{"id":318400,"date":"2024-03-26T14:00:19","date_gmt":"2024-03-26T08:30:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=318400"},"modified":"2024-04-03T15:14:04","modified_gmt":"2024-04-03T09:44:04","slug":"allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam\/","title":{"rendered":"Read why Allahabad HC set aside CJM\u2019s order taking cognizance of criminal conspiracy against Development Officer and SP in Public Toilet Scam"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Allahabad High Court:<\/span> In an application for revision filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519685\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">397<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519692\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">401<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;), the State challenged the validity of the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate(&#8216;CJM&#8217;) issued in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ram Pratap<\/span> v <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Anup Kumar Singh<\/span><a id=\"fnref1\" href=\"#fn1\" title=\"1. Misc. Application No. 717 of 2021.\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a> which has been rendered unsustainable in law, Subhash Vidyarthi, J. said that the accused persons have acted in discharge of their official duty while committing the alleged offending acts, cognizance of which cannot be taken without previous sanction of the Government.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Facts<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">An application under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519391\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">156(3)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> was filed by the complainant against the block development officer (&#8216;BDO&#8217;) and the Village Panchayat Officer (&#8216;VPO&#8217;) (&#8216;revisionists&#8217;) alleging that the work of the construction of toilets was being carried out against the prescribed standards. Thereupon, separate enquiries were conducted by the Chief Development Officer, (&#8216;CDO&#8217;) and the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, (&#8216;SDM&#8217;), reports of which contained different findings. The complainant also got his own enquiry conducted by the VPO who thereafter submitted his application to the SDM. The VPO in her report stated that 511 toilets had been constructed whereas the enquiry report by the SDM stated that 150 toilets were incomplete and 40 had not been constructed and that the amount has been misappropriated in the name of constructing 511 toilets.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">A complaint was also filed by the complainant alleging physical abuse and name calling at a public office against the accused persons<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The CJM upon perusal of all the documents and Reports directed the Station House Office (&#8216;SHO&#8217;) to register a case against appropriate persons in appropriate sections and submit a compliance report within seven days. Thereafter, a First Information Report (&#8216;FIR&#8217;) was registered against the two accused under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561632\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">323<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561858\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">504<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561854\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">500<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561432\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">166<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thereafter, the investigating officer submitted the final report in which no offence was made out against the accused persons. Consequently, a protest application was filed by the complainant against the final report alleging discrepancies in the investigation and that an offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561745\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">409<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> was also made out. against the accused persons..<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The CJM Court while deciding upon the protest application said that the matter involved was that of embezzlement of public money, but the FIR was registered only for the offence of causing hurt, abusing, and defaming the complainant. The CJM, found that it was apparent that illegalities were committed in construction of toilets and when the complainant made enquiry regarding it, was beaten up, abused and disrespected. Thus, there was sufficient reason for taking cognizance of the offence under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561745\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">409<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561632\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">323<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561858\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">504<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561854\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">500<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> against the accused persons.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court while rejecting preliminary objection of the complainant that the State Government has no locus standi to assail the validity of the impugned order, said that the State has an interest in protecting its officers from any frivolous prosecution launched without its sanction. Thus, it held that the State has the right to assail validity of the impugned order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court while interpreting Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519442\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">197<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> cited <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Amod Kumar Kanth<\/span> v <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Assn. of Victim of Uphaar Tragedy<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/K1r1Cqt1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 578<\/a>; <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Gauri Shankar Prasad<\/span> v <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Bihar<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/smvDw1kn\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2000) 5 SCC 15<\/a> and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Orissa<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ganesh Chandra Jew<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Ir0M0r1D\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2004) 8 SCC 40<\/a>. The Court said that the abovesaid judgments aver that the object behind the Section is to be adjudged on a case-to-case basis and object of the Section is to save the officials but it is not a part of the policy to set an official above the common law. Further, it added that the action constituting the offence must have a reasonable and rational nexus with the official duties required to be discharged by such public servant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Bench clarified that all the aforesaid persons have acted in discharge of their official duty while committing the alleged offending acts, cognizance of which cannot be taken without previous sanction of the Government.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Bench clarified the applicability of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519700\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">409<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> in this case by showcasing that there needs to be a specific allegation of commission of some act which prima facie makes out the commission of the offence. The Bench added that there seems to be absolutely no factual allegation made in the complaint or in the protest petition and no material to prima facie establish &#8216;entrustment&#8217; of any property to any of the accused persons or to the effect that any of them have dishonestly misappropriated or converted to his own use that property or have dishonestly used or disposed of that property in violation of any direction of law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Bench mentioned Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519434\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">190 (1) (b)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> to conclude that cognizance of offence by a magistrate can be taken upon a police report be filed with such facts, but in this case no offence took place, and that no such fact has been stated in the police report as may make out cognizance of any offence. In absence of the police having reported such facts, as make out commission of any offence, the CJM could not have taken cognizance of any offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519434\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">190 (1) (b)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a>. Thus, the order taking cognizance of offence under Section 190 (1) (b) of the CrPC was bad in law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Concerning the allegation regarding embezzlement of money, the Court mentioned that the Village Panchayat Secretary had produced the digital diary of each of the toilets along with its beneficiary, which established that all the toilets had been completed and there is no reason to dispute the same.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">With respect to the incident of beating and abusing, the Court accepted the alibi of the BDO on the basis of the log book of his official vehicle and with regard to defamation, the Bench remarked that the report did not bear the signature of the BDO, and it was not issued under his authority.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Bench noted that entire application under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519391\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">156 (3)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> had no mention of any embezzlement of public money and the only allegation was that of discrepancy in the two reports submitted by two different officers. The Court highlighted that the findings of the report by the CDO showed no embezzlement and that the date of the report of the SDM is not available on record and there is a possibility that the two reports mention the situation existing on two different points on time. It further added that besides stating that the matter involves embezzlement of public money, there are no particulars in the order as to who has committed the embezzlement of public money and in what manner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court made special mention of that fact that the application under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519391\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">156(3)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> did not make a mention of any specific offence committed by the accused persons nor was any specific offence mentioned in the order of the CJM, therefore there was no material for the CJM to justify cognizance of the offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519434\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">190 (1) (b)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> and that it was merely on assumption but the Magistrate ought to have arrived at a prima facie satisfaction from a complaint or a police report or any information received from any person that such offence has been committed. The Court also remarked that, in this scenario, the CJM could have only passed an order for further investigation regarding the allegation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that the offences punishable under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561632\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">323<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561858\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">504<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561854\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">500<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> are non-cognizable offences, therefore, only a complaint can be registered in respect of those offences and that the CJM has acted illegally in directing trial of the accused persons for the aforesaid offences as a State&#8217;s case. Further, a failure to register an offence under Section 409 would not be an offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561433\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">166-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>, therefore, it cannot be concluded that the SHO has not obeyed the orders of the CJM.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Bench while stating that there were patent illegalities in the order of the CJM which warranted interference by this instant Court, allowed the revision of the impugned order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">State of UP v. Chief Judicial Magistrate Barabanki, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/dNLlf3nt\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine All 644<\/a>, Order dated 07-03-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Revisionist:<\/span> Government Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Opposite Party:<\/span> Advocate Dinesh Kumar, Advocate Dharmendra Singh, Advocate Krishna Gopal<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn1\" href=\"#fnref1\">1.<\/a> Misc. Application No. 717 of 2021.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Merely because the accused persons were holding some office, they cannot be tried for commission of any offence without any specific allegation of commission of any act on their part make out the ingredients of the offence.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314936,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2822,58008,2682,66778,49287,2675,66780,66777,66779,34362,43835],"class_list":["post-318400","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Allahabad_High_Court","tag-cognizance-of-offence","tag-embezzlement","tag-justice-subhash-vidyarthi","tag-previous-sanction","tag-public_servant","tag-public-toilet-scam","tag-revision-order","tag-revision-petition-allowed","tag-section-197-crpc","tag-section-401-crpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Allahabad HC sets aside CJM\u2019s order taking cognizance of criminal conspiracy against Development Officer and SP in Public Toilet Scam | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Allahabad HC set aside CJM\u2019s order taking cognizance of criminal conspiracy against Development Officer and SP in Public Toilet Scam\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Read why Allahabad HC set aside CJM\u2019s order taking cognizance of criminal conspiracy against Development Officer and SP in Public Toilet Scam\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad HC set aside CJM\u2019s order taking cognizance of criminal conspiracy against Development Officer and SP in Public Toilet Scam\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-03-26T08:30:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-04-03T09:44:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Read why Allahabad HC set aside CJM\u2019s order taking cognizance of criminal conspiracy against Development Officer and SP in Public Toilet Scam\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam\/\",\"name\":\"Allahabad HC sets aside CJM\u2019s order taking cognizance of criminal conspiracy against Development Officer and SP in Public Toilet Scam | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-26T08:30:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-04-03T09:44:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Allahabad HC set aside CJM\u2019s order taking cognizance of criminal conspiracy against Development Officer and SP in Public Toilet Scam\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Allahabad High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Read why Allahabad HC set aside CJM\u2019s order taking cognizance of criminal conspiracy against Development Officer and SP in Public Toilet Scam\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Allahabad HC sets aside CJM\u2019s order taking cognizance of criminal conspiracy against Development Officer and SP in Public Toilet Scam | SCC Times","description":"Allahabad HC set aside CJM\u2019s order taking cognizance of criminal conspiracy against Development Officer and SP in Public Toilet Scam","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Read why Allahabad HC set aside CJM\u2019s order taking cognizance of criminal conspiracy against Development Officer and SP in Public Toilet Scam","og_description":"Allahabad HC set aside CJM\u2019s order taking cognizance of criminal conspiracy against Development Officer and SP in Public Toilet Scam","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-03-26T08:30:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-04-03T09:44:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Read why Allahabad HC set aside CJM\u2019s order taking cognizance of criminal conspiracy against Development Officer and SP in Public Toilet Scam","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam\/","name":"Allahabad HC sets aside CJM\u2019s order taking cognizance of criminal conspiracy against Development Officer and SP in Public Toilet Scam | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-03-26T08:30:19+00:00","dateModified":"2024-04-03T09:44:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Allahabad HC set aside CJM\u2019s order taking cognizance of criminal conspiracy against Development Officer and SP in Public Toilet Scam","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Allahabad High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/allahabad-hc-set-aside-cjm-order-cognizance-criminal-conspiracy-development-officer-sp-public-toilet-scam\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Read why Allahabad HC set aside CJM\u2019s order taking cognizance of criminal conspiracy against Development Officer and SP in Public Toilet Scam"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":291187,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/03\/no-name-in-fir-chargesheet-magistrate-can-summon-accused-if-involvement-found-allahabad-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":318400,"position":0},"title":"In case of prima facie involvement, summon can be issued even in absence of name in police report or FIR: Allahabad HC reiterates","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that the Magistrate is not bound in such a situation to follow the procedure laid down in Sections 200 and 202 of CrPC for taking cognizance of a case under Section 190(1)(a), though, it is open to him to act under Section 200 or Section 202\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295043,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/20\/allahabad-hc-denies-relief-man-accused-posting-lord-hanuman-disrespectable-picture-media-legalnews\/","url_meta":{"origin":318400,"position":1},"title":"Inherent powers of High Court are well defined: Allahabad High Court refuses to quash case against man accused of posting Lord Hanuman&#8217;s disrespectable picture","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court reiterated that at the stage of taking cognizance, the Court should not get in the merits of the case, and at such stage, the Court's power is limited.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":317871,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/20\/allahabad-high-court-refuses-quash-chargesheet-3-men-accused-rasing-anti-india-slogans-temple\/","url_meta":{"origin":318400,"position":2},"title":"Allahabad HC declines to quash criminal proceedings against 3 men accused of raising slogans against India, and abusing persons in a Temple","author":"Editor","date":"March 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that, while deciding an application under Section 482 CrPC, it can only examine whether the case for trial of the accused person is made out on the basis of prosecution allegations and the material collected in support thereof.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282812,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/31\/allahabad-high-court-an-order-of-discharge-would-be-warranted-only-in-cases-where-court-is-satisfied-that-there-are-no-chances-of-conviction-and-the-trial-would-be-a-futi\/","url_meta":{"origin":318400,"position":3},"title":"An order of discharge would be warranted only in cases where Court is satisfied that there are no chances of conviction, and trial would be a futile exercise; Allahabad High Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"January 31, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court has held that the Trial Court has, after analysing the entire facts and evidence have concluded that there is sufficient ground to frame charges against the accused, and thus has rejected the discharge application. So, there is no illegality in the impugned order","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":280369,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/26\/allahabad-high-court-no-illegality-in-taking-written-statement-of-witness-under-section-161-crpc-when-reduced-in-recording-in-case-diary-in-presence-of-witnesses-as-well-as\/","url_meta":{"origin":318400,"position":4},"title":"Allahabad High Court| No illegality in taking written statement of witness under Section 161 CrPC when reduced into writing in presence of witnesses as well as I.O.","author":"Editor","date":"December 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"A written statement sent by post or deliver by another person, may not fall under \u2018to examine orally' but a written statement submitted by witness himself to I.O., and if the I.O. has assured its genuineness and reduced it in writing, shall be a statement duly recorded under Section 161\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":282925,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/magistrate-cannot-summon-accused-on-a-printed-proforma-without-assigning-any-reason-nor-can-take-cognizance-on-police-report-without-applying-judicial-mind-allahabad-high-cour\/","url_meta":{"origin":318400,"position":5},"title":"Magistrate cannot summon accused on a printed proforma without assigning any reason nor can take cognizance on police report without applying judicial mind, Allahabad High Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"February 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court remitted back the matter to the Magistrate and directed him to decide afresh the issue for taking cognizance and summoning the applicants and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318400","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=318400"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318400\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314936"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=318400"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=318400"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=318400"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}