{"id":315631,"date":"2024-02-29T12:00:30","date_gmt":"2024-02-29T06:30:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=315631"},"modified":"2024-03-07T09:44:09","modified_gmt":"2024-03-07T04:14:09","slug":"calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\/","title":{"rendered":"Calcutta High Court upholds rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application despite disclosure of Cause of Action through \u2018clever drafting\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Calcutta High Court:<\/span> In an application challenging the dismissal of an application under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523624\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">VII Rule 11<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (CPC) on the ground of being barred by law, lacked jurisdiction and being vexatious, a single-judge bench comprising of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee,* J.<\/span>, dismissed the petitioner&#8217;s application under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574971\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">227<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a>, stating that the trial court&#8217;s decision was not manifestly unjust or illegal. The Court emphasised that the petitioner should have raised objections to the suit&#8217;s maintainability before the trial court, rather than directly approaching the High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the plaintiff participated in an auction held by the Debt Recovery Officer and offered Rs. 2.90 crores to purchase a property involved in a proceeding initiated by ICICI Bank against the secured debtor. The petitioner, NST Housing Development (P) Ltd., also participated in the auction and offered Rs. 2.30 crores for the same property. The plaintiff was declared the successful bidder but failed to pay the earnest money which led to declaration that the petitioner is successful bidder and the property was sold to the petitioners. The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the secured debtor&#8217;s appeal, and possession of the property was delivered to the petitioner. The petitioner converted the property from &#8216;Shali&#8217; land to &#8216;Bastu&#8217; land, making it suitable for construction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The plaintiff subsequently filed a suit, seeking permanent injunction and a declaration enforcing an alleged agreement for sale dated 21-12-2012. The petitioners filed an application under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523624\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">VII Rule 11<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC<\/a>, seeking rejection of the plaint, arguing various legal grounds including the suit being barred by law, lack of jurisdiction, and absence of cause of action. The lower court, vide order dated 05-02-2016, rejected the application under Order VII Rule 11, stating that it should only consider the averments in the plaint, not those in the written statement. Aggrieved by the impugned order rejection the Order VII Rule 11, the petitioner challenged the same contending that the suit is barred by law, lacked jurisdiction, and is vexatious. The main issue in the present application is whether the suit filed by the plaintiff maintainable or should be rejected under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523624\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">VII Rule 11<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The Court noted that the petitioner&#8217;s main grievance is related to the way of clever drafting, the plaintiff has tried to create an illusory cause of action for framing the suit. The Court stated that it is a well settled that Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523624\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">VII Rule 11<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC<\/a> applies to plaints that do not disclose a cause of action, not those where the cause of action is alleged to be non-existent. The Court held that the lower court&#8217;s decision was not erroneous or illegal as it adhered to the principle of considering only the averments in the plaint while deciding on rejection under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523624\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">VII Rule 11<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt;font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;&#8230;the observation of the Trial Court that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">the Court while dealing with an application cannot go beyond the averments made in the plaint while deciding an application seeking rejection of plaint<\/span>, is neither perverse nor illegal, since it is settled law from various judicial pronouncements that at the time of consideration of a prayer regarding rejection of plaint, only the averments made in the plaint is relevant.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court emphasised that the Court&#8217;s jurisdiction under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574971\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">227<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a> should not be used as an appellate remedy and advised the petitioner to file a preliminary issue regarding the suit&#8217;s maintainability before the trial court for expedited resolution. The Court dismissed the application, allowing the plaintiff&#8217;s suit to proceed, but granted the petitioner the opportunity to challenge the maintainability of the suit before the lower court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">N.S.T. Housing Development (P) Ltd. v. ICICI Bank Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/T0y3716u\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Cal 2049<\/a>, order dated 27-02-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Shyamal Chakraborty, Mr. Debajyoti Mondal and Ms. Anjana Das, Counsel for the Petitioners<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Sakya Sen and Mr. Manas Das, Counsel for the Opposite Party 3<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Calcutta High Court stated that &#8220;Order VII, Rule 11 is applicable to the plaint which does not disclose cause of action and not the cases where the plea is non-existence of cause of action.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":314821,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2689,12171,65865,60251,22434,22424],"class_list":["post-315631","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-cause-of-action","tag-clever-drafting","tag-justice-ajoy-kumar-mukherjee","tag-order-vii-rule-11-cpc","tag-rejection-of-plaint"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Calcutta High Court upholds rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court upheld rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application despite disclosure of Cause of Action through \u2018clever drafting\u2019\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court upholds rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application despite disclosure of Cause of Action through \u2018clever drafting\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court upheld rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application despite disclosure of Cause of Action through \u2018clever drafting\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-02-29T06:30:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-03-07T04:14:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court upholds rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application despite disclosure of Cause of Action through \u2018clever drafting\u2019\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/29\\\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/29\\\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"headline\":\"Calcutta High Court upholds rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application despite disclosure of Cause of Action through \u2018clever drafting\u2019\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-02-29T06:30:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-07T04:14:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/29\\\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":697,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/29\\\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Calcutta High Court\",\"Cause of action\",\"clever drafting\",\"Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee\",\"Order VII Rule 11 CPC\",\"Rejection of plaint\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/29\\\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/29\\\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/29\\\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\\\/\",\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court upholds rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/29\\\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/29\\\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-02-29T06:30:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-07T04:14:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court upheld rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application despite disclosure of Cause of Action through \u2018clever drafting\u2019\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/29\\\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/29\\\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/29\\\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Calcutta High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/29\\\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court upholds rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application despite disclosure of Cause of Action through \u2018clever drafting\u2019\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_7\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application | SCC Times","description":"Calcutta High Court upheld rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application despite disclosure of Cause of Action through \u2018clever drafting\u2019","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Calcutta High Court upholds rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application despite disclosure of Cause of Action through \u2018clever drafting\u2019","og_description":"Calcutta High Court upheld rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application despite disclosure of Cause of Action through \u2018clever drafting\u2019","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-02-29T06:30:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-03-07T04:14:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Calcutta High Court upholds rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application despite disclosure of Cause of Action through \u2018clever drafting\u2019","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\/"},"author":{"name":"Ritu","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"headline":"Calcutta High Court upholds rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application despite disclosure of Cause of Action through \u2018clever drafting\u2019","datePublished":"2024-02-29T06:30:30+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-07T04:14:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\/"},"wordCount":697,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","keywords":["Calcutta High Court","Cause of action","clever drafting","Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee","Order VII Rule 11 CPC","Rejection of plaint"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\/","name":"Calcutta High Court upholds rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-02-29T06:30:30+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-07T04:14:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court upheld rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application despite disclosure of Cause of Action through \u2018clever drafting\u2019","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Calcutta High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Calcutta High Court upholds rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application despite disclosure of Cause of Action through \u2018clever drafting\u2019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315631","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=315631"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315631\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314821"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=315631"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=315631"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=315631"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}