{"id":316506,"date":"2024-03-08T17:00:21","date_gmt":"2024-03-08T11:30:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=316506"},"modified":"2024-03-08T15:59:55","modified_gmt":"2024-03-08T10:29:55","slug":"an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018An extrajudicial confession, being weak evidence, requires corroboration\u2019; Calcutta High Court sets aside conviction under Section 302 IPC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Calcutta High Court:<\/span> In an appeal challenging the judgment of conviction under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">302<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> based on the principles of the Last Seen Theory, extrajudicial confession, subsequent conduct, and recovery of the alleged weapon, a division bench comprising of Chitta Ranjan Dash and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Partha Sarathi Sen,* JJ.<\/span>, after analysing the circumstantial evidence, found it insufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The Court held that there was a break in the chain of evidence, leading to the appellant&#8217;s acquittal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the complainant lodged a written complaint with the Officer-in-Charge, Khardah Police Station, stating that his daughter was found murdered in their tenanted accommodation. The complainant suspected his grandson to be the accused, who was found wearing a blood-stained &#8216;gamcha&#8217; when the deceased was discovered. Based on the complaint, the police started investigation, the appellant was charged under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">302<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>. The trial court convicted the appellant based on circumstantial evidence, including the last seen theory, extrajudicial confession, subsequent conduct, and recovery of the alleged weapon, under section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">302<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> and sentenced to suffer regressive imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000\/-. The appellant appealed against the judgment of conviction dated 03-09-2009 and the order of sentence dated 05-09-2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant argued that there were discrepancies in the prosecution&#8217;s case, such as the time gap between the last sighting of the accused and the discovery of the deceased&#8217;s body. The recovery of the alleged weapon lacked proper evidence, and the extrajudicial confession was not corroborated. On the other hand, the prosecution contended that the circumstantial evidence, including the last seen theory and extrajudicial confession, established the appellant&#8217;s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. It was argued that the subsequent conduct of the appellant and the recovery of the alleged weapon supported the conviction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court reviewed the evidence presented, including the autopsy report, witness testimonies, and forensic reports and noted that there is no doubt that the deceased&#8217;s death was natural, and the trial court is absolutely justified in coming to a conclusion that the death of the deceased is homicidal in nature. The Court noted discrepancies in the prosecution&#8217;s case, particularly regarding the extrajudicial confession and stated that the omission in complainant&#8217;s statement is in contradiction within the meaning of the proviso of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519398\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">162<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> read with Section 145 of the Evidence Act which the trial court has failed to visualize. The Court asserted that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;it is settled principle of law that an extrajudicial confession is well known to be a weak piece of evidence although in a given situation reliance thereon can be placed&#8221;.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted weaknesses in the prosecution&#8217;s evidence, including insufficient proof of the alleged offending weapon, recovery of the alleged weapon and doubts regarding the reliability of the last seen theory. The Court stated that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;the conduct of the appellant being present at the spot immediately after the occurrence is a factor negativing any motive on his part. It might have so happened that when the appellant was in deep sleep, who was sleeping separately from the deceased though in the same room, the deceased might have been murdered by P.W.1 or any other person. So this circumstance cannot be taken as a circumstance of last seen or as a circumstance to suggest that it is only the appellant who had the opportunity to kill the deceased.&#8221;<\/span> The Court found that the prosecution failed to establish a clear motive for the appellant&#8217;s alleged crime and the trial court was not justified in applying the principle of Section 8 of the Evidence Act against the present appellant in the said trial.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Considering the lack of concrete evidence connecting the appellant to the crime, the Court held that the circumstantial evidence presented by the prosecution was deemed insufficient to establish the appellant&#8217;s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The Court set aside the judgment and order of conviction against the appellant and acquitted the appellant of the charge under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">302<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>. The appellant was discharged from his bail bond and set at liberty. The Court directed the relevant authorities to forward copies of the judgment to the trial court and the Calcutta High Court Legal Services Committee for further action.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Dipjyoti Dhar v. State of W.B., C.R.A. No. 744 of 2009 with CRAN 1 of 2009 (Old No. CRAN 3017 of 2009), order dated 06-03-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Partha Sarathi Sen<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr.Navanil De, Amicus Curiae and Ms. Monami Mukherjee, Counsel for the Appellant<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Prasun Kumar Dutta, APP, Mr. Santanu Deb Roy and Mr. Md. Kuttubuddin, Counsel for the Respondent\/State<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Calcutta High Court criticised the trial court for not properly assessing the evidence and for erroneously applying legal principles and set aside conviction on prosecution&#8217;s failure to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":314821,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2689,3468,66210,62071,62070,45189,30765,66211],"class_list":["post-316506","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-conviction","tag-extrajudicial-confession","tag-justice-chitta-ranjan-dash","tag-justice-partha-sarathi-sen","tag-last-seen-theory","tag-section-302-ipc","tag-weak-evidence"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>\u2018An extrajudicial confession, being weak evidence, requires corroboration\u2019; Calcutta High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court sets aside conviction under Section 302 IPC and held that \u2018an extrajudicial confession, being weak evidence, requires corroboration\u2019.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018An extrajudicial confession, being weak evidence, requires corroboration\u2019; Calcutta High Court sets aside conviction under Section 302 IPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court sets aside conviction under Section 302 IPC and held that \u2018an extrajudicial confession, being weak evidence, requires corroboration\u2019.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-03-08T11:30:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018An extrajudicial confession, being weak evidence, requires corroboration\u2019; Calcutta High Court sets aside conviction under Section 302 IPC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"\u2018An extrajudicial confession, being weak evidence, requires corroboration\u2019; Calcutta High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-08T11:30:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court sets aside conviction under Section 302 IPC and held that \u2018an extrajudicial confession, being weak evidence, requires corroboration\u2019.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Calcutta High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018An extrajudicial confession, being weak evidence, requires corroboration\u2019; Calcutta High Court sets aside conviction under Section 302 IPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u2018An extrajudicial confession, being weak evidence, requires corroboration\u2019; Calcutta High Court | SCC Times","description":"Calcutta High Court sets aside conviction under Section 302 IPC and held that \u2018an extrajudicial confession, being weak evidence, requires corroboration\u2019.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018An extrajudicial confession, being weak evidence, requires corroboration\u2019; Calcutta High Court sets aside conviction under Section 302 IPC","og_description":"Calcutta High Court sets aside conviction under Section 302 IPC and held that \u2018an extrajudicial confession, being weak evidence, requires corroboration\u2019.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-03-08T11:30:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018An extrajudicial confession, being weak evidence, requires corroboration\u2019; Calcutta High Court sets aside conviction under Section 302 IPC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/","name":"\u2018An extrajudicial confession, being weak evidence, requires corroboration\u2019; Calcutta High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-03-08T11:30:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court sets aside conviction under Section 302 IPC and held that \u2018an extrajudicial confession, being weak evidence, requires corroboration\u2019.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Calcutta High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/an-extrajudicial-confession-being-weak-evidence-requires-corroboration-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018An extrajudicial confession, being weak evidence, requires corroboration\u2019; Calcutta High Court sets aside conviction under Section 302 IPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":268684,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/20\/bom-hc-%e2%94%82-extra-judicial-confession-is-a-weak-piece-of-evidence-conviction-under-s-302-ipc-set-aside\/","url_meta":{"origin":316506,"position":0},"title":"Bom HC \u2502 Extra-judicial confession is a weak piece of evidence; Conviction under S. 302 IPC set aside","author":"Editor","date":"June 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of Sadhana S. Jadhav and Milind N. Jadhav, JJ., allowed an appeal which was filed against the conviction of the appellant for the offence punishable under section 302 of Penal code, 1860 wherein he was sentenced to suffer R.I. for life and fine of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325821,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/cal-hc-delivers-split-verdict-murder-case-acquittal-ordered-by-one-judge-sentence-commuted-by-another-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":316506,"position":1},"title":"Calcutta High Court Division Bench Delivers Split Verdict in Murder Case: Acquittal Ordered by One Judge, Sentence Commuted by Another","author":"Arunima","date":"July 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In a high-stakes murder case, the Calcutta High Court's division bench delivered a split verdict. Justice Soumen Sen commuted the death sentence to 30 years of imprisonment, while Justice Partha Sarathi Sen ordered an outright acquittal. The case has now been referred to the Chief Justice for further directions.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287201,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/18\/supreme-court-remarks-judgment-by-chhattisgarh-high-court-as-sketchy-acquits-murder-convict-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":316506,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court finds Chhattisgarh High Court&#8217;s judgment \u2018Sketchy\u2019; Acquits murder convict in a 20-year-old case","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court said that the cherished principles or golden threads of proof beyond reasonable doubt which runs through the web of our law should not be stretched morbidly which was done by the Courts below.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sketchy","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-783.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-783.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-783.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-783.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272712,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/31\/calcutta-high-court-gets-9-new-additional-judges\/","url_meta":{"origin":316506,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court gets 9 new Additional Judges","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The President appoints following to be the\u00a0 Additional Judges of the Calcutta High Court, in that order of seniority, for a period of two years with effect from the date they assume charge of their respective offices:\u00a0 Shri Biswaroop Chowdhury; Shri Partha Sarathi Sen; Shri Prasenjit Biswas; Shri Uday Kumar;\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268950,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/honour-killing-acquittal-28-years-later-last-seen-together-benefit-of-doubt-supreme-court-murder-conviction-criminal-law-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":316506,"position":4},"title":"No conviction based on &#8216;last seen together&#8217; theory when possibility of suicidal death not ruled out; SC sets man free in a 28-year-old honour killing case","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe suspicion howsoever strong cannot take place of proof.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/No-conviction-based-on-last-seen-together-theory-when-possibility-of-suicidal-death-not-ruled-out-SC-sets-man-free-in-a-28-year-old-honour-killing-case.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/No-conviction-based-on-last-seen-together-theory-when-possibility-of-suicidal-death-not-ruled-out-SC-sets-man-free-in-a-28-year-old-honour-killing-case.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/No-conviction-based-on-last-seen-together-theory-when-possibility-of-suicidal-death-not-ruled-out-SC-sets-man-free-in-a-28-year-old-honour-killing-case.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/No-conviction-based-on-last-seen-together-theory-when-possibility-of-suicidal-death-not-ruled-out-SC-sets-man-free-in-a-28-year-old-honour-killing-case.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/No-conviction-based-on-last-seen-together-theory-when-possibility-of-suicidal-death-not-ruled-out-SC-sets-man-free-in-a-28-year-old-honour-killing-case.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280892,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/03\/acid-attack-ocular-evidence-motive-reliable-criminal-trial-section-326a-penal-code-calcutta-high-court-legal-research-updates-news-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":316506,"position":5},"title":"No interference in case of well-founded, unshaken ocular and documentary evidence: Calcutta High Court upholds conviction in Acid Attack case","author":"Editor","date":"January 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court based its ruling on the well settled principle of law that where oral evidence is convincing, reliable and trustworthy, the motive behind the occurrence loses its relevance.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image95.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/316506","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=316506"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/316506\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314821"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=316506"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=316506"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=316506"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}