs and concessions\u2019 in Competent Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/13\/nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/13\/nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times\/","name":"NCLAT affirms parties\u2019 right to seek redress regarding \u2018reliefs and concessions\u2019 in Competent Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/13\/nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/13\/nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp","datePublished":"2024-04-13T05:30:56+00:00","dateModified":"2024-04-19T04:29:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"NCLAT affirmed parties' right to seek redress regarding 'reliefs and concessions' in Competent Court and upheld Resolution Plan's approval.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/13\/nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/13\/nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/13\/nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/13\/nclat-affirms-parties-right-to-seek-redress-regarding-reliefs-and-concessions-in-competent-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NCLAT upholds Resolution plan and affirms parties\u2019 right to seek redress for \u2018reliefs and concessions\u2019 in Competent Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":315814,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/02\/nclat-affirms-rejection-of-application-for-valuation-queries-post-resolution-plan-approval-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":319992,"position":0},"title":"NCLAT affirms NCLT\u2019s rejection of application for valuation queries post-resolution plan approval","author":"Ritu","date":"March 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In the instant matter, the NCLT rejected the application, noting the approval of the resolution by the Committee of Creditors and the absence of filing through an authorized representative.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":306776,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/07\/belated-claims-even-if-allegedly-due-to-fraud-may-not-be-admitted-once-resolution-plan-is-approved-nclat-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":319992,"position":1},"title":"Belated claims, even if allegedly due to fraud, may not be admitted once Resolution Plan is approved: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"November 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT rejected Resolution Professional\u2019s reliance on Section 17 of the Limitation Act, 1963, as no fraud was found on the part of the Corporate Debtor.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":307298,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/16\/doctrine-of-promissory-estoppel-cannot-be-applied-against-approved-resolution-plan-under-ibc-nclat-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":319992,"position":2},"title":"IBC| Doctrine of promissory estoppel cannot be applied against approved Resolution Plan: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"November 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority\u2019s order on finding no error in rejecting the appellant\u2019s objections to the Resolution Plan.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":312306,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/27\/no-demonstrated-legal-infirmity-or-non-compliance-with-section-302-of-the-ibc-found-nclat-upholds-resolution-plan-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":319992,"position":3},"title":"\u2018No demonstrated legal infirmity or non-compliance with Section 30(2) of the IBC found\u2019; NCLAT upholds Resolution Plan approval","author":"Ritu","date":"January 27, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT held that the commercial wisdom of the CoC was considered paramount, and no interference was justified.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":285793,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/01\/coc-resolution-plan-approved-nclt-application-rejected-direction-for-reconsideration-appeal-nclat-order-set-aside-company-law-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":319992,"position":4},"title":"Once Resolution Plan approved and submitted to Adjudicating Authority, it cannot be sent back for re-consideration: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"March 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In matter related to reconsideration of Resolution Plan after approval, NCLAT held that thought the object of the CIRP is maximisation of value of the Corporate Debtor, but the said maximisation must be achieved within the timeline provided in the scheme.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":348725,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/26\/single-homebuyer-cant-challenge-coc-approved-resolution-plan-nclat-upholds-cocs-commercial-wisdom-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":319992,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Single Homebuyer can\u2019t challenge CoC approved Resolution Plan\u2019; NCLAT upholds CoC\u2019s commercial wisdom","author":"Ritu","date":"May 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Resolution Plan has been approved by 83.46% voting share of the CoC, therefore, at the instance of Appellant, approval of Resolution Plan cannot be allowed to be questioned.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319992","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=319992"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319992\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/315817"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=319992"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=319992"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=319992"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}