{"id":317356,"date":"2024-03-16T16:00:37","date_gmt":"2024-03-16T10:30:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=317356"},"modified":"2024-03-21T12:07:34","modified_gmt":"2024-03-21T06:37:34","slug":"delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court<\/span>: An application under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519739\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">438<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code<\/a> was preferred on behalf of the petitioner seeking anticipatory bail in FIR under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561756\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">419<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561758\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">420<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561375\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">120-B<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> and Sections 66C and 66D of IT Act, registered at Crime Branch, Delhi. Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J., refused anticipatory bail because at this stage, petitioner cannot be presumed to have no association with the running of fictitious call centre, since Investigating Agency is in possession of WhatsApp messages of the petitioner exchanged with staff deployed at the call centre and the same needs to be investigated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The case against the petitioner arises from FIR registered at the Crime Branch, Delhi, under various sections of the IPC and the IT Act. The prosecution alleged that a raid was conducted at a property in Village Kakrola, Delhi, where a fake call center was operating. The call center was involved in fraudulent activities, including impersonating Amazon employees and convincing customers, particularly those based abroad, to purchase gift vouchers which were then illegally encashed. Eleven tele-callers were found at the scene, along with digital devices used for the fraudulent activities. The case was initiated based on secret information about the operation of the fake call center. The allegations of fraud and illegal activities prompted the authorities to conduct a raid, leading to the registration of FIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Counsel for petitioner submitted that he was merely a director of the company, Tremendous Trips Private Limited, and that another individual was primarily responsible for managing its affairs. They presented documents to support the petitioner&#8217;s limited involvement in the company&#8217;s operations. The Counsel emphasized the lack of evidence linking him directly to the fraudulent activities and highlighted the absence of complaints from victims. The prosecution opposed the petitioner&#8217;s application for anticipatory bail, pointing out that he had evaded joining the investigation despite notices and warrants. They presented evidence, including WhatsApp messages, allegedly linking Ahmad to the fraudulent activities.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court carefully considered the arguments presented by both parties. It noted that the petitioner had failed to join the investigation and had evaded appearing before the authorities despite notices and warrants. The Court acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations and the need for a thorough investigation into the modus operandi of the fraud, including tracing hawala transactions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that while the petitioner may not have been directly involved in managing the company, the evidence suggested his association with fraudulent activities. The presence of WhatsApp messages exchanged between Ahmad and the call center staff indicated a deeper involvement that warranted further investigation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After thorough consideration, the Court held that no grounds for anticipatory bail were made out the case. The seriousness of the allegations, failure to cooperate with the investigation, and the evidence linking him to the fraudulent activities led to the dismissal of his application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Irshad Ahmed v. State NCT of Delhi, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/r0NsXdCl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Del 1786<\/a>, decided on 13-03-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Rahul Mehra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kushal Kumar, Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Mr. Anand Thumbayil and Mr. Akash Deep Gupta, Advocates for petitioner<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP with Inspector Pankaj Thakran, PS: Crime Branch<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The case of the prosecution that tele-callers were impersonating themselves as employees of Amazon and receiving calls from customers, who were facing problems related to Amazon Prime Videos and other services provided by Amazon.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[66455,66456,13011,35776,31324,66454,66452,3067,36209,42403,66453,43064,54723,59804,40005],"class_list":["post-317356","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-amazon-call-centre","tag-amazon-fake-call-centre","tag-anticipatory-bail","tag-crime-branch","tag-delhi","tag-digital-devices","tag-fake-call-center","tag-FIR","tag-first-information-report","tag-fraudulent-activities","tag-gift-vouchers","tag-hawala-transactions","tag-impersonation","tag-modus-operandi","tag-whatsapp-messages"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Delhi HC denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-03-16T10:30:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-03-21T06:37:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/16\\\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/16\\\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"headline\":\"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-16T10:30:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-21T06:37:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/16\\\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":550,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/16\\\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Amazon Call Centre\",\"Amazon Fake Call Centre\",\"anticipatory bail\",\"Crime Branch\",\"Delhi\",\"Digital devices\",\"Fake call center\",\"FIR\",\"First Information Report\",\"Fraudulent Activities\",\"Gift vouchers\",\"Hawala Transactions\",\"impersonation\",\"modus operandi\",\"Whatsapp Messages\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/16\\\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/16\\\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/16\\\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\\\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/16\\\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/16\\\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-16T10:30:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-21T06:37:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/16\\\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/16\\\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/16\\\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/16\\\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/scc-editor_9\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case| SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case","og_description":"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-03-16T10:30:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-03-21T06:37:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/"},"author":{"name":"Arunima","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"headline":"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case","datePublished":"2024-03-16T10:30:37+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-21T06:37:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/"},"wordCount":550,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","keywords":["Amazon Call Centre","Amazon Fake Call Centre","anticipatory bail","Crime Branch","Delhi","Digital devices","Fake call center","FIR","First Information Report","Fraudulent Activities","Gift vouchers","Hawala Transactions","impersonation","modus operandi","Whatsapp Messages"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-03-16T10:30:37+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-21T06:37:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-amazon-fake-call-center-case-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail in Amazon Prime fake call center fraud case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317356","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=317356"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317356\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=317356"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=317356"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=317356"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}