{"id":314810,"date":"2024-02-21T12:00:04","date_gmt":"2024-02-21T06:30:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=314810"},"modified":"2024-02-28T16:54:07","modified_gmt":"2024-02-28T11:24:07","slug":"cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Calcutta High Court finds no illegality or material irregularity in DRAT\u2019s order; reiterates High Court\u2019s jurisdictional limits under Article 227"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Calcutta High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574971\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">227<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a> challenging the judgment and order passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, a single-judge bench comprising of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Prasenjit Biswas,* J.<\/span>, has reiterated the principle that High Court intervention under Article 227 is warranted only in cases of grave dereliction of duty or flagrant violation of fundamental principles of law or justice, which were not established in the present case. The Court found no illegality or material irregularity in the DRAT&#8217;s judgment and affirmed the same.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Factual Matrix<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the petitioner bank sanctioned various loan facilities to the respondent. However, due to concerns regarding the borrower&#8217;s creditworthiness, the bank unilaterally reduced the sanctioned limits, leading to a dispute over repayment. The matter was brought before the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Kolkata, which partially allowed the bank&#8217;s application for recovery. The bank then appealed to the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), Kolkata, which noted that the bank unilaterally reduced the sanctioned limit without prior notice to the borrower, leading to disputes over the terms of the agreement and upheld the decision of the lower tribunal. The petitioner filed an application under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574971\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">227<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a> challenging the judgment and order dated 20-05-2011 passed by the DRAT in connection with appeal no. 11 of 2006.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Moot Point<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether the High Court, in exercising its jurisdiction under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574971\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">227<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a>, improperly assumed the role of an appellate court and exceeded its jurisdiction?<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Parties&#8217; Contentions<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner argued that it had valid reasons for reducing the loan limits and that the respondent failed to repay the loan as per the agreement. It was contended that the DRT and DRAT erred in their findings. On the other hand, the respondent argued that the bank&#8217;s unilateral reduction of the loan limits constituted a breach of contract and that the DRT and DRAT correctly ruled in their favor.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#8217;s Assessment<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court cited <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Boorugu Mahadeb &amp; Sons<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sirigiri Narasing Rao<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/N9qTAY3V\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2016) 3 SCC 343<\/a> and held that while exercising jurisdiction under Article 227, the Court cannot act as an appellate court and reevaluate the facts of the case unless there is a clear error of law or jurisdictional error by the lower tribunals. The Court cited <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Jai Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Municipal Corpn. of Delhi<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/93z14Vl8\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2010) 9 SCC 385<\/a>, emphasising that Article 227 jurisdiction should be sparingly exercised and interference is warranted only in cases of grave dereliction of duty or flagrant violation of fundamental principles of law or justice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Applying the above-mentioned principles in the cited precedents, the Court held that there is no grave dereliction of duty or flagrant violation of fundamental principles of law or justice, was established in the present case. The Court emphasised that the petitioner bank&#8217;s unilateral actions constituted a breach of contract and held that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;the Bank as the creditor cannot be allowed to take benefits of its own wrong and cannot unilaterally change or amend the agreement entered in between the Bank and the opposite party.&#8221;<\/span> Since there was no such error apparent on the face of the record, the Court affirmed the DRAT&#8217;s judgment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#8217;s Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court found no illegality or material irregularity in the DRAT&#8217;s decision and held that there is no ground for interference as <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;there is nothing to say that the findings of both the Tribunal are perverse or illegal or that no reasonable person can possibly come to such a conclusion which the tribunals have arrived at.&#8221;<\/span> The Court dismissed the application filed under Article 227, affirming the judgment and order of the DRAT. The connected applications were disposed of and closed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Central Bank of India<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Premimer Feed Meals (P) Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/B6Agz7xN\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Cal 1561<\/a>, order dated 19-02-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Prasenjit Biswas<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Gautam Chakrabory, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Sagar Bandyopadhyay, Ms. Soma Kar Ghosh, Mr. Arabinda Pathak, Counsel for the Opposite Party 6<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Soumya Roy, Mr. Sayan Sarkar, Counsel for the Opposite Party<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Calcutta High Court reasoned that the High Court&#8217;s jurisdiction under Article 227 is not appellate in nature and cannot be exercised to correct mere errors of fact.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":314821,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[14471,2689,49695,4861,28984,65538,60109,30292],"class_list":["post-314810","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-227","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-central-bank-of-india","tag-drat","tag-drt","tag-jurisdictional-limits","tag-justice-prasenjit-biswas","tag-loan"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Calcutta High Court affirms DRAT\u2019s order on finding no illegality or material irregularity under Article 227 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court affirmed DRAT&#039;s order on finding no illegality or material irregularity and reiterated High Court&#039;s jurisdictional limits under Article 227.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court finds no illegality or material irregularity in DRAT\u2019s order; reiterates High Court\u2019s jurisdictional limits under Article 227\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court affirmed DRAT&#039;s order on finding no illegality or material irregularity and reiterated High Court&#039;s jurisdictional limits under Article 227.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-02-21T06:30:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-02-28T11:24:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court finds no illegality or material irregularity in DRAT\u2019s order; reiterates High Court\u2019s jurisdictional limits under Article 227\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/21\\\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/21\\\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"headline\":\"Calcutta High Court finds no illegality or material irregularity in DRAT\u2019s order; reiterates High Court\u2019s jurisdictional limits under Article 227\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-02-21T06:30:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-28T11:24:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/21\\\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":695,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/21\\\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Article 227\",\"Calcutta High Court\",\"Central Bank of India\",\"DRAT\",\"DRT\",\"jurisdictional limits\",\"Justice Prasenjit Biswas\",\"loan\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/21\\\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/21\\\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/21\\\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\\\/\",\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court affirms DRAT\u2019s order on finding no illegality or material irregularity under Article 227 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/21\\\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/21\\\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-02-21T06:30:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-28T11:24:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court affirmed DRAT's order on finding no illegality or material irregularity and reiterated High Court's jurisdictional limits under Article 227.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/21\\\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/21\\\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/21\\\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Calcutta High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/21\\\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court finds no illegality or material irregularity in DRAT\u2019s order; reiterates High Court\u2019s jurisdictional limits under Article 227\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_7\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Calcutta High Court affirms DRAT\u2019s order on finding no illegality or material irregularity under Article 227 | SCC Times","description":"Calcutta High Court affirmed DRAT's order on finding no illegality or material irregularity and reiterated High Court's jurisdictional limits under Article 227.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Calcutta High Court finds no illegality or material irregularity in DRAT\u2019s order; reiterates High Court\u2019s jurisdictional limits under Article 227","og_description":"Calcutta High Court affirmed DRAT's order on finding no illegality or material irregularity and reiterated High Court's jurisdictional limits under Article 227.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-02-21T06:30:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-02-28T11:24:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Calcutta High Court finds no illegality or material irregularity in DRAT\u2019s order; reiterates High Court\u2019s jurisdictional limits under Article 227","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\/"},"author":{"name":"Ritu","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"headline":"Calcutta High Court finds no illegality or material irregularity in DRAT\u2019s order; reiterates High Court\u2019s jurisdictional limits under Article 227","datePublished":"2024-02-21T06:30:04+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-28T11:24:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\/"},"wordCount":695,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","keywords":["Article 227","Calcutta High Court","Central Bank of India","DRAT","DRT","jurisdictional limits","Justice Prasenjit Biswas","loan"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\/","name":"Calcutta High Court affirms DRAT\u2019s order on finding no illegality or material irregularity under Article 227 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-02-21T06:30:04+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-28T11:24:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court affirmed DRAT's order on finding no illegality or material irregularity and reiterated High Court's jurisdictional limits under Article 227.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Calcutta High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Calcutta High Court finds no illegality or material irregularity in DRAT\u2019s order; reiterates High Court\u2019s jurisdictional limits under Article 227"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":272712,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/31\/calcutta-high-court-gets-9-new-additional-judges\/","url_meta":{"origin":314810,"position":0},"title":"Calcutta High Court gets 9 new Additional Judges","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The President appoints following to be the\u00a0 Additional Judges of the Calcutta High Court, in that order of seniority, for a period of two years with effect from the date they assume charge of their respective offices:\u00a0 Shri Biswaroop Chowdhury; Shri Partha Sarathi Sen; Shri Prasenjit Biswas; Shri Uday Kumar;\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310485,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/01\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-forfeiture-of-earnest-money-in-e-auction-sale-dispute-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":314810,"position":1},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds forfeiture of earnest money in e-auction sale dispute","author":"Ritu","date":"January 1, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court stated that the terms of the e-auction notice explicitly stated the conditions of the sale, including the forfeiture clause in case of non-compliance by the bidder.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298871,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/08\/calcutta-hc-warned-disquiet-litigant-against-misuse-legal-process-and-imposed-cost-rs-5-lakh\/","url_meta":{"origin":314810,"position":2},"title":"Calcutta High Court warns disquiet litigant against misuse of Legal Process; imposes Rs. 5 Lakh cost","author":"Ritu","date":"August 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court observed that the argument advanced by the applicants leave an impression that \u201ca desperate attempt is made to have the order reviewed in the garb of recall\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304719,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/14\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-lower-courts-order-for-condonation-of-delay-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":314810,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Jurisdiction under Article 227 is vast, should be exercised sparingly\u2019; Calcutta High Court upholds lower court\u2019s order to condone delay","author":"Ritu","date":"October 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cBy the Civil Procedure Code (amendment Act, 1999) the scope of Section 115 of the code has been curtailed but that does not mean that due to such curtailment, the High court\u2019s power of superintendence under Article 227 has been expanded.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":315019,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/consumer-disputes-redressal-forums-overlooked-statutory-provisions-under-multi-state-co-operative-societies-act-cal-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":314810,"position":4},"title":"Special laws override general laws| Consumer Forums must adhere to Arbitration mandate under Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"February 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court noted that specific provision under Section 84 of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 mandates arbitration for disputes involving members and the society.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":305285,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/19\/no-stay-on-eviction-suit-amid-pending-declaratory-suit-when-matter-in-issue-is-different-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":314810,"position":5},"title":"Eviction suit cannot be stayed amid pending declaratory suit when scope of inquiry in two suits is different: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"October 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court held that the decision in the declaratory suit would not necessarily non-suit the plaintiff in the eviction suit as the matters in issue in the two suits are not directly and substantially same.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/314810","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=314810"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/314810\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314821"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=314810"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=314810"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=314810"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}