{"id":318465,"date":"2024-03-27T09:00:44","date_gmt":"2024-03-27T03:30:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=318465"},"modified":"2024-03-26T19:31:54","modified_gmt":"2024-03-26T14:01:54","slug":"2024-scc-vol-3-part-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/2024-scc-vol-3-part-1\/","title":{"rendered":"2024 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Administrative Law — Administrative Action — Administrative or Executive Function — File notings\/Internal orders:<\/span> In-principle approval and file notings do not give rise to vested rights. [DDA<\/i> v. Hello Home Education Society<\/i>, (2024) 3 SCC 148<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Applicability of Section 29-A<\/a> of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a>, to Applications Filed Post Termination of the Tribunal’s Mandate:<\/span> In this article the author discussed the question whether an application seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal be entertained after the mandate of the Tribunal has expired under Section 29-A(4) of the Act? Part II of the article critically evaluates the contradictory decisions passed by the aforementioned High Courts. Part III analyses the scope of Section 29-A(4) of the Act and concludes the article with important observations. [Only Time Will Tell: Applicability of Section 29-A to Applications Filed Post Termination of the Tribunal’s Mandate by Anuraag Mitra and Shantanu Lakhotia<\/i>, (2024) 3 SCC (J-25)<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Constitution of India<\/a> — Art. 226<\/a> — Writ of habeas corpus:<\/span> Writ of habeas corpus is not maintainable against remand order by judicial officer. Principles clarified re interplay between S. 167 CrPC and S. 19 PMLA. [V. Senthil Balaji<\/i> v. State<\/i>, (2024) 3 SCC 51<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Constitution of India<\/a> — Arts. 229<\/a>, 221(2)<\/a>, 226<\/a> and 141<\/a>:<\/span> Principles clarified relating to scope of rule-making powers of High Court under Art. 229 and matters to which it extends. [State of U.P.<\/i> v. Assn. of Retired Supreme Court & High Court Judges<\/i>, (2024) 3 SCC 1<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Consumer Protection — Services — Medical practitioners\/services\/Medical negligence — Deficiency of service:<\/span> In this case, death of patient occurred during post-operative care and non-attendance by doctors from the Neurosurgery team who operated the patient was made the ground, on facts, held, there is no negligence by respondent doctors in attending to the deceased. They cannot be held negligent for the death of the deceased. [Kalyani Rajan<\/i> v. Indraprastha Apollo Hospital<\/i>, (2024) 3 SCC 37<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> — S. 319<\/a> — Summoning of additional accused — Police atrocities against person accused in corruption case:<\/span> In this case, the question arose whether appellant investigating police officer of corruption case and three other police officials, was properly summoned as additional accused in trial against Head Constable K on allegations of demanding bribes to not torture accused D in main corruption case, to not seek further remand, help him get bail and to give him good treatment in custody. Prima facie evidence, whether available to make a triable case against the said summoned additional accused, determined. [Gurdev Singh Bhalla<\/i> v. State of Punjab<\/i>, (2024) 3 SCC 142<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Experts and Arbitration:<\/span> This article approaches the problem of “hired guns” — experts who, through a real or perceived sense of obligation towards their appointing parties, bring their expertise to bear in a manner that is obviously partial and ultimately unhelpful to the Tribunal. [Experts and Arbitration: “Hired Guns” — Modern Solutions To Ancient Problems, by Professor Doug Jones AO<\/i>, (2024) 3 SCC (J-6)<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> — S. 61<\/a> r\/w S. 7<\/a> — Limitation period for filing appeal before NCLAT:<\/span> Affixation of date of hearing on the order, as purported date of pronouncement of the order is not permissible, when the matter is heard but order not pronounced on the same date. [Sanjay Pandurang Kalate<\/i> v. Vistra ITCL India Ltd.<\/i>, (2024) 3 SCC 27<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Lord Denning — A Tribute:<\/span> This article is a tribute to Lord Denning, who has been described as the most influential judge of the 20th century. [Lord Denning — A Tribute by<\/i> v. Sudhish Pai<\/i>, (2024) 3 SCC (J-1)<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Penal Code, 1860<\/a> — S. 364-A<\/a> or S. 364<\/a> — Determination of:<\/span> Ingredients of S. 364-A and matters to be established for conviction under S. 364-A, reiterated. [Neeraj Sharma<\/i> v. State of Chhattisgarh<\/i>, (2024) 3 SCC 125<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Administrative Law — Administrative Action — Administrative or Executive Function — File notings\/Internal orders: In-principle approval and file notings do not give <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":318466,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[43052,53993,10131,7601,11241,66809],"class_list":["post-318465","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases","tag-administrative-action","tag-administrative-law","tag-arbitration-and-conciliation-act","tag-constitution-of-india","tag-consumer-protection","tag-experts-and-arbitration"],"yoast_head":"\n2024 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Administrative Law \u2014 Administrative Action \u2014 Administrative or Executive Function \u2014 File notings\/Internal orders\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/2024-scc-vol-3-part-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2024 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Administrative Law \u2014 Administrative Action \u2014 Administrative or Executive Function \u2014 File notings\/Internal orders\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/2024-scc-vol-3-part-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-03-27T03:30:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/2024-SCC-Vol.-3-Part-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"2024 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/2024-scc-vol-3-part-1\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/2024-scc-vol-3-part-1\/\",\"name\":\"2024 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/2024-scc-vol-3-part-1\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/2024-scc-vol-3-part-1\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/2024-SCC-Vol.-3-Part-1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-27T03:30:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Administrative Law \u2014 Administrative Action \u2014 Administrative or Executive Function \u2014 File notings\/Internal orders\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/2024-scc-vol-3-part-1\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/2024-scc-vol-3-part-1\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/2024-scc-vol-3-part-1\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/2024-SCC-Vol.-3-Part-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/2024-SCC-Vol.-3-Part-1.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"2024 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/2024-scc-vol-3-part-1\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2024 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2024 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1 | SCC Times","description":"Administrative Law \u2014 Administrative Action \u2014 Administrative or Executive Function \u2014 File notings\/Internal orders","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/2024-scc-vol-3-part-1\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2024 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1","og_description":"Administrative Law \u2014 Administrative Action \u2014 Administrative or Executive Function \u2014 File notings\/Internal orders","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/2024-scc-vol-3-part-1\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-03-27T03:30:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/2024-SCC-Vol.-3-Part-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"2024 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/2024-scc-vol-3-part-1\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/2024-scc-vol-3-part-1\/","name":"2024 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/2024-scc-vol-3-part-1\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/2024-scc-vol-3-part-1\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/2024-SCC-Vol.-3-Part-1.webp","datePublished":"2024-03-27T03:30:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Administrative Law \u2014 Administrative Action \u2014 Administrative or Executive Function \u2014 File notings\/Internal orders","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/2024-scc-vol-3-part-1\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/2024-scc-vol-3-part-1\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/2024-scc-vol-3-part-1\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/2024-SCC-Vol.-3-Part-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/2024-SCC-Vol.-3-Part-1.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"2024 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/2024-scc-vol-3-part-1\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2024 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/2024-SCC-Vol.-3-Part-1.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":280170,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/","url_meta":{"origin":318465,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court | Review is permissible against an order dismissing a petition under S. 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act","author":"Editor","date":"December 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"While exercising the power conferred by Section 11 of the Act, the Court ceases to be a Court of Record and the review or reopening of proceedings which is sought is not with respect to any power exercised by the Court under Section 11 on merits but on account of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":56241,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/15\/disputes-between-government-owned-corporations-should-not-go-through-long-expensive-trails-but-be-quickly-resolved-by-way-of-arbitration\/","url_meta":{"origin":318465,"position":1},"title":"Disputes between Government Owned Corporations should not go through long expensive trials but be quickly resolved by way of Arbitration","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 15, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Considering the sad state of affairs of long drawn expensive and cumbersome trials to resolve disputes between two Government owned corporations and the fact that one of the parties in the case at hand had with considerable tenacity opposed the move aimed at a quick and effective resolution\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252798,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/08\/section-74c-of-the-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-acquiesence-by-silence\/","url_meta":{"origin":318465,"position":2},"title":"Section 7(4)(C) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 : Acquiesence by Silence?","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by M. Dhyan Chinnappa\u2020 and Rohan Tigadi\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "OP. ED."","block_context":{"text":"OP. ED.","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-14.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-14.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-14.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-14.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-14.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6164,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/09\/04\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-pt-i-or-pt-ii-doctrine-of-severability-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":318465,"position":3},"title":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Pt. I or Pt. II \u2014 Doctrine of severability","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 4, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Cases Reported in 2014 SCC Vol. 7 August 28, 2014 Part 4Law of substantive contract does not determine law of arbitration agreement\/lex arbitri. Parties are entitled to agree that law of one country would govern substantive contract and laws of another country would apply to arbitration agreement. Parties can also\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "SCC Weekly"","block_context":{"text":"SCC Weekly","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/supremecourtcases\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6218,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/09\/04\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-pt-i-or-pt-ii-doctrine-of-severability\/","url_meta":{"origin":318465,"position":4},"title":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Pt. I or Pt. II \u2014 Doctrine of severability","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 4, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Cases Reported in 2014 SCC Vol. 7 August 28, 2014 Part 4Law of substantive contract does not determine law of arbitration agreement\/lex arbitri. Parties are entitled to agree that law of one country would govern substantive contract and laws of another country would apply to arbitration agreement. Parties can also\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Alternate Dispute Resolution"","block_context":{"text":"Alternate Dispute Resolution","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/alternate_dispute_resolution\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299153,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/14\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-1\/","url_meta":{"origin":318465,"position":5},"title":"2023 SCC Vol. 7 Part 1","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 8, 11 and 7: Non-payment or deficient payment of stamp duty on substantive contract comprising\/containing arbitration clause, or on standalone arbitration agreement, in cases where payment of stamp duty is mandatory, renders such arbitration agreement as non-existent pending payment of (the balance) stamp\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"2023 scc vol. 7 part 1","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/2023-scc-vol.-7-part-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/2023-scc-vol.-7-part-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/2023-scc-vol.-7-part-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/2023-scc-vol.-7-part-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318465","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=318465"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318465\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/318466"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=318465"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=318465"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=318465"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}