{"id":318470,"date":"2024-03-27T10:00:22","date_gmt":"2024-03-27T04:30:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=318470"},"modified":"2024-04-03T13:08:14","modified_gmt":"2024-04-03T07:38:14","slug":"affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Affidavit of Disclosure required to be filed by wife in maintenance cases, despite ex parte order on husband; Jharkhand High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Jharkhand High Court<\/span>: While deciding the instant petition questioning the order of the Family Judge allowing the petition under Section 125<\/a> of CrPC<\/a> against the petitioner-husband ex-parte<\/span> and directed him to pay maintenance to his wife and minor daughter, the Bench of Anubha Rawat Chaudhary J.*<\/span>, relying on the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court in Rajnesh v. Neha<\/span>, (2021) 2 SCC 324<\/a>, pointed out that even though the proceeding was ex-parte<\/span> against the husband, still the wife was required to file an affidavit so as to find out her assets\/liabilities\/source of income etc.<\/p>\n

The Court disposed of the petition and redirected the case of maintenance filed by the wife, to the Family Court, requiring the parties to appear before the said Court with their respective affidavits of income disclosure, as per the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court in Rajnesh<\/span> v. Neha (supra).<\/span><\/p>\n

Background<\/p>\n

The wife filed a case for maintenance under Section 125<\/a> of CrPC<\/a> before the Principal District Judge-cum-Family Judge, Ramgarh (“Family Court”). The Family Court issued the impugned ex-parte order via which the husband was directed to pay maintenance of Rs. 5,000 per month to his wife, and Rs. 1,000 per month tohis minor daughter.<\/p>\n

The husband brought the instant criminal revision petition before the High Court against the afore-stated impugned order.<\/p>\n

The husband claimed, even though he was a B. Tech Graduate, he was currently unemployed. Despite his unemployment, his income was tentatively assumed to be in between Rs. 25,000\/- to Rs. 30,000\/-. Therefore, he submitted that the impugned order requires interference. The husband further contended that the notice for the maintenance case was served to his brother instead of him, hence the husband had no knowledge of the proceedings, which resulted in the impugned ex-parte order.<\/p>\n

Per contra, the respondents submitted that the husband and his brother were living under the same roof hence the notice was accepted as validly served and that the husband willfully missed the Family Court proceedings. It was argued that the impugned order was well-reasoned and therefore does not require any interference.<\/p>\n

Observations and Judgment<\/p>\n

Perusing the contentions of the parties, the Court noted that the impugned order calls for interference solely on the reason of the order being ex-parte and that the guidelines in Rajnesh v. Neha (supra)<\/span> have not been complied with.<\/p>\n

The Court extensively referred to the case of Rajnesh<\/span> v. Neha (supra)<\/span> wherein the Supreme Court had issued important guidelines to create a uniform format of Affidavit for Disclosure of Assets and Liabilities to be filed in maintenance proceedings.<\/p>\n

The Court in the instant case specifically referred to Rajnesh<\/span> v. Neha (supra)<\/span> with regards to fixation of quantum of maintenance, disclosures of income by both the parties, issue of overlapping jurisdiction with regards to maintenance, cases where wife also has some earning etc.<\/p>\n

The Court found that the directions issued by the Supreme Court in the case of Rajnesh v. Neha (supra)<\/span> were not complied with, therefore, leading to the non-fixture of the quantum of maintenance as required under the guidelines.<\/p>\n

The Court reiterated the importance of filing of the Affidavit of Disclosure of Assets and Liabilities by both parties in all maintenance proceedings, including pending proceedings before the Family Court\/District Court\/Magistrates Court concerned, nationwide.<\/p>\n

The Court directed the parties to appear before the Court of Principal District Judge – cum- Family Judge, Ramgarh along with their respective affidavit of disclosures, disclosing their financial status including the period from the date of filing of the case.<\/p>\n

The Court also directed the Family Court to pass a fresh order after the parties’ directed appearance within three months from the date of their appearance.<\/p>\n

In terms of the maintenance amount fixed by the impugned order, the Court observed that the husband would continue to pay the current amount until the disposal of the matter before the Court, which shall be subjected to the outcome of the case.<\/p>\n

[Sandeep Prasad v. State of Jharkhand, 2024 SCC OnLine Jhar 642<\/a>, decided on 01-03-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Petitioner:<\/span> Nehru Mahto, Advocate<\/p>\n

For the State:<\/span> Sunil Kumar Dubey, APP<\/p>\n

For the Opposite Parties Nos. 2 and 3:<\/span> Gaurav Kumar, Advocate:. Syed H. Arsh, Advocate<\/p>\n

Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Code<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Even if the proceeding was ex-parte against the petitioner, still the required affidavit was to be filed by the wife so as to find out her assets\/liabilities\/source of income etc.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":317614,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[66811,66812,29620,31976,3374,5791,2863,66810,12531],"class_list":["post-318470","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-affidavit-of-disclosure","tag-anubha-rawat-choudhary","tag-criminal-revision-petition","tag-ex-parte","tag-family_court","tag-jharkhand-high-court","tag-maintenance","tag-rajnesh-v-neha","tag-section-125-crpc"],"yoast_head":"\nEx parte maintenance case against husband re-directed to Family Court due to non-disclosure of wife\u2019s income & assets<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Parties to maintenance proceedings failed to comply with Supreme Court guidelines in Rajnesh v. Neha, redirected to Family Court by Jharkhand High Court.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Affidavit of Disclosure required to be filed by wife in maintenance cases, despite ex parte order on husband; Jharkhand High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Parties to maintenance proceedings failed to comply with Supreme Court guidelines in Rajnesh v. Neha, redirected to Family Court by Jharkhand High Court.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-03-27T04:30:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-04-03T07:38:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Affidavit of Disclosure required to be filed by wife in maintenance cases, despite ex parte order on husband; Jharkhand High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Ex parte maintenance case against husband re-directed to Family Court due to non-disclosure of wife\u2019s income & assets\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-27T04:30:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-04-03T07:38:14+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Parties to maintenance proceedings failed to comply with Supreme Court guidelines in Rajnesh v. Neha, redirected to Family Court by Jharkhand High Court.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Jharkhand High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Affidavit of Disclosure required to be filed by wife in maintenance cases, despite ex parte order on husband; Jharkhand High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ex parte maintenance case against husband re-directed to Family Court due to non-disclosure of wife\u2019s income & assets","description":"Parties to maintenance proceedings failed to comply with Supreme Court guidelines in Rajnesh v. Neha, redirected to Family Court by Jharkhand High Court.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Affidavit of Disclosure required to be filed by wife in maintenance cases, despite ex parte order on husband; Jharkhand High Court","og_description":"Parties to maintenance proceedings failed to comply with Supreme Court guidelines in Rajnesh v. Neha, redirected to Family Court by Jharkhand High Court.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-03-27T04:30:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-04-03T07:38:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Affidavit of Disclosure required to be filed by wife in maintenance cases, despite ex parte order on husband; Jharkhand High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/","name":"Ex parte maintenance case against husband re-directed to Family Court due to non-disclosure of wife\u2019s income & assets","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-03-27T04:30:22+00:00","dateModified":"2024-04-03T07:38:14+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Parties to maintenance proceedings failed to comply with Supreme Court guidelines in Rajnesh v. Neha, redirected to Family Court by Jharkhand High Court.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Jharkhand High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Affidavit of Disclosure required to be filed by wife in maintenance cases, despite ex parte order on husband; Jharkhand High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":309825,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/21\/no-mention-mode-of-service-notice-husband-s-125-crpc-allahabad-high-court-set-aside-ex-parte-maintenance-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":318470,"position":0},"title":"No mention of mode of service of notice to husband in proceeding under S.125 CrPC; Allahabad HC set aside ex-parte maintenance order","author":"Apoorva","date":"December 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"To afford an opportunity to the husband to present his case before the court below and to ensure the just decision of maintenance case filed under Section 125 CrPC, Allahabad High Court set aside the ex-parte maintenance order","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268007,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/06\/if-wife-is-earning-can-it-operate-as-a-bar-from-awarding-maintenance-to-suit-lifestyle-of-her-husband-law-legal-updates-telangana-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":318470,"position":1},"title":"If wife is earning, can it operate as a bar from awarding maintenance to suit lifestyle of her husband in matrimonial home? Tel HC answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Telangana High Court: Sathish Reddy, J., while addressing a maintenance case, expressed that, the wife\u2019s earning capacity cannot be a bar from awarding her maintenance. Factual Background Instant case was filed by the petitioners to set aside the order of the lower Court wherein the said petition was filed by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":240638,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/14\/bom-hc-if-the-wife-is-earning-something-for-livelihood-can-the-same-be-a-ground-to-refuse-alimony-under-s-24-of-hindu-marriage-act-read-courts-ruling-taking-reiterating-scs-decision\/","url_meta":{"origin":318470,"position":2},"title":"Bom HC | If the wife is earning something for livelihood, can the same be a ground to refuse alimony under S. 24 of Hindu Marriage Act? Read Court’s ruling reiterating SC’s decision","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 14, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Mangesh S. Patil, J., in the present application directed the husband to pay an amount of Rs 10,000 towards alimony pendente lite under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Petitioner-wife has impugned the order passed by the Family Court, Judge wherein her application was rejected in which\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260173,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/17\/right-to-maintenance\/","url_meta":{"origin":318470,"position":3},"title":"[Right to Maintenance] Jhar HC | What is the effective date of grant of maintenance? Is it the date of judgment or the date of filing of maintenance application?","author":"Editor","date":"January 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J., held that right to claim maintenance must date back to the date of filing the application since the period during which the maintenance proceedings remained pending is not within the control of the applicant. The facts of the case were such that the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":319457,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/05\/section-125-crpc-lic-premium-loan-not-deductions-maintainance\/","url_meta":{"origin":318470,"position":4},"title":"[Section 125 CrPC] LIC premium, loan instalments no reason to avoid maintenance; Allahabad HC upholds order granting maintenance to wife and children","author":"Editor","date":"April 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court shall take only the present income of the husband and wife into consideration for determining maintenance payable to the wife and children.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261308,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/08\/261308\/","url_meta":{"origin":318470,"position":5},"title":"Tri HC \u2502Whether maintenance granted to the wife under S. 125 CrPC can be cancelled in view of husband\u2019s obtaining a decree for restitution of conjugal rights and wife\u2019s refusal for the same?","author":"Editor","date":"February 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: S.G. Chattopadhyay, J., decided on a petition which was filed by the petitioner challenging order passed by the Additional Judge, Family Court which stated that the petitioner was not entitled to any maintenance allowance under section 125 Cr.P.C from her husband in view of her refusal to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318470","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=318470"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318470\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317614"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=318470"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=318470"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=318470"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}