{"id":315022,"date":"2024-02-22T17:00:23","date_gmt":"2024-02-22T11:30:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=315022"},"modified":"2024-02-29T09:40:50","modified_gmt":"2024-02-29T04:10:50","slug":"del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Hospital deemed an \u2018Industry\u2019 under Industrial Disputes Act\u2019; Delhi High Court affirms Rights of a \u2018Workman\u2019 in Hospital Dispute"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> A petition was filed seeking to quash or set aside the impugned award and declare that respondent 1 is not entitled for any relief much less the relief granted by impugned award wherein the Labour Court directed the reinstatement of the respondent workman, along with full back wages and continuity of services. Chandra Dhari Singh, J., upheld the decision of the Labour Court in favor of the respondent workman based on evidence supporting the respondent workman&#8217;s claim of continuous service preceding the termination of employment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute (petitioner) is an institute financed by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. It primarily focuses on research in chest and allied diseases and provides medical facilities. A workman (respondent) worked as a casual and daily wager pump operator at the petitioner hospital since 1985, with a last drawn salary of Rs. 1300\/- per month. Allegedly, the respondent&#8217;s services were illegally terminated on 10-05-1991. In response to the alleged illegal termination, the respondent workman raised an industrial dispute by issuing a demand notice on 06-06-1991. Eventually, on 20-08-1992, the dispute was referred to the Labour Court, Karkardoama, Delhi for adjudication. During the proceedings, the petitioner Hospital contested the maintainability of the dispute, arguing that it cannot be considered an industry under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002756734\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Industrial Disputes Act, 1947<\/a> (ID Act). Following the completion of the proceedings, the Labour Court passed an award in favor of the respondent workman on 29-07-2002, directing the petitioner hospital to reinstate the respondent with full back wages and continuity of services. As the petitioner hospital failed to implement the award, the respondent workman served a demand notice on 11-09-2002, requesting implementation, which went unanswered. Subsequently, the respondent workman filed an application under Section 33C(1) of the ID Act for execution of the award. A recovery certificate was issued on April 4, 2003, for Rs. 3,03,554 covering the period from 10-05-1991 to 30-09-1992. Displeased with the award dated 29-07-2002, the petitioner hospital filed a petition before the court seeking to quash the award.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Counsel for petitioner challenged the jurisdiction of the Labour Court in adjudicating the dispute. It was contended that the Hospital, being a medical institution, does not qualify as an industry under the Industrial Disputes Act (ID Act), thus rendering the Labour Court&#8217;s decision invalid. Additionally, it was argued that the dispute was referred by the State Government instead of the appropriate authority, the Union of India, further questioning the legality of the referral. The petitioner also raised concerns regarding the respondent workman&#8217;s absence from duty, alleging that notifications were issued regarding the matter, which were allegedly denied by the respondent during the proceedings. Furthermore, the petitioner highlighted the respondent&#8217;s failure to report for duty until 2003, suggesting that the respondent&#8217;s primary interest lies in monetary recovery rather than reinstatement. Finally, the petitioner disputed the Labour Court&#8217;s directive for reinstatement, asserting that the respondent failed to substantiate claims of having worked for more than 240 days preceding the alleged termination.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Counsel for respondent challenged the validity of the petition itself, citing a significant delay of two years in its filing and the absence of substantial legal questions raised therein. The respondent argued that the Labour Court&#8217;s decision was based on a proper appreciation of facts and records, without any legal irregularities. It was further contended that efforts were made to resolve the dispute amicably, but the petitioner&#8217;s lack of cooperation necessitated the filing of the claim. Additionally, the respondent pointed out that the petitioner&#8217;s own witness admitted to not issuing any letter calling for the respondent&#8217;s resumption of duty. Therefore, the respondent asserted that the petition lacked merit and legal standing, urging the court to dismiss it accordingly.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Relying on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bangalore Water Supply &amp; Sewerage Board<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">A. Rajappa<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/NO4E8N1x\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(1978) 2 SCC 213<\/a>, the Court noted that the hospitals, despite being non-profit institutions, qualify as part of an industry under the Industrial Disputes Act due to the services they render, based on the interpretation of Section 2(j) of the ID Act, which defines &#8220;industry&#8221; broadly enough to encompass entities providing services, such as hospitals. The court noted that while a previous ruling on a similar matter is under review by a larger bench, until a new decision is made, the original ruling stands as the law of the land. This observation underscores the importance of adhering to existing legal precedents until they are overturned or modified through due process. The court examined the validity of the State Government&#8217;s authority to refer disputes for adjudication. It observes that this authority is supported by a notification issued by the Union of India in 1975, entrusting State Governments with the power to refer disputes. Furthermore, the court cites previous legal judgments upholding the validity of such notifications, confirming the legitimacy of the State Government&#8217;s actions in this regard.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The court delved into the respondent workman&#8217;s continuous service preceding the termination of employment. It noted that despite the petitioner Hospital&#8217;s contention that the burden of proof lies with the respondent, evidence such as attendance records from the relevant period supported the respondent&#8217;s claim of continuous service. This observation highlighted the importance of assessing the evidence presented in determining the outcome of disputes. The court acknowledged the significant delay in resolving the case, spanning over two decades. It expressed concern over the impact of this delay on economically disadvantaged litigants, emphasizing the importance of timely access to justice. This observation underscored the need for efficient judicial processes to uphold the rights of all citizens and maintain public trust in the legal system.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court upheld the validity of the State Government&#8217;s authority to refer the dispute for adjudication citing a notification issued by the Union of India entrusting such powers to the State Governments, which had been upheld by previous legal judgments. Thus, the Court found no illegality with the impugned award dated 29-07-2002, passed by the Labour Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute v. Nishikesh Tyagi, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/894cNbnq\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Del 1214<\/a>, decided on 01-02-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. M.K. Singh, Advocate for petitioner<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Jawahar Raja, Ms. Meghna De, Ms. L.Gangmei and Ms. Aditi, Advocates for respondents<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Delhi High Court upholds Labour Court&#8217;s finding, affirming Hospital as an Industry under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 validating State Government&#8217;s referral authority, and confirming the continuous service of the workman.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2543,3278,9931,65629,65628,3279],"class_list":["post-315022","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-industrial_dispute","tag-labour-court","tag-reinstatement-of-services","tag-vallabhbhai-patel-chest-institute","tag-workman"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi HC upholds Labour Court&#039;s award, affirms Rights of \u2018Workman\u2019 in Hospital Dispute| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court upholds Labour Court&#039;s Findings: Hospital Deemed an \u2018Industry\u2019 Under ID Act and Confirms Continuous Service of Workman.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Hospital deemed an \u2018Industry\u2019 under Industrial Disputes Act\u2019; Delhi High Court affirms Rights of a \u2018Workman\u2019 in Hospital Dispute\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court upholds Labour Court&#039;s Findings: Hospital Deemed an \u2018Industry\u2019 Under ID Act and Confirms Continuous Service of Workman.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-02-22T11:30:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-02-29T04:10:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Hospital deemed an \u2018Industry\u2019 under Industrial Disputes Act\u2019; Delhi High Court affirms Rights of a \u2018Workman\u2019 in Hospital Dispute\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC upholds Labour Court's award, affirms Rights of \u2018Workman\u2019 in Hospital Dispute| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-02-22T11:30:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-29T04:10:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court upholds Labour Court's Findings: Hospital Deemed an \u2018Industry\u2019 Under ID Act and Confirms Continuous Service of Workman.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Hospital deemed an \u2018Industry\u2019 under Industrial Disputes Act\u2019; Delhi High Court affirms Rights of a \u2018Workman\u2019 in Hospital Dispute\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC upholds Labour Court's award, affirms Rights of \u2018Workman\u2019 in Hospital Dispute| SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court upholds Labour Court's Findings: Hospital Deemed an \u2018Industry\u2019 Under ID Act and Confirms Continuous Service of Workman.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Hospital deemed an \u2018Industry\u2019 under Industrial Disputes Act\u2019; Delhi High Court affirms Rights of a \u2018Workman\u2019 in Hospital Dispute","og_description":"Delhi High Court upholds Labour Court's Findings: Hospital Deemed an \u2018Industry\u2019 Under ID Act and Confirms Continuous Service of Workman.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-02-22T11:30:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-02-29T04:10:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Hospital deemed an \u2018Industry\u2019 under Industrial Disputes Act\u2019; Delhi High Court affirms Rights of a \u2018Workman\u2019 in Hospital Dispute","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC upholds Labour Court's award, affirms Rights of \u2018Workman\u2019 in Hospital Dispute| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-02-22T11:30:23+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-29T04:10:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court upholds Labour Court's Findings: Hospital Deemed an \u2018Industry\u2019 Under ID Act and Confirms Continuous Service of Workman.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/del-hc-upholds-labor-court-award-hospital-is-an-industry-under-industrial-disputes-act-directs-continous-service-of-workman-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Hospital deemed an \u2018Industry\u2019 under Industrial Disputes Act\u2019; Delhi High Court affirms Rights of a \u2018Workman\u2019 in Hospital Dispute"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":294406,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/12\/delhi-high-court-enhances-compensation-illegal-termination-workman-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":315022,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court enhances compensation from Rs 50,000 to Rs. 1,50,000 for illegal termination of \u2018workman\u2019","author":"Arunima","date":"June 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court observed that Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. R. Rajappa, 1978 (3) SCR 207 acts as a North star for the courts to reach the conclusion regarding the applicability of the Industrial Dispute Act to an organization by laying down elaborate guidelines with respect to the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219381,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/11\/del-hc-reinstatement-cannot-be-granted-where-employee-acts-in-a-manner-by-which-management-loses-confidence-in-him-order-of-reinstatement-quashed\/","url_meta":{"origin":315022,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Reinstatement cannot be granted where employee acts in a manner by which management loses confidence in him; order of reinstatement quashed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0J.R. Midha, J. allowed a writ petition filed by the employer challenging the award of the Labour Court whereby the respondent was ordered to be reinstated with 40% back wages. The employer had engaged the respondent on daily wages, who deposited deficient sale proceeds for several months in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":213403,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/08\/hp-hc-limitation-of-appeal-to-be-kept-in-view-while-moulding-the-relief\/","url_meta":{"origin":315022,"position":2},"title":"HP HC | Limitation of appeal to be kept in view while moulding the relief","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of Surya Kant, C.J. and Sandeep Sharma, J. dismissed a letters patent appeal finding no merit in the case as the issue stood settled between the parties in the earlier round of litigation. In the pertinent matter, the respondent was a workman engaged\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6553,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/03\/25\/delay-in-raising-industrial-dispute-is-not-a-ground-for-rejection-of-claim\/","url_meta":{"origin":315022,"position":3},"title":"Delay in raising industrial dispute is not a ground for rejection of claim","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 25, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: While deciding on the issue of rejection of claim on the ground of inordinate delay and laches in an industrial dispute, the bench of Sanjay Karol, J. held that delay in raising the dispute and referring the same to the Labour Court for adjudication is not\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259132,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/27\/if-labour-court-orders-reinstatement-and-employer-challenges-the-said-order-is-workman-entitled-to-payment-of-full-wages-during-the-pendency-of-challenge\/","url_meta":{"origin":315022,"position":4},"title":"If Labour Court orders reinstatement and employer challenges the said order, is workman entitled to payment of full wages during pendency of challenge by employer? Del HC explains in consonance of Industrial Disputes Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Rajiv Shakdher and Talwant Singh, JJ., decided a matter with regard to payment of full wages to workman while proceedings are pending pertaining to him in the Court. Respondent 1 \u2013 workman moved the application under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":348627,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/23\/delhi-high-court-burden-of-proof-ddu-hospital-safai-karamchari-compensation-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":315022,"position":5},"title":"Burden of Proof shifts to Management once employment is proved: Delhi HC upholds \u20b970,000 compensation for Safai Karamchari terminated by DDU Hospital","author":"Arunima","date":"May 23, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cBurden of proof, in any enquiry or trial, keeps on shifting and the moment the averments made in the claim petition were deposed on oath by the respondent in her evidence, it was for the Management to have rebutted and disproved the same.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315022","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=315022"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315022\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=315022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=315022"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=315022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}