{"id":317356,"date":"2024-03-16T16:00:37","date_gmt":"2024-03-16T10:30:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=317356"},"modified":"2024-03-21T12:07:34","modified_gmt":"2024-03-21T06:37:34","slug":"delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court<\/span>: An application under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519739\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">438<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code<\/a> was preferred on behalf of the petitioner seeking anticipatory bail in FIR under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561756\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">419<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561758\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">420<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561375\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">120-B<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> and Sections 66C and 66D of IT Act, registered at Crime Branch, Delhi. Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J., refused anticipatory bail because at this stage, petitioner cannot be presumed to have no association with the running of fictitious call centre, since Investigating Agency is in possession of WhatsApp messages of the petitioner exchanged with staff deployed at the call centre and the same needs to be investigated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The case against the petitioner arises from FIR registered at the Crime Branch, Delhi, under various sections of the IPC and the IT Act. The prosecution alleged that a raid was conducted at a property in Village Kakrola, Delhi, where a fake call center was operating. The call center was involved in fraudulent activities, including impersonating Amazon employees and convincing customers, particularly those based abroad, to purchase gift vouchers which were then illegally encashed. Eleven tele-callers were found at the scene, along with digital devices used for the fraudulent activities. The case was initiated based on secret information about the operation of the fake call center. The allegations of fraud and illegal activities prompted the authorities to conduct a raid, leading to the registration of FIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Counsel for petitioner submitted that he was merely a director of the company, Tremendous Trips Private Limited, and that another individual was primarily responsible for managing its affairs. They presented documents to support the petitioner&#8217;s limited involvement in the company&#8217;s operations. The Counsel emphasized the lack of evidence linking him directly to the fraudulent activities and highlighted the absence of complaints from victims. The prosecution opposed the petitioner&#8217;s application for anticipatory bail, pointing out that he had evaded joining the investigation despite notices and warrants. They presented evidence, including WhatsApp messages, allegedly linking Ahmad to the fraudulent activities.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court carefully considered the arguments presented by both parties. It noted that the petitioner had failed to join the investigation and had evaded appearing before the authorities despite notices and warrants. The Court acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations and the need for a thorough investigation into the modus operandi of the fraud, including tracing hawala transactions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that while the petitioner may not have been directly involved in managing the company, the evidence suggested his association with fraudulent activities. The presence of WhatsApp messages exchanged between Ahmad and the call center staff indicated a deeper involvement that warranted further investigation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After thorough consideration, the Court held that no grounds for anticipatory bail were made out the case. The seriousness of the allegations, failure to cooperate with the investigation, and the evidence linking him to the fraudulent activities led to the dismissal of his application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Irshad Ahmed v. State NCT of Delhi, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/r0NsXdCl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Del 1786<\/a>, decided on 13-03-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Rahul Mehra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kushal Kumar, Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Mr. Anand Thumbayil and Mr. Akash Deep Gupta, Advocates for petitioner<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP with Inspector Pankaj Thakran, PS: Crime Branch<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The case of the prosecution that tele-callers were impersonating themselves as employees of Amazon and receiving calls from customers, who were facing problems related to Amazon Prime Videos and other services provided by Amazon.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[66455,66456,13011,35776,31324,66454,66452,3067,36209,42403,66453,43064,54723,59804,40005],"class_list":["post-317356","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-amazon-call-centre","tag-amazon-fake-call-centre","tag-anticipatory-bail","tag-crime-branch","tag-delhi","tag-digital-devices","tag-fake-call-center","tag-FIR","tag-first-information-report","tag-fraudulent-activities","tag-gift-vouchers","tag-hawala-transactions","tag-impersonation","tag-modus-operandi","tag-whatsapp-messages"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi HC denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-03-16T10:30:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-03-21T06:37:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-16T10:30:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-21T06:37:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case| SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case","og_description":"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-03-16T10:30:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-03-21T06:37:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-03-16T10:30:37+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-21T06:37:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":288837,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/08\/delhi-high-court-rejects-anticipatory-bail-to-accused-alleged-of-duping-people-for-loan-sanction-under-pradhan-mantri-mudra-loan-yojana-legal-updates-news-research-awareness-news-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":317356,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court refuses bail to Justdial employee alleged of duping people on the pretext of getting their loans sanctioned under the \u2018PM Mudra Loan\u2019","author":"Arunima","date":"April 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court noted that the applicant was working at Justdial in December 2016 as a Relationship Manager and was actively involved in supplying data to his co-accused persons and his link with the said co-accused persons.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":248392,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/19\/delhi-district-court-rohini-anticipatory-bail-plea-of-olympic-wrestler-sushil-kumar-denied\/","url_meta":{"origin":317356,"position":1},"title":"Delhi District Court (Rohini) | Anticipatory Bail plea of Olympic wrestler Sushil Kumar, denied","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi District Court (Rohini): While dismissing the application and refusing to grant anticipatory bail to wrestler Sushil Kumar, the court said that the accused is the main conspirator on the basis of records of investigation so far and FIR is not an encyclopedia. \u00a0 The Court cited the observation of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Delhi-Rohini-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Delhi-Rohini-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Delhi-Rohini-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Delhi-Rohini-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Delhi-Rohini-Court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298208,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/01\/delhi-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-in-delayed-fir-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":317356,"position":2},"title":"Delay of nine months in lodging of FIR by wife; Delhi High Court grants anticipatory bail to husband accused of rape, sexual harassment, cruelty","author":"Editor","date":"August 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cDuring the said period of trial, there is no occasion for the applicant to keep him languishing behind the bars, as it would serve no purpose especially in view of the aforesaid and as it is a trite law that no person is presumed guilty until proven otherwise.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281506,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/delhi-high-court-grants-bail-to-accused-cheating-fake-calls-usa-united-states-of-america-citizens-call-center-legalnews-legalresearch-legalawareness\/","url_meta":{"origin":317356,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court grants bail to an accused allegedly engaged in cheating citizens of the United States of America from a fake call center","author":"Editor","date":"January 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a bail application filed by the accused, Kapil Taneja, seeking bail for alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 120-B, 34 and 389 of the Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) read with Sections 66-C and 66-D of the Information Technology Act, 2000, (IT Act), Amit Sharma, J., granted\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":221402,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/23\/del-hc-accused-whose-anticipatory-bail-is-rejected-by-sc-ought-to-surrender-before-io-concerned-proceedings-issued-under-s-83-crpc-held-not-vitiated\/","url_meta":{"origin":317356,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | Accused, whose anticipatory bail is rejected by SC, ought to surrender before IO concerned; proceedings issued under S. 83 CrPC held not vitiated","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Brijesh Sethi, J. dismissed a criminal writ petition challenging the order of the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption) whereby proceedings\u00a0against the petitioner under Section 83 CrPC\u00a0(attachment of property of person absconding)\u00a0were initiated. The petitioner was involved in a case under Section 13(1)(d)\u00a0of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":286199,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/04\/mass-religious-conversion-case-not-only-period-of-punishment-but-nature-of-offence-should-also-be-taken-into-consideration-while-granting-anticipatory-bail-allahabad-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":317356,"position":5},"title":"[Mass Religious Conversion Case] Not only period of punishment, but nature of offence should also be taken into consideration while granting anticipatory bail: Allahabad High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that it cannot close its eyes to the fact that the material evidence has been collected regarding mass conversion of persons and this case has taken a far more serious turn where the victims are coming forward to give evidence, thus, in case anticipatory bail is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317356","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=317356"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317356\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=317356"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=317356"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=317356"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}