{"id":314975,"date":"2024-02-22T12:00:55","date_gmt":"2024-02-22T06:30:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=314975"},"modified":"2024-02-28T16:28:03","modified_gmt":"2024-02-28T10:58:03","slug":"cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Calcutta High Court upholds public use presumption for pot dumping land; dismisses Permanent Injunction claim"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Calcutta High Court:<\/span> In an appeal against the judgment and decree passed by the Additional District Judge setting aside against the grant of permanent injunction in favor of the appellant, a single-judge bench comprising of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee,* J.<\/span>, upheld the presumption of public use of the land for pot dumping and rejected the appellant&#8217;s claims due to appellant&#8217;s failure to establish lawful possession or breach of contract by the respondents.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Factual Matrix<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant, as plaintiff, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the villagers-defendants to restrain them from trespassing or utilizing a certain plot of land. The appellant claimed to have purchased adjacent plots of land, which included the disputed plot, from the original owner. Despite being recorded as public land for dumping pots in the Record of Rights, the plaintiff claimed possession with the villagers&#8217; consent until threats of dispossession arose. The respondents-defendants claimed customary right over the land for pot dumping ceremonies.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Trial Court, 2nd Munsif, Contai granted permanent injunction in favor of the appellant, which was challenged by the respondents in the appeal. The Additional District Judge set aside the trial court&#8217;s judgment. Aggrieved by the impugned judgment and decree dated 21-08-1991 passed by the Additional District Judge, the appellant preferred the present appeal. The appellant argued amalgamation of the disputed plot with purchased plots and challenged the characterization of the land as &#8220;Khas Mohal Land.&#8221; However, the respondents contended longstanding customary rights over the land for dumping pots.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Moot Point<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p>Whether the appellant established a legal right justifying the grant of permanent injunction?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether the respondents&#8217; customary rights over the land for dumping earthen pots invalidate the appellant&#8217;s claim?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#8217;s Observation and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court found the trial court&#8217;s judgment erroneous in granting permanent injunction without proper evidence of the appellant&#8217;s lawful possession. The Court noted that a permanent injunction requires the appellant to establish a legal right and breach thereof, which the plaintiff failed to prove. The Court stated that the appellant&#8217;s failure to rebut the presumption of public use for dumping pots, as recorded in the Record of Rights, weakened their claim.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">Despite acknowledging the appellant&#8217;s unauthorized occupation and payments for damages, the Court found no evidence of lawful possession or breach by the defendants. The Court noted that,<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;The plaintiff, who seeks equity, must do equity first. A wrong doer cannot claim equity and in order to claim equitable relief like permanent injunction, plaintiff must show that his possession is lawful. Mere inconvenience is not enough to entitle a party to an injunction. There must be violation of a legal right and in considering whether such injunction can be granted, the amount of injury sustained is material. Where no irreparable injury is shown, the injunction should be refused.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court upheld the presumption of public usage for pot dumping based on record entries and rejected the appellant&#8217;s claims of amalgamation and ownership. The Court held that the appellant failed to establish lawful possession or breach of rights by the respondents, leading to the rejection of the claim for permanent injunction. The Court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the judgment and decree of the appeal court due to lack of evidence supporting a breach of contract or obligation by the respondents.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sarbeswar Pradhan<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bijay Krishna Pradhan<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0Mu4lPef\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Cal 1569<\/a>, order dated 19-02-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. A.K. Gayen and Ms. A.A. Gayan, Counsel for the Appellants<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Balai Lal Sahoo, Counsel for the Respondents<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;When damages have been paid for unlawful use of land then plaintiff, being a wrong doer, cannot claim equitable relief for wrongful use of such land, in respect of which he has no right, title, interest.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":314821,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8991,2689,38783,60251,32676,32000,14201],"class_list":["post-314975","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-equitable-relief","tag-justice-ajoy-kumar-mukherjee","tag-lawful-possession","tag-legal-right","tag-permanent-injunction"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Calcutta High Court dismisses claim for Permanent Injunction due to lack of legal right and lawful possession | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court dismissed the claim for Permanent Injunction due to lack of legal right and lawful possession.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court upholds public use presumption for pot dumping land; dismisses Permanent Injunction claim\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court dismissed the claim for Permanent Injunction due to lack of legal right and lawful possession.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-02-22T06:30:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-02-28T10:58:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court upholds public use presumption for pot dumping land; dismisses Permanent Injunction claim\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court dismisses claim for Permanent Injunction due to lack of legal right and lawful possession | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-02-22T06:30:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-28T10:58:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court dismissed the claim for Permanent Injunction due to lack of legal right and lawful possession.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Calcutta High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court upholds public use presumption for pot dumping land; dismisses Permanent Injunction claim\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses claim for Permanent Injunction due to lack of legal right and lawful possession | SCC Times","description":"Calcutta High Court dismissed the claim for Permanent Injunction due to lack of legal right and lawful possession.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Calcutta High Court upholds public use presumption for pot dumping land; dismisses Permanent Injunction claim","og_description":"Calcutta High Court dismissed the claim for Permanent Injunction due to lack of legal right and lawful possession.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-02-22T06:30:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-02-28T10:58:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Calcutta High Court upholds public use presumption for pot dumping land; dismisses Permanent Injunction claim","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/","name":"Calcutta High Court dismisses claim for Permanent Injunction due to lack of legal right and lawful possession | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-02-22T06:30:55+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-28T10:58:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court dismissed the claim for Permanent Injunction due to lack of legal right and lawful possession.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Calcutta High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/cal-hc-dismisses-claim-for-permanent-injunction-due-to-lack-of-legal-right-and-lawful-possession-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Calcutta High Court upholds public use presumption for pot dumping land; dismisses Permanent Injunction claim"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":299271,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/14\/no-eviction-on-unauthorized-construction-outside-tenanted-portion-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":314975,"position":0},"title":"No eviction under Section 108 of Transfer of Property Act on unauthorized construction outside tenanted portion: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"August 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court remanded the eviction case to First Appellate Court on finding that the alleged construction was outside the tenancy property.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":263180,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/05\/permanent-injunction-cant-be-granted-against-true-owner-once-the-title-dispute-is-settled-sc-reverses-three-concurrent-findings\/","url_meta":{"origin":314975,"position":1},"title":"Permanent Injunction can&#8217;t be granted against true owner once the title dispute is settled; SC reverses three concurrent findings\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Reversing the concurrent findings of all the Court below in a case where the plaintiff was granted the relief of permanent injunction despite having lost the title, the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that the plaintiff is not entitled to a relief of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Permanent-Injunction-cant-be-granted-against-true-owner-once-the-title-dispute-is-settled-Supreme-Court-reverses-three-concurrent-findings.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Permanent-Injunction-cant-be-granted-against-true-owner-once-the-title-dispute-is-settled-Supreme-Court-reverses-three-concurrent-findings.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Permanent-Injunction-cant-be-granted-against-true-owner-once-the-title-dispute-is-settled-Supreme-Court-reverses-three-concurrent-findings.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Permanent-Injunction-cant-be-granted-against-true-owner-once-the-title-dispute-is-settled-Supreme-Court-reverses-three-concurrent-findings.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Permanent-Injunction-cant-be-granted-against-true-owner-once-the-title-dispute-is-settled-Supreme-Court-reverses-three-concurrent-findings.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297997,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/29\/appointment-of-15-additional-judges-as-permanent-judges-of-5-high-courts\/","url_meta":{"origin":314975,"position":2},"title":"Appointment of 15 Additional Judges as permanent Judges of 5 High Courts","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"15 Additional Judges have been made permanent Judges in Gauhati High Court, Bombay High Court, Kerala High Court, Himachal Pradesh High Court and Calcutta High Court","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"appointment of 15 additional judges","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/appointment-of-15-additional-judges.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/appointment-of-15-additional-judges.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/appointment-of-15-additional-judges.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/appointment-of-15-additional-judges.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311358,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":314975,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Temporary nature of agreement and renewals indicates license status\u2019; Calcutta High Court orders eviction","author":"Ritu","date":"January 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cEven if there are certain clauses which the parties may have aided from the tenancy legislation, is no ground to \u2026 declare the unambiguous leave and licence agreement to be an agreement of tenancy ignoring preponderance of probability.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":263641,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/14\/parties-to-agreement-of-sale-consciously-changing-their-relationship-cannot-seek-relief-on-the-basis-of-previously-established-relationship\/","url_meta":{"origin":314975,"position":4},"title":"Cal HC | Parties to agreement of sale consciously changing their relationship cannot seek relief on the basis of previously established relationship","author":"Editor","date":"March 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: The Division Bench of Soumen Sen and\u00a0 Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, JJ., dismissed an appeal concerned with a breach of contract. The appeal arose out of a judgment in a suit for recovery of possession and injunction. Trial Court had decreed the suit on contest and dismissed the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298314,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/02\/calcutta-high-court-granted-injunction-against-proposed-political-protest-and-gherao\/","url_meta":{"origin":314975,"position":5},"title":"Here\u2019s why Calcutta High Court stayed TMC\u2019s proposed Political Protest and \u2018Gherao\u2019","author":"Ritu","date":"August 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court restrained TMC respondents from carrying out a pre-planned \u201cgherao\u201d of the residences of the leaders of a particular political party.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/314975","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=314975"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/314975\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314821"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=314975"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=314975"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=314975"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}