{"id":315527,"date":"2024-02-28T11:00:07","date_gmt":"2024-02-28T05:30:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=315527"},"modified":"2024-03-07T09:27:00","modified_gmt":"2024-03-07T03:57:00","slug":"cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/28\/cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Calcutta High Court directs \u2018M.V. Marintrust – 01\u2019 vessel\u2019s owner to appoint Surveyor to assess goods\u2019 quantity, damage and current value"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Calcutta High Court:<\/span> In an application filed, by the owner of the vessel M.V. Marintrust – 01, seeking appointment of a Surveyor to assess the quantum of damage caused to the goods contained in the containers aboard the vessel docked at Syama Prasad Mookerjee Port, Kolkata, a single-judge bench comprising of Moushumi Bhattacharya,* J.<\/span>, disposed of the application with detailed directions regarding the identification, storage, and sale of salvaged goods from the vessel. The Court also addressed logistical issues, customs procedures, and the urgency of selling the vessel and directed the owner to appoint a Surveyor to assess the goods’ quantity, damage, and current value.<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the applicant, Marintrust Limited, claiming the ownership of the vessel M.V. Marintrust – 01, currently docked at Syama Prasad Mookerjee Port, Kolkata, located within the admiralty jurisdiction of the Court, filed an application before the High Court. The vessel was arrested in an admiralty suit brought by Plaintiff 1 and 2 seeking compensation for damages suffered. The vessel experienced a capsizing\/listing incident on 23-03-2022 while berthed at Kolkata Port, resulting in submerged cargo. The vessel was subsequently brought upright on 15-09-2022, and cargo was recovered. Plaintiffs 1 and 2 obtained an arrest order on 29-09-2022 from a Co-ordinate Bench and further orders for the sale of vessels on 28-06-2023, with Joint Special Officers appointed for the sale. The applicant sought the appointment of a Surveyor to assess damage to goods in containers salvaged from the vessel and mitigate the damages. On the other hand, the Port Authorities and Plaintiffs resist the appointment, citing outstanding port charges and logistical complications.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the Owner solely claimed ownership over the vessel in question, not on the goods inside the containers and, similarly, the Port’s claim is restricted to the vessel alone. The noted that the appellant seeks redressal for the loss of goods stored within specific containers among those onboard, distinct from the goods within the 165 containers currently located within the Port premises and appellant alone can identify the containers holding their goods. The Court noted that all goods are Customs duty paid and intended for export, necessitating the consent or no objection of Customs Authorities for the removal of salvaged goods\/containers. The Court highlighted further issues including the vessel’s dilapidated condition, logistics of removing containers, ownership claims, customs procedures, and vessel’s sale urgency and passed the following directions:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    Plaintiffs to identify containers holding their cargo in the presence of the vessel’s owner.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    Owner to arrange a Customs Bonded Warehouse for container storage at their expense.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  3. \n

    Owner to obtain Customs permission for container movement.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  4. \n

    Containers to be de-stuffed in presence of plaintiffs with prior notice.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  5. \n

    Goods sold after de-stuffing and survey, with all costs borne by the vessel’s owner.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  6. \n

    Port’s lien preserved as first charge on goods sold.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  7. \n

    Fresh auction for the vessel to be conducted with a new valuer.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  8. \n

    Owner to provide an undertaking to the Customs Bonded Warehouse for costs.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    The Court directed the owner to appoint an accredited Surveyor, subject to fulfillment of the above directions, to assess the quantum of goods, damage caused to the goods and approximate damage at the time when the containers were salvaged and file Report indicating the aforesaid as well as approximate price of the goods as on date. The application is allowed and disposed of as per the directions provided.<\/p>\n

    [Grasim Industries Ltd.<\/span> v. Owners and Parties Interested in the Vessel M V Marintrust — 01, (IMO 9783174)<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine Cal 1843<\/a>, order dated 26-02-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n

    *Judgment by Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

    Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

    Mr. K.R. Thaker, Mr. Soumik Kundu, Counsel for the Plaintiff<\/p>\n

    Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury, Mr. Soumyadip Saha, Mr. Dwip Raj Basu, Mr. Anubhav Sinha, Mr. Nikhil Kr. Roy, Mr. Abhijit Sarkar, Counsel for the Defendant No. 1\/Application<\/p>\n

    Mr. Pourush Bandopadhyay, Adv. Mr. Anirban Ghosh, Counsel for the Intervener<\/p>\n

    Mr. Tilak Kr. Bose, Sr. Adv., Mr. Pranit Bag, Mr. Aditya Sarkar, Counsel for the Kolkata Port Trust<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Calcutta High Court directed the Joint Special Officers to conduct a fresh auction for the vessel in conformity with the order of sale and appoint a fresh valuer who will reflect a more realistic value of the vessel.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":314821,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2831,2689,57782,65821,35656,41722,30779],"class_list":["post-315527","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Auction","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-justice-moushumi-bhattacharya","tag-m-v-marintrust-01","tag-surveyor","tag-syama-prasad-mookerjee-port","tag-vessel"],"yoast_head":"\nCalcutta High Court directs 'M.V. Marintrust - 01' vessel's owner to appoint Surveyor to assess goods' quantity, damage and current value | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court directed 'M.V. Marintrust - 01' vessel's owner to appoint Surveyor to assess goods' quantity, damage, and current value.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/28\/cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court directs \u2018M.V. Marintrust - 01\u2019 vessel\u2019s owner to appoint Surveyor to assess goods\u2019 quantity, damage and current value\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court directed 'M.V. Marintrust - 01' vessel's owner to appoint Surveyor to assess goods' quantity, damage, and current value.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/28\/cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-02-28T05:30:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-03-07T03:57:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court directs \u2018M.V. Marintrust - 01\u2019 vessel\u2019s owner to appoint Surveyor to assess goods\u2019 quantity, damage and current value\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/28\/cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/28\/cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court directs 'M.V. Marintrust - 01' vessel's owner to appoint Surveyor to assess goods' quantity, damage and current value | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/28\/cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/28\/cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-02-28T05:30:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-07T03:57:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court directed 'M.V. Marintrust - 01' vessel's owner to appoint Surveyor to assess goods' quantity, damage, and current value.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/28\/cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/28\/cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/28\/cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Calcutta High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/28\/cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court directs \u2018M.V. Marintrust – 01\u2019 vessel\u2019s owner to appoint Surveyor to assess goods\u2019 quantity, damage and current value\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Calcutta High Court directs 'M.V. Marintrust - 01' vessel's owner to appoint Surveyor to assess goods' quantity, damage and current value | SCC Times","description":"Calcutta High Court directed 'M.V. Marintrust - 01' vessel's owner to appoint Surveyor to assess goods' quantity, damage, and current value.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/28\/cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Calcutta High Court directs \u2018M.V. Marintrust - 01\u2019 vessel\u2019s owner to appoint Surveyor to assess goods\u2019 quantity, damage and current value","og_description":"Calcutta High Court directed 'M.V. Marintrust - 01' vessel's owner to appoint Surveyor to assess goods' quantity, damage, and current value.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/28\/cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-02-28T05:30:07+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-03-07T03:57:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Calcutta High Court directs \u2018M.V. Marintrust - 01\u2019 vessel\u2019s owner to appoint Surveyor to assess goods\u2019 quantity, damage and current value","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/28\/cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/28\/cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times\/","name":"Calcutta High Court directs 'M.V. Marintrust - 01' vessel's owner to appoint Surveyor to assess goods' quantity, damage and current value | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/28\/cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/28\/cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-02-28T05:30:07+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-07T03:57:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court directed 'M.V. Marintrust - 01' vessel's owner to appoint Surveyor to assess goods' quantity, damage, and current value.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/28\/cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/28\/cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/28\/cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Calcutta High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/28\/cal-hc-directs-m-v-marintrust-01-vessels-owner-to-appoint-surveyor-to-assess-goods-quantity-damage-and-current-value-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Calcutta High Court directs \u2018M.V. Marintrust – 01\u2019 vessel\u2019s owner to appoint Surveyor to assess goods\u2019 quantity, damage and current value"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":230418,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/03\/cabinet-approves-renaming-of-kolkata-port-trust-as-syama-prasad-mookerjee-trust\/","url_meta":{"origin":315527,"position":0},"title":"Cabinet approves renaming of Kolkata Port Trust as Syama Prasad Mookerjee Trust","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 3, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Union Cabinet has given its approval to rename Kolkata Port as Syama Prasad Mookerjee Port. The Board of Trustees of Kolkata Port Trust in its Meeting held on 25th February, 2020 has also passed a Resolution to re-name Kolkata Port as Syama Prasad Mookerjee Port, Kolkata considering his multifaceted genius\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cabinet Decisions"","block_context":{"text":"Cabinet Decisions","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/cabinet_decisions\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/CABINET-SECRETARIAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/CABINET-SECRETARIAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/CABINET-SECRETARIAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/CABINET-SECRETARIAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/CABINET-SECRETARIAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298911,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/09\/compliance-s19-msmed-act-is-a-pre-requisite-for-seeking-stay-arbitral-award-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":315527,"position":1},"title":"Compliance of Section 19 of MSMED Act is a pre-requisite for seeking Stay on Arbitral Award: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"August 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court held that failure to comply with procedural requirements under Section 19 of the MSMED Act renders application for stay of Arbitral Award as not maintainable.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":243256,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/02\/ncdrc-what-are-the-obligations-of-the-insured-taking-a-marine-insurance-policy-principle-of-utmost-good-faith-favours-whom-commission-delineates\/","url_meta":{"origin":315527,"position":2},"title":"NCDRC | What are the obligations of the insured taking a Marine Insurance Policy? Principle of Utmost Good Faith favours whom? Commission delineates","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): Anup K. Thakur (Presiding Member) dismissed a consumer complaint against the insurance company in case of a Marine Cargo Specific Voyage Policy, holding that it was for the insured\/complainant to ensure full compliance of all the policy conditions in its own interest and that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":201132,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/01\/arrest-of-marine-vessel-mv-pelagos-directed-in-light-of-maritime-claim-under-section-41n-of-admiralty-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":315527,"position":3},"title":"Arrest of marine vessel MV PELAGOS directed in light of maritime claim under Section 4(1)(n) of Admiralty Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 1, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ashis Kumar Chakraborty, J. allowed an application for arrest of marine vessel filed in an admiralty suit. The plaintiff claimed to have a maritime claim against the defendant vessel for USD 234,286.24 on account of supply of bunkers and fuel to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":315678,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/orissa-hc-orders-arrest-of-vessel-mv-debi-for-unpaid-berth-hire-charges-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":315527,"position":4},"title":"Orissa HC orders arrest of Vessel at Paradip Port for unpaid berth hire charges and penalty of about 8 crores","author":"Editor","date":"February 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Paradip International Cargo Terminal Pvt. Ltd. sought arrest of the cargo vessel for the unpaid dues of about 7.95 Crores towards the berth hire and penal berth hire charges.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299478,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/marine-hull-insurance-policy-insured-failed-establish-warranty-class-complied-sc-upholds-ncdrc-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":315527,"position":5},"title":"Marine Hull Insurance Policy| Insurer not liable to reimburse loss upon Insured’s failure to comply with warranty class; SC upholds NCDRC order","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court said that when the defects are not intimated, and the warranty class has not been complied with, the Classification Certificate automatically becomes invalid.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"marine hull insurance policy","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/marine-hull-insurance-policy.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/marine-hull-insurance-policy.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/marine-hull-insurance-policy.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/marine-hull-insurance-policy.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315527","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=315527"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315527\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314821"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=315527"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=315527"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=315527"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}