{"id":315600,"date":"2024-02-29T09:00:13","date_gmt":"2024-02-29T03:30:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=315600"},"modified":"2024-03-07T09:56:51","modified_gmt":"2024-03-07T04:26:51","slug":"civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Civil Court lacks jurisdiction over Waqf Property disputes: Calcutta High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Calcutta High Court:<\/span> In a civil revision petition seeking rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d)<\/a> of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (CPC) contending trial court’s lack of jurisdiction, a single-judge bench comprising of Prasenjit Biswas,* J.<\/span>, held that the suit, being related to a waqf property, fell within the jurisdiction of the Waqf Tribunal, and the civil court lacked jurisdiction to entertain it. The Court allowed the revision petition and held that the plaint is liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d)<\/a> of CPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the petitioners-defendants in the filed a revision application against the order of the trial court dismissing their application under Order VII Rule 11(d)<\/a> of the CPC<\/a> in Title Suit before the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), 3rd Court at Alipore. The suit was filed by the predecessors in interest of the plaintiffs-opposite parties against the petitioners seeking various reliefs regarding the leasehold right, title, and interest of a property, alleging interference from the Mysore Family Fateha Fund Committee. Aggrieved by the impugned dismissal of the Order VII Rule 11(d) application, the petitioners filed the present revision before this Court challenging the same.<\/p>\n

The petitioner contended that the civill court erred in rejecting their application under Order VII Rule 11(d)<\/a> of CPC<\/a> as that the suit was barred by law, specifically citing Sections 83<\/a> and 85<\/a> of the Waqf Act, 1995<\/a> and the matter should have been addressed by the Competent Authority under the Act. However, the plaintiffs contended that the plaint did not show that the suit was barred by any law, as required under Order VII Rule 11(d)<\/a> of the CPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Moot Point<\/p>\n

Whether the defendants\/respondents herein made out a case for rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC?<\/p>\n

Court’s Observation<\/p>\n

After referring to Saleem Bhai<\/span> v. State of Maharashtra<\/span>, (2003) 1 SCC 557; Surjit Kaur Gill<\/span> v. Adrsh Kaur Gill<\/span>, (2014) 16 SCC 125 and Madanuri Sri Rama Chandra Murthy<\/span> v. Syed Jalal<\/span>, (2017) 13 SCC 174 and the Court observed that the jurisdictional issue should be decided based on the averments in the plaint alone, and the pleas in the written statement were irrelevant at that stage. The Court emphasised that the court should not dissect the plaint’s language but consider it as a whole to ascertain its true import.<\/p>\n

“Whether the suit is barred by any law must be determined from the statements in the plaint and it is not open to decide the issue on the basis of any other material including the written statement in the case.”<\/p>\n

After considering the parties’ arguments and examining the Sections 83<\/a> and 85<\/a> of the Waqf Act, 1995<\/a>, the Court found that the suit fell within the jurisdiction of the Waqf Tribunal as per Section 85 of the Act, thereby barring the jurisdiction of the civil court. Referring to Rajasthan Wakf Board<\/span> v. Devki Nandan Pathak<\/span>, (2017) 14 SCC 561; Rashid Wali Beg<\/span> v. Farid Pindari<\/span>, (2022) 4 SCC 414 and Sections 83<\/a> and 85<\/a> of the Waqf Act, 1995<\/a>, the Court held that the plaint revealed that the dispute related to a waqf property, thereby attracting the application of Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC. The Court held that the suit was indeed barred by law and thus qualified for rejection under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that the civil court without giving due regard to provisions of law and the issue raised in the application, simply concluded that the question of jurisdiction was a mixed question of law and fact, and it can be decided only after evidence, both oral and documentary, could be adduced. The Couet opined that “the said finding of the trial court is quite infirm, erroneous and discrepant, which requires interference by this court in this revision.”<\/span><\/p>\n

Court’s Decision<\/p>\n

The Court allowed the revision petition and held that the civil court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit, and the plaint was liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC.<\/p>\n

[S.M. Shahid Alam<\/span> v. Jyotiranjan Banerjee<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine Cal 1923<\/a>, order dated 27-02-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment by Justice Prasenjit Biswas<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Ganesh Shrivastava and Mr. Sukanta Das, Counsel for the Petitioners<\/p>\n

Mr. Saptangshu Basu, Mr. Dwijadas Chakraborty, Counsel for the Opposite Party 1<\/p>\n

Mr. T. Chakraborty, Mr. S. Sanyal, Counsel for the State<\/p>\n

Md. Salahuddin, Md. A. Zaman, Md. Raziauddin, Counsel for the Wakf Board<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Calcutta High Court held that “in order to decide whether the suit is barred by any law, it is the statement in the plaint which will have to be construed.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":314821,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2689,10551,3686,60109,65853,22424,65852],"class_list":["post-315600","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-civil-court","tag-Jurisdiction","tag-justice-prasenjit-biswas","tag-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc","tag-rejection-of-plaint","tag-section-85-of-waqf-act"],"yoast_head":"\n'Civil Court' jurisdiction barred by Section 85 of Waqf Act'; Calcutta High Court allows application under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court allowed application under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC and held that Civil Court' jurisdiction is barred by Section 85 of Waqf Act.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Civil Court lacks jurisdiction over Waqf Property disputes: Calcutta High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court allowed application under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC and held that Civil Court' jurisdiction is barred by Section 85 of Waqf Act.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-02-29T03:30:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-03-07T04:26:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Civil Court lacks jurisdiction over Waqf Property disputes: Calcutta High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"'Civil Court' jurisdiction barred by Section 85 of Waqf Act'; Calcutta High Court allows application under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-02-29T03:30:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-07T04:26:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court allowed application under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC and held that Civil Court' jurisdiction is barred by Section 85 of Waqf Act.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Calcutta High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Civil Court lacks jurisdiction over Waqf Property disputes: Calcutta High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"'Civil Court' jurisdiction barred by Section 85 of Waqf Act'; Calcutta High Court allows application under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC | SCC Times","description":"Calcutta High Court allowed application under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC and held that Civil Court' jurisdiction is barred by Section 85 of Waqf Act.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Civil Court lacks jurisdiction over Waqf Property disputes: Calcutta High Court","og_description":"Calcutta High Court allowed application under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC and held that Civil Court' jurisdiction is barred by Section 85 of Waqf Act.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-02-29T03:30:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-03-07T04:26:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Civil Court lacks jurisdiction over Waqf Property disputes: Calcutta High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/","name":"'Civil Court' jurisdiction barred by Section 85 of Waqf Act'; Calcutta High Court allows application under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-02-29T03:30:13+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-07T04:26:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court allowed application under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC and held that Civil Court' jurisdiction is barred by Section 85 of Waqf Act.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Calcutta High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Civil Court lacks jurisdiction over Waqf Property disputes: Calcutta High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":342620,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/01\/s-85-of-waqf-act-waqf-tribunal-has-exclusive-jurisdiction-over-disputes-once-property-qualifies-as-waqf-by-user-raj-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":315600,"position":0},"title":"S. 85 of Waqf Act | Waqf Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction over disputes once a property qualifies as \u2018Waqf by user\u2019: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 1, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is not disputed that Masjid is a place used for religious purpose for praying Namaz etc., therefore, it comes within the definition of \u2018Waqf\u2019.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":353854,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/19\/jk-hc-holds-if-waqf-tribunal-absent-civil-court-can-decide-waqf-disputes\/","url_meta":{"origin":315600,"position":1},"title":"In absence of Waqf Tribunal, Civil Courts have jurisdiction to entertain waqf disputes: J&K and Ladakh HC","author":"Editor","date":"July 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cEven in a case where there is an express bar for exercising jurisdiction by the civil courts, the consideration as to the scheme of the statute in question and the adequacy or sufficiency of the remedy provided, is permissible in law.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"civil court can decide waqf dispute","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/civil-court-can-decide-waqf-dispute.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/civil-court-can-decide-waqf-dispute.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/civil-court-can-decide-waqf-dispute.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/civil-court-can-decide-waqf-dispute.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":315631,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":315600,"position":2},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application despite disclosure of Cause of Action through \u2018clever drafting\u2019","author":"Ritu","date":"February 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court stated that \u201cOrder VII, Rule 11 is applicable to the plaint which does not disclose cause of action and not the cases where the plea is non-existence of cause of action.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":344285,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/24\/s-24-cpc-cannot-invoked-case-filed-in-court-without-jurisdiction-o-vii-r-10-cpc-invoked-bombay-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":315600,"position":3},"title":"S. 24 CPC cannot be invoked for proceedings filed without jurisdiction, Order VII Rule 10 CPC has to be invoked: Bombay High Court","author":"Editor","date":"March 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that when any Civil Court holds that it lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of the suit or application, it had to pass order under Order VII Rule 10 of CPC for return of plaint, and procedure of transfer of proceeding under Section 24 of CPC could\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":155204,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/11\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-revisional-jurisdiction-as-impugned-plaint-doesnt-suffer-from-any-irregularity\/","url_meta":{"origin":315600,"position":4},"title":"High Court refuses to invoke revisional jurisdiction as impugned plaint doesn\u2019t suffer from any irregularity","author":"Saba","date":"September 11, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court:\u00a0The petitioner aggrieved by an order of rejection of his application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC by the Senior Civil Judge, Rajgarh preferred a petition. The respondent filed a suit for eviction and mesne profit against the petitioner-defendant before the Civil Judge, Rajgarh, Churu. During the pendency\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":366581,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/rejection-plaint-application-of-mind-non-disclosure-of-cause-of-action-jk-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":315600,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Rejection of Plaint requires attentive application of mind, not routine action\u2019: J&K & Ladakh HC upholds Trial Court order for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action","author":"Editor","date":"November 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe essence of an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC to terminate a civil action or to put an end to a litigation is an essential duty of a Civil Court so that further judicial time is not invested wastefully.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"rejection of plaint","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/rejection-of-plaint.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/rejection-of-plaint.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/rejection-of-plaint.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/rejection-of-plaint.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315600","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=315600"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315600\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314821"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=315600"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=315600"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=315600"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}