{"id":31811,"date":"2016-01-06T15:37:07","date_gmt":"2016-01-06T10:07:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=31811"},"modified":"2016-02-05T17:37:08","modified_gmt":"2016-02-05T12:07:08","slug":"repossession-of-goods-by-the-financial-institution-in-case-of-default-in-repayment-of-loan-does-not-amount-to-theft","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/repossession-of-goods-by-the-financial-institution-in-case-of-default-in-repayment-of-loan-does-not-amount-to-theft\/","title":{"rendered":"Repossession of goods by the financial institution in case of default in repayment of loan does not amount to theft"},"content":{"rendered":"

Madras High Court<\/strong>: While setting aside the FIR registered against the officials of the Bank for an offence under Section 379 Penal Code, a bench of S. Vaidyanathan J ruled that no criminal action could be taken against the financier\/ financial institution for repossessing the goods hypothecated with them in case of default in repayment of loan.<\/p>\n

In the instant case, a loan agreement was signed between the petitioner and the 2nd<\/sup> respondent for a sum of Rs.9,00,000\/- for purchase of a car. The petitioner seized the car on default in the repayment of loan and kept it in their custody. The 2nd<\/sup> respondent filed a case against the officials of the Bank for an offence under Section 379 IPC. After registering the case, the 1st<\/sup> respondent Police sent a communication to the bank, asking them to surrender the vehicle, as the same is required for investigation as well as for production before the Court. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed the present petition under Section 482 of CrPC to quash the FIR pending on the file of the 1st respondent Police.<\/p>\n

The Court referred K.A. Mathai \u00a0v. Kora Bibikutty,<\/em> (1996) 7 SCC 212<\/a> where it was held that in case of default to make payment of installments financier had a right to resume possession even if the hire purchase agreement does not contain a clause of resumption of possession for the reason that such a condition is to be read in the Agreement. The Court also referred Anup Sarmah vs. Bhola Nath Sharma, <\/em>(2013) 1 SCC 400<\/a>\u00a0where it was held that in an Agreement of hire purchase, the purchaser remains merely a trustee\/bailee on behalf of the financier \/ financial institution and ownership remains with the latter. Accordingly, the Court made it clear that in case vehicle is seized by the financier, no criminal action can be taken against him as he is repossessing the goods owned by him, and in such an eventuality, it cannot be held that the financier had committed an offence of theft and that too, with the requisite mens rea and requisite dishonest intention. [HDFC Bank Limited v. State, 2015 SCC Online Mad 10573<\/a>,<\/em> decided on 21.12.2015]<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Madras High Court: While setting aside the FIR registered against the officials of the Bank for an offence under Section 379 Penal <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[4381,3394,4391,4401],"class_list":["post-31811","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-default","tag-goods","tag-repossession","tag-theft"],"yoast_head":"\nRepossession of goods by the financial institution in case of default in repayment of loan does not amount to theft | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/repossession-of-goods-by-the-financial-institution-in-case-of-default-in-repayment-of-loan-does-not-amount-to-theft\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Repossession of goods by the financial institution in case of default in repayment of loan does not amount to theft\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madras High Court: While setting aside the FIR registered against the officials of the Bank for an offence under Section 379 Penal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/repossession-of-goods-by-the-financial-institution-in-case-of-default-in-repayment-of-loan-does-not-amount-to-theft\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-01-06T10:07:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-05T12:07:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/repossession-of-goods-by-the-financial-institution-in-case-of-default-in-repayment-of-loan-does-not-amount-to-theft\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/repossession-of-goods-by-the-financial-institution-in-case-of-default-in-repayment-of-loan-does-not-amount-to-theft\/\",\"name\":\"Repossession of goods by the financial institution in case of default in repayment of loan does not amount to theft | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-01-06T10:07:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-05T12:07:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/repossession-of-goods-by-the-financial-institution-in-case-of-default-in-repayment-of-loan-does-not-amount-to-theft\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/repossession-of-goods-by-the-financial-institution-in-case-of-default-in-repayment-of-loan-does-not-amount-to-theft\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/repossession-of-goods-by-the-financial-institution-in-case-of-default-in-repayment-of-loan-does-not-amount-to-theft\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Repossession of goods by the financial institution in case of default in repayment of loan does not amount to theft\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Repossession of goods by the financial institution in case of default in repayment of loan does not amount to theft | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/repossession-of-goods-by-the-financial-institution-in-case-of-default-in-repayment-of-loan-does-not-amount-to-theft\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Repossession of goods by the financial institution in case of default in repayment of loan does not amount to theft","og_description":"Madras High Court: While setting aside the FIR registered against the officials of the Bank for an offence under Section 379 Penal","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/repossession-of-goods-by-the-financial-institution-in-case-of-default-in-repayment-of-loan-does-not-amount-to-theft\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-01-06T10:07:07+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-05T12:07:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/repossession-of-goods-by-the-financial-institution-in-case-of-default-in-repayment-of-loan-does-not-amount-to-theft\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/repossession-of-goods-by-the-financial-institution-in-case-of-default-in-repayment-of-loan-does-not-amount-to-theft\/","name":"Repossession of goods by the financial institution in case of default in repayment of loan does not amount to theft | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-01-06T10:07:07+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-05T12:07:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/repossession-of-goods-by-the-financial-institution-in-case-of-default-in-repayment-of-loan-does-not-amount-to-theft\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/repossession-of-goods-by-the-financial-institution-in-case-of-default-in-repayment-of-loan-does-not-amount-to-theft\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/repossession-of-goods-by-the-financial-institution-in-case-of-default-in-repayment-of-loan-does-not-amount-to-theft\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Repossession of goods by the financial institution in case of default in repayment of loan does not amount to theft"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":264487,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/national-company-law-tribunal-orders-insolvency-proceedings-against-supertech\/","url_meta":{"origin":31811,"position":0},"title":"National Company Law Tribunal orders insolvency proceedings against Supertech: Indebted and defaulted repayment of loan","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi: The Coram of P.N. Prasad, Judicial Member and Rahul Bhatnagar, Technical Member, declared insolvency proceedings against the builder Supertech Limited. An application was filed to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against Supertech Limited under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316660,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/11\/know-thy-judge-justice-vaidyanathan-madras-hc-chief-justice-meghalaya-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":31811,"position":1},"title":"Know Thy Judge | Justice S. Vaidyanathan, the 12th Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice S. Vaidyanathan was appointed by the President as new Chief Justice of the High Court of Meghalaya on 02-02-2024 and took charge of his new office on 11-02-2024.","rel":"","context":"In "Know thy Judge"","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Justice S. Vaidyanathan Meghalaya High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Justice-S.-Vaidyanathan-Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Justice-S.-Vaidyanathan-Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Justice-S.-Vaidyanathan-Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Justice-S.-Vaidyanathan-Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313714,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/fundamental-right-to-travel-abroad-cannot-be-curtailed-only-because-of-default-in-loan-payment-dhc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":31811,"position":2},"title":"Fundamental right to travel abroad cannot be curtailed only because of default in loan payment: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"February 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOffice Memorandum issued by Ministry of Home Affairs permits Banks to issue a request for opening a Look Out Circular, in exceptional cases, even if they are not covered by its guidelines, even in such cases, the same can be issued only if departure of such person is detrimental to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":251543,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/20\/pawnor-under-contract-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":31811,"position":3},"title":"Del HC | Can \u2018Pawnor\u2019 under Ss. 172\/176 of Contract Act be made liable for repayment of entire debt, in absence of any guarantee being furnished? Succinct Report\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Rajiv Sahai Endlaw and Asha Menon, JJ., held that the pawnor, merely by his act of delivering his own goods to a creditor in consideration of a credit facility granted to the debtor\/borrower, by legal fiction becomes liable for the entire debt, would\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":232413,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/17\/bom-hc-rbi-circulars-granting-moratorium-on-loan-repayment-does-not-apply-to-mutual-funds-and-debentures\/","url_meta":{"origin":31811,"position":4},"title":"Bom HC | RBI Circulars granting moratorium on loan repayment does not apply to mutual funds and debentures","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of R.D. Dhanuka and V.G. Bisht, JJ., held that the RBI Circulars dated 27th march, 2020 and 23rd may, 2020 with regard to moratorium on repayment of term loans will not apply to Mutual Funds and Debentures. Petitioner had made a private placement of 650\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":199940,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/09\/contractual-terms-cannot-be-altered-by-virtue-of-article-226-of-the-constitution-of-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":31811,"position":5},"title":"Contractual terms cannot be altered by virtue of Article 226 of the Constitution of India","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 9, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dama Seshadri Naidu, J., decided a writ petition wherein it held that the jurisdiction of Article 226 of the Constitution of India does not go to the extent of altering the terms of a contract. As per the facts of the case,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31811","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31811"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31811\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31811"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31811"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31811"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}