{"id":316151,"date":"2024-03-05T16:00:37","date_gmt":"2024-03-05T10:30:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=316151"},"modified":"2024-03-12T12:21:14","modified_gmt":"2024-03-12T06:51:14","slug":"madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data\/","title":{"rendered":"Madras HC sets aside Controller\u2019s order rejecting patent application of Microsoft Tech. claiming invention titled \u2018Message Communication of Sensor and other Data\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madras High Court:<\/span> In an appeal filed by Microsoft Technology Licensing (&#8216;Microsoft&#8217;) against the order passed by the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs(&#8216;Controller&#8217;) whereby Patent Application, which is the national phase application derived from PCT Application dated 15-09-2010, was rejected of the Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J. while setting aside the impugned order, said that the claimed invention would not be obvious from cited prior art, as the cited prior art is focused on the publication of sensor values upon occurrence of an event of interest to enable the subscribing application to receive sensor data only when there is a change in sensor values. By contrast, the problem resolved by the claimed invention is the transmission of sensor data in a form which is easy to process by the subscribing application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Microsoft filed the patent application on 27-02-2012 for an invention titled &#8220;Message Communication of Sensor and other Data&#8221; claiming priority from 23-09-2009. Pursuant to a request for examination, the first examination report (FER) was issued by the Controller on 27-06-2019. Microsoft filed a detailed response thereto on 27-12-2019. Along with such response, amended claims 1 to 14 were filed. The hearing was conducted on 14-07-2020 and Microsoft filed written submissions thereafter. Eventually, by order dated 29-09-20, the application was rejected. The present appeal arises in the said facts and circumstances.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that the application for the grant of patent was rejected under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001555825\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2(1) (ja)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002768478\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Patents Act, 1970<\/a> largely on the basis that the claimed invention would be obvious to the person skilled in the art based on the teachings of prior art D4.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court took note of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001555825\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2(1)(ja)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002768478\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Patents Act<\/a>, which defines inventive step, and said that the assessment of inventive step of a claimed invention is to be made by a two-step process. It underscores the centrality of the person skilled in the art (PSITA). The starting point in identifying PSITA is the field of invention, which is enabling applications in computers to receive sensor data by way of lightweight messages. The PSITA would, therefore, be a software engineer with an understanding of hardware\/computer electronics.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the problem, that the claimed invention addresses itself to is the reduction of complexity by converting raw sensor data into lightweight messages which are transmitted or communicated to the subscribing application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Since the impugned order relied only on prior art D4, the Court did a comparison with said prior art, and said that the solution provided by the claimed invention is the conversion of raw sensor data into messages that are transmitted to the subscribing application and may be easily read by such application. By contrast, the cited prior art does not envisage the conversion of raw sensor data into easy-to-read messages.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court said that the Controller is correct in stating that both the cited prior art and the claimed invention provide for the transmission of sensor data to a subscribing application, but the difference lies in how such data is transmitted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Concerning whether prior art D4 contains teaching, suggestion or motivation to lead the PSITA to the claimed invention, the Court took note of complete specification of D4, and said that there is nothing in prior art D4 that addresses the problem of complexity in the communication of data from sensors to subscribing applications. Thus, not only is the problem addressed by the prior art and the claimed invention different but even otherwise the recitals and disclosures in D4 do not suggest or motivate, much less teach, the PSITA to arrive at the claimed invention.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court viewed that claimed invention would not be obvious to the PSITA from prior art D4 because arriving at the claimed invention from D4 requires ingenuity and not mere skill in the art.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that the claimed invention would not be obvious from cited prior art, as the cited prior art is focused on the publication of sensor values upon occurrence of an event of interest to enable the subscribing application to receive sensor data only when there is a change in sensor values. By contrast, the problem resolved by the claimed invention is the transmission of sensor data in a form which is easy to process by the subscribing application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, it set aside the impugned order and allowed the application to proceed to grant subject to amendment of the independent claims.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/y5JR53T5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Mad 285<\/a>, decided on 28-02-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Appellant:<\/span> Advocate Vindhya S.Mani, Advocate Kiran Manokaran<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent:<\/span> SPC S.Diwakar<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Madras High Court said that the Controller is correct in stating that both the cited prior art and the claimed invention provide for the transmission of sensor data to a subscribing application, but the difference lies in how such data is transmitted.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":314802,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[57600,2567,66090,66091,35161,66092,66093,66094],"class_list":["post-316151","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-inventive-step","tag-Madras_High_Court","tag-message-communication-of-sensor","tag-microsoft-technology-licensing","tag-patent-application","tag-person-skilled-in-the-art","tag-prior-art","tag-psita"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Madras HC sets aside Controller\u2019s order rejecting patent application of Microsoft Tech. claiming invention on Message Communication of Sensor and other Data | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Madras HC set aside Controller\u2019s order rejecting patent application of Microsoft Tech. claiming invention titled \u2018Message Communication of Sensor and other Data\u2019\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madras HC sets aside Controller\u2019s order rejecting patent application of Microsoft Tech. claiming invention titled \u2018Message Communication of Sensor and other Data\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madras HC set aside Controller\u2019s order rejecting patent application of Microsoft Tech. claiming invention titled \u2018Message Communication of Sensor and other Data\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-03-05T10:30:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-03-12T06:51:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Madras HC sets aside Controller\u2019s order rejecting patent application of Microsoft Tech. claiming invention titled \u2018Message Communication of Sensor and other Data\u2019\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data\/\",\"name\":\"Madras HC sets aside Controller\u2019s order rejecting patent application of Microsoft Tech. claiming invention on Message Communication of Sensor and other Data | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-05T10:30:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-12T06:51:14+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"Madras HC set aside Controller\u2019s order rejecting patent application of Microsoft Tech. claiming invention titled \u2018Message Communication of Sensor and other Data\u2019\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Madras High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madras HC sets aside Controller\u2019s order rejecting patent application of Microsoft Tech. claiming invention titled \u2018Message Communication of Sensor and other Data\u2019\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Madras HC sets aside Controller\u2019s order rejecting patent application of Microsoft Tech. claiming invention on Message Communication of Sensor and other Data | SCC Blog","description":"Madras HC set aside Controller\u2019s order rejecting patent application of Microsoft Tech. claiming invention titled \u2018Message Communication of Sensor and other Data\u2019","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madras HC sets aside Controller\u2019s order rejecting patent application of Microsoft Tech. claiming invention titled \u2018Message Communication of Sensor and other Data\u2019","og_description":"Madras HC set aside Controller\u2019s order rejecting patent application of Microsoft Tech. claiming invention titled \u2018Message Communication of Sensor and other Data\u2019","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-03-05T10:30:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-03-12T06:51:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Madras HC sets aside Controller\u2019s order rejecting patent application of Microsoft Tech. claiming invention titled \u2018Message Communication of Sensor and other Data\u2019","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data\/","name":"Madras HC sets aside Controller\u2019s order rejecting patent application of Microsoft Tech. claiming invention on Message Communication of Sensor and other Data | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-03-05T10:30:37+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-12T06:51:14+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"Madras HC set aside Controller\u2019s order rejecting patent application of Microsoft Tech. claiming invention titled \u2018Message Communication of Sensor and other Data\u2019","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Madras High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/madras-hc-sets-aside-controller-order-rejecting-patent-application-microsoft-tech-invention-message-communication-of-sensor-data\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madras HC sets aside Controller\u2019s order rejecting patent application of Microsoft Tech. claiming invention titled \u2018Message Communication of Sensor and other Data\u2019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":322587,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/21\/no-teaching-suggestion-motivation-prior-art-make-obvious-psita-madras-hc-remands-patent-application-controller-reconsideration\/","url_meta":{"origin":316151,"position":0},"title":"\u2018No teaching, suggestion or motivation in prior art to make it obvious to a person skilled in art\u2019; Madras HC remands patent application to Controller for reconsideration","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Since about 12 years have elapsed from the date of application, Madras High Court directed that the Patent Application be disposed of within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292278,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/invention-not-to-be-deemed-a-computer-programme-per-se-solely-due-to-use-of-algorithms-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":316151,"position":1},"title":"Invention not to be deemed a \u2018computer programme per se\u2019 solely due to use of algorithms and computer-executable instructions: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"May 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"It is essential for the Indian Patent Office to adopt a more comprehensive approach when assessing Computer Related Inventions (CRIs), considering technical effects and contributions provided by the invention rather than solely focusing on the implementation of algorithms and computer-executable instructions.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324672,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/19\/madras-high-court-affirms-rejection-of-iit-m-patent-on-method-of-doping-potassium-for-lack-of-inventive-step\/","url_meta":{"origin":316151,"position":2},"title":"Madras High Court affirms rejection of IIT-M Patent on \u2018Method of Doping Potassium\u2019, for lack of inventive step","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court concluded that without any experimental data to compare the costs of using filtrate material, which requires frequent changing, vis-a-vis using an external reagent, the economic significance of the claimed invention cannot be established. Thus, the claimed invention lacks an inventive step under Section 2(1)(ja) of the Patents\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309533,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/17\/controller-failed-identify-basis-concluding-non-disclosure-madras-high-court-directs-grant-patent\/","url_meta":{"origin":316151,"position":3},"title":"Controller failed to identify basis for concluding non-disclosure: Madras HC directs to proceed application for grant of patent","author":"Apoorva","date":"December 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court said that the appellants have given complete specifications which also capture the results of the evaluation of the claimed invention against the parameters of penetration, nutrient permeability and root penetration test.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277875,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/22\/simplicity-does-not-defeat-an-invention-and-even-simple-inventions-are-patentable-delhi-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":316151,"position":4},"title":"Simplicity does not defeat an invention and even simple inventions are patentable: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"November 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case where an appeal was filed against the order of Controller General of Patents and Designs (Respondent) refusing the application for grant of patent \u2018Notched Fastener\u2019, the Single Judge Bench of Prathiba M. Singh, J. held that simplicity would not defeat the grant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309843,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/21\/madras-hc-finds-controller-order-unreasoned-remands-patent-application-aluminum-trihydrate-particles-reconsideration\/","url_meta":{"origin":316151,"position":5},"title":"Madras HC remands patent application on &#8216;Aluminum Trihydrate Particles&#8217; for reconsideration; finds Controller&#8217;s order unreasoned","author":"Apoorva","date":"December 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While drawing the conclusion that the application does not fulfil the requirements of Section 16, the respondent has merely referred to the objections raised in the hearing notice.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/316151","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=316151"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/316151\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314802"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=316151"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=316151"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=316151"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}