{"id":318084,"date":"2024-03-22T12:00:31","date_gmt":"2024-03-22T06:30:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=318084"},"modified":"2024-04-03T16:45:26","modified_gmt":"2024-04-03T11:15:26","slug":"delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Arrest and Jail should be resorted in rare cases of contumacious denial to pay the maintenance; Delhi High Court sets aside detention order"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> An appeal was filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001572296\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808783\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Family Courts Act, 1984<\/a> was filed on behalf of the appellant\/husband against the order dated 30-09-2022 vide which the appellant\/husband has been directed to be taken into custody for civil imprisonment on account of non-payment of arrears of maintenance awarded under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543751\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">24<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hindu Marriage Act, 1955<\/a> in the execution petition. A division bench of Suresh Kumar Kait and Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ., sets aside the impugned order of detention of the appellant\/husband sentencing him to undergo civil imprisonment for another period of three months in compliance of the maintenance decree for not being justified.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The case in question revolves around a dispute concerning the enforcement of a maintenance decree under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543751\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">24<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hindu Marriage Act<\/a> (HMA). The appellant (husband), was ordered by the Court to provide maintenance to the respondent (wife), called the decree-holder. Despite the Court&#8217;s order, the appellant failed to comply with the maintenance decree, leading to legal proceedings initiated by the decree-holder. Following the appellant&#8217;s repeated defaults in payment of maintenance, the decree-holder filed multiple execution petitions seeking the enforcement of the maintenance decree. These petitions were filed periodically as the maintenance payments accrued over time. However, despite the decree holder&#8217;s efforts to enforce the decree through the legal process, the appellant continued to default on the payments, leading to further legal action.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">During the legal proceedings, the appellant raised several arguments challenging the repeated enforcement of the maintenance decree through civil imprisonment. The appellant contended that under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523803\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">58(1)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Civil Procedure Code<\/a> (CPC), civil imprisonment could not exceed three months for non-payment of a sum exceeding Rs. 5,000. Additionally, the appellant argued that re-arrest under the same decree was prohibited under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523803\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">58(2)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC<\/a>. The appellant also disputed the characterization of the maintenance decree as a composite decree, which would allow for repeated arrests and re-commitments.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court meticulously examined the provisions of the CPC governing civil imprisonment in execution of decrees, particularly focusing on Section 58. The Court analyzed the language and intent behind these provisions, considering previous case law and legal interpretations. Furthermore, the Court scrutinized the nature of maintenance decrees and their enforcement under the law. Through detailed analysis, the Court aimed to arrive at a reasoned understanding of the legal framework governing civil imprisonment in cases of non-compliance with maintenance decrees. The Court emphasized that re-arrests and re-commitments under the same decree were not permissible under the law. Additionally, the Court clarified the distinction between civil and criminal procedures regarding the enforcement of maintenance decrees.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court remarked that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;it is the total period in civil prison in execution of the decree in the same suit, cannot exceed three months. Though the decree may be executed in instalments as in the case of maintenance orders, but the decree\/order being only one, arrest can be made as prescribed, for a maximum period of three months. Though the execution petition may be filed for realization of the maintenance that may become due sometimes, that would not give a right to seek further imprisonment beyond the maximum period as prescribed by Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523803\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">58(2)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC<\/a>. A person who has already having been sent to civil imprisonment for a period of three months, cannot be sent to civil prison again in execution of the same decree for a second time. Further, merely because the judgement debtor had been detained in civil prison for the full term of three months as provided under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523803\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">58(2)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC<\/a>, his debt cannot be said to be discharged, which can still be recovered through other means as provided in the section.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further remarked that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;From the bare perusal of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519355\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">125(3)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a>, it is evident that for default of every month in payment of maintenance, the defaulter can be sent to one month imprisonment. Therefore, for every month, the defaulter is liable to be sent to one month imprisonment. The stark distinction between execution proceedings for an Order under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519355\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">125<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543751\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">24<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hindu Marriage Act<\/a>, is evident from the language used in the relevant sections. The present Order being under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543751\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">24<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hindu Marriage Act<\/a>, the Execution Petition is governed by the provisions of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC, 1908<\/a> which does not provide for re-arrest once the person has undergone the maximum period of three months of civil imprisonment.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that civil imprisonment for non-payment of maintenance under the same decree could not exceed three months in total. Consequently, the Court set aside the impugned order for further civil imprisonment, ruling in favor of the appellant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Mohiet Anand v. Parul Anand, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/zmXPH4oC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Del 1968<\/a>, decided on 01-02-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Parnjay Chopra, Advocate for appellant<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Y.K. Singh &amp; Mr. Pranaynath Jha, Advocates with respondent in person<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">A person who has already having been sent to civil imprisonment for a period of three months, cannot be sent to civil prison again in execution of the same decree for a second time.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[66678,66674,66673,2543,66677,66680,66675,66681,66679,66682,66672,12531,66676],"class_list":["post-318084","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-civil-imprisonment","tag-civil-imprisonment-duration","tag-contumacious-denial-of-maintenance","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-execution-of-maintenance-decree","tag-fairness-in-maintenance-recovery","tag-legal-restrictions-on-jail-time","tag-legal-rights-in-maintenance-disputes","tag-limitations-on-repeat-arrests","tag-maintenance-decree","tag-maintenance-enforcement-limitations","tag-section-125-crpc","tag-section-58-cpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi High Court prohibits repeat civil imprisonment for same decree| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Arrest and Jail should be resorted in rare cases of contumacious denial to pay the maintenance; Delhi High Court sets aside detention order\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Arrest and Jail should be resorted in rare cases of contumacious denial to pay the maintenance; Delhi High Court sets aside detention order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arrest and Jail should be resorted in rare cases of contumacious denial to pay the maintenance; Delhi High Court sets aside detention order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-03-22T06:30:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-04-03T11:15:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Arrest and Jail should be resorted in rare cases of contumacious denial to pay the maintenance; Delhi High Court sets aside detention order\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi High Court prohibits repeat civil imprisonment for same decree| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-22T06:30:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-04-03T11:15:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Arrest and Jail should be resorted in rare cases of contumacious denial to pay the maintenance; Delhi High Court sets aside detention order\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Arrest and Jail should be resorted in rare cases of contumacious denial to pay the maintenance; Delhi High Court sets aside detention order\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi High Court prohibits repeat civil imprisonment for same decree| SCC Times","description":"Arrest and Jail should be resorted in rare cases of contumacious denial to pay the maintenance; Delhi High Court sets aside detention order","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Arrest and Jail should be resorted in rare cases of contumacious denial to pay the maintenance; Delhi High Court sets aside detention order","og_description":"Arrest and Jail should be resorted in rare cases of contumacious denial to pay the maintenance; Delhi High Court sets aside detention order","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-03-22T06:30:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-04-03T11:15:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Arrest and Jail should be resorted in rare cases of contumacious denial to pay the maintenance; Delhi High Court sets aside detention order","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi High Court prohibits repeat civil imprisonment for same decree| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-03-22T06:30:31+00:00","dateModified":"2024-04-03T11:15:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Arrest and Jail should be resorted in rare cases of contumacious denial to pay the maintenance; Delhi High Court sets aside detention order","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/delhi-high-court-prohibits-repeat-civil-imprisonment-for-same-maintenance-decree-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Arrest and Jail should be resorted in rare cases of contumacious denial to pay the maintenance; Delhi High Court sets aside detention order"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":300444,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/31\/delhi-high-court-maintenance-legal-debt-recovery-civil-suit-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":318084,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court | Maintenance amount is a legal &#8216;debt&#8217;, can be recovered through a civil suit","author":"Arunima","date":"August 31, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThis is a case that clamours for the exercise of judicial conscience to address the conundrum of whether an individual's right to recover arrears in maintenance subsists even after the expiry of the period stipulated in section 125(3) CrPC.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301573,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/15\/delhi-hc-divorced-daughter-is-not-a-dependant-u-s-21-of-the-hindu-adoption-and-maintenance-act-1956-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":318084,"position":1},"title":"Divorced daughter is not a dependant u\/s 21 of Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, thus not entitled to maintenance: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"September 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAn unmarried or widowed daughter is recognized to have a claim in the estate of the deceased, but a \u2018divorced daughter\u2019 does not feature in the category of dependents entitled to maintenance.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":380001,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-s-300-crpc-not-applicable-to-dv-act-maintenance-arrears-fully-recoverable\/","url_meta":{"origin":318084,"position":2},"title":"S. 300 CrPC inapplicable to DV Act proceedings; maintenance arrears recoverable despite civil imprisonment: Allahabad High Court","author":"Malika Bhola","date":"April 2, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Invoking Section 300 CrPC to deny execution of maintenance under the DV Act is contrary to law and reflects non-application of mind.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"maintenance arrears recoverable despite imprisonment","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/maintenance-arrears-recoverable-despite-imprisonment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/maintenance-arrears-recoverable-despite-imprisonment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/maintenance-arrears-recoverable-despite-imprisonment.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/maintenance-arrears-recoverable-despite-imprisonment.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304802,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/15\/delhi-hc-maintenance-proceedings-under-hindu-adoptions-and-maintenance-act-1956-are-not-suits-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":318084,"position":3},"title":"Maintenance proceedings under Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 are not suits, ad valorem court fee not liable to be paid: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"October 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Family Courts Act, 1984 was enacted pursuant to the 59th Report of the Law Commission wherein it was stressed that in dealing with the disputes concerning the family, the family court should adopt an approach radically different from that adopted in ordinary civil proceedings.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":308496,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/delhi-hc-focus-of-domestic-violence-act-to-provide-immediate-relief-to-victims-by-way-of-maintenance-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":318084,"position":4},"title":"Domestic Violence Act focuses on providing immediate relief to victims through maintenance, not Imprisonment for non-payment of maintenance: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"December 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Domestic Violence Act was enacted to offer certain civil remedies to the victims of domestic violence. These remedies encompass an array of protective measures, residence orders, and monetary reliefs, designed to address the multifaceted nature of abuse.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":302026,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/21\/delhi-high-court-reduces-maintenance-expense-principles-equity-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":318084,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court reduces maintenance expense of husband given to wife on principles of equity","author":"Arunima","date":"September 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"There is no dispute to the legal position that the spouse is liable to maintain the other spouse and children, however, equity shall be maintained only if one is directed to pay interim maintenance to his\/her capacity.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318084","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=318084"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/318084\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=318084"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=318084"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=318084"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}