{"id":319230,"date":"2024-04-03T12:00:53","date_gmt":"2024-04-03T06:30:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=319230"},"modified":"2024-04-05T16:30:24","modified_gmt":"2024-04-05T11:00:24","slug":"cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"CoCs cannot consider Resolution Plans from applicants not listed in Prospective Resolution Applicants\u2019 List: NCLAT"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi:<\/span> In an appeal challenging the order of Adjudicating Authority which allowed the Committee of Creditors (CoCs) to consider the Resolution Plan of the applicant subject to certain conditions, a 3-member bench comprising of Ashok Bhushan, J., Mr. Barun Mitra, (Technical Member) and Arun Baroka (Technical Member), held that that Resolution Plans from applicants which are not included in the list of Prospective Resolution Applicants (PRAs) cannot be considered by the CoCs.<\/p>\n

“When no fresh Form G has been issued, it is not open for any new applicant to submit application before the Adjudicating Authority for being permitted to participate in the CIRP and submit Resolution Plan.”<\/p>\n

The instant matter involves two appeals filed by appellant, Ashdan Properties (P) Ltd., challenging the orders passed by the Adjudicating Authority. The Adjudicating Authority directed the CoC to consider the Resolution Plan of the Applicant subject to allowing a fresh opportunity for all Resolution Applicants to revise their bids. Another order directed the Resolution Professional to present the Plans of B-Right Real Estate Ltd. and MGN Agro Properties (P) Ltd. to the CoC for consideration, with a strict deadline set for further submissions. The appellant, having undergone 33 rounds of bidding and declared H1, objected to the consideration of new applicants whose names were not in the list of PRAs. The CoC, via affidavit, conveyed its decision to only negotiate with the existing Resolution Applicants listed as PRAs. The core issue revolved around the consideration of Resolution Plans by the CoC from entities whose names were not included in the final list of PRAs.<\/p>\n

The appellant contended that the application was filed by Patanjali Ayurveda Ltd. and two other applicants who were not included in the list of PRAs. The appellant argued that since these applicants were not included in the list of PRAs, there was no reason to issue a direction to the CoC to consider their application or Resolution Plan. However, the respondent argued that the CoC had accepted the application submitted by Patanjali Ayurveda Ltd., so they should also consider the applications of the other intervenors\/applicants.<\/p>\n

The NCLAT noted that Regulation 39(1)(b) of CIRP Regulations, 2016 prohibited the consideration of a Resolution Plan from an entity not listed as a PRA and Regulation 36A permitted the CoC to modify the Invitation for Expression of Interest and decide not to proceed with new applications. The NCLAT observed that as per Regulation 39(1)(b) of CIRP Regulations, the committee shall not consider a resolution plan received from an application whose name does not appear in the list of PRAs. It was further observed that without a fresh Form G being issued it is not open for any new applicant to submit application before the Adjudicating Authority for being permitted to participate in the CIRP and submit Resolution Plan. Furthermore, the CoC has filed an affidavit stating that they have decided not to consider any additional new entrants and will confine their consideration to Resolution Applicants whose names were there in the final list of PRAs dated 07-11-2023.<\/p>\n

The NCLAT allowed the appeals and set aside the orders dated 12-02-2024 and 21-02-2024 and held that Resolution Plans from applicants not included in the list of PRAs cannot be considered by the CoCs.<\/p>\n

[Ashdan Properties (P) Ltd.<\/span> v. Mamta Binani<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine NCLAT 386<\/a>, order dated 18-03-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Sonam Mhatre, Mr. Akash Kakade, Mr. Darshil Thakkar, Mr. Somnath Padhan, Ms. Namrata Saraogi, Mr. Swetab Kumar, Mr. Kartik Pandey, Mr. Pawan Kaushik, Counsel for the Appellant<\/p>\n

Mr. Sandeep Bajaj, Ms. Aakanksha Nehra, Ms. Gunjan Nauyar, Counsel for the Respondent No. 1<\/p>\n

Mr. Gautam Singh, Mr. Aditya Vaibhav Singh, Counsel for the Respondent No. 3<\/p>\n

Mr. Gaurav Mitra with Ms. Neha Bhosle, Ms. Laveena Tejwani, Sr. Advocate, Counsel for the Respondent No. CoC<\/p>\n

Mr. Sameer Pandit, Ms. Sarreh Khambati, Mr. Aman Raj Gandhi, Ms. Saloni Kumar, Mr. Devanshu Behl, Counsel for the Respondents<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

NCLAT held that CoCs’ resolution not to consider Resolution Plans from additional new entrants rendered the NCLAT’s orders unsustainable.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":315817,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[16621,48843,32458,46429,30182,22014,67137,30228],"class_list":["post-319230","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-16621","tag-cirp-regulations","tag-committee-of-creditors","tag-justice-ashok-bhushan","tag-national-company-law-appellate-tribunal","tag-nclat","tag-prospective-resolution-applicants","tag-resolution-plan"],"yoast_head":"\nCoCs cannot consider Resolution Plans from applicants not listed in Prospective Resolution Applicants\u2019 List: NCLAT | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"NCLAT held that the CoCs cannot consider Resolution Plans from applicants not listed in Prospective Resolution Applicants\u2019 List.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"CoCs cannot consider Resolution Plans from applicants not listed in Prospective Resolution Applicants\u2019 List: NCLAT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"NCLAT held that the CoCs cannot consider Resolution Plans from applicants not listed in Prospective Resolution Applicants\u2019 List.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-04-03T06:30:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-04-05T11:00:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"CoCs cannot consider Resolution Plans from applicants not listed in Prospective Resolution Applicants\u2019 List: NCLAT\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"CoCs cannot consider Resolution Plans from applicants not listed in Prospective Resolution Applicants\u2019 List: NCLAT | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-04-03T06:30:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-04-05T11:00:24+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"NCLAT held that the CoCs cannot consider Resolution Plans from applicants not listed in Prospective Resolution Applicants\u2019 List.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CoCs cannot consider Resolution Plans from applicants not listed in Prospective Resolution Applicants\u2019 List: NCLAT\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CoCs cannot consider Resolution Plans from applicants not listed in Prospective Resolution Applicants\u2019 List: NCLAT | SCC Times","description":"NCLAT held that the CoCs cannot consider Resolution Plans from applicants not listed in Prospective Resolution Applicants\u2019 List.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"CoCs cannot consider Resolution Plans from applicants not listed in Prospective Resolution Applicants\u2019 List: NCLAT","og_description":"NCLAT held that the CoCs cannot consider Resolution Plans from applicants not listed in Prospective Resolution Applicants\u2019 List.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-04-03T06:30:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-04-05T11:00:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"CoCs cannot consider Resolution Plans from applicants not listed in Prospective Resolution Applicants\u2019 List: NCLAT","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times\/","name":"CoCs cannot consider Resolution Plans from applicants not listed in Prospective Resolution Applicants\u2019 List: NCLAT | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp","datePublished":"2024-04-03T06:30:53+00:00","dateModified":"2024-04-05T11:00:24+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"NCLAT held that the CoCs cannot consider Resolution Plans from applicants not listed in Prospective Resolution Applicants\u2019 List.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/cocs-cannot-consider-resolution-plans-from-applicants-not-listed-in-prospective-resolution-applicants-list-nclat-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CoCs cannot consider Resolution Plans from applicants not listed in Prospective Resolution Applicants\u2019 List: NCLAT"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":297888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/28\/operational-creditor-cannot-claim-payment-equal-to-financial-creditor-in-insolvency-proceeding-under-ibc-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":319230,"position":0},"title":"Operational Creditor cannot claim payment equal to Financial Creditor in Insolvency proceeding under IBC: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"July 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The principle of equality is applicable only in same class of creditors, i.e., secured or unsecured, financial or operational.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297687,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/26\/irp-rp-cannot-seek-unpaid-fees-costs-members-corporate-debtor-insolvency-nclat-scc-blog-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":319230,"position":1},"title":"In project wise insolvency, IRP\/RP cannot seek unpaid Fees\/Costs from members of CoCs of another project of Corporate Debtor: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"July 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT held that the appellant has no Locus Standi to make claim for any unpaid Fees\/Costs from the members of the CoCs, as he is neither the RP in the project nor is connected with another project.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":348725,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/26\/single-homebuyer-cant-challenge-coc-approved-resolution-plan-nclat-upholds-cocs-commercial-wisdom-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":319230,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Single Homebuyer can\u2019t challenge CoC approved Resolution Plan\u2019; NCLAT upholds CoC\u2019s commercial wisdom","author":"Ritu","date":"May 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Resolution Plan has been approved by 83.46% voting share of the CoC, therefore, at the instance of Appellant, approval of Resolution Plan cannot be allowed to be questioned.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282321,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/24\/after-closure-of-challenge-process-and-consequent-receipt-of-resolution-plan-the-adjudicating-authority-cannotdirect-consideration-of-the-revised-plan-submitted-thereafter\/","url_meta":{"origin":319230,"position":3},"title":"NCLAT| After closure of Challenge Process and consequent receipt of resolution plan, Adjudicating Authority cannot direct consideration of the revised plan submitted thereafter","author":"Editor","date":"January 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal observed that once the CoC has decided to vote on the resolution plans after closure of challenge process, the Adjudicating Authority cannot direct the CoC to consider any revised plan submitted thereafter.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":289137,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/10\/nclt-approved-resolution-plan-nclat-allocation-meager-amount-no-ground-challenge-plan-appeal-dismissed-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":319230,"position":4},"title":"\u201cLaw will take its own course\u201d; NCLAT refuses to interfere with NCLT’s order approving Resolution Plan","author":"Ritu","date":"April 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLAT held that that the allocation of meagre amount in Resolution Plan to Creditors can be questioned when the plan value earmarked for them is less than the liquidation value but same is not the case in instant matter.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":285793,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/01\/coc-resolution-plan-approved-nclt-application-rejected-direction-for-reconsideration-appeal-nclat-order-set-aside-company-law-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":319230,"position":5},"title":"Once Resolution Plan approved and submitted to Adjudicating Authority, it cannot be sent back for re-consideration: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"March 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In matter related to reconsideration of Resolution Plan after approval, NCLAT held that thought the object of the CIRP is maximisation of value of the Corporate Debtor, but the said maximisation must be achieved within the timeline provided in the scheme.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319230","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=319230"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319230\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/315817"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=319230"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=319230"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=319230"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}