{"id":318560,"date":"2024-03-27T18:30:56","date_gmt":"2024-03-27T13:00:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=318560"},"modified":"2024-03-27T18:11:27","modified_gmt":"2024-03-27T12:41:27","slug":"notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon\/","title":{"rendered":"Notice should be served at Company\u2019s registered office: Maharashtra SCDRC in Consumer Case against Decathlon"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra:<\/span> In an appeal against the order passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (&#8216;DCDRC&#8217;) restraining written statement of Decathlon while it complained of notice served in an improper manner, Justice S.P. Tavade, SCDRC Maharashtra President and Poonam V. Maharshi, SCDRC member allowed the same while stating that notice should have been served at the registered office.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Factual Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Decathlon, a company incorporated under the Provisions of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000055985\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Companies Act, 1956<\/a>, preferred the instant appeal against order passed on 20-01-2023 in the absence of any written statement order passed against them.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The respondent preferred a complaint under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000214241\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">35<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000214317\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Consumer Protection Act, 2019<\/a> alleging deficiency in service against Decathlon. It was alleged that the notice of complaint was not properly served to Decathlon on its registered address at Bangalore which was duly mentioned in the title clause of the complaint, and that despite the same was made as one of the opponents in the cause title. Decathlon came to know about the complaint through its Store Office in Mumbai, and thereafter they filed an appearance on 15-12-2022 and sought time for reply. The next date was 10-01-2023 when Decathlon moved an application for taking the said written statement on record which was objected to by the complainant. DCDRC allowed the objection and order was passed on 20-01-2023 due to 5 days&#8217; delay in filing the written statement, hence, the instant appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">SCDRC noticed that perusal of record reflected that complaint was admitted on 14-10-2022 and complainant filed report of service of notice on 10-01-2023 showing duly served notice on 21-10-2022 at a Mumbai store of Decathlon, which was submitted to be not described as the Branch Office while quoting Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000214274\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">65(4)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000214317\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Consumer Protection Act, 2019<\/a>, Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523316\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">XXIX Rule 2<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Code of Civil Procedure, 1908<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001537414\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">20<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002766251\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Companies Act, 2013<\/a>, hinting that &#8220;service of notice is to be made at registered office of the company only.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, SCDRC was of the opinion that the submissions made by the complainant for serving notice at the Branch Office could not be considered. SCDRC found the cause of the delay to be sufficient to explain the 5-day delay and condoned the same. SCDRC further noted that &#8220;No notice report was filed on record to show that the notice is duly served at the registered Office address.&#8221; Thus, SCDRC set aside the impugned order passed by DCDRC and allowed the instant appeal, directing Decathlon to file a written version before DCDRC within 2 weeks from the date of receiving the order copy and DCDRC to allow both the parties to file affidavit of evidence and thereafter, decide the complaint in accordance with the law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Decathlon Sports India Pvt. Ltd. v. Hardik D. Shah, Appeal No. A\/23\/295, Order dated 29-02-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Appellants: Advocate Alok Vajpeyee, Advocate Ishwar Sethi<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Respondents: Advocate Suchitra Ovhal<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">SCDRC opined that the submissions made by the complainant for serving notice at the Branch Office could not be considered.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67513,"featured_media":318564,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[34012,66860,66859,62215,48590],"class_list":["post-318560","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-company","tag-decathlon","tag-maharashtra-scdrc","tag-registered-office","tag-state-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Notice should be served at Company\u2019s registered office: Maharashtra SCDRC in Consumer Case against Decathlon | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Maharashtra SCDRC dealing with a Consumer Case against Decathlon held that notice should be served at Company\u2019s registered office.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Notice should be served at Company\u2019s registered office: Maharashtra SCDRC in Consumer Case against Decathlon\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Maharashtra SCDRC dealing with a Consumer Case against Decathlon held that notice should be served at Company\u2019s registered office.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-03-27T13:00:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/company-registered-office.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Notice should be served at Company\u2019s registered office: Maharashtra SCDRC in Consumer Case against Decathlon\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon\/\",\"name\":\"Notice should be served at Company\u2019s registered office: Maharashtra SCDRC in Consumer Case against Decathlon | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/company-registered-office.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-27T13:00:56+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\"},\"description\":\"Maharashtra SCDRC dealing with a Consumer Case against Decathlon held that notice should be served at Company\u2019s registered office.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/company-registered-office.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/company-registered-office.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"company registered office\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Notice should be served at Company\u2019s registered office: Maharashtra SCDRC in Consumer Case against Decathlon\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\",\"name\":\"Ridhi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ridhi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Notice should be served at Company\u2019s registered office: Maharashtra SCDRC in Consumer Case against Decathlon | SCC Times","description":"Maharashtra SCDRC dealing with a Consumer Case against Decathlon held that notice should be served at Company\u2019s registered office.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Notice should be served at Company\u2019s registered office: Maharashtra SCDRC in Consumer Case against Decathlon","og_description":"Maharashtra SCDRC dealing with a Consumer Case against Decathlon held that notice should be served at Company\u2019s registered office.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-03-27T13:00:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/company-registered-office.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ridhi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Notice should be served at Company\u2019s registered office: Maharashtra SCDRC in Consumer Case against Decathlon","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ridhi","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon\/","name":"Notice should be served at Company\u2019s registered office: Maharashtra SCDRC in Consumer Case against Decathlon | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/company-registered-office.webp","datePublished":"2024-03-27T13:00:56+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea"},"description":"Maharashtra SCDRC dealing with a Consumer Case against Decathlon held that notice should be served at Company\u2019s registered office.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/company-registered-office.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/company-registered-office.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"company registered office"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/notice-should-served-company-registered-office-maharashtra-scdrc-consumer-case-decathlon\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Notice should be served at Company\u2019s registered office: Maharashtra SCDRC in Consumer Case against Decathlon"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea","name":"Ridhi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ridhi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/company-registered-office.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":336894,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/09\/ncdrc-remands-consumer-case-theft-scdrc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":318560,"position":0},"title":"NCDRC remands consumer case regarding theft to Madhya Pradesh SCDRC to be decided on merits","author":"Sucheta","date":"December 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCDRC noted that Reliance General Insurance did not take the issue of territorial jurisdiction before SCDRC; therefore, SCDRC basing its decision on the same, was bad in law.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288106,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/29\/consumer-commission-cannot-decide-disputed-questions-of-fact-supreme-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":318560,"position":1},"title":"Complaints with \u2018highly disputed questions of facts\u2019 cannot be decided by Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission\/Forum: Supreme Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"March 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court quashed the original complaint and said that respondent miserably failed to discharge his burden to prove deficiency in service on part of the bank.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Consumer Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-909.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-909.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-909.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-909.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294847,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/theft-on-train-not-deficiency-in-service-by-railways-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":318560,"position":2},"title":"&#8220;Theft on train not deficiency in service by Railways&#8221;; Supreme Court sets aside concurrent orders by NCDRC, SCDRC and District Consumer Forum","author":"Ridhi","date":"June 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court expressed that \u201cWe fail to understand as to how the theft could be said to be in any way a deficiency in service by the Railways.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"theft on train","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/theft-on-train.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/theft-on-train.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/theft-on-train.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/theft-on-train.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":284710,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/21\/ncdrc-failure-of-duty-of-care-by-icu-staff-compensation-by-scdrc-delhi-just-and-adequate-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":318560,"position":3},"title":"Failure of duty of care by ICU staff; NCDRC finds compensation granted by SCDRC to be just and adequate","author":"Ridhi","date":"February 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While dealing with a challenge against the order of the State Commission, Delhi, the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission found the same reasoned, and the compensation to be just and adequate, thereby dismissing both the appeals.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-482.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-482.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-482.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-482.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-482.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294607,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/14\/hospital-wins-medical-negligence-case-before-ncdrc-pays-compensation-on-humanitarian-grounds\/","url_meta":{"origin":318560,"position":4},"title":"NCDRC | Hospital wins medical negligence case, but pays compensation on humanitarian grounds","author":"Editor","date":"June 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While dealing with the challenge against the order of SCDRC, the NCDRC found that the hospital made every possible attempt during medical complications after a successful surgery.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national consumer disputes redressal commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323119,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/ncdrc-stays-order-against-honda-by-maharashtra-consumer-commission-to-replace-defective-vehicle-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":318560,"position":5},"title":"NCDRC stays Maharashtra Consumer Commission\u2019s order directing Honda Motors to replace defective vehicle","author":"Editor","date":"May 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Maharashtra Commission in the impugned order, had concluded that the vehicle had a manufacturing defect, without calling for an expert report on the matter.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318560","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67513"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=318560"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318560\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/318564"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=318560"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=318560"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=318560"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}