{"id":314889,"date":"2024-02-21T16:00:10","date_gmt":"2024-02-21T10:30:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=314889"},"modified":"2024-02-28T17:01:54","modified_gmt":"2024-02-28T11:31:54","slug":"no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018No claim certificate\u2019 by a party does not automatically render dispute non-arbitrable: Gujarat HC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Gujarat High Court:<\/span> In an application under Section 11<\/a> of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> (‘the Act’) for appointment of Arbitrator, Sunita Agarwal, CJ., allowed the application and held that the petitioner’s claim was not stale or non-arbitrable if ‘No Claim Certificate’ was issued.<\/p>\n

Background<\/p>\n

In the matter at hand, the petitioner gave a Notice of Claim dated 01-10-2018 to the Narmada Clean Tech Limited (‘respondent’), which was subsequently denied by the respondent. The respondent filed an application before the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ankleshwar, District Bharuch under Section 8<\/a> of the Act<\/a>, which was allowed, and the matter was referred to Arbitration. The petitioner sent a notice dated 16-05-2023 to the respondent to give consent for appointment of Arbitrator. The respondent refuted the said notice and asserted that all the claims were settled in 2015 and ‘No Claim Certificate’ was issued on 25-11-2015 and the amount paid under the terms of the contract was accepted by the petitioner. The respondent’s submission was that the petitioner’s claim was belated, and the dispute was non-arbitrable.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision<\/p>\n

The Court relied on NTPC Ltd.<\/span> v. SPML Infra Ltd.<\/span>, (2023) 9 SCC 385<\/a>, wherein the principle ‘eye of the needle’ was propounded. The Court reiterated that inquiry by the Courts at a pre-referral stage under Section 11(6)<\/a> of the Act<\/a> is very narrow and is confined to the preliminary inquiry about the existence and validity of an arbitration agreement and the applicant’s privity to the agreement. For inquiry regarding the non-arbitrability of the dispute, at the referral stage, the Court said that it is settled that such an inquiry is an exception to the general rule and the principle that the Arbitral Tribunal is the preferred first authority to determine and decide all questions of non-arbitrability. The Court also reiterated that the referral Court may reject claims which are manifestly and ex-facie non-arbitrable. The Court said that it can be examined in the inquiry, whether the assertion of arbitrability is bona fide or not. Further, the Court said that if the Court reaches a clear conclusion on prima facie scrutiny of the facts, that there is not even a vestige of doubt that the claim is non-arbitrable, it may refuse to refer the dispute to arbitration. However, even if there is slightest of doubt, the rule is to refer the dispute to arbitration.<\/p>\n

On applying the said principle to the case at hand and upon prima facie scrutiny of the material, the Court held that it cannot be concluded that the dispute was non-arbitrable, or the petitioner’s claim had become stale for issuance of ‘No Claim Certificate’ on 25-11-2015. The Court noted that the application under Section 11(6)<\/a> of the Act<\/a> was filed after dismissal of the Commercial Suit. Therefore, the Court referred the dispute to Arbitration and appointed a sole Arbitrator to resolve the disputes between the parties in accordance with the Arbitration Centre (Domestic and International), High Court of Gujarat Rules, 2021.<\/p>\n

[Poll Cont Associates v. Narmada Clean Tech Ltd., 2024 SCC OnLine Guj 1123<\/a>, decided on: 09-02-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the petitioner: Advocate JF Mehta<\/p>\n

For the respondent: Advocate Abhishek M Mehta<\/p>\n

Buy Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"arbitration<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“If the Court reaches a clear conclusion that there is not even a vestige of doubt that the claim is non-arbitrable, it may refuse to refer the dispute to arbitration, otherwise, the rule is to refer the dispute to arbitration”.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67517,"featured_media":314807,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[48163,10131,65563,65565,3096,65564,53246,65562,45421],"class_list":["post-314889","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-48163","tag-arbitration-and-conciliation-act","tag-arbitration-centre-domestic-and-international","tag-chief-justice-sunita-agarwal","tag-Gujarat_High_Court","tag-high-court-of-gujarat-rules","tag-no-claim-certificate","tag-non-arbitrable-dispute","tag-section-11"],"yoast_head":"\nNo claim certificate does not render dispute non-arbitrable: Gujarat HC | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"No claim certificate does not automatically render dispute non-arbitrable: Gujarat High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018No claim certificate\u2019 by a party does not automatically render dispute non-arbitrable: Gujarat HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"No claim certificate does not automatically render dispute non-arbitrable: Gujarat High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-02-21T10:30:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-02-28T11:31:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018No claim certificate\u2019 by a party does not automatically render dispute non-arbitrable: Gujarat HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"No claim certificate does not render dispute non-arbitrable: Gujarat HC | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-02-21T10:30:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-28T11:31:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"description\":\"No claim certificate does not automatically render dispute non-arbitrable: Gujarat High Court\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Gujarat High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018No claim certificate\u2019 by a party does not automatically render dispute non-arbitrable: Gujarat HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No claim certificate does not render dispute non-arbitrable: Gujarat HC | SCC Blog","description":"No claim certificate does not automatically render dispute non-arbitrable: Gujarat High Court","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018No claim certificate\u2019 by a party does not automatically render dispute non-arbitrable: Gujarat HC","og_description":"No claim certificate does not automatically render dispute non-arbitrable: Gujarat High Court","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-02-21T10:30:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-02-28T11:31:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018No claim certificate\u2019 by a party does not automatically render dispute non-arbitrable: Gujarat HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/","name":"No claim certificate does not render dispute non-arbitrable: Gujarat HC | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-02-21T10:30:10+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-28T11:31:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"description":"No claim certificate does not automatically render dispute non-arbitrable: Gujarat High Court","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp","width":886,"height":591,"caption":"Gujarat High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018No claim certificate\u2019 by a party does not automatically render dispute non-arbitrable: Gujarat HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":206752,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/13\/amended-section-8-of-ac-act-does-not-inundate-entire-regime-of-special-legislation-in-non-arbitrable-casessc\/","url_meta":{"origin":314889,"position":0},"title":"Amended Section 8 of A&C Act does not inundate entire regime of special legislation in non-arbitrable cases: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 13, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of Uday U. Lalit and Ashok Bhushan, JJ. dismissed a review petition filed against Supreme Court's judgment dated 13-02-2018 [Emaar MGF Ltd. v. Aftab Singh, 2018 SCC OnLine SC 2378 (order)] whereby the appeals filed by review petitioners were dismissed. The appeals were filed challenging the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261859,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/17\/a-dispute-cannot-be-referred-for-arbitration-on-account-of-fraud\/","url_meta":{"origin":314889,"position":1},"title":"Bombay HC rejects argument that a dispute cannot be referred for arbitration on account of fraud: Read why","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: B.P. Colabawalla, J., addressed an arbitration application filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Instant application was filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes and differences between\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Bombay_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Bombay_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Bombay_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Bombay_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Bombay_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276570,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/preliminary-inquiry-under-section-11-of-the-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996\/","url_meta":{"origin":314889,"position":2},"title":"Preliminary Inquiry under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Ayushi Raghuwanshi*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image1-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image1-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image1-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266579,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":314889,"position":3},"title":"Whether Arbitration involving third parties leading to other proceedings would be arbitrable? Kar HC answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: B.M. Shyam Prasad, J., held that there cannot be a complete adjudication of the petitioner\u2019s rights unless the third parties are also heard. In the present matter, the petitioner was a society registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 and first respondent was a company registered\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/KarArb.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/KarArb.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/KarArb.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/KarArb.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/KarArb.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272263,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/26\/calcutta-high-court-conduct-of-parties-not-a-substitute-for-an-arbitration-agreement\/","url_meta":{"origin":314889,"position":4},"title":"Calcutta High Court | Conduct of Parties – not a substitute for an arbitration agreement","author":"Editor","date":"August 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Calcutta High Court: While deciding a review petition, Debangsu Basak, J. held that the court while exercising powers under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot substitute arbitration agreement with conduct of parties. Facts of the Case The respondent filed an application under Section 11\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":338138,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/30\/dispute-relating-infringement-of-copyright-is-arbitrable-orissa-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":314889,"position":5},"title":"Dispute relating to infringement of copyright against a particular person is arbitrable: Orissa High Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"December 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court relied on Vidya Drolia v. Durga Trading Corpn., (2019) 20 SCC 406., wherein it was held that a claim for infringement of copyright against a particular person is arbitrable, though in some manner the arbitrator would examine the right to copyright, a right in rem.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/314889","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=314889"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/314889\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314807"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=314889"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=314889"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=314889"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}