{"id":315798,"date":"2024-03-01T18:00:56","date_gmt":"2024-03-01T12:30:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=315798"},"modified":"2024-03-07T09:58:41","modified_gmt":"2024-03-07T04:28:41","slug":"directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Calcutta High Court holds Directors liable for dishonored cheque despite company\u2019s \u201cstruck-off\u201d status"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Calcutta High Court:<\/span> In a revision application against the rejection of an application for Substitute Service of Summons under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519817\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">65<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (CrPC), a single-judge bench comprising of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Shampa Dutt (Paul),* J.<\/span>, allowed the revision, setting aside the order of the Metropolitan Magistrate and held that the denial of the application for Substitute Service of Summons under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519817\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">65<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a>, was unjustified. The Court directed the trial court to proceed against the directors of the dissolved company for offenses committed while the company was operational.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Factual Matrix<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the petitioner, Biman Bangladesh Airlines Limited is an International Airlines Company incorporated and registered under the Companies Act of Bangladesh. The opposite party 1, Kuka Travels Private Limited, issued an Account Payee Cheque to the petitioner, which was dishonored due to insufficient funds and despite issuing a legal demand notice, the respondents failed to make payment. The petitioner filed a complaint under Sections 138 and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544370\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">141<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881<\/a>. The complaint was transferred to the Metropolitan Magistrate at Calcutta, who issued summons to the Respondents. The opposite party 2 and 3 appeared before the trial court, but service upon respondent 1 could not be effected due to its undisclosed new address. The petitioner contended that since the new address of the respondent is not known, the service of the summon upon the opposite party 1 can only be effected if the Serving Officer affix one of the duplicates of the summons on some conspicuous part of the house or homestead where the Registered Office of the opposite party 1 was situated when the dishonoured cheque was issued and applied for substitute service under Section 65 of the CrPC, but the application was rejected. The trial court, vide order dated 27-08-2018, held that there was no provision for substituted service of summons under the CrPC. Aggrieved by the impugned order passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, the petitioner preferred the present revisional application before the High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Parties&#8217; Contentions<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The opposite party 2 contented that they were no longer the directors of the company, and the impugned cheque was issued when the company was in existence and the opposite parties were its directors. 24. It was contended that the status of the Company is &#8220;Strike Off&#8221;. The petitioner, in return, contended that since opposite party 1 was struck off from the register of companies, its directors, opposite Party 2 and 3, are liable for the company&#8217;s liabilities.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Moot Point<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p>Whether substituted service of summons can be allowed under Section 65 of the CrPC in cases where the accused&#8217;s address is unknown?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Whether the company&#8217;s dissolution affects the liability of its directors for offenses committed while the company was operational?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#8217;s Analysis<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Court emphasised that Section 65 of the CrPC provides for substituted service of summons when service cannot be effected despite due diligence and the section also provides for various methods of service, including service through the Indian embassy and affixation of the summons. The Court noted that the word &#8220;person&#8221; in Section 65 includes a company, which is a juristic person and a legal entity. The Court asserted that the court must apply its judicial mind and make inquiries before declaring the summons as duly served and in the present case, since conventional service failed due to the unknown whereabouts of opposite party 1, Substitute Service should have been allowed.\\<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;Company Status &#8220;Strike Off&#8221; is a legal process, that a company&#8217;s directors can initiate to close the business officially. When a business is voluntarily struck off, it is removed from the official register of companies, and its legal existence is ended.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;Once the strike-off order is issued, the company&#8217;s name will be removed from the Registrar&#8217;s records and the company will no longer exist. This means that the company&#8217;s assets will be distributed among its creditors according to the terms of the strike-off order.&#8221;<\/span> The Court asserted that the liability for the dishonored cheque extends to the directors of the struck-off company as they were responsible for the company&#8217;s affairs when the offense occurred. The Court held that the company&#8217;s dissolution does not absolve its directors of liability for offenses committed while the company was operational.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#8217;s Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While allowing the revision application and setting aside the order of trial court, the Court directed the trial court to proceed against the directors of the &#8220;strike off&#8221; company in accordance with the law. All connected applications were disposed of, and any interim orders were vacated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Biman Bangladesh Airlines Ltd. v. Kuka Travels (P) Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0u66briO\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Cal 2142<\/a>, order dated 28-02-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Partha Chakraborty, Ms. Poulami Dutta, Counsel for the Appellant<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Aasish Choudhury, Ms. Minal Palana, Ms. Meera Agarwal, Counsel for the Opposite Pary 2 and 3<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">None, Counsel for the Opposite Pary 1\/State<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Calcutta High Court opined that the trial court failed to consider the provisions of Section 65 which allow for alternate methods of service when due diligence fails.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":314821,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2689,58955,65954,59921,30798,65955],"class_list":["post-315798","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-directors-liability","tag-dishonored-cheque-lies","tag-justice-shampa-dutt-paul","tag-struck-off","tag-substituted-service"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Director\u2019s Liability for dishonored cheque, despite company\u2019s \u201cstruck-off\u201d status: Calcutta High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Director\u2019s Liability for dishonored cheque, despite company\u2019s \u201cstruck-off\u201d status: Calcutta High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court holds Directors liable for dishonored cheque despite company\u2019s \u201cstruck-off\u201d status\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Director\u2019s Liability for dishonored cheque, despite company\u2019s \u201cstruck-off\u201d status: Calcutta High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-03-01T12:30:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-03-07T04:28:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court holds Directors liable for dishonored cheque despite company\u2019s \u201cstruck-off\u201d status\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"Director\u2019s Liability for dishonored cheque, despite company\u2019s \u201cstruck-off\u201d status: Calcutta High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-01T12:30:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-07T04:28:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Director\u2019s Liability for dishonored cheque, despite company\u2019s \u201cstruck-off\u201d status: Calcutta High Court\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Calcutta High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court holds Directors liable for dishonored cheque despite company\u2019s \u201cstruck-off\u201d status\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Director\u2019s Liability for dishonored cheque, despite company\u2019s \u201cstruck-off\u201d status: Calcutta High Court | SCC Times","description":"Director\u2019s Liability for dishonored cheque, despite company\u2019s \u201cstruck-off\u201d status: Calcutta High Court","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Calcutta High Court holds Directors liable for dishonored cheque despite company\u2019s \u201cstruck-off\u201d status","og_description":"Director\u2019s Liability for dishonored cheque, despite company\u2019s \u201cstruck-off\u201d status: Calcutta High Court","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-03-01T12:30:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-03-07T04:28:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Calcutta High Court holds Directors liable for dishonored cheque despite company\u2019s \u201cstruck-off\u201d status","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/","name":"Director\u2019s Liability for dishonored cheque, despite company\u2019s \u201cstruck-off\u201d status: Calcutta High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-03-01T12:30:56+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-07T04:28:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Director\u2019s Liability for dishonored cheque, despite company\u2019s \u201cstruck-off\u201d status: Calcutta High Court","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Calcutta High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/directors-liability-for-dishonored-cheque-despite-companys-struck-off-status-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Calcutta High Court holds Directors liable for dishonored cheque despite company\u2019s \u201cstruck-off\u201d status"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":312019,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/23\/no-conviction-solely-based-on-accuseds-statements-under-section-313-of-crpc-calcutta-high-court-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":315798,"position":0},"title":"\u2018No conviction solely based on accused\u2019s statements under Section 313 of CrPC\u2019; Calcutta High Court sets aside conviction","author":"Ritu","date":"January 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court noted that the impugned notice has not been produced before the Court, thus not proved, the case's foundation is wrong and thus not maintainable.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299796,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/calcutta-hc-refuses-to-quash-proceeding-against-teacher-for-involvement-in-communal-disturbance-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":315798,"position":1},"title":"Calcutta High Court refuses to quash proceeding against teacher for involvement in Communal Disturbance case","author":"Ritu","date":"August 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Considering the nature of the alleged offences and the available evidence, the Calcutta High Court found a prima facie case against the petitioner to proceed to trial.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299162,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/12\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-revision-seeking-cancellation-of-bail-in-assault-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":315798,"position":2},"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses revision seeking cancellation of bail in assault case","author":"Ritu","date":"August 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court criticized the trial court for solely relying on party's submissions and not calling for injury report.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":302661,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/29\/prima-facie-evidence-undated-cheque-security-in-dishonor-of-cheque-case-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":315798,"position":3},"title":"&#8216;Need to interpret Section 138 in a manner that preserves the law\u2019s efficacy&#8217;: Calcutta High Court sets aside conviction","author":"Ritu","date":"September 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In the instant matter of cheque bounce, on the date of presentation of the cheque, the company which allegedly issued the cheque was no more existence.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298297,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/02\/woman-has-right-maintenance-from-her-partner-who-contract-second-marriage-under-personal-law-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":315798,"position":4},"title":"Women entitled to care and support from partners who contract second marriage under personal law: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"August 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court set aside the impugned order and modified the maintenance amount to Rs. 6,000 per month.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299948,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":315798,"position":5},"title":"\u201cAbsurd and improbable\u201d: Calcutta High Court sets aside maliciously instituted criminal case with no sufficient grounds for legal action","author":"Ritu","date":"August 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While quashing the criminal proceeding filed against petitioners, the Calcutta High Court held that the same is lacking with substantial evidence and is institutes with malicious intent.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315798","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=315798"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315798\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314821"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=315798"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=315798"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=315798"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}