{"id":316172,"date":"2024-03-06T09:00:14","date_gmt":"2024-03-06T03:30:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=316172"},"modified":"2024-03-05T18:31:10","modified_gmt":"2024-03-05T13:01:10","slug":"2024-scc-vol-2-part-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/2024-scc-vol-2-part-3\/","title":{"rendered":"2024 SCC Vol. 2 Part 3"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a>: Objections to the award:<\/span> Law summarised relating to Court&#8217;s power to review awards under S. 34, as existing prior to amendment made to S. 34 by Act 3 of 2016 with retrospective effect from 23-10-2015. [<i>Batliboi Environmental Engineers Ltd.<\/i> v. <i>Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd.<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/62dN16L1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 2 SCC 375<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726966\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Consumer Protection Act, 1986<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001572592\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">22<\/a> &#8212; Causation\/Assessment of Loss\/Surveyors, Investigators and Loss Assessors:<\/span> NCDRC cannot selectively rely on portions of expert reports which supported its conclusions. [<i>S.S. Cold Storage (India) (P) Ltd.<\/i> v. <i>National Insurance Co. Ltd.<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/IjDFZhnl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 2 SCC 467<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Evidence Act, 1872<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516774\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">32(1)<\/a> &#8212; Conflicting dying declarations &#8212; One exonerating accused and one inculpating him:<\/span> Matters to be considered for determination of which dying declaration is to be believed, illustrated. [<i>Surjit Singh<\/i> v. <i>State of Punjab<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Sp8Oi09N\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 2 SCC 411<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559400\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">153-A<\/a> r\/w Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559357\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">132<\/a> &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559358\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">132-A<\/a> and Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559391\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">147<\/a> &amp; 148 &#8212; Block assessment &#8212; Scope of assessment under S. 153-A:<\/span> Assessment under S. 153-A, in respect of completed assessments\/unabated assessments is not permissible, when no incriminating material found during the course of search under S. 132 or requisition under S. 132-A. [<i>CIT<\/i> v. <i>Abhisar Buildwell (P) Ltd.<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ny2uUp00\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 2 SCC 433<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">153-A<\/a> r\/w Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559357\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">132<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559358\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">132-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559391\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">147<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559392\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">148<\/a> &#8212; Block assessment &#8212; Scope of assessment under S. 153-A:<\/span> Assessment under S. 153-A, in respect of completed assessments\/unabated assessments is not permissible, when no incriminating material found during the course of search under S. 132 or requisition under S. 132-A. [<i>CIT<\/i> v. <i>King Buildcon (P) Ltd.<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/3W4YdX0M\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 2 SCC 465<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> &#8212; Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549788\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">53<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549762\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3(30)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549762\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3(31)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549784\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">5(21)<\/a> &#8212; Review against judgment and order dt. 6-9-2022, Rainbow Papers, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/wl8FKDTq\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 9 SCC 545<\/a>:<\/span> Tenability of contention of petitioners\/interveners that the Court in the impugned judgment had failed to consider the waterfall mechanism contained in S. 53, as also failed to consider other provisions of IBC, in review application based on observations made by coordinate Bench in Raman Ispat, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/uhQCUnl1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 10 SCC 60<\/a>, determined. [<i>Sanjay Kumar Agarwal<\/i> v. <i>State Tax Officer<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/cGW2h5pn\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 2 SCC 362<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Insurance &#8212; General Insurance &#8212; Motor Vehicle Insurance &#8212; Accident Insurance &#8212; BMW Secure Policy:<\/span> The question of liability under BMW Secure arises only when the liability of the insured under the new motor vehicle policy is established. Therefore, it must be established that the insurer has accepted the case regarding the total loss of the insured vehicle. [<i>Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.<\/i> v. <i>Mukul Aggarwal<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/9Co8x34I\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 2 SCC 344<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Insurance &#8212; Life Insurance &#8212; Life insurance claim &#8212; Insurance policy &#8212; When becomes effective &#8212; Date on which the policy is issued, as opposed to date of proposal or date of issuance of receipt &#8212; Relevance of:<\/span> The date of issuance of the policy would be the relevant date for all purposes and not the date of proposal or the date of issuance of the receipt. Also, even if backdating of policy has been done, the date of issuance of policy would still be the relevant date. [<i>Reliance Life Insurance Co. Ltd.<\/i> v. <i>Jaya Wadhwani<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/uG75w1lc\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 2 SCC 427<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561848\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">497<\/a> &#8212; Offence of adultery:<\/span> While striking down S. 497 IPC in Joseph Shine, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/381qNjbV\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2019) 3 SCC 39<\/a> declaring offence of adultery as unconstitutional, said judgment of Supreme Court, held, was not at all concerned with provisions relating thereto under <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002794845\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Army Act, 1950<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002948374\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Navy Act, 1957<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002831283\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Air Force Act, 1950<\/a>. [<i>Joseph Shine<\/i> v. <i>Union of India<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/dB0P5SST\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 2 SCC 334<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561869\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">53<\/a> Secondly r\/w S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561790\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">45<\/a> &#8212; Life imprisonment:<\/span> Power to pass a modified sentence of life imprisonment, specifying a minimum non-remittable term of imprisonment in excess of 14 yrs, held, is available to High Courts and Supreme Court even in cases where the law does not prescribe the death sentence as one of the punishments and limits the maximum punishment to imprisonment for life with nothing further. [<i>Ravinder Singh<\/i> v. <i>State (NCT of Delhi)<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/PC54sFwW\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 2 SCC 323<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> &#8212; Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">376<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">506<\/a> &#8212; Rape on ground of false promise of marriage &#8212; Requirements of:<\/span> In this case, consensual relationship culminating in solemnisation of marriage being established from notice issued by advocate of victim, and victim&#8217;s own statements, held, allegation of rape, not tenable, hence, FIR quashed. [<i>Ajeet Singh<\/i> v. <i>State of U.P.<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/KLS88GOs\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 2 SCC 422<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002829235\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Registration Act, 1908<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001534818\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">47<\/a> &#8212; Effective date of operation of sale deed:<\/span> If, in a given case, a sale deed is executed and entire agreed consideration is paid on or before execution of sale deed, after it is registered, held, it will operate from date of its execution. Thus, held, in such a case interpolations unilaterally made in the sale deed after its execution, but before its registration will have no effect, as the sale deed as it stood at the time of its execution will operate. [<i>Kanwar Raj Singh<\/i> v. <i>GEJO<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Y29eAJW5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 2 SCC 416<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 &#8212; S. 34: Objections to the award: Law summarised relating to Court&#8217;s power to review awards under <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":316176,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[47649,10131,66103,18321,6252,13081,31265,48603,3095],"class_list":["post-316172","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases","tag-accident-insurance","tag-arbitration-and-conciliation-act","tag-bmw-secure-policy","tag-consumer-protection-act","tag-evidence-act","tag-income-tax-act","tag-insurance-policy","tag-motor-vehicle-insurance","tag-NCDRC"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>2024 SCC Vol. 2 Part 3 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 34: Objections to the award: Law summarised relating to Court\u2019s power to review awards\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/2024-scc-vol-2-part-3\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2024 SCC Vol. 2 Part 3\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 34: Objections to the award: Law summarised relating to Court\u2019s power to review awards\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/2024-scc-vol-2-part-3\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-03-06T03:30:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/2024-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-3.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/2024-scc-vol-2-part-3\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/2024-scc-vol-2-part-3\/\",\"name\":\"2024 SCC Vol. 2 Part 3 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/2024-scc-vol-2-part-3\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/2024-scc-vol-2-part-3\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/2024-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-3.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-06T03:30:14+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 34: Objections to the award: Law summarised relating to Court\u2019s power to review awards\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/2024-scc-vol-2-part-3\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/2024-scc-vol-2-part-3\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/2024-scc-vol-2-part-3\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/2024-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-3.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/2024-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-3.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"2024 SCC Vol. 2 Part 3\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/2024-scc-vol-2-part-3\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2024 SCC Vol. 2 Part 3\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2024 SCC Vol. 2 Part 3 | SCC Times","description":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 34: Objections to the award: Law summarised relating to Court\u2019s power to review awards","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/2024-scc-vol-2-part-3\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2024 SCC Vol. 2 Part 3","og_description":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 34: Objections to the award: Law summarised relating to Court\u2019s power to review awards","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/2024-scc-vol-2-part-3\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-03-06T03:30:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/2024-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-3.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/2024-scc-vol-2-part-3\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/2024-scc-vol-2-part-3\/","name":"2024 SCC Vol. 2 Part 3 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/2024-scc-vol-2-part-3\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/2024-scc-vol-2-part-3\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/2024-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-3.webp","datePublished":"2024-03-06T03:30:14+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 34: Objections to the award: Law summarised relating to Court\u2019s power to review awards","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/2024-scc-vol-2-part-3\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/2024-scc-vol-2-part-3\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/2024-scc-vol-2-part-3\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/2024-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-3.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/2024-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-3.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"2024 SCC Vol. 2 Part 3"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/2024-scc-vol-2-part-3\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2024 SCC Vol. 2 Part 3"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/2024-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-3.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":217158,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/23\/extent-of-judicial-review-in-foreign-awards-whether-arbitration-and-conciliation-amendment-act-2015-expanded-the-scope-of-public-policy-in-section-48-of-the-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":316172,"position":0},"title":"Extent of Judicial Review in Foreign Awards: Whether Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 expanded the scope of \u201cPublic Policy\u201d in Section 48 of the Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"by Soumyajit Saha\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/AdobeStock_122928222.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/AdobeStock_122928222.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/AdobeStock_122928222.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/AdobeStock_122928222.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/AdobeStock_122928222.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273538,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/12\/trajectory-of-international-commercial-arbitration-in-india-and-the-role-of-judiciary\/","url_meta":{"origin":316172,"position":1},"title":"Trajectory of International Commercial Arbitration in India and the Role of Judiciary","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Shivaprakash M. Nagarale\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-1-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-1-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-1-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275309,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/10\/madras-high-court-arbitral-tribunal-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-arbitral-award-specific-relief-act-public-policy-specific-performance-legal-research-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":316172,"position":2},"title":"Madras High Court | Courts will not interfere or set aside an arbitral award, merely because an alternative view is possible; Adopt a hands-off approach","author":"Editor","date":"October 10, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Madras High Court: In an intra-Court appeal filed against the order of the single judge, whereby, the judge allowed the original petition filed by the respondents under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (\u2018the Act\u2019) and set aside the award, passed by the Arbitral Tribunal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279003,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/mandatory-and-directory-provisions-under-the-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996\/","url_meta":{"origin":316172,"position":3},"title":"Mandatory and Directory Provisions under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Manavendra Mishra\u2020 and Alok Vajpeyi\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image53.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":282502,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/26\/supreme-court-parties-can-adduce-evidence-or-additional-evidence-in-proceedings-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-if-strong-exceptional-case-is-made-ou\/","url_meta":{"origin":316172,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court| Pre-amended Section 34(2)(a) shall be applicable on arbitration proceedings commenced and concluded prior to amendment of 2019","author":"Editor","date":"January 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Upholding the Karnataka High Court order, the Supreme Court held that the Karnataka High Court has not committed any error in permitting the respondents to file affidavits\/additional evidence in the proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. However, permitted the appellant to cross-examine and\/or produce contrary evidence.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-6-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":6161,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/03\/14\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-ss-34-and-5-merits-of-arbitral-award\/","url_meta":{"origin":316172,"position":5},"title":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 34 and 5 \u2014 Merits of arbitral award","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 14, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Case Reported in 2015 SCC Vol. 3 March 7, 2015 Part 1None of the grounds contained in S. 34(2)(a) deal with the merits of the decision rendered by an arbitral award, it is only when arbitral award is in conflict with public policy of India as per S. 34(2)(b)(ii), that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;SCC Weekly&quot;","block_context":{"text":"SCC Weekly","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/supremecourtcases\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/316172","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=316172"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/316172\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/316176"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=316172"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=316172"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=316172"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}