{"id":319133,"date":"2024-04-02T12:00:04","date_gmt":"2024-04-02T06:30:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=319133"},"modified":"2024-04-05T16:42:02","modified_gmt":"2024-04-05T11:12:02","slug":"hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes\/","title":{"rendered":"In absence of any statutory provision, seniority must be counted from the date of appointment: Himachal Pradesh High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Himachal Pradesh High Court:<\/span> An appeal was filed against the judgment whereby it was held that respondent was appointed on 08-05-2003 and was thus governed by Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, (&#8216;1972 Rules&#8217;) and not by the Himachal Pradesh Civil Services Contributory Pension Rules, 2006. The Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Tarlok Singh Chauhan*<\/span> and Sushil Kukreja, JJ., in the absence of any statutory provision or rule made thereunder or under the proviso of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575124\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">309<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>, once an incumbent was appointed to the post, his\/her seniority had to be counted from the date of appointment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, after perusal of the order of appointment, the Court opined that it clearly proved in no uncertain terms that the appointment order of the respondent was issued with the intention of the Appointing Authority to appoint the respondent with immediate effect. The only rider was that the appointee would be entitled to pay and allowances from the date of joining of the post. Thus, in the given facts and circumstances, the Court opined that they were not persuaded enough to take a view other than the one taken by the writ Court and dismissed the present appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, in pursuance of the order dated 08-05-2003, the respondent was appointed as a clerk on compassionate grounds and after undergoing medical examination, she joined her duties on 17-05-2003. However, State Government issued a notification dated 15-05-2003, whereby the appointments made in the State on or 15-05-2003, were excluded from the applicability of the 1972 Rules, with intention of the Government to notify Contributory Pension Scheme for such government servants whose appointments were made on or after 15-05-2003.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The respondent filed the writ petition stating that appellants were thrusting upon her to become a member under the Contributory Pension Scheme by considering her appointment date as 17-05-2003 as against her order of appointment dated 08-05-2003. The writ Court after taking note of these admitted facts concluded that respondent was appointed on 08-05-2003 and was thus governed by 1972 Rules and not by the Himachal Pradesh Civil Services Contributory Pension Rules, 2006.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, appellant filed the present appeal. The question that arose for consideration before the present Court was whether the appointment of the respondent would be governed by the appointment letter dated 08-05-2003 or from the actual date of joining.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that appointment date was normally a starting point of competition of length of service. The principle of leaning in favour of initial date of appointment was fully justifiable based on rule of fairness and the anxiety to avoid any injustice. The Court further opined that in the absence of any statutory provision or rule made thereunder or under the proviso of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575124\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">309<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>, once an incumbent was appointed to the post, his\/her seniority had to be counted from the date of appointment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">T. Valsan v. K. Kanagaraj<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=SlRYVC05MDAxNjA1NzQwJiYmJiY0MCYmJiYmU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmdWxsc2NyZWVuJiYmJiZ0cnVlJiYmJiZULiBWYWxzYW4gdi4gSy4gS2FuYWdhcmFqJiYmJiZQaHJhc2UmJiYmJmdTZWFyY2gmJiYmJmZhbHNl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 7 SCC 614<\/a> and opined that no rules or statutory provisions had been brought to the notice of the writ Court regarding the determination of seniority. Therefore, the seniority of the respondent would ordinarily have been determined on or from the date of her appointment, that is 08-05-2003.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further considering <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Dr. Amarjit Singh Ahluwalia v. State of Punjab<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=KDE5NzUpIDMgU0NDIDUwMyYmJiYmNDAmJiYmJlNlYXJjaFBhZ2U=\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(1975) 3 SCC 503<\/a>, opined that the present appointment was of a kind, where the appointment was simpliciter without saying as to when the appointment should take effect. Further, after perusal of the order of appointment, the Court opined that it clearly proved in no uncertain terms that the appointment order of the respondent was issued with the intention of the Appointing Authority to appoint respondent with immediate effect. The only rider was that the appointee would be entitled to pay and allowances from the date of joining of the post.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that if appellants wanted the seniority of the respondent to be counted from a subsequent date like the date of joining, then nothing prevented them from mentioning similar condition as was fixed regarding the pay and allowances with respect to seniority also, that the same would be reckoned from the date of joining of the post. Thus, in the given facts and circumstances, the Court opined that they were not persuaded enough to take a view other than the one taken by the writ Court and dismissed the present appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">State of H.P. v. Reena Verma, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/OpQDxjW0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine HP 917<\/a>, decided on 05-03-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by- Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Appellants:<\/span> Ramakant Sharma, Navlesh Verma and Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocate Generals.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> P.P. Chauhan, Advocate<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;If appellants wanted the seniority of respondent to be counted from a date of joining, then nothing prevented them from mentioning similar condition as was fixed regarding the pay and allowances with respect to seniority also.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":318873,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34010,32822,67091,2929,5271,3793,32583],"class_list":["post-319133","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-central-civil-services-pension-rules","tag-date-of-appointment","tag-himachal-pradesh-civil-services-contributory-pension-rules","tag-Himachal_Pradesh_High_Court","tag-pension","tag-Seniority","tag-statutory-provision"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>HP HC: In absence of any statutory provision, seniority to be counted from date of appointment | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court opined that they were not persuaded enough to take a view other than the one taken by the writ Court and dismissed the present appeal.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"In absence of any statutory provision, seniority must be counted from the date of appointment: Himachal Pradesh High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court opined that they were not persuaded enough to take a view other than the one taken by the writ Court and dismissed the present appeal.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-04-02T06:30:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-04-05T11:12:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"In absence of any statutory provision, seniority must be counted from the date of appointment: Himachal Pradesh High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes\/\",\"name\":\"HP HC: In absence of any statutory provision, seniority to be counted from date of appointment | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-04-02T06:30:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-04-05T11:12:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Himachal Pradesh High Court opined that they were not persuaded enough to take a view other than the one taken by the writ Court and dismissed the present appeal.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Himachal Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"In absence of any statutory provision, seniority must be counted from the date of appointment: Himachal Pradesh High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"HP HC: In absence of any statutory provision, seniority to be counted from date of appointment | SCC Times","description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court opined that they were not persuaded enough to take a view other than the one taken by the writ Court and dismissed the present appeal.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"In absence of any statutory provision, seniority must be counted from the date of appointment: Himachal Pradesh High Court","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court opined that they were not persuaded enough to take a view other than the one taken by the writ Court and dismissed the present appeal.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-04-02T06:30:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-04-05T11:12:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"In absence of any statutory provision, seniority must be counted from the date of appointment: Himachal Pradesh High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes\/","name":"HP HC: In absence of any statutory provision, seniority to be counted from date of appointment | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-04-02T06:30:04+00:00","dateModified":"2024-04-05T11:12:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court opined that they were not persuaded enough to take a view other than the one taken by the writ Court and dismissed the present appeal.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Himachal Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/hp-hc-in-absence-of-any-statutory-provision-seniority-counted-from-date-ofappointment-scctimes\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"In absence of any statutory provision, seniority must be counted from the date of appointment: Himachal Pradesh High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":272001,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/20\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-second-wife-entitled-to-family-pension-only-when-personal-law-of-deceased-employee-allows-bigamy\/","url_meta":{"origin":319133,"position":0},"title":"Himachal Pradesh High Court | Second Wife entitled to family pension only when personal law of deceased employee allows Bigamy","author":"Editor","date":"August 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: In a petition related to family pension, Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J has held that the second wife of a deceased employee is not entitled to family pension under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 unless the personal law of the deceased employee allows more than\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Himachal Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":347372,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/08\/past-contractual-service-pension-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":319133,"position":1},"title":"Can past contractual service count towards pension once an employee is regularised? Supreme Court answers","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court directed that the Union of India should notify the appellants about the mode and manner in which they could exercise this option and provide information regarding the amounts that the appellants will need to remit if they choose to opt for pension under the Rules.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"past contractual service pension","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/past-contractual-service-pension.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/past-contractual-service-pension.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/past-contractual-service-pension.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/past-contractual-service-pension.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":306322,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/03\/himachal-pradesh-hc-grants-service-benefits-to-employees-from-initial-appointment-on-contract-basis-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":319133,"position":2},"title":"State is not expected to deprive lawful benefits of employees; Himachal Pradesh HC grants service benefits to employees from initial date of appointment on contract basis","author":"Editor","date":"November 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt appears, in order to avoid its liability to pay salary attached to the post and to deprive the employees from lawful service benefits available to them, exploitative policy of contract appointment for initial five years is being adopted and practiced.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"himachal pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":367188,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/all-hc-constituent-institution-employees-general-provident-fund-scheme-benefit-no-absolute-right-to\/","url_meta":{"origin":319133,"position":3},"title":"Constituent Institution employees have no absolute right to General Provident Fund Scheme benefit: Allahabad High Court","author":"Editor","date":"November 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cEven after the institution become constituent of Allahabad University, it still remains autonomous, and its finances are taken care by Central Government independently.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Constituent Institution employee General Provident Fund Scheme benefit","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Constituent-Institution-employee-General-Provident-Fund-Scheme-benefit.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Constituent-Institution-employee-General-Provident-Fund-Scheme-benefit.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Constituent-Institution-employee-General-Provident-Fund-Scheme-benefit.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Constituent-Institution-employee-General-Provident-Fund-Scheme-benefit.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":225895,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/central-govt-employees-selected-for-appointment-before-1-1-2004-but-joined-service-on-or-after-1-1-2004-can-now-opt-to-be-covered-under-central-civil-services-pension-rules-1972\/","url_meta":{"origin":319133,"position":4},"title":"Central Govt. employees selected for appointment before 1-1-2004, but joined service on or after 1-1-2004, can now opt to be covered under &#8212; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"The Department of Pension and Pensioners\u2019 Welfare has taken out an order through which all Central Government employees whose selection for appointment was finalized before 01.01.2004 but who joined service on or after 01.01.2004, can now opt to be covered under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 instead of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":301312,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/12\/public-authorities-accountable-failure-to-discharge-its-duties-hp-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":319133,"position":5},"title":"Public authorities should be made accountable for lapses or failure to discharge its duties: Himachal Pradesh High Court","author":"Editor","date":"September 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cPublic authorities hold the public funds in trust. The public money cannot be allowed to be wasted by unjustified delays caused by the public authorities in discharge of their duties.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"himachal pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319133","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=319133"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319133\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/318873"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=319133"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=319133"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=319133"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}