{"id":317790,"date":"2024-03-19T16:15:26","date_gmt":"2024-03-19T10:45:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=317790"},"modified":"2024-03-22T10:00:29","modified_gmt":"2024-03-22T04:30:29","slug":"college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf\/","title":{"rendered":"College Romance Web Series | Supreme Court quashes obscenity case against The Viral Fever"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> In appeals against Delhi High Court&#8217;s dismissal to quash orders of investigation and prosecution for production, transmission, and online publication of obscene and sexually-explicit material under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540657\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">67<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540658\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">67-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002796572\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Information Technology Act, 2000<\/a> (&#8216;IT Act&#8217;) against the makers of web-series &#8216;College Romance&#8217; (TVF Media Labs Private Ltd.), the Division Bench of AS Bopanna and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, JJ. quashed the criminal case against the makers of &#8216;College Romance&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Factual Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellants in the instant matter were the actors, casting director, script writers, creator of &#8216;College Romance&#8217; and the media company owning the YouTube channel which hosted the web-series. The instant matter pertained to the complaint filed before the Assistant Commissioner of Police stating that Episode 5 Season 1 of the said web series titled &#8216;Happily F****d Up&#8217;, contained vulgar and obscene language, constituting offence under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561592\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">292<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561594\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">294<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561863\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">509<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;), Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540657\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">67<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540658\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">67-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002796572\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IT Act<\/a> and Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001569964\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2(c)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001569965\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002810436\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986<\/a>. Later, Investigating Officer denied cognizable offence in the absence of obscenity, but the ACMM directed registration of First Information Report (&#8216;FIR&#8217;) under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561592\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">292<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561594\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">294<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> and Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540657\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">67<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540658\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">67-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002796572\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IT Act<\/a> with the explanation that &#8220;vulgar language used is prima facie capable of appealing to prurient interests of the audience and is hence obscene&#8221;. Revision petition led the Additional Sessions Judge to modify the order directing FIR only under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540657\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">67<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540658\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">67-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002796572\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IT Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Petition under Section 482 seeking to quash the said orders got dismissed by the Delhi High Court and consequent directions were issued for registration of FIR under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540657\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">67<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540658\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">67-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002796572\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IT Act<\/a>, which was impugned hereunder. An FIR was accordingly registered on 16-04-2023.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#8217;s Analysis<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court perused the High Court&#8217;s explanation and concluded that the issue to be determined was whether use of expletives and profane language in the titles and content of &#8216;College Romance&#8217; constituted an offence of publication and transmission of obscene and sexually explicit content under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540657\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">67<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540658\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">67-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002796572\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IT Act<\/a>. The Court went on to examine the provisions in context of &#8216;obscenity&#8217; and &#8216;sexually explicit material&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court touched upon constitutionally upheld Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561592\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">292<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> through <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ranjit D. Udeshi<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/MBW42Y2a\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1964 SCC OnLine SC 52<\/a>, Hicklin Test, sex, nudity, public decency and morality, and the likeliness to pander to lascivious, prurient, sexually precocious minds, and appeal to or have the tendency to appeal to the &#8220;carnal side of human nature&#8221; for explaining obscenity. The concept was refined in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Chandrakant Kalyandas Kakodkar<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Uy9L67VB\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(1969) 2 SCC 687<\/a> and a catena of cases throwing light upon sex and nudity in art and literature.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court hinted that the High Court purportedly applied the community standard test as laid down in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Aveek Sarkar<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of W.B.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/S8DTd133\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2014) 4 SCC 257<\/a>, and also appreciated the position of law for standard determination of &#8216;obscene&#8217;. The Court highlighted the incorrectly framed question for inquiry by the High Court and pointed towards the natural arrival at a wrong answer, for equating profanities and vulgarity with obscenity, without analyzing in detail how such language by itself could be sexual, lascivious, prurient, or depraving and corrupting. It explained that &#8220;the enquiry under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561592\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">292<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> or under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540657\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">67<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002796572\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IT Act<\/a> does not hinge on whether the language or words are decent, or whether they are commonly used in the country. Rather, from the plain language of the provision, the inquiry is to determine whether the content is lascivious, appeals to prurient interests, or tends to deprave and corrupt the minds of those in whose hands it is likely to fall.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court went on to explain that &#8220;While the literal meaning of the terms used may be sexual in nature and they may refer to sexual acts, their usage does not arouse sexual feelings or lust in any viewer of ordinary prudence and common sense. Rather, the common usage of these words is reflective of emotions of anger, rage, frustration, grief, or perhaps excitement&#8230;. When we notice the use of such language in the context of the plot and theme of the web-series, which is a light-hearted show on the college lives of young students, it is clear that the use of these terms is not related to sex and does not have any sexual connotation.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While clarifying that the standard for determining obscenity could not be that of an adolescent&#8217;s or child&#8217;s mind, the Court hinted towards the High Court which &#8216;incorrectly used the standard of &#8220;impressionable minds&#8221;.&#8217; For the web series not being classified as restricted to those above the age of 18 years, as pointed out by the High Court, the Court commented that &#8220;While such anxiety is not misplaced, the availability of content that contains profanities and swear words cannot be regulated by criminalizing it as obscene.&#8221; It further hinted at the lack of offence made out under Section 67A as per High Court&#8217;s remarks.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court allowed instant appeals and set aside the impugned judgment and FIR under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540657\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">67<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540658\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">67-A<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002796572\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IT Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><!--\n\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Apoorva Arora v. State (NCT of Delhi), <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/uSw0VDFn\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 325<\/a>, decided on 19-03-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<hr\/>\n\n\n\n\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioners:<\/span> Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv., Sajan Poovayya, Sr. Adv, Mahesh Agarwal, Adv., Ameet Naik, Adv., Ankur Saigal, Adv., S. Lakshmi Iyer, Adv., Madhu Gadodiaya, Adv., Chirag Nayak, Adv., Sanjanthi Sajan Poovayya, Adv., Misha Rohatgi, Adv., Devansh Srivastava, Adv., Raksha Agarwal, Adv., Kajal Dalal, Adv., Abhishek Kakker, Adv., Raksha Agarwal, Adv., Pallavi Mishra, Adv., Sujoy Mukharji, Adv., Tarini Kulkarni, Adv., E. C. Agrawala, AOR, Madhavi Divan, Sr. Adv., Harish Salve, Sr. Adv., Ameet Naik, Adv., Raghav Shankar, Adv., Madhu Gadodia, Adv., Harshvardhan Jha, Adv., Yugandhara Pawar Jha, AOR, Sujoy Mukherjee, Adv., Tarini Kulkarni, Adv., Pallavi Mishra, Adv., Aman Pathak, Adv.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondents:<\/span> K M Nataraj, A.S.G., Shreekant Neelappa Terdal, AOR, Sarath Nambiar, Adv., Sanjay Kr. Tyagi, Adv., Sridhar Potaraju, Adv., Nidhi Khanna, Adv., Karthik Jasra, Adv., Dr. Arun Kr. Yadav, Adv., Arvind Singh, Adv., Indira Bhakar, Adv., Vinayak Sharma, Adv., Vatsal Joshi, Adv., Chitransh Sharma, Adv., Anuj Srinivas Udupa, Adv., Satvika Thakur, Adv., Yogi Rajpurohit, Adv., Aayush Saklani, Adv., Shubham Mishra, Adv., Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR, VVV Pattabhi Ram, Adv., Prashant Rawat, Adv., Purnendu Bajpai, Adv., Rajat Nair, Adv., Khushboo Aggarwal, Adv.<\/p>\n\n--><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-overflow: ellipsis; background-color: #92A8D1; text-align:justify; clear:both; text-size-adjust: auto; overflow: auto;\">\n<p style=\"font-size: 18pt; margin-top: 5px; text-align: center;\">CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\" style=\"word-wrap: break-word; border-collapse:collapse; table-layout: fixed; margin-top: 10px;\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"41%\"\/>\n<col width=\"59%\"\/>\n<\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\"><p\"><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7;\"><b>Citation:<\/b><\/span><br \/> <span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-size: 10pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/uSw0VDFn\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 325<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p\"><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7;\"><b>Appellants&#160;:<\/b><\/span><br \/> Apoorva Arora<\/p>\n<p\"><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7;\"><b>Respondents&#160;:<\/b><\/span><br \/> State (NCT of Delhi)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7;\"><b>Advocates who appeared in this case<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7;\"><b>For Petitioners:<\/b><\/span><br \/> Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv., Sajan Poovayya, Sr. Adv, Mahesh Agarwal, Adv., Ameet Naik, Adv., Ankur Saigal, Adv., S. Lakshmi Iyer, Adv., Madhu Gadodiaya, Adv., Chirag Nayak, Adv., Sanjanthi Sajan Poovayya, Adv., Misha Rohatgi, Adv., Devansh Srivastava, Adv., Raksha Agarwal, Adv., Kajal Dalal, Adv., Abhishek Kakker, Adv., Raksha Agarwal, Adv., Pallavi Mishra, Adv., Sujoy Mukharji, Adv., Tarini Kulkarni, Adv., E. C. Agrawala, AOR, Madhavi Divan, Sr. Adv., Harish Salve, Sr. Adv., Ameet Naik, Adv., Raghav Shankar, Adv., Madhu Gadodia, Adv., Harshvardhan Jha, Adv., Yugandhara Pawar Jha, AOR, Sujoy Mukherjee, Adv., Tarini Kulkarni, Adv., Pallavi Mishra, Adv., Aman Pathak, Adv.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7;\"><b>For Petitioners:<\/b><\/span><br \/> Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv., Sajan Poovayya, Sr. Adv, Mahesh Agarwal, Adv., Ameet Naik, Adv., Ankur Saigal, Adv., S. Lakshmi Iyer, Adv., Madhu Gadodiaya, Adv., Chirag Nayak, Adv., Sanjanthi Sajan Poovayya, Adv., Misha Rohatgi, Adv., Devansh Srivastava, Adv., Raksha Agarwal, Adv., Kajal Dalal, Adv., Abhishek Kakker, Adv., Raksha Agarwal, Adv., Pallavi Mishra, Adv., Sujoy Mukharji, Adv., Tarini Kulkarni, Adv., E. C. Agrawala, AOR, Madhavi Divan, Sr. Adv., Harish Salve, Sr. Adv., Ameet Naik, Adv., Raghav Shankar, Adv., Madhu Gadodia, Adv., Harshvardhan Jha, Adv., Yugandhara Pawar Jha, AOR, Sujoy Mukherjee, Adv., Tarini Kulkarni, Adv., Pallavi Mishra, Adv., Aman Pathak, Adv.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-size: 12pt; margin-top: -20px; margin-left: 5px;\"><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7;\"><b>CORAM&#160;:<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"banner\" style=\"overflow: hidden; display: flex; justify-content: space-between; padding-left: 3%;\">\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/20.-A.S-Bopanna-modified.png\" alt=\"AS Bopanna, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">AS Bopanna, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/03\/supreme-court-know-thy-judge-ps-narasimha-legal-news-updates\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/33.-Narasimha-modified.png\" alt=\"Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%; border:2px solid #FF5733; padding: 1px;\"><br \/><b>Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J.<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Delhi High Court had earlier directed registration of a First Information Report (&#8216;FIR&#8217;) against the makers of TVF web series &#8216;College Romance&#8217;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67513,"featured_media":317793,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[66567,2543,3067,30630,4141,43000,5363,66566,55895],"class_list":["post-317790","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-college-romance","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-FIR","tag-it-act","tag-obscenity","tag-ott-platforms","tag-supreme-court","tag-the-viral-fever","tag-tvf"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>College Romance Web Series | Supreme Court quashes obscenity case against TVF | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court quashed criminal case against owners of College Romance\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"College Romance Web Series | Supreme Court quashes obscenity case against The Viral Fever\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court quashed criminal case against owners of College Romance\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-03-19T10:45:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-03-22T04:30:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/College-Romance-Obscenity.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"College Romance Web Series | Supreme Court quashes obscenity case against The Viral Fever\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf\/\",\"name\":\"College Romance Web Series | Supreme Court quashes obscenity case against TVF | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/College-Romance-Obscenity.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-19T10:45:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-22T04:30:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court quashed criminal case against owners of College Romance\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/College-Romance-Obscenity.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/College-Romance-Obscenity.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"College Romance Obscenity\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"College Romance Web Series | Supreme Court quashes obscenity case against The Viral Fever\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\",\"name\":\"Ridhi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ridhi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"College Romance Web Series | Supreme Court quashes obscenity case against TVF | SCC Times","description":"Supreme Court quashed criminal case against owners of College Romance","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"College Romance Web Series | Supreme Court quashes obscenity case against The Viral Fever","og_description":"Supreme Court quashed criminal case against owners of College Romance","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-03-19T10:45:26+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-03-22T04:30:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/College-Romance-Obscenity.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ridhi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"College Romance Web Series | Supreme Court quashes obscenity case against The Viral Fever","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ridhi","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf\/","name":"College Romance Web Series | Supreme Court quashes obscenity case against TVF | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/College-Romance-Obscenity.webp","datePublished":"2024-03-19T10:45:26+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-22T04:30:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea"},"description":"Supreme Court quashed criminal case against owners of College Romance","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/College-Romance-Obscenity.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/College-Romance-Obscenity.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"College Romance Obscenity"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/college-romance-web-series-supreme-court-quashes-obscenity-case-against-tvf\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"College Romance Web Series | Supreme Court quashes obscenity case against The Viral Fever"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea","name":"Ridhi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ridhi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/College-Romance-Obscenity.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":286716,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/obscene-lascivious-and-profane-language-delhi-high-court-reprimands-owners-of-tvf-web-series-college-romance\/","url_meta":{"origin":317790,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court reprimands owners of TVF web series \u2018College Romance\u2019 over \u201cobscene, lascivious and profane language\u201d","author":"Editor","date":"March 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court upheld the order of ASJ to register an FIR under the provision of the Information Technology Act, 2000 against the petitioner, however, clarified that the same does not include the direction to arrest any of the accused or petitioner.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280740,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/30\/sexual-harrasment-mumbai-court-acquits-tvf-founder-arunabh-kumar-on-grounds-of-no-concrete-evidence-unreasonable-delay-in-filing-fir-interest-witnesses-82\/","url_meta":{"origin":317790,"position":1},"title":"[Sexual Harassment] Mumbai Court acquits TVF founder Arunabh Kumar on grounds of \u2018no concrete evidence\u2019 \u2018unreasonable delay in filing FIR\u2019 \u2018interest witnesses\u2019 \u2018possibility of grudge or rivalry\u2019","author":"Editor","date":"December 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court acquitted the accused and held that the prosecution failed to prove their case beyond reasonable doubt.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Metropolitan Magistrate","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image129.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":318936,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/31\/supreme-court-roundup-march-2024-electoral-bonds-celebratory-firing-permanent-commission-to-woman-ssc-officer-compensation-to-neet-ug-candidates\/","url_meta":{"origin":317790,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court Roundup March 2024 | Electoral Bonds; Celebratory firing; Permanent Commission to Woman SSC Officer; Compensation to NEET UG Candidates","author":"Editor","date":"March 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The month of March began with a setback to MPs\/ MLAs with Supreme Court stripping them off their immunity if they cast vote after taking bribes and continued with opening the pandora\u2019s box of \u2018electoral bonds\u2019 kept safely with SBI.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court Roundup","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/sc-round.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/sc-round.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/sc-round.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/sc-round.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":93831,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/21\/if-no-charge-has-been-made-out-under-section-67of-it-act-then-appellant-cannot-be-proceeded-against-under-section-292-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":317790,"position":3},"title":"If no charge has been made out under Section 67of IT Act, then appellant cannot be proceeded against under Section 292 IPC","author":"Saba","date":"December 21, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: While determining the question whether the appellant who has been discharged under Section 67 of the IT Act could be proceeded under Section 292 IPC, the Bench of Dipak Misra and Praffula C. Pant, JJ. held that when the Information Technology Act in various provisions deals with obscenity\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296198,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/tandav-web-series-row-sc-adjourns-hearing-to-august-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":317790,"position":4},"title":"Here&#8217;s all you need to know about Tandav Web-Series Row as SC directs States to file Status Report of FIRs","author":"Editor","date":"July 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The makers and producers of the Amazon web-series \u2018Tandav\u2019 were accused of hurting religious sentiments and outraging religious beliefs by inserting controversial dialogues.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"tandav web-series","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tandav-web-series.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tandav-web-series.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tandav-web-series.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tandav-web-series.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270325,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/19\/mohammed-zubair-multiple-fir-to-be-heard-on-july-20-no-precipitate-steps-till-then-supreme-court-legal-news-updates-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":317790,"position":5},"title":"Supreme Court to hear Mohd Zubair&#8217;s plea challenging multiple FIRs on July 20; &#8220;No precipitate steps&#8221; against him till then","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: When the matter relating to multiple FIRs being registered against Alt-New co-founder and fact checker Mohammed Zubair was urgently mentioned before the bench of Dr. Dy Chandrachud and AS Bopanna, JJ, the Court listed the matter for hearing on July 20, 2022 but directed that, \u201cno precipitate steps\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Supreme-Court-to-hear-Mohd.-Zubairs-plea-challenging-multiple-FIRs-on-July-20-No-precipitate-steps-against-him-till-then.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Supreme-Court-to-hear-Mohd.-Zubairs-plea-challenging-multiple-FIRs-on-July-20-No-precipitate-steps-against-him-till-then.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Supreme-Court-to-hear-Mohd.-Zubairs-plea-challenging-multiple-FIRs-on-July-20-No-precipitate-steps-against-him-till-then.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Supreme-Court-to-hear-Mohd.-Zubairs-plea-challenging-multiple-FIRs-on-July-20-No-precipitate-steps-against-him-till-then.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Supreme-Court-to-hear-Mohd.-Zubairs-plea-challenging-multiple-FIRs-on-July-20-No-precipitate-steps-against-him-till-then.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317790","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67513"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=317790"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317790\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317793"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=317790"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=317790"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=317790"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}