{"id":314343,"date":"2024-02-16T15:00:11","date_gmt":"2024-02-16T09:30:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=314343"},"modified":"2024-02-16T14:17:18","modified_gmt":"2024-02-16T08:47:18","slug":"delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi HC refuses concerns against Anant Ambani-Radhika Merchant wedding venue, says &#8216;pure apprehension that injury may be caused to animals&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed by the petitioner under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;), the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Suresh Kumar Kait* and Girish Kathpalia*, JJ.<\/span>, and opined that the present petition was filed purely on the apprehension that some injury or ill-treatment might be caused to the animals during the events scheduled on 01-03-2024 to 03-03-2024, and such sort of petition could not be entertained simply on the basis of apprehension. Further, since a High-Powered Committee (&#8216;HPC&#8217;) had already been constituted after the directions passed in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sudipa Nath v. Union of India<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=SlRYVC05MDAxMzA1Njc2JiYmJiY0MCYmJiYmU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmdWxsc2NyZWVuJiYmJiZ0cnVlJiYmJiZTdWRpcGEgTmF0aCB2LiBVbmlvbiAyMDIyIFNDQyBPbkxpbmUgVHJpIDY5MSYmJiYmQWxsV29yZHMmJiYmJmdTZWFyY2gmJiYmJmZhbHNl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2022 SCC OnLine Tri 691<\/a>, therefore the said Committee was at liberty to be present and oversee the aforesaid event and to take all cautions permissible under law, if any, to ensure that no inhumane behaviour was caused to the animals.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner claimed to be a practicing advocate, animal lover and a wildlife enthusiast. The petitioner stated that he had filed the present petition to advocate and fight for the fundamental rights of animals guaranteed by the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>. On 13-01-2021, a news report was published regarding the wedding of Anant Ambani and Radhika Merchant, and as per the report the dates of the pre-wedding and wedding festivities were 01-03-2024 to 03-03-2024, and the venue was Reliance Greens, Gujarat. The petitioner claimed that since the wedding was of the son of the Chairman of Reliance Industries, thus, they had indirect control over Greens Zoological, Rescue and Rehabilitation Centre (&#8216;Respondent 3&#8217;) and Radhe Krishna Temple Elephant Welfare Trust (&#8216;Respondent 4&#8217;), as these were situated on their property.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner submitted that he had a right under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519450\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">200<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> to file a complaint and the said right was being curtailed by Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001569323\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">23<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776238\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960<\/a> (&#8216;PCA&#8217;). Therefore, Section 23 of the PCA was arbitrary, unjust, oppressive and unconstitutional. Further, in case due to paucity of time, the constitutional validity of Section 23 of PCA could not be decided, therefore, considering that the prima facie case was made out by the petitioner against Respondents 3 and 4, petitioner prayed that Animal Welfare Board of India (&#8216;Respondent 2&#8217;) to be directed to file a complaint under Section 23 of the PCA against Respondents 3 and 4, because if no one took action against them, they would go scot-free and the animals would suffer inhumane treatment and cruelty. However, if Respondent 4 was not able to file the complaint and stop the events, then interim relief to be granted, in directing Respondents 3 and 4 to not hold the events by displaying or exhibiting the animals in their possession in any manner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the respondents submitted that Reliance Complex, Jamnagar was a private property and was not open to public for events. Further, a one-time private, personal and non-commercial event was being held at various locations in the complex and there was no provision contained in any law, including the Wildlife Act, 1972 or the Recognition of Zoo Rules, 1992 that prohibited Respondents 3 and 4 from inviting guests to view their facilities, especially for non-commercial purposes.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the present petition was filed purely on the apprehension that some injury or ill-treatment might be caused to the animals during the events scheduled on 01-03-2024 to 03-03-2024, and such sort of petition could not be entertained simply on the basis of apprehension. The Court further opined that since the HPC had already been constituted after the directions passed in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sudipa Nath v. Union of India<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=SlRYVC05MDAxMzA1Njc2JiYmJiY0MCYmJiYmU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmdWxsc2NyZWVuJiYmJiZ0cnVlJiYmJiZTdWRpcGEgTmF0aCB2LiBVbmlvbiAyMDIyIFNDQyBPbkxpbmUgVHJpIDY5MSYmJiYmQWxsV29yZHMmJiYmJmdTZWFyY2gmJiYmJmZhbHNl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2022 SCC OnLine Tri 691<\/a>, therefore the said Committee was at liberty to be present and oversee the aforesaid event and to take all cautions permissible under law, if any, to ensure that no inhumane behaviour was caused to the animals.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further clarified that either HPC might depute any of its member to oversee the event scheduled from 01-03-2024 to 03-02-2024 or HPC might go itself to oversee the aforesaid event and accordingly, disposed of the present petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Rahul Narula v. Union of India, W.P.(CRL) 485 of 2024, decided on 12-02-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by- Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Girish Kathpalia<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Pritam Biswas, Advocate;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> Shardul Singh, Devika Mohan, Ahish Shahpurkar and Anjali Tiwari, Advocates.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;It is submitted that a one-time private, and non-commercial event is being held at various locations in the complex and there is no provision contained in any law, that prohibit Respondents 3 and 4 from inviting guests to view their facilities, especially for non-commercial purposes.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":303940,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[65407,33653,19471,2543,3268,65410,39892,65408,65409],"class_list":["post-314343","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-anant-ambani","tag-apprehension","tag-constitution","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-Fundamental_Rights","tag-injury-to-animals","tag-prevention-of-cruelty-to-animals-act","tag-radhika-merchant","tag-wedding-venue"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi HC refuses concerns against Anant Ambani-Radhika Merchant wedding venue |SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court opined that the present petition was filed purely on the apprehension and such sort of petition could not be entertained simply based on apprehension.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi HC refuses concerns against Anant Ambani-Radhika Merchant wedding venue, says \u2018pure apprehension that injury may be caused to animals\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court opined that the present petition was filed purely on the apprehension and such sort of petition could not be entertained simply based on apprehension.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-02-16T09:30:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi HC refuses concerns against Anant Ambani-Radhika Merchant wedding venue, says &#8216;pure apprehension that injury may be caused to animals&#8217;\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC refuses concerns against Anant Ambani-Radhika Merchant wedding venue |SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-02-16T09:30:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court opined that the present petition was filed purely on the apprehension and such sort of petition could not be entertained simply based on apprehension.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi HC refuses concerns against Anant Ambani-Radhika Merchant wedding venue, says &#8216;pure apprehension that injury may be caused to animals&#8217;\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC refuses concerns against Anant Ambani-Radhika Merchant wedding venue |SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court opined that the present petition was filed purely on the apprehension and such sort of petition could not be entertained simply based on apprehension.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi HC refuses concerns against Anant Ambani-Radhika Merchant wedding venue, says \u2018pure apprehension that injury may be caused to animals\u2019","og_description":"Delhi High Court opined that the present petition was filed purely on the apprehension and such sort of petition could not be entertained simply based on apprehension.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-02-16T09:30:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi HC refuses concerns against Anant Ambani-Radhika Merchant wedding venue, says &#8216;pure apprehension that injury may be caused to animals&#8217;","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC refuses concerns against Anant Ambani-Radhika Merchant wedding venue |SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2024-02-16T09:30:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Delhi High Court opined that the present petition was filed purely on the apprehension and such sort of petition could not be entertained simply based on apprehension.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/delhi-hc-refuses-concerns-against-anant-ambani-radhika-merchant-wedding-venue-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi HC refuses concerns against Anant Ambani-Radhika Merchant wedding venue, says &#8216;pure apprehension that injury may be caused to animals&#8217;"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":314514,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/18\/high-court-weekly-roundup-february-2024-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":314343,"position":0},"title":"HIGH COURT FEBRUARY 2024 WEEKLY ROUNDUP| Stories on Jagan Mohan Reddy; K. Annamalai; Trade mark squatting; Right to travel abroad; and more","author":"Apoorva","date":"February 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Court Round Up&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Court Round Up","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/high-court-round-up\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"High Court weekly Roundup","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/feb-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/feb-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/feb-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/feb-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323553,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/del-hc-grants-injunction-rogue-websites-relating-false-articles-anant-ambani-interview-cnn-channel-anand-narasimhan-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":314343,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court grants injunction against rogue websites peddling false articles on Anant Ambani Interview with CNBC-TV18","author":"Arunima","date":"June 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The article on the websites describes a fake\/made-up interview from the actual Interview of Mr. Ambani with Mr. Anand Narasimhan, a senior anchor and Managing Editor at CNN-News18 uploaded on Network 18 Media and Investments Limited, Youtube Channel.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313972,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/delhi-hc-municipal-authorities-cannot-be-expected-to-wipe-out-all-stray-animals-from-roads-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":314343,"position":2},"title":"Municipal authorities cannot be expected to wipe out all stray animals from roads; duty is to take sincere steps to ensure animals are rehabilitated: Delhi HC","author":"Arushi","date":"February 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe duty of the municipal authorities is to take concerted, sincere and optimum steps to ensure that such animals are rehabilitated and do not possess a menace to residents of Delhi or to the traffic plying on the roads.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310367,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":314343,"position":3},"title":"Delhi HC upholds constitutional validity of Section 115BBE of Income Tax Act, 1961; Says \u2018cannot be held unconstitutional on apprehension of misuse\u2019","author":"Editor","date":"December 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is settled law that the Act provides a complete machinery for assessment or re-assessment of tax and the assessee is not permitted to abandon that machinery to invoke jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256930,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/auction-of-milching-cows-with-calves-do-not-amount-to-cruelty-under-pc-act-1962\/","url_meta":{"origin":314343,"position":4},"title":"Ori HC | Auction of milching cows with calves do not amount to cruelty under PC Act 1962 or Orissa Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1960","author":"Editor","date":"November 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of Jaswant Singh and S.K. Panigrahi, JJ., dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The present petition was filed by a registered trust engaged in the activity of rescue, care, treatment and rehabilitation of animals under the provisions of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":318112,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/22\/arvind-kejriwal-withdraws-sc-plea-against-ed-arrest-in-delhi-excise-policy-scam-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":314343,"position":5},"title":"Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal withdraws SC plea against arrest by ED in Delhi Excise Policy scam","author":"Editor","date":"March 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A Special Bench comprising of Sanjiv Khanna, MM Sundresh and Bela Trivedi, JJ. was hearing the matter.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Arvind Kejriwal's plea against ED arrest","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Arvind-Kejriwals-plea-against-ED-arrest.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Arvind-Kejriwals-plea-against-ED-arrest.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Arvind-Kejriwals-plea-against-ED-arrest.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Arvind-Kejriwals-plea-against-ED-arrest.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/314343","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=314343"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/314343\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/303940"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=314343"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=314343"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=314343"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}