{"id":319376,"date":"2024-04-04T10:00:35","date_gmt":"2024-04-04T04:30:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=319376"},"modified":"2024-04-06T11:22:06","modified_gmt":"2024-04-06T05:52:06","slug":"pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Pendency of a criminal case cannot be a ground to refuse renewal of passport\u2019; Telangana HC directs renewal for a period of ten years"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Telangana High Court:<\/span> The petitioner approached the Court seeking to pass an order\/direction more so in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare that Respondent 2’s action in refusing passport services to petitioner vide order dated 30-1-2024 (‘impugned order’) on account of pendency of a case before the XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad as illegal, high handed and arbitrary apart from being in violation of petitioner’s rights under Articles 14<\/a>, 19<\/a> and 21<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a> and consequently set aside the order dated 30-1-2024 and direct Respondent 2 to renew petitioner’s passport for ten years.<\/p>\n

Surepalli Nanda, J.<\/span>, opined that pendency of a criminal case could not be ground to deny passport facilities to petitioner since petitioner’s right to personal liberty not only included petitioner’s right to travel abroad, but also petitioner’s right to possess or hold a passport. The Court directed Respondent 2 to re-consider petitioner’s application and pass appropriate orders for issuance of passport for a period of ten years.<\/p>\n

Background<\/p>\n

Petitioner submitted that he had a valid passport issued on 9-8-2023 which was valid up to 8-8-2024 and as petitioner’s passport was due to expire, an application for its renewal was filed dated 25-1-2024 and Respondent 2, vide letter dated 30-1-2024 sought clarification from petitioner for issuing the renewed passport on the ground of adverse police report, since petitioner was involved in a criminal case under Sections 420<\/a>, 468<\/a>, 471<\/a> of the Penal Code, 1860<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The impugned order dated 30-1-2024 was issued by Respondent 2 intimating that it was decided by the competent authority to refuse passport services to petitioner under Section 5(2)(c)<\/a> of the Passports Act, 1967<\/a> (‘the Act’), to be read with Section 6(2)(f)<\/a> of the Act<\/a>, in view of pendency of a case against petitioner and further Respondent 2 sought for, acquittal order from the case or obtain permission to travel abroad from the same Court, where the criminal case was pending for re-considering petitioner’s application. Aggrieved by the said proceedings dated 30-1-2024 issued by Respondent 2, petitioner filed the present writ petition.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the impugned order dated 30-1-2024 issued to petitioner by Respondent 2 indicated that the passport services to petitioner were denied by on account of pendency of case under Sections 420<\/a>, 468<\/a>, 471<\/a> of the IPC<\/a>, and that petitioner was falsely implicated in the said case and that issue pertains to certain immovable property which belonged to his relative and that petitioner was always available to the police and would cooperate with the investigation.<\/p>\n

The Court opined that pendency of a criminal case could not be ground to deny passport facilities to petitioner since petitioner’s right to personal liberty not only included petitioner’s right to travel abroad, but also petitioner’s right to possess or hold a passport. The Court opined that the act of Respondent 2 was contrary to the procedure laid down under the Act and the principle laid down by the Supreme Court in Vangala Kasturi Rangacharyulu<\/span> v. CBI<\/span>, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 3549<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Court relied on Sumit Mehta v State (NCT of Delhi)<\/span>, (2013) 15 SCC 570<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court observed that “the law presumes an accused to be innocent till his guilt is proved. As a presumable innocent person, he is entitled to all the fundamental rights including the right to liberty guaranteed under Article 21<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a>”<\/span>. The Court also relied on Maneka Gandhi<\/span> v. Union of India<\/span>, (1978) 1 SCC 248<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court held that “no person can be deprived of his right to go abroad unless there is a law enabling the State to do so and such law contains fair, reasonable and just procedure”<\/span>.<\/p>\n

This Court in Ravi Kumar Panasa<\/span> v. Union of India<\/span>, W.P. 11674 of 2022, while interpreting the provisions of the Gazette Notification issued by the Central Government vide GSR No.570(E) dated 25-8-1993 (‘the Gazette Notification’) wherein instructions were issued to renew the passport only for a period of one year, in case where criminal cases were pending, if no time frame was mentioned by the Courts; and Rule 12 of Passport Rules 1980 (‘the 1980 Rules’), had held that Passports should be renewed for a period of ten years in accordance with Rule 12 of the 1980 Rules. This Court took a similar view in Venkata Padmaja Polisetti<\/span> v. Union of India<\/span>, W.P. 17965 of 2023.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court allowed the writ petition and set aside the impugned order dated 30-1-2024 passed by Respondent 2. The Court directed Respondent 2 to re-consider the application dated 25-1-2024 of petitioner and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law for issuance of passport for a period of ten years, under Section 10<\/a> of the Act<\/a> and under Rule 12 of the 1980 Rules, without reference to the Criminal Proceedings pending against petitioner and the Gazette Notification.<\/p>\n

[Venkata Siva Kumar Yadhanapudi v. Union of India, 2024 SCC OnLine TS 402<\/a>, Order dated 14-3-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Petitioner: S. Nagesh Reddy, Counsel<\/p>\n

For the Respondents: A.S. Vasudevan, Counsel<\/p>\n

Buy Constitution of India  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Respondent 2’s act is contrary to the procedure laid down under the Passports Act, 1967 and the principle laid down by the Supreme Court in Vangala Kasturi Rangacharyulu v. CBI, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 3549.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":315575,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31928,67186,3397,8021,32846,34241,67187,48915,47381,33941],"class_list":["post-319376","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-criminal-case","tag-ground-to-refuse","tag-passport","tag-pendency","tag-renewal","tag-renewal-of-passport","tag-right-to-hold-possess-passport","tag-right-to-personal-liberty","tag-right-to-travel-abroad","tag-telangana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\n\u2018Pendency of a criminal case cannot be a ground to refuse renewal of passport\u2019; Telangana HC directs renewal for a period of ten years | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Telangana High Court directed passport renewal for ten years and held that pendency of a criminal case could not be a ground to refuse passport renewal.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Pendency of a criminal case cannot be a ground to refuse renewal of passport\u2019; Telangana HC directs renewal for a period of ten years\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Telangana High Court directed passport renewal for ten years and held that pendency of a criminal case could not be a ground to refuse passport renewal.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-04-04T04:30:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-04-06T05:52:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Pendency of a criminal case cannot be a ground to refuse renewal of passport\u2019; Telangana HC directs renewal for a period of ten years\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"\u2018Pendency of a criminal case cannot be a ground to refuse renewal of passport\u2019; Telangana HC directs renewal for a period of ten years | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-04-04T04:30:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-04-06T05:52:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Telangana High Court directed passport renewal for ten years and held that pendency of a criminal case could not be a ground to refuse passport renewal.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Telangana High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Pendency of a criminal case cannot be a ground to refuse renewal of passport\u2019; Telangana HC directs renewal for a period of ten years\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u2018Pendency of a criminal case cannot be a ground to refuse renewal of passport\u2019; Telangana HC directs renewal for a period of ten years | SCC Times","description":"Telangana High Court directed passport renewal for ten years and held that pendency of a criminal case could not be a ground to refuse passport renewal.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Pendency of a criminal case cannot be a ground to refuse renewal of passport\u2019; Telangana HC directs renewal for a period of ten years","og_description":"Telangana High Court directed passport renewal for ten years and held that pendency of a criminal case could not be a ground to refuse passport renewal.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-04-04T04:30:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-04-06T05:52:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Pendency of a criminal case cannot be a ground to refuse renewal of passport\u2019; Telangana HC directs renewal for a period of ten years","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news\/","name":"\u2018Pendency of a criminal case cannot be a ground to refuse renewal of passport\u2019; Telangana HC directs renewal for a period of ten years | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-04-04T04:30:35+00:00","dateModified":"2024-04-06T05:52:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Telangana High Court directed passport renewal for ten years and held that pendency of a criminal case could not be a ground to refuse passport renewal.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Telangana High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/pendency-of-criminal-case-no-ground-to-refuse-passport-renewal-telhc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Pendency of a criminal case cannot be a ground to refuse renewal of passport\u2019; Telangana HC directs renewal for a period of ten years"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":237488,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/kar-hc-elaborating-upon-s-6-of-passport-act-court-directs-for-renewal-of-passport-to-authorities-concerned-irrespective-of-a-pending-criminal-case-against-petitioner\/","url_meta":{"origin":319376,"position":0},"title":"Kar HC | Elaborating upon S.6 of Passport Act, Court directs for renewal of passport to authorities concerned irrespective of a pending criminal case against petitioner","author":"Editor","date":"October 15, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Hemant Chandangoudar J., while allowing the Writ Petition against the Passport Authority, elaborated upon the relevant provisions of the Passport Act and the Right to unhindered movement as a facet to Article 21. Brief Facts This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the constitution praying\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":258755,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/20\/can-pendency-of-matrimonial-cases-be-a-ground-to-deny-a-passport\/","url_meta":{"origin":319376,"position":1},"title":"Can someone’s passport be impounded merely because a case under S. 498-A IPC is pending or a red corner notice issued? MP HC unravels","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Sujoy Paul, J., held that the pendency of matrimonial cases alone cannot be a ground to decline the renewal of the passport. In the present matter, the petitioner was a travel blogger and consultant who approached the Court a second time against the action of Regional\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":211720,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/11\/ker-hc-show-cause-notice-issued-under-passport-act-must-be-considered-by-authority-only-after-hearing-the-affected-party\/","url_meta":{"origin":319376,"position":2},"title":"Ker HC | Show-cause notice issued under Passport Act must be considered by Authority only after hearing the affected party","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: The Bench of Devan Ramachandran, J. disposed of a petition cautioning Passport Authority of not taking any action against the petitioner without properly notifying him as any action taken against him without his knowledge, might be detrimental to his employment in the USA. Petitioner herein had applied\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":211414,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/ker-hc-pendency-of-criminal-case-concealed-in-passport-application-applicant-liable-to-pay-compounding-fee-and-give-reasons-for-such-suppression\/","url_meta":{"origin":319376,"position":3},"title":"Ker HC | Pendency of criminal case concealed in passport application \u2013 applicant liable to pay compounding fee and give reasons for such suppression","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: The Bench of Devan Ramachandran, J. allowed a petition for consideration of passport application a person entangled in a criminal proceeding. Petitioner\u2019s case was that the 2nd respondent (Regional Passport Officer) was refusing to issue passport to him in spite of his valid application, for no tenable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":280166,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/allahabad-high-court-reiterates-moea-notification-that-even-during-the-pendency-of-criminal-case-passport-could-be-issued-renewed-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":319376,"position":4},"title":"MoEA notification that even during the pendency of criminal case, passport could be issued\/renewed; Allahabad High Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"December 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The reports of non-cognizable cases in which the Magistrate had not even ordered for investigation were being considered for rejection of passport, thus, the Allahabad High Court directed the DG of Police to instruct his officers to give a report regarding the pendency of reports in non-cognizable cases after proper\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":331043,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/mere-pendency-of-criminal-case-when-negative-final-report-is-filed-not-a-ground-for-refusal-to-issue-passport-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":319376,"position":5},"title":"Mere pendency of criminal case, where negative final report has been filed, not a ground to refuse passport: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"September 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that the petitioner\u2019s case is not covered by the expression \u201cproceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by the applicant are pending before a criminal Court in India\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319376","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=319376"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319376\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/315575"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=319376"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=319376"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=319376"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}