{"id":31871,"date":"2016-01-06T16:54:57","date_gmt":"2016-01-06T11:24:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=31871"},"modified":"2016-01-15T18:42:57","modified_gmt":"2016-01-15T13:12:57","slug":"section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature\/","title":{"rendered":"Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938 not declaratory and retrospective in nature"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court <\/strong>: While upholding the order of the Bombay High Court, the division bench of Vikramajit Sen and S.K. Singh, JJ., \u00a0held that in accordance with the Insurance Act, 1938, the policies issued by the appellant are both assignable and transferable.The bench also ruled that it is not appropriate to import the principles of public policy, which are always imprecise, difficult to define, into contractual matters.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The respondents had brought a writ petition before the Bombay High Court to set aside the circulars issued by the appellant which said that the assignments which prima facie are trade oriented cannot be registered by them. The court allowed the writ petition ruling that the insurance policies are both transferable and assignable. The decision was brought in an appeal before the Court. The Court brought the matter under the purview of Section 38 of the Insurance Act (prior to its amendment) and said that the only exception to procedure were its seven sub-section or the terms and condition of the policies.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court, on perusing the contentions and concerned statutory provisions, dismissed the appeal and observed that the amended Section 38 of the Insurance Act is not declaratory and was not intended by the legislature to make it retrospective in nature. The Court referred to its judgment in Avinder Singh v. State of Punjab, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/1979_1_SCC_137\">(1979) 1 SCC 137<\/a> and Agricultural Market Committee v. Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/1997_5_SCC_516\">(1997) 5 SCC 516<\/a> wherein it has been held that &#8220;Legislature cannot face itself by delegating its plenary powers unless the delegate functions strictly under its provisions.&#8221; [<em>LIC of India v. Insure policy plus services pvt. Ltd., <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2015_SCC_OnLine_SC_1384\">2015 SCC OnLine SC 1384<\/a><b><\/b><em><b>,\u00a0<\/b><\/em>\u00a0decided on 29th December, 2015]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court : While upholding the order of the Bombay High Court, the division bench of Vikramajit Sen and S.K. Singh, JJ., <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[4411],"class_list":["post-31871","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-insurance-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938 not declaratory and retrospective in nature | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938 not declaratory and retrospective in nature\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court : While upholding the order of the Bombay High Court, the division bench of Vikramajit Sen and S.K. Singh, JJ.,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-01-06T11:24:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-15T13:12:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature\/\",\"name\":\"Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938 not declaratory and retrospective in nature | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-01-06T11:24:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-15T13:12:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938 not declaratory and retrospective in nature\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938 not declaratory and retrospective in nature | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938 not declaratory and retrospective in nature","og_description":"Supreme Court : While upholding the order of the Bombay High Court, the division bench of Vikramajit Sen and S.K. Singh, JJ.,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-01-06T11:24:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-15T13:12:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature\/","name":"Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938 not declaratory and retrospective in nature | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2016-01-06T11:24:57+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-15T13:12:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/section-38-of-the-insurance-act-1938-not-declaratory-and-retrospective-in-nature\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938 not declaratory and retrospective in nature"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":313825,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/12\/calcutta-high-court-rejects-appeal-on-compliance-of-section-64vb-of-insurance-act-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":31871,"position":0},"title":"Calcutta High Court rejects appeal on compliance of Section 64VB of Insurance Act; directs dispersal of insurance claim","author":"Ritu","date":"February 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWaiver is the abandonment of a right which normally every body is at liberty to waive. It is an intentional relinquishment of known right or advantage, benefit, claim or privilege which except for such waiver the party would have enjoyed.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":371423,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/02\/bom-hc-consumer-not-penalised-insurer-cheque-negligence\/","url_meta":{"origin":31871,"position":1},"title":"Consumer cannot be penalised for insurer&#8217;s operational negligence with premium cheque: Bombay High Court","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"January 2, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe dishonour was not due to insufficiency of funds but due to technical problems in the aftermath of the floods.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"consumer insurer cheque negligence","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/consumer-insurer-cheque-negligence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/consumer-insurer-cheque-negligence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/consumer-insurer-cheque-negligence.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/consumer-insurer-cheque-negligence.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":342027,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/22\/article-226-where-must-the-action-be-instituted\/","url_meta":{"origin":31871,"position":2},"title":"Article 226 &#8211; Where Must the \u201cAction\u201d be Instituted?","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Spenta Havewala Kapadia*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Article 226","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/shared-image-_37_.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/shared-image-_37_.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/shared-image-_37_.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/shared-image-_37_.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319380,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/sc-clarifies-that-whether-company-can-file-consumer-complaint-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":31871,"position":3},"title":"Can a company file a consumer complaint under Consumer Protection Act, 1986? SC clarifies","author":"Editor","date":"April 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, a body corporate was brought within the definition of \u2018person\u2019, indicating that the legislature realized the incongruity in the unamended provision and rectified the anomaly by including the word \u2018company\u2019 in the definition of \u2018person\u2019.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"consumer complaint by company under Consumer Protection Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/company-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/company-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/company-2.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/company-2.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":347638,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/arbitration-insurance-dispute-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":31871,"position":4},"title":"Can a dispute raised by an insured be referred to arbitration after issuing full and final discharge voucher to the insurer? Supreme Court answers","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe doctrine of Kompetenz-Kompetenz is now firmly embedded in the arbitration jurisprudence in India. This doctrine is based on the principle that an arbitral tribunal is competent to rule on its own jurisdiction including on the issue of existence or validity of an arbitration agreement\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"arbitration after full and final settlement","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/arbitration-after-full-and-final-settlement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/arbitration-after-full-and-final-settlement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/arbitration-after-full-and-final-settlement.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/arbitration-after-full-and-final-settlement.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":198599,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":31871,"position":5},"title":"SC modifies Bombay High Court&#8217;s order as an interim measure during the pendency of appeal in a divorce petition","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 17, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A bench of N.V. Ramana and S. Abdul Nazeer JJ., modified the order of the High Court of Bombay in a divorce petition filed seeking for the modification of the maintenance and alimony amount. The facts of the case state that the appellant (wife) had filed a petition\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31871","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31871"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31871\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31871"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31871"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31871"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}