{"id":313977,"date":"2024-02-14T11:00:12","date_gmt":"2024-02-14T05:30:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=313977"},"modified":"2024-05-03T11:37:04","modified_gmt":"2024-05-03T06:07:04","slug":"tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm\/","title":{"rendered":"Reviving BITs: Reimaging Tax Paradigm"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Introduction<\/h4>\n

Presenting the interim budget for Financial Year 2024-2025, the Union Finance Minister made an announcement which marks a significant departure from the decade old policy stance of the Government of India (GOI). She announced that the GOI is \u201cnegotiating bilateral investment treaties with our foreign partners\u201d towards the stated objective of \u201cencouraging sustained foreign investment\u201d with a marked priority that such treaties should be negotiated \u201cin the spirit of \u2018first develop India\u2019 \u201d.1<\/sup><\/a> There is a lot of history, a rather intricate one, which shall be put behind with this decadal shift in GOI\u2019s policy in relation to bilateral investment treaties (BIT). More critically, there are multiple prisms to dissect the various contours of GOI\u2019s BIT policy. This article attempts to revisit the tax-related dimension of the historical account of Indian experience with BIT.<\/p>\n

Vodafone and Cairn BIT awards: Leading the charge against scoping tax in BIT framework<\/h4>\n

Typically, BITs address the impact of host State\u2019s legislation and governmental action on the investments made by the non-residents in the host States. However, in the absence of any specific carve-outs and given the steering impact of tax incidence on investments, the scope of BITs has been consistently tested to bring tax measures within their ambit. Two major arbitral awards, in Vodafone International Holdings BV<\/span> v. Union of India<\/span>2<\/sup><\/a> and Cairn Energy Plc and Cairn UK Holdings Ltd.<\/span> v. Republic of India<\/span>3<\/sup><\/a>, under BIT, both against the GOI, firmly declared that tax laws and policy can indeed be scrutinised and declared as violation of BIT commitments.<\/p>\n

In brief, in Vodafone<\/span>4<\/sup><\/a>, the Indian tax authorities considered an offshore transaction as leading to capital gains tax consequences in India. This was challenged by Vodafone<\/span> before Indian courts. After losing initially before the High Court, its challenge was accepted by the Supreme Court in its decision which quashed the demands.5<\/sup><\/a> However, the GOI proposed a retrospective amendment of the Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a>6<\/sup><\/a> to nonetheless subject the transaction to tax in India. Instead of challenging these amendments before the courts, Vodafone<\/span>7<\/sup><\/a> initiated proceedings under the India-Netherlands BIT and succeeded before the Tribunal constituted under the BIT.8<\/sup><\/a> In Cairn<\/span>9<\/sup><\/a>, the same retrospective amendment was applied by the GOI in the wake of the former\u2019s offshore corporate reorganisation. The application of this amendment was challenged under the India-United Kingdom BIT which resulted a similar award against the GOI.10<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

The common thread of both awards in Vodafone<\/span>11<\/sup><\/a> and Cairn<\/span>12<\/sup><\/a> was that ordinarily tax was outside the BIT, but the application of tax laws could nonetheless come in conflict with the assurances under the BIT where they resulted in \u201ctax-related investment disputes\u201d. This conclusion is thereafter tested on the touchstone of the fair and equitable treatment (FET) standard to declare whether the impugned tax measures are in violation of the BIT commitments. Simultaneously, this aspect has resulted into another expansion of BIT framework.13<\/sup><\/a> This development led to extensive details on the scope of BIT and whether they were in conflict with the \u201ctax sovereignty\u201d of the BIT partners.14<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

GOI\u2019s revisit to BIT scope<\/h4>\n

Perhaps wary of the impending developments, even before the awards were pronounced in the Vodafone<\/span>15<\/sup><\/a> and Cairn<\/span>16<\/sup><\/a> BIT disputes, the GOI had already taken a policy decision of revisiting the BIT framework and, specifically, excluding tax from the scope of BITs.17<\/sup><\/a> The 2015 Revised Indian BIT Model18<\/sup><\/a> specifically excludes \u201cany law or measure regarding taxation, including measures taken to enforce taxation obligations\u201d. Obviating any scope for doubt, it further stipulates that:<\/p>\n

[f]or greater certainty, it is clarified that where the State in which investment is made decides that conduct alleged to be a breach of its obligations under this Treaty is a subject-matter of taxation, such decision of that State, whether before or after the commencement of arbitral proceedings, shall be non-justiciable and it shall not be open to any Arbitration Tribunal to review such decision.19<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

Simultaneous to this new policy stand, the GOI also terminated all its existing BITs and started executing new BITs on the basis of the 2015 Revised Model, such as in the case of Brazil.20<\/sup><\/a> In other words, the incumbent policy of the GOI is to exclude tax altogether from the scope of BIT.21<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

2024 announcement: Winds of change in the offing<\/h4>\n

As a prelude to the interim budget announcement, it is interesting to note that even before the announcement the GOI was already in the process of negotiating comprehensive BITs pursuant to the termination of the earlier BITs. While the ongoing negotiations on India-EU BIT are mostly in media reports,22<\/sup><\/a> there is a formal announcement as regards other BITs. For illustration, the 2022 Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement between GOI and UAE23<\/sup><\/a> specifically states that both the Government have agreed to finalise a new BIT.24<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

The announcement, nonetheless, carries significance. One may be tempted to dismiss these words as superfluous (given that they are generally the objective of all BITs), nonetheless, the announcement that the GOI shall negotiate BITs \u201cin the spirit of \u2018first develop India\u2019\u201d carries a significant heft. Firstly, the announcement itself is a change of stance, from a conservative outlook manifesting from the 2015 Revised Model to a more open and outgoing outlook as regards the BIT policy of GOI. Secondly, these expressions imply that GOI can be expected to negotiate BITs in a manner such that the resultant inward investment addresses the growth aspirations of India, particularly the aspiration to attain a \u201cdeveloped country\u201d status by 2047. This could be achieved either by stipulation of conditions or by specifying the sectors in which investments would be entitled to BIT protection.<\/p>\n

However, it is not yet clear whether these BITs would be negotiated based on the 2015 Revised Model \u2014 in which case they would exclude tax laws and application of tax measures from their scope \u2014 or is there a change in the GOI\u2019s stance and tax measures are nonetheless covered within these BITs under negotiation. This aspect is crucial as there appears to be considerable shift in the GOI\u2019s approach to applying tax measures, as marked by the GOI\u2019s 2021 proposal25<\/sup><\/a> to withdraw the application of the 2012 retrospective amendments, which were subsequently approved by the Parliament.26<\/sup><\/a> While moving the Bill for consideration of Parliament, the revisited policy stand of the GOI was firmly evident, insofar as it acknowledged that the \u201cretrospective clarificatory amendment and consequent demand created in a few cases continues to be a sore point with potential investors\u201d and stressed that \u201cforeign investment has an important role to play in promoting faster economic growth and employment\u201d.<\/p>\n

While it is premature to conclude on the content of the prospective BITs, in the wake of such shift in policy thinking, one cannot be faulted for the hope that tax measures would find their way back in the Indian BITs.<\/p>\n

Sharpening FET standard: The way forward<\/h4>\n

There is a famous saying \u2014 Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it. The Vodafone<\/span>27<\/sup><\/a> and Cairn<\/span>28<\/sup><\/a> BIT awards can be the basis for significant learnings in case one is determined to set things right in respect of the interplay of tax and BIT. This requires a balance between two competing priorities. On the one hand is the consideration that in order to keep BITs meaningful, there should not be a total carve-out of tax from BITs as, after all, tax measures (if not calibrated in their application) can be a direct tool for expropriation, an eventuality protecting against which is the quintessential objective of BIT. On the other hand, simultaneously, there is relative merit in the argument that an unbridled application (read expansion) of the FET standard, that too by certain individuals who are not privy to the welfare agenda of host States, can indeed result in deprivation of tax sovereignty.<\/p>\n

The middle path perhaps lies in crystallising the nebulous application of the FET standard into specific parameters (which can be by way of illustrations if not exhaustively) such that tax sovereignty considerations do not repeatedly arise to scuttle a BIT claim against application of tax measures. To exemplify this aspect, for example, the BIT can sharpen the application of FET standard against specific instances which are considered as intrusive application of tax measures, such as prohibiting application of tax legislation retrospectively; pre-enactment consultation with foreign investors; lead time to foreign investors to implement tax law changes; availability of pragmatic exit routes to foreign investors, etc. Such and other similar specific enumerations of what is considered as impermissible application of tax measures can, though not an exhaustive delineation or replacement of the FET standard, can usher confidence amongst the investors expressively better than the current GOI\u2019s stand of whole exclusion of tax from the scope of BIT.<\/p>\n

The fact that the budget speech has put on record the clear policy stand of GOI \u2014 to go ahead with BIT negotiations \u2014 it is in the fitness of things to revisit the 2015 Revised Model\u2019s stance on tax to make these negotiations meaningful and indeed result into increased foreign investment.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

*Advocate, Supreme Court of India; LLM, London School of Economics; BBA, LLB (Hons.) (Double Gold Medalist), National Law University, Jodhpur. The author can be reached at mailtotarunjain@gmail.com<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

1.<\/a> Government of India, Interim Budget 2024-2025, Speech of Nirmala Sitharaman, Minister of Finance, para 74, available at <https:\/\/www.indiabudget.gov.in\/doc\/Budget_Speech.pdf<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

2.<\/a> (2012) 6 SCC 613<\/a>.<\/p>\n

3.<\/a> Cairn Energy PLC and Cairn UK Holdings Limited v. The Republic of India<\/span>, PCA Case No. 2016-7, Award dated 21-12-2020<\/p>\n

4.<\/a> (2012) 6 SCC 613<\/a>.<\/p>\n

5.<\/a> Vodafone International Holdings BV<\/span> v. Union of India<\/span>, (2012) 6 SCC 613<\/a>.<\/p>\n

6.<\/a> Vide Finance Act, 2012<\/a>. For details, see Memorandum to Finance Bill, 2012<\/span>, pp. 19-20, available at <https:\/\/www.indiabudget.gov.in\/budget2012-2013\/ub2012-13\/mem\/mem1.pdf<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

7.<\/a> (2012) 6 SCC 613<\/a>.<\/p>\n

8.<\/a> Vodafone International Holdings BV<\/span> v. Union of India<\/span>, PCA Case No. 2016-35, Award dated 25-9-2020<\/p>\n

9.<\/a> Cairn Energy PLC and Cairn UK Holdings Limited v. The Republic of India<\/span> , PCA Case No. 2016-7, Award dated 21-12-2020<\/p>\n

10.<\/a> Cairn Energy PLC and Cairn UK Holdings Limited v. The Republic of India<\/span>, PCA Case No. 2016-7, Award dated 21-12-2020 available at <https:\/\/investmentpolicy.unctad.org\/investment-dispute-settlement\/cases\/691\/cairn-v-india<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

11.<\/a> (2012) 6 SCC 613<\/a>.<\/p>\n

12.<\/a> Cairn Energy PLC and Cairn UK Holdings Limited v. The Republic of India<\/span> , PCA Case No. 2016-7, Award dated 21-12-2020<\/p>\n

13.<\/a> See generally<\/span>, Anna Crevon-Tarassova, Francisco Garcia-Elorrio and Asha Rajan, \u201cTaxation-Related ISDS\u201d, Global Arbitration Review (22-7-2022) <https:\/\/globalarbitrationreview.com\/guide\/the-guide-energy-arbitrations\/fifth-edition\/article\/taxation-related-isds<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

14.<\/a> See generally<\/span>, <https:\/\/kluwertaxblog.com\/2020\/10\/13\/investment-treaties-interjecting-taxations-realm-the-latest-in-vodafones-india-saga\/<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

15.<\/a> (2012) 6 SCC 613<\/a>.<\/p>\n

16.<\/a> Cairn Energy PLC and Cairn UK Holdings Limited v. The Republic of India<\/span>, PCA Case No. 2016-7, Award dated 21-12-2020.<\/p>\n

17.<\/a> For details, see<\/span> Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Press Information Bureau , Model Text for the Indian Bilateral Investment Treaty (16-12-2015) <https:\/\/pib.gov.in\/newsite\/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=133412<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

18.<\/a> Model Text for the Indian Bilateral Investment Treaty available at <https:\/\/dea.gov.in\/sites\/default\/files\/ModelBIT_Annex_0.pdf<\/a>>.<\/span><\/p>\n

19.<\/a> Model Text for the Indian Bilateral Investment Treaty, Art. 2.4(ii<\/span>), available at <https:\/\/dea.gov.in\/sites\/default\/files\/ModelBIT_Annex_0.pdf<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

20.<\/a> For details, see<\/span> United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, International Investment Agreements Navigator, Investment Policy Hub <https:\/\/investmentpolicy.unctad.org\/international-investment-agreements\/countries\/96\/india<\/a>>.<\/span><\/p>\n

21.<\/a> See further, Tenth Report of Parliament Committee on External Affairs, India and Bilateral Investment Treaties<\/span>, (September 2021), available at https:\/\/eparlib.nic.in\/bitstream\/123456789\/811585\/1\/17_External_Affairs_10.pdf<\/a>. ??<\/p>\n

22.<\/a> For illustration, see India, EU set for 7th round of free-trade talks next month (22-1-2024), <https:\/\/www.bilaterals.org\/?india-eu-set-for-7th-round-of-free<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

23.<\/a> Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) available at <https:\/\/commerce.gov.in\/international-trade\/trade-agreements\/comprehensive-economic-partnership-agreement-between-the-government-of-the-republic-of-india-and-the-government-of-the-united-arab-emirates-uae\/<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

24.<\/a> Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Art. 12.1 available at https:\/\/commerce.gov.in\/international-trade\/trade-agreements\/comprehensive-economic-partnership-agreement-between-the-government-of-the-republic-of-india-and-the-government-of-the-united-arab-emirates-uae\/<\/a>.<\/p>\n

25.<\/a> For details, see Lok Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi, Members’ Reference Service Larrdis, Legislative Note, The Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2021, available at <https:\/\/loksabhadocs.nic.in\/Refinput\/New_Reference_Notes\/English\/10082021_111820_102120474.pdf<\/a>> and Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2021.<\/p>\n

26.<\/a> Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2021<\/a>, amending Expln. 5 to Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a>, S. 9(1).<\/p>\n

27.<\/a> (2012) 6 SCC 613<\/a>.<\/p>\n

28.<\/a> Cairn Energy PLC and Cairn UK Holdings Limited v. The Republic of India<\/span>, PCA Case No. 2016-7, Award dated 21-12-2020<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Tarun Jain*
\nCite as: 2024 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 16<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":313979,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[20271,31771],"tags":[42169,65334,46260,65335,48165,35955,2621,65333],"class_list":["post-313977","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-experts_corner","category-articles-by-tarun-jain-on-indirect-tax-issues","tag-bilateral-investment-treaties","tag-comprehensive-economic-partnership-agreement","tag-experts-corner","tag-fair-and-equitable-treatment","tag-investment-disputes","tag-tarun-jain","tag-Tax","tag-tax-paradigm"],"yoast_head":"\nReviving BITs: Reimaging Tax Paradigm | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Tarun Jain revisited the tax-related dimension of the historical account of Indian experience with bilateral investment treaties\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Reviving BITs: Reimaging Tax Paradigm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tarun Jain revisited the tax-related dimension of the historical account of Indian experience with bilateral investment treaties\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-02-14T05:30:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-05-03T06:07:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/bilateral-investment-treaties.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Reviving BITs: Reimaging Tax Paradigm\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm\/\",\"name\":\"Reviving BITs: Reimaging Tax Paradigm | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/bilateral-investment-treaties.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-02-14T05:30:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-05-03T06:07:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Tarun Jain revisited the tax-related dimension of the historical account of Indian experience with bilateral investment treaties\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/bilateral-investment-treaties.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/bilateral-investment-treaties.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"bilateral investment treaties\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Reviving BITs: Reimaging Tax Paradigm\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Reviving BITs: Reimaging Tax Paradigm | SCC Blog","description":"Tarun Jain revisited the tax-related dimension of the historical account of Indian experience with bilateral investment treaties","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Reviving BITs: Reimaging Tax Paradigm","og_description":"Tarun Jain revisited the tax-related dimension of the historical account of Indian experience with bilateral investment treaties","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-02-14T05:30:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-05-03T06:07:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/bilateral-investment-treaties.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Reviving BITs: Reimaging Tax Paradigm","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm\/","name":"Reviving BITs: Reimaging Tax Paradigm | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/bilateral-investment-treaties.webp","datePublished":"2024-02-14T05:30:12+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-03T06:07:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Tarun Jain revisited the tax-related dimension of the historical account of Indian experience with bilateral investment treaties","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/bilateral-investment-treaties.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/bilateral-investment-treaties.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"bilateral investment treaties"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/tarun-jain-reviving-bit-reimaging-tax-paradigm\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Reviving BITs: Reimaging Tax Paradigm"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/bilateral-investment-treaties.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":298435,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/03\/tax-sparing-under-indian-tax-treaties-delhi-high-court-expounds-the-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":313977,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Tax Sparing\u2019 under Indian Tax Treaties: Delhi High Court Expounds the Law","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"By Tarun Jain\u2020 Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 66","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"indian tax treaties","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/indian-tax-treaties.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/indian-tax-treaties.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/indian-tax-treaties.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/indian-tax-treaties.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255214,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/06\/india-and-retrospective-tax-on-indirect-transfers-burying-the-hatchet\/","url_meta":{"origin":313977,"position":1},"title":"India and Retrospective Tax on Indirect Transfers: Burying the Hatchet","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by\u00a0Indruj Singh Rai\u2020 and Hardeep Singh Chawla\u2020\u2020 Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 75","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-63.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-63.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-63.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-63.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-63.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316139,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/tax-arbitration-in-india-scope-and-trends\/","url_meta":{"origin":313977,"position":2},"title":"Tax Arbitration in India: Scope and Trends","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Tarun Jain\u2020 Cite as: 2024 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 23","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tax Arbitration","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Tax-Arbitration.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Tax-Arbitration.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Tax-Arbitration.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Tax-Arbitration.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372176,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/09\/virtual-permanent-establishment-delhi-high-court-tax-treaty-analysis\/","url_meta":{"origin":313977,"position":3},"title":"Virtual Permanent Establishment: Indian High Court Rejects Clamour to Expand Tax Treaty Contours","author":"Editor","date":"January 9, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"by Tarun Jain*","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Virtual Permanent Establishment India","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Virtual-Permanent-Establishment-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Virtual-Permanent-Establishment-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Virtual-Permanent-Establishment-India.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Virtual-Permanent-Establishment-India.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278732,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/29\/vodafone-versus-india-a-never-ending-saga\/","url_meta":{"origin":313977,"position":4},"title":"Vodafone versus India: A Never-Ending Saga","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Swarnendu Chatterjee\u2020 and Anwesha Pal\u2020\u2020 Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 82","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-307.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":160534,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/29\/cabinet-approves-signing-and-ratification-of-bilateral-investment-treaty-between-india-and-belarus-on-investments\/","url_meta":{"origin":313977,"position":5},"title":"Cabinet approves signing and ratification of Bilateral Investment Treaty between India and Belarus on investments","author":"Saba","date":"September 29, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"The Union Cabinet has given its approval for signing and ratification of the Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) between the India and Belarus on Investments. The Treaty is likely to increase investment flows between the two countries. The agreement is expected to improve the confidence of the investors resulting in an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "News"","block_context":{"text":"News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313977","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=313977"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313977\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/313979"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=313977"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=313977"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=313977"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}