{"id":316562,"date":"2024-03-09T10:00:09","date_gmt":"2024-03-09T04:30:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=316562"},"modified":"2024-03-14T14:21:30","modified_gmt":"2024-03-14T08:51:30","slug":"delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/","title":{"rendered":"[Mumbai Twin Blast] Delhi HC rejects petition filed by death row convict seeking copy of alleged Intelligence Bureau report suggesting false implication of accused persons"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed by the petitioner challenging the order passed by the Central Information Commission (&#8216;CIC&#8217;), <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Subramonium Prasad, J.*<\/span>, noted that the information sought by the petitioner was on the basis of the newspaper article published in 2009, alleging there was an Intelligence Bureau report, which suggested false implication and arrest of accused persons, and was placed before the Ministry of Home Affairs for review of evidence in the bomb blast case, and opined that it had been well established that a report or an article published in a newspaper was considered only hearsay evidence. The Court opined that such a newspaper report, or article, was not a document through which an allegation of fact could be proven. Further, affidavits had also been filed by responsible officers in the Court stating that no such report exists, and there was reason to disbelieve the affidavit of the respondent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court opined that it was not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the CIC and dismissed the present petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner was convicted and sentenced to death in the Mumbai Twin blast, also known as 7\/11 bomb blast case which took place in 2006. The petitioner was sentenced to punishment of death for an offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">302<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;), Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001524688\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3(b)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002927389\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Explosive Substances Act, 1908<\/a>, Section 3(1)(i) of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 and apart from this the petitioner was also sentenced for various offences under IPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner made an RTI application to the CPIO Intelligence Bureau seeking a copy of an alleged Intelligence Bureau report, which suggested false implication and arrest of accused persons, and was placed before the Ministry of Home Affairs in 2009 for review of evidence in the bomb blast case. However, the information as sought for by the petitioner was rejected by the CPIO, Ministry of Home Affairs, on the ground that the agency from which the information was sought was exempted from the purview of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001541431\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">24(1)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002760680\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Right to Information Act, 2005<\/a> (&#8216;RTI Act&#8217;).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thereafter, the petitioner filed a first appeal under Section 19(1) of the RTI Act with the designated First Appellate Authority (&#8216;FAA&#8217;). The petitioner pleaded that Section 24(1) of the RTI Act would not apply as his case was one of human rights violation. The petitioner further added that the officers involved in the investigation of the Twin Blast case were awarded various medals and other monetary benefits for the arrest of innocent persons, which was an act of corruption and hence could not be excluded under Section 24(1) of the RTI Act. However, the FAA rejected the petitioner&#8217;s appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Subsequently, the petitioner filed the second appeal with the CIC, and the CIC in its order upheld the decision of the CPIO and FAA and stated that the query raised by the petitioner failed to satisfy two preconditions under Section 24(1) of the RTI Act, that were, (i) the information being sought must relate to allegations of corruption \/ human right violations; and (ii) the same must be expressly barred under Section 8 of the RTI Act. Further, the petitioner filed the writ petition in this Court on the grounds that the information sought by the petitioner was related to allegations of violation of human rights. The Coordinate Bench vide Judgment dated 16-01-2019 held that the petitioner&#8217;s application was related to violation of human rights and the CIC&#8217;s conclusion was erroneous, and further remanded the matter back to the CIC to be considered afresh.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the CIC heard the matter afresh where the CPIO, Intelligence Bureau, contended that the no such report, as claimed by the petitioner, was submitted to the Ministry of Home Affairs. Thus, the CIC passed an order directing the CPIO to file an affidavit deposing that no such report was submitted in 2009 and therefore no such information could be provided to the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the petitioner challenged the aforesaid order in the present petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the information sought by the petitioner was on the basis of the newspaper article published in 2009, alleging there was an Intelligence Bureau report, which suggested false implication and arrest of accused persons, and was placed before the Ministry of Home Affairs for review of evidence in the bomb blast case, and opined that it had been well established that a report or an article published in a newspaper was considered only hearsay evidence. The Court opined that such a newspaper report, or article, was not a document through which an allegation of fact could be proven.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that no such gross error had occurred by the CIC in their adjudication of the order, and the premise on which the petitioner was relying could not be taken as gospel truth. Further, affidavits had also been filed by responsible officers in the Court stating that no such report exists, and there was reason to disbelieve the affidavit of the respondent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court opined that it was not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the CIC and dismissed the present petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddique v. CPIO, Intelligence Bureau, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/FZK16FCO\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Del 1587<\/a>, decided on 28-02-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by- Justice Subramonium Prasad<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Arpit Bhargava, Sarthak Sharma and Pankaj, Advocates.;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Rahul Sharma, Central, Senior Panel Counsel with C. K. Bhatt, Ayush Bhatt and Angad Gautam, Advocates; Rakesh Kumar, CGSC with Sunil, Advocate.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The premise on which the petitioner is relying, the publishing of such newspaper article, cannot be taken as gospel truth.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3700,6211,38580,34177,2543,3508,36303,66216,21784],"class_list":["post-316562","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-accused","tag-cic","tag-cpio","tag-death-row-convict","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-false_implication","tag-intelligence-bureau","tag-mumbai-twin-blast-case","tag-right-to-information-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi HC rejects petition filed by death row convict seeking copy of alleged Intelligence Bureau report|SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court opined that it was not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the CIC and dismissed the present petition.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[Mumbai Twin Blast] Delhi HC rejects petition filed by death row convict seeking copy of alleged Intelligence Bureau report suggesting false implication of accused persons\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court opined that it was not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the CIC and dismissed the present petition.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-03-09T04:30:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-03-14T08:51:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"[Mumbai Twin Blast] Delhi HC rejects petition filed by death row convict seeking copy of alleged Intelligence Bureau report suggesting false implication of accused persons\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC rejects petition filed by death row convict seeking copy of alleged Intelligence Bureau report|SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-09T04:30:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-14T08:51:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court opined that it was not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the CIC and dismissed the present petition.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[Mumbai Twin Blast] Delhi HC rejects petition filed by death row convict seeking copy of alleged Intelligence Bureau report suggesting false implication of accused persons\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC rejects petition filed by death row convict seeking copy of alleged Intelligence Bureau report|SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court opined that it was not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the CIC and dismissed the present petition.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[Mumbai Twin Blast] Delhi HC rejects petition filed by death row convict seeking copy of alleged Intelligence Bureau report suggesting false implication of accused persons","og_description":"Delhi High Court opined that it was not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the CIC and dismissed the present petition.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-03-09T04:30:09+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-03-14T08:51:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"[Mumbai Twin Blast] Delhi HC rejects petition filed by death row convict seeking copy of alleged Intelligence Bureau report suggesting false implication of accused persons","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/","name":"Delhi HC rejects petition filed by death row convict seeking copy of alleged Intelligence Bureau report|SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-03-09T04:30:09+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-14T08:51:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Delhi High Court opined that it was not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the CIC and dismissed the present petition.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/delhi-hc-rejects-petition-filed-by-death-row-convict-seeking-copy-of-alleged-intelligence-bureau-report-scctimes\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[Mumbai Twin Blast] Delhi HC rejects petition filed by death row convict seeking copy of alleged Intelligence Bureau report suggesting false implication of accused persons"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":283482,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/09\/delhi-high-court-upheld-cpio-order-rejecting-disclosure-of-information-regarding-investigation-of-terrorist-act-barred-under-right-to-information-act-legalnews-legalresearch-legalawareness\/","url_meta":{"origin":316562,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court | Disclosure of reports and dossiers relating to terrorist acts under investigation is barred by RTI Act","author":"Editor","date":"February 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Mumbai blasts which are the subject matter of the reports, were one of the worst terror attacks on India, leading to hundreds of deaths and hundreds of injured persons. Thus, reports\/dossiers on such investigations can have a major bearing on India's security, sovereignty and integrity.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":224353,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/21\/nirbhaya-casesc-yet-again-rejects-pawan-kumars-plea-of-juvenility\/","url_meta":{"origin":316562,"position":1},"title":"Nirbhaya Case|SC yet again rejects Pawan Kumar\u2019s plea of juvenility","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of R. Banumathi, Ashok Bhushan and AS Bopanna, JJ has dismissed the Special Leave Petition filed by Pawan Kumar Gupta, one of the four death row convicts in the Nirbhaya Gang rape case where he \u201creagitated\u201d the plea of juvenility. The Court said, \u201conce a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":223366,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/18\/nirbhaya-case-sc-rejects-review-petition-filed-by-the-fourth-death-row-convict-akshay-kumar-singh\/","url_meta":{"origin":316562,"position":2},"title":"Nirbhaya Case| SC rejects review petition filed by the fourth death row convict Akshay Kumar Singh [Full Report]","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: After a brief hearing on the review petition filed by Akshay Kumar Singh, one of the convicts in the brutal December 16, 2012, Nirbhaya gang-rape and murder case, seeking modification and leniency, the 3-judge bench of R Banumathi, Ashok Bhushan and AS Bopanna, JJ has rejected the review\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":227316,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/19\/nirbhaya-akshay-kumars-plea-challenging-rejection-of-mercy-petition-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":316562,"position":3},"title":"Nirbhaya| Akshay Kumar&#8217;s plea challenging rejection of mercy petition dismissed","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of R Banumathi, Ashok Bhushan and AS Bopanna, JJ rejected the plea filed by Akshay Kumar Singh, one of the convicts in the 2012 Nirbhaya gang-rape and murder case, who had\u00a0 challenged the order of rejection of his mercy petition by the President of India,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224665,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/28\/nirbhaya-case-order-on-death-row-convict-mukesh-kumars-petition-against-rejection-of-his-mercy-plea-by-the-president-tomorrow\/","url_meta":{"origin":316562,"position":4},"title":"Nirbhaya Case| Order on death row convict Mukesh Kumar\u2019s petition against rejection of his mercy plea by the President tomorrow","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 28, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: After a day long hearing in he petition filed Nirbhaya gang-rape and murder convict Mukesh Kumar Singh, challenging the rejection of his mercy petition by President Ram Nath Kovind, the 3-judge bench of R Banumathi, AS Bopanna and Ashok Bhushan, JJ has said that it will pass the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":225669,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/14\/nirbhaya-case-sc-dismisses-vinay-kumars-plea-against-rejection-of-mercy-plea\/","url_meta":{"origin":316562,"position":5},"title":"Nirbhaya Case| SC dismisses Vinay Kumar\u2019s plea against rejection of mercy plea","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 14, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A 3-judge bench of R. Banumathi, Ashok Bhushan and AS Bopanna, JJ has dismissed the plea seeking review of the order of the President of India rejecting the mercy petition of Vinay Kumar Sharma, one of the convicts in the Nirbhaya gang-rape case. It said, \u201cThe note put\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/316562","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=316562"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/316562\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=316562"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=316562"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=316562"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}