{"id":319987,"date":"2024-04-12T19:30:22","date_gmt":"2024-04-12T14:00:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=319987"},"modified":"2024-04-18T09:50:28","modified_gmt":"2024-04-18T04:20:28","slug":"no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"No bar on political parties under Articles 243-ZA or 243-R of the Constitution from contesting municipal elections: Delhi High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> The Division Bench of Manmohan, ACJ., and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J.*<\/span>, opined that there was no bar under Articles <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575022\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">243-ZA<\/a> or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575013\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">243-R<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a> on the political parties from contesting municipal elections. The Court also opined that the adoption of the Symbols by Respondent 3, the State Election Commission of Delhi (&#8216;SEC&#8217;) in the Municipal Elections was reasonable and not arbitrary.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The present petition was filed under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>, seeking the direction of this Court to declare Rules 15 and 24 (Impugned Rules) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation (Election of Councillors) Rules, 2012 (&#8216;2012 Rules&#8217;) as ultra vires the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a> and consequently strike off Part-I of the Nomination Paper contained in Form No. 2 of the 2012 Rules. Petitioner also sought a direction to SEC i.e., to stop putting the reserved symbols of political parties on the list of contesting candidates. Petitioner sought a further direction to the SEC to conduct election of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (&#8216;MCD&#8217;) without the reserved symbols, which allegedly violated fundamental rights of petitioner enshrined under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">14<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>. Petitioner contested the General Election to MCD-2022 from Ward No. 150, Green Park as an independent candidate and lost the said election.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Petitioner submitted that the impugned Rules impinge upon conduct of the free and fair municipal elections and the impugned Rules violate Articles <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575022\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">243-ZA<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575006\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">243-K<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>. The impugned Rules aim to create a class of candidates which was not defined or recognized under Part IX or IX-A of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>. The presence of reserved symbols of political party on the list of contesting candidates was arbitrary as the same takes away the level playing field for all the candidates, and thus was violative of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">14<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Petitioner stated that reserved symbols were not used for the Gram Panchayat elections, which were governed by Part-IX of the Constitution as they were meant for grass-root level democracy and similarly, reserved symbols should not be used for municipal elections held under Part-IX A of the Constitution. Further, in the absence of a corresponding provision in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002948396\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957<\/a> (&#8216;DMC Act&#8217;) akin to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001558765\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">29-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002801315\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Representation of People Act, 1951<\/a> (&#8216;1951 Act&#8217;), the 2012 Rules could not grant recognition to use of the name and reserved symbols of National parties as well as State parties in the elections of MCD.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the right of the political parties to participate and contest the elections was recognized by the Election Commission of India (&#8216;ECI&#8217;), independent of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001558765\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">29-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002801315\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1951 Act<\/a> and even prior to its incorporation in the 1951 Act. The Court further observed that the power of superintendence, direction, and control of the preparation of electoral rolls for, and the conduct of, elections of MCD were vested in the SEC under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575022\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">243-ZA<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a> and this Constitutional power of the SEC was also statutorily recognized under Section 7 of the DMC Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The SEC exercising its power under Section 7 of the DMC Act read with Rule 15 of the 2012 Rules, had issued Municipal Corporation of Delhi Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 2022 (Symbol Order 2022) for the elections held in 2022 and granted recognition to the National and State Parties already recognised by ECI. Even in the absence of the impugned Rule 15, the power of SEC to grant recognition to political parties, like ECI could be traced to its powers under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575022\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">243-ZA<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a> and Section 7 of the DMC Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Kanhiya Lal Omar v. R.K. Trivedi<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/SearchResult.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(1985) 4 SCC 628<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court held that the recognition granted by SEC to the political parties to contest municipal elections was within its jurisdiction and not ultra vires. The Court opined that there was no bar under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575022\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">243-ZA<\/a> or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575013\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">243-R<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a> on political parties from contesting municipal elections.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the backbone of the Indian democracy were the people itself, who go on to choose their representative by way of direct election. The Court observed that in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sadiq Ali v. Election Commission of India<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/SearchResult.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(1972) 4 SCC 664<\/a>, the Supreme Court while testing the constitutional vires of Para 15 of the Symbols Order, 1968, deliberated upon the genesis of introduction of symbols system in the elections of India. Therefore, the Court opined that the adoption of the Symbols by the SEC in the Municipal Elections was reasonable and not arbitrary.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court relied on Alka Ghalot v. State (NCT of Delhi), WP(C) 1189 of 2021, wherein the issue of disruption of level playing field in MCD elections was raised and the petition was dismissed observing that it was not shown that any different process of allotment of symbols was followed in the National or the State Election, which would prove the violation of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">14<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>. Thus, the Court opined that the plea of violation of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">14<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a> did not survive for consideration.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that SEC in the Symbol Order 2022 had granted recognition to the National and State Parties already recognized by ECI and provided for allotment of Symbols to contesting candidates. Thus, the Court opined that the Symbol Order 2022 issued by the SEC in exercise of its powers under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575022\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">243-ZA<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>, Section 7 of the DMC Act and Rule 15 of the 2012 Rules was not ultra vires. The Court dismissed the present petition being devoid of merit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Lokesh Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi), <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/4m5Nj51r\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Del 2553<\/a>, decided on 3-4-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Petitioner: Hargyan Singh Gahlot, Manoj Kumar Badriwal, Advocates<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Respondent: Sameer Vashisht, ASC (Civil); Neeraj, SPC; Vedansh Anand, Government Pleader; Rudra Paliwal, Mahesh Kumar Rathore, Sanjay Pal, Aman Singh, Harshita Nathrani, Advocates<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The backbone of the Indian democracy are the people itself, who go on to choose their representative by way of direct election.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[67523,67522,2749,19471,2543,49137,33315,3413,67524],"class_list":["post-319987","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-243-r","tag-articles-243-za","tag-bar","tag-constitution","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-election-symbols","tag-municipal-elections","tag-political_parties","tag-state-election-commission-of-delhi"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>No bar on political parties under Article 243-ZA or 243-R of the Constitution from contesting municipal elections: Delhi HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that there was no bar on the political parties under Articles 243-ZA or 243-R of the Constitution from contesting municipal elections.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No bar on political parties under Articles 243-ZA or 243-R of the Constitution from contesting municipal elections: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that there was no bar on the political parties under Articles 243-ZA or 243-R of the Constitution from contesting municipal elections.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-04-12T14:00:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-04-18T04:20:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"No bar on political parties under Articles 243-ZA or 243-R of the Constitution from contesting municipal elections: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"No bar on political parties under Article 243-ZA or 243-R of the Constitution from contesting municipal elections: Delhi HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-04-12T14:00:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-04-18T04:20:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court held that there was no bar on the political parties under Articles 243-ZA or 243-R of the Constitution from contesting municipal elections.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"No bar on political parties under Articles 243-ZA or 243-R of the Constitution from contesting municipal elections: Delhi High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No bar on political parties under Article 243-ZA or 243-R of the Constitution from contesting municipal elections: Delhi HC | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court held that there was no bar on the political parties under Articles 243-ZA or 243-R of the Constitution from contesting municipal elections.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No bar on political parties under Articles 243-ZA or 243-R of the Constitution from contesting municipal elections: Delhi High Court","og_description":"Delhi High Court held that there was no bar on the political parties under Articles 243-ZA or 243-R of the Constitution from contesting municipal elections.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-04-12T14:00:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-04-18T04:20:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"No bar on political parties under Articles 243-ZA or 243-R of the Constitution from contesting municipal elections: Delhi High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news\/","name":"No bar on political parties under Article 243-ZA or 243-R of the Constitution from contesting municipal elections: Delhi HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-04-12T14:00:22+00:00","dateModified":"2024-04-18T04:20:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Delhi High Court held that there was no bar on the political parties under Articles 243-ZA or 243-R of the Constitution from contesting municipal elections.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/no-bar-on-political-parties-from-contesting-municipal-elections-dhc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"No bar on political parties under Articles 243-ZA or 243-R of the Constitution from contesting municipal elections: Delhi High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":319981,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/delhi-hc-rejects-vck-partys-petition-to-allot-pot-symbol-for-contesting-2024-general-elections-scctimes\/","url_meta":{"origin":319987,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court rejects VCK party\u2019s petition to allot \u201cPOT\u201d symbol for contesting 2024 General Elections","author":"Arushi","date":"April 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cPetitioner has simply mentioned the numerical number of constituencies it intends to contest without complying with the mandatory provisions of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316181,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/dhc-upholds-first-come-first-served-basis-to-allot-free-election-symbols-to-unrecognized-parties-legal-news-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":319987,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court upholds \u2018first-come-first-served\u2019 basis to allot free election symbols to unrecognized parties","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cPetitioner is seeking to retain an advantage for the registered unrecognized political parties to get continued access to a particular free symbol and therefore indirectly converting a free symbol into a reserved symbol.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":208434,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/19\/kar-hc-municipal-elections-repetition-of-reservation-in-any-ward-for-any-category-anti-thesis-of-rotation-principle-envisaged-under-article-243-t-of-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":319987,"position":2},"title":"Kar HC | Municipal elections: Repetition of reservation in any ward for any category \u2013 anti-thesis of rotation principle envisaged under Article 243-T of Constitution  \u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 19, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: The Bench of S. Sunil Dutt Yadav, J. allowed a civil writ petition challenging State\u2019s notification dated 10-08-2018 which stipulated reservation for various wards of Mangaluru City Corporation in the upcoming elections. Petitioners, being aspirant candidates who intended to contest elections in various wards, contended that the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":340772,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/07\/s-29a-representation-of-people-act-does-not-confer-upon-eci-to-supervise-internal-elections-of-political-party-dhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":319987,"position":3},"title":"Section 29A of Representation of People Act, 1951 does not confer upon ECI to supervise internal elections of registered political party: Delhi HC","author":"Arushi","date":"February 7, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"It is not for the Election Commission of India (\u2018ECI\u2019) to resolve internal management disputes of political parties and in case of any grievance, the remedy may lie in taking recourse to filing a declaratory suit or any other appropriate civil remedy.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316086,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/04\/thc-upholds-validity-of-s-382-rpa-legal-news-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":319987,"position":4},"title":"Telangana HC upholds validity of S.38(2) of RPA which provides for preferential treatment to candidates of political party over other independent candidates","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSection 38(2) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, does not treat the equals as unequals, as the candidates belonging to recognized political parties, registered political parties and independent political parties stand on a different footing.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Telangana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":329900,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/delhi-hc-rejects-plea-expelled-jdu-member-against-internal-election-nitish-kumar-party-president\/","url_meta":{"origin":319987,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court rejects plea by expelled JDU member against internal election of Nitish Kumar as party president","author":"Editor","date":"September 3, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018The functions performed by the Election Commission of India under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 are essentially quasi-judicial in nature, and any order issued thereunder constitutes a quasi-judicial order.\u2019","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319987","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=319987"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319987\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=319987"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=319987"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=319987"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}