{"id":319732,"date":"2024-04-08T17:00:05","date_gmt":"2024-04-08T11:30:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=319732"},"modified":"2024-04-08T16:57:33","modified_gmt":"2024-04-08T11:27:33","slug":"murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence\/","title":{"rendered":"Murder convict acquitted by Jharkhand High Court after eight years due to insufficient circumstantial evidence"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Jharkhand High Court:<\/span> In the instant criminal appeal preferred in 2017 by the convict against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the Trial Court in 2016 under Section 302<\/a> of Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (“IPC”), the Division Bench of Subhash Chand*<\/span>. and Ananda Sen, JJ., held that the prosecution had failed to prove their case beyond reasonable doubt, and therefore the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence issued by the Trial Court requires interference. The Court thus set aside the conviction and sentence and the convict was acquitted of the charge levelled against him and was directed to be released.<\/p>\n

Background<\/p>\n

The convict-appellant preferred a criminal appeal against the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence by the Trial Court under Section 302 of the Penal Code, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-III, West Singhbum, before the High Court.<\/p>\n

In 2012, the informant submitted a written information with the concerned police station, wherein he alleged that the convict murdered his mother by throttling her, due to an alleged land dispute.<\/p>\n

The Trial Court, holding the accused guilty for the offence under Section 302<\/a> of IPC<\/a>, sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life, along with fine of Rs.10,000.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Judgment<\/p>\n

The Court scrutinised the evidence to determine the legality and propriety of the impugned judgment and sentencing order of the Trial Court.<\/p>\n

The Court said that the instant case was based on last seen evidence alone and the same remained uncorroborated by any other evidence.in that regard, the Court referred to the case of Jabir<\/span> v. State of Uttarakhand<\/span>, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 32<\/a>, where the Supreme Court held that the court should not convict any accused only based on the last seen circumstances.<\/p>\n

About the case of the prosecution that is based on circumstantial evidence, the Court pointed out that the evidence of motive becomes relevant and important, as for the lack of same, a prosecution case becomes doubtful.<\/p>\n

Regarding the afore-stated pint, the Court relied on the case of Nandu Singh<\/span> v. State of Madhya Pradesh<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1454<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court held that the absence of motive in case of circumstantial evidence weighs in favour of accused.<\/p>\n

It was also said by the Court in the instant case that the prosecution’s case is based on circumstantial evidence and the chain of circumstantial evidence is incomplete from the evidence adduced on behalf of the prosecution. It was further pointed out that circumstantial evidence should be conclusive, and free of every possibility of the hypothesis except the one to be proved.<\/p>\n

Therefore, the Court noted that the impugned conviction was solely based on last seen evidence which was not corroborated with any evidence, hence the same cannot be said to be just and proper.<\/p>\n

The Court also relied on the case of Sharad Birdhichand Sarda<\/span> v. State of Maharashtra<\/span>, (1984) 4 SCC 116<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court laid down five golden principles to be followed in a case that is based on circumstantial evidence, which are-<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    circumstances from which the conclusion of guilt is to be drawn must be fully established.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    the facts so established must not be explainable on any other hypothesis except the guilt of the accused.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  3. \n

    the circumstances should conclusive nature.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  4. \n

    the circumstances should exclude every possible hypothesis except the one to be proved.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  5. \n

    the chain of evidence must be so complete that there are no gaps that leave out any reasonable grounds for innocence of the accused and must establish that the act must have been performed by the accused.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    In the view of the above analysis, the Court, while allowing the criminal appeal, held that the prosecution had failed to prove their case beyond reasonable doubt, and the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence passed by the Trial Court requires interference.<\/p>\n

    Hence the impugned judgment and order of the Trial Court was set aside and the convict was acquitted of the charge levelled against him and was directed to be released.<\/p>\n

    [Sur Singh Sidhu v. State of Jharkhand, 2024 SCC OnLine Jhar 657<\/a>, Judgment on 18-03-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n

    Judgment by Justice Subhash Chand<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

    Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

    Advocates for the Appellant: Varsha Ramsisaria<\/p>\n

    Advocates for the Respondent: Priya Shreshtha, Special Public Prosecutor<\/p>\n

    Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

    \"penal<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    The Court noted that the conviction was solely based on last seen evidence and it was not corroborated with any evidence, hence it could not be said to be just and proper.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":317614,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[4561,6431,3433,30436,5791,67388,3156,52113,67389],"class_list":["post-319732","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-acquittal","tag-beyond-reasonable-doubt","tag-circumstantial_evidence","tag-convict","tag-jharkhand-high-court","tag-last-seen-evidence","tag-murder","tag-section-302-of-penal-code","tag-subhash-chand-and-ananda-sen"],"yoast_head":"\nMurder convict acquitted after 8 years due to lack of proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Murder convict acquitted by Jharkhand HC after eight years due to the insufficient proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Murder convict acquitted by Jharkhand High Court after eight years due to insufficient circumstantial evidence\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Murder convict acquitted by Jharkhand HC after eight years due to the insufficient proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-04-08T11:30:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Murder convict acquitted by Jharkhand High Court after eight years due to insufficient circumstantial evidence\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence\/\",\"name\":\"Murder convict acquitted after 8 years due to lack of proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-04-08T11:30:05+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Murder convict acquitted by Jharkhand HC after eight years due to the insufficient proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Jharkhand High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Murder convict acquitted by Jharkhand High Court after eight years due to insufficient circumstantial evidence\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Murder convict acquitted after 8 years due to lack of proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt","description":"Murder convict acquitted by Jharkhand HC after eight years due to the insufficient proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Murder convict acquitted by Jharkhand High Court after eight years due to insufficient circumstantial evidence","og_description":"Murder convict acquitted by Jharkhand HC after eight years due to the insufficient proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-04-08T11:30:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Murder convict acquitted by Jharkhand High Court after eight years due to insufficient circumstantial evidence","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence\/","name":"Murder convict acquitted after 8 years due to lack of proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-04-08T11:30:05+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Murder convict acquitted by Jharkhand HC after eight years due to the insufficient proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Jharkhand High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/murder-convict-acquitted-by-jharkhand-high-court-after-eight-years-due-to-insufficient-circumstantial-evidence\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Murder convict acquitted by Jharkhand High Court after eight years due to insufficient circumstantial evidence"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":327220,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/not-necessary-to-prove-motive-behind-offence-when-eyewitness-testimony-credible-jhc-upholds-conviction\/","url_meta":{"origin":319732,"position":0},"title":"Not necessary to prove motive behind offence, when eyewitness testimony is credible: Jharkhand HC upholds conviction","author":"Arushi","date":"July 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that admittedly, the death is homicidal, and the doctor also found that the cause of death is injury, which was inflicted upon the deceased persons. Therefore, the ocular evidence corroborates with the medical evidence.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287201,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/18\/supreme-court-remarks-judgment-by-chhattisgarh-high-court-as-sketchy-acquits-murder-convict-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":319732,"position":1},"title":"Supreme Court finds Chhattisgarh High Court’s judgment \u2018Sketchy\u2019; Acquits murder convict in a 20-year-old case","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court said that the cherished principles or golden threads of proof beyond reasonable doubt which runs through the web of our law should not be stretched morbidly which was done by the Courts below.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sketchy","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-783.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-783.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-783.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-783.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280788,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/02\/allahabad-high-court-removing-the-corpse-from-place-of-murder-does-not-cause-disappearance-of-evidence-of-murder\/","url_meta":{"origin":319732,"position":2},"title":"Allahabad High Court | Removing the corpse from place of murder does not cause disappearance of evidence of murder","author":"Editor","date":"January 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court observed that Section 201 IPC looks upon a person giving false information with intent to screen an offender as an accessory after the fact and makes him culpable as an offender committing an offence against public justice. It partly allowed the appeal against conviction under Section 201\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":291587,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/last-seen-evidence-not-irrevocable-conclusion-complete-chain-of-evidence-necessary-supreme-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":319732,"position":3},"title":"Last seen evidence does not lead to irrevocable conclusion without complete chain of evidence establishing guilt; SC acquits convict in a 23-year-old murder case","author":"Editor","date":"May 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court said that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt and the case did not pass the standard required in a case of circumstantial evidence.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"last seen evidence","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/last-seen-evidence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/last-seen-evidence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/last-seen-evidence.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/last-seen-evidence.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":322672,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/sikkim-hc-sets-murder-convict-free-due-to-weak-circumstantial-evidence-of-prosecution\/","url_meta":{"origin":319732,"position":4},"title":"Man convicted of murdering a government employee, set free by Sikkim HC due to gaps in circumstantial evidence","author":"Editor","date":"May 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court said that the prosecution evidence must establish that the accused was the perpetrator of the offence and no one else.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sikkim High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335745,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/orissa-high-court-acquits-two-accused-convicted-due-to-circumstantial-evidence-and-suspicious-conduct\/","url_meta":{"origin":319732,"position":5},"title":"Suspicion alone insufficient for conviction; Orissa High Court acquits two and convicts one in murder case","author":"Editor","date":"November 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn dealing with circumstantial evidence, there is always a danger that conjecture or suspicion lingering on mind might take the place of proof and therefore, the Court has to be watchful and ensure that such thing should not take place.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319732","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=319732"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319732\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317614"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=319732"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=319732"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=319732"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}