{"id":317726,"date":"2024-03-19T15:30:33","date_gmt":"2024-03-19T10:00:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=317726"},"modified":"2024-03-21T11:46:03","modified_gmt":"2024-03-21T06:16:03","slug":"police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Police protection is neither fundamental right nor statutory right\u2019; Madhya Pradesh High Court directs removal of Police security"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition seeking police protection due to alleged threats to petitioner&#8217;s lives and property by certain miscreants, a single-judge bench comprising of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Anand Pathak,* J.<\/span>, held that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;providing security to petitioners and alike persons in such manner\/flimsy pretext is contrary to the Constitutional Spirit and undermines the well-being quotient of society at large&#8221;<\/span> and ordered the removal of police security and directed the petitioners to pay outstanding fees.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the petitioners, who are real brothers and permanent residents of Gwalior, sought relief through a writ petition under Article 226\/227 of the Constitution and requested the Court to direct the Superintendent of Police to provide them with security due to alleged threats to their lives and property. This request stemmed from an incident in 2005 when the petitioners were threatened by miscreants for extortion. Despite several representations and intermittent police protection, an attack occurred in which the son of one petitioner was killed. The miscreants involved were prosecuted and convicted for various offenses. The petitioners persisted in seeking police protection over the years, even after the accused were convicted. The petitioners, despite possessing licensed weapons, sought police protection on multiple occasions. The police department raised concerns over the misuse of police resources and non-payment of fees by the petitioners for the security provided. The police authorities eventually moved an application seeking dismissal of the petition, citing the financial burden and misuse of resources.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">While acknowledging the unfortunate incident involving the petitioners, the Court held that prolonged police protection without assessing ongoing threat perception is unjustified. The Court reasoned that while police protection may be warranted in certain circumstances, it should be provided temporarily and in exceptional cases. The Court criticised the petitioners for failing to pay for the security services provided and noted their misuse of police protection for personal gain. The Court emphasised on the primary duties of the police in maintaining law and order and highlighted the misuse of resources when providing prolonged security to individuals.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;So far as plea of police security is concerned, it is neither a Fundamental Right nor a Statutory Right of the petitioners to claim personal guards from police department. Police is meant for providing protection and security to common man and it is not meant for protecting persons like petitioners for years together that too without assessing threat perception.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court dismissed the petition and held that police protection is not a fundamental or statutory right. The Court directed the removal of police security for the petitioners and ordered them to pay the outstanding dues promptly. Additionally, the Court instructed authorities to reassess the threat perception of individuals receiving police protection and to ensure that such protection is only provided when necessary. The Court also proposed the formation of a committee to formulate rules and regulations regarding the provision of police protection in the future.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Dilip Sharma<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of M.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/g5MQz7J4\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine MP 1314<\/a>, order dated 14-03-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Anand Pathak<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri Sanjeev Jain, Counsel for the Petitioners<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri Neelesh Singh Tomar, Government Advocate, Counsel for the Respondents<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Madhya Pradesh High Court highlighted the need for judicious assessment of threat perception and responsible utilization of police resources.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":317738,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[66536,59820,7201,9601,40627],"class_list":["post-317726","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-fundamental-right-statutory-right","tag-justice-anand-pathak","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-police-protection","tag-police-security"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Police protection is neither fundamental right nor statutory right: Madhya Pradesh High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court directed removal of Police security and held that police protection is neither fundamental right nor statutory right.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Misleading Patanjali Ads | Supreme Court orders personal appearance of Baba Ramdev, Acharya Balakrishna\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In Patanjali misleading advertisements case, the Supreme Court ordered Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balakrishna to personally appear before the Court.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-03-19T10:00:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-03-21T06:16:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Police protection is neither fundamental right nor statutory right\u2019; Madhya Pradesh High Court directs removal of Police security\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/19\\\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/19\\\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"headline\":\"\u2018Police protection is neither fundamental right nor statutory right\u2019; Madhya Pradesh High Court directs removal of Police security\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-19T10:00:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-21T06:16:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/19\\\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":541,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/19\\\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"fundamental right statutory right\",\"Justice Anand Pathak\",\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\",\"police protection\",\"Police Security\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/19\\\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/19\\\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/19\\\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\\\/\",\"name\":\"Police protection is neither fundamental right nor statutory right: Madhya Pradesh High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/19\\\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/19\\\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-19T10:00:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-21T06:16:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court directed removal of Police security and held that police protection is neither fundamental right nor statutory right.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/19\\\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/19\\\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/19\\\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/19\\\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Police protection is neither fundamental right nor statutory right\u2019; Madhya Pradesh High Court directs removal of Police security\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_7\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Police protection is neither fundamental right nor statutory right: Madhya Pradesh High Court | SCC Times","description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court directed removal of Police security and held that police protection is neither fundamental right nor statutory right.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Misleading Patanjali Ads | Supreme Court orders personal appearance of Baba Ramdev, Acharya Balakrishna","og_description":"In Patanjali misleading advertisements case, the Supreme Court ordered Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balakrishna to personally appear before the Court.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-03-19T10:00:33+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-03-21T06:16:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Police protection is neither fundamental right nor statutory right\u2019; Madhya Pradesh High Court directs removal of Police security","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/"},"author":{"name":"Ritu","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"headline":"\u2018Police protection is neither fundamental right nor statutory right\u2019; Madhya Pradesh High Court directs removal of Police security","datePublished":"2024-03-19T10:00:33+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-21T06:16:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/"},"wordCount":541,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","keywords":["fundamental right statutory right","Justice Anand Pathak","Madhya Pradesh High Court","police protection","Police Security"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/","name":"Police protection is neither fundamental right nor statutory right: Madhya Pradesh High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-03-19T10:00:33+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-21T06:16:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court directed removal of Police security and held that police protection is neither fundamental right nor statutory right.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Madhya Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/police-protection-is-neither-fundamental-right-nor-statutory-right-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Police protection is neither fundamental right nor statutory right\u2019; Madhya Pradesh High Court directs removal of Police security"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317726","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=317726"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317726\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317738"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=317726"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=317726"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=317726"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}