{"id":313728,"date":"2024-02-10T17:00:44","date_gmt":"2024-02-10T11:30:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=313728"},"modified":"2024-02-16T17:34:13","modified_gmt":"2024-02-16T12:04:13","slug":"cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"Unresolved factual \u2018Factual disputes should be resolved during trial\u2019; Calcutta High Court dismisses interlocutory application and Review motion"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Calcutta High Court:<\/span> In an application seeking directions for repurchasing unsold stock of “Power Team” products and adjustment of the amount payable under the decree, a single-judge bench comprising of Krishna Rao,* J.<\/span>, the defendant’s application and the Review application, stating that the issues raised should be resolved during the trial of the suit and it is inappropriate to grant relief seeking in the application at the interlocutory stage of the ongoing suit.<\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, an International Distribution Agreement was entered between the plaintiff and defendant on 15-07-2005, wherein the defendant was appointed as a distributor of “Power Team” products. Despite the agreement’s expiry, the parties continued their business relationship on a principal-to-principal basis. The plaintiff filed a suit against the defendant for a decree of US$ 1,60,708.16 along with interest due to the defendant’s failure to pay for goods supplied. The defendant contested the suit, leading to the judgment and decree dated 18-09-2018. The defendant filed an application seeking various reliefs including leave to file a Memorandum of Review from a judgment and decree dated 18-09-2018, issuance of directions to the plaintiff, appointment of a Special Officer, and other related directions. By an order dated 10-10-2018, the court directed that the application shall not be treated as a review application but as a substantive application for appointment of a Special Officer and other specified directions. An order dated 26-11-2019, appointed a Special Officer who verified the stocks and submitted a report. The defendant made the present application, seeking directions for repurchasing unsold stock of “Power Team” products and adjustment of the amount payable under the decree.<\/p>\n

Moot Point<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    Whether the defendant’s application for relief, based on Clause 20(a) of the agreement, maintainable?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    Whether the plaintiff’s actions, including refusal of certificates and trademark notices, justify the relief sought by the defendant?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  3. \n

    Whether the Court can grant interim relief resembling final relief?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Parties’ Contentions<\/p>\n

    The defendant claimed that the plaintiff’s refusal to provide necessary certificates hindered sales and relied on the agreement’s Clause 20(a) and previous court orders for relief. It was contended that the application is maintainable, as it was treated as a substantive application by the Court. It was further contended that the agreement’s termination does not negate the plaintiff’s obligation to repurchase unsold stock. On the other hand, the plaintiff contended against the maintainability of the application and disputed the defendant’s claims regarding the goods and enforceability of the agreement post-expiration.<\/p>\n

    Court’s Observation<\/p>\n

    Regarding the agreement’s expiration, the Court acknowledged the ongoing business relationship but found that the specific obligations required careful consideration, especially in light of the plaintiff’s trademark concerns. The Court noted that the plaintiff contended that the labels appearing on stocks are as “SPX POWER TEAM” but the Trademark of the plaintiff is only “Power Team” and the goods are not of the plaintiff. The Court found no merit in the defendant’s arguments regarding the trademark infringement notices hindering sales. The Court held that the defendant’s claims regarding the distribution agreement and trademark infringement should be decided during the trial of the suit.<\/p>\n

    The Court noted that the application had been treated as a substantive one and clarified that the withdrawal of the review aspect did not invalidate the present application. The Court reiterated the substantive nature of the application and upheld its previous order treating the application as substantive, not a review.<\/p>\n

    The Court observed that the relief sought in the present application overlapped with the defendant’s counterclaim, indicating a duplication of claims. The Court emphasised on the need for resolution of factual disputes in the ongoing suit before granting relief. The Court also asserted the need for caution in granting interim relief that resembles final relief, particularly considering the complexities of the case and the ongoing suit proceedings.<\/p>\n

    “It is well settled law that the Court can pass interim relief in the nature of final relief but such power is required to be used springily and with utmost caution.”<\/p>\n

    Considering the complexity of the issues raised, the Court concluded that they were better suited for resolution during the trial of the suit rather than through an interlocutory application. The Court dismissed the application finding it inappropriate to grant relief seeking in the application at the interlocutory stage of the ongoing suit.<\/p>\n

    Court’s Decision<\/p>\n

    The Court dismissed both the defendant’s present application seeking directions for repurchasing unsold stock of “Power Team” products in order to adjust the amount payable under the decree and defendant’s review application.<\/p>\n

    [SPX Flow Technology Singapore Pte Ltd.<\/span> v. Sanjay Jain<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine Cal 1295<\/a>, order dated 08-02-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n

    *Judgment by Justice Krishna Rao<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

    Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

    Mr. Soumabho Ghose, Ms. R.V. Kundalia, Ms. Tiyana Bhattacharyya, Ms. Aritra Chakraborty and Ms. S. Rai Singhania, Counsel for the Plaintiff<\/p>\n

    Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Trivedi, Mr. Shaunak Mitra, Mr. Aritra Basu, Ms. Iram Hassan and Mr. Sanket Sarawagi, Counsel for the Defendant<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Calcutta High Court emphasised the need for caution in granting relief at the interlocutory stage, particularly when it resembles final relief.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":290502,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2689,34546,64025,65251,2897,3221],"class_list":["post-313728","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-interlocutory-application","tag-justice-krishna-rao","tag-pending-suit","tag-Review","tag-Trademark"],"yoast_head":"\nCalcutta High Court dismisses interlocutory application and Review motion due to unresolved factual disputes and stage of ongoing suit | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court dismissed interlocutory application and Review motion due to unresolved factual disputes and stage of ongoing suit.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Unresolved factual \u2018Factual disputes should be resolved during trial\u2019; Calcutta High Court dismisses interlocutory application and Review motion\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court dismissed interlocutory application and Review motion due to unresolved factual disputes and stage of ongoing suit.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-02-10T11:30:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-02-16T12:04:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Unresolved factual \u2018Factual disputes should be resolved during trial\u2019; Calcutta High Court dismisses interlocutory application and Review motion\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/\",\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court dismisses interlocutory application and Review motion due to unresolved factual disputes and stage of ongoing suit | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-02-10T11:30:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-16T12:04:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court dismissed interlocutory application and Review motion due to unresolved factual disputes and stage of ongoing suit.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"calcutta high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Unresolved factual \u2018Factual disputes should be resolved during trial\u2019; Calcutta High Court dismisses interlocutory application and Review motion\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses interlocutory application and Review motion due to unresolved factual disputes and stage of ongoing suit | SCC Blog","description":"Calcutta High Court dismissed interlocutory application and Review motion due to unresolved factual disputes and stage of ongoing suit.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Unresolved factual \u2018Factual disputes should be resolved during trial\u2019; Calcutta High Court dismisses interlocutory application and Review motion","og_description":"Calcutta High Court dismissed interlocutory application and Review motion due to unresolved factual disputes and stage of ongoing suit.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-02-10T11:30:44+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-02-16T12:04:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Unresolved factual \u2018Factual disputes should be resolved during trial\u2019; Calcutta High Court dismisses interlocutory application and Review motion","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/","name":"Calcutta High Court dismisses interlocutory application and Review motion due to unresolved factual disputes and stage of ongoing suit | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2024-02-10T11:30:44+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-16T12:04:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court dismissed interlocutory application and Review motion due to unresolved factual disputes and stage of ongoing suit.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"calcutta high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Unresolved factual \u2018Factual disputes should be resolved during trial\u2019; Calcutta High Court dismisses interlocutory application and Review motion"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":311817,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":313728,"position":0},"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses Revisional Application on claim of collusion and fraud; Case to proceed for Trial","author":"Ritu","date":"January 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court clarified that rejection of the plaint is not warranted based on allegations of collusion or lack of cause of action, which are factual issues to be determined during the trial.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310324,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/cal-hc-upholds-mandatory-injunction-directs-demolition-in-violation-of-restraint-order-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":313728,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Court has power to grant mandatory injunctions at interlocutory stage\u2019; Calcutta High Court directs demolition in violation of injunction order","author":"Ritu","date":"December 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court reiterated that the court, in exercising equitable jurisdiction, has the power to remedy wrongful acts, especially when there is a violation of a restraint order.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313280,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/06\/a-mere-undertaking-does-not-create-charge-without-transfer-of-interest-calcutta-high-court-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":313728,"position":2},"title":"\u2018A mere undertaking does not create charge without transfer of interest\u2019; Calcutta High Court dismisses application seeking rejection of plaint","author":"Ritu","date":"February 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court stated that the defendant did not produce any documents to prove he has complied with his obligation under MOU, leading to its cancellation.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313235,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/06\/cal-hc-affirms-rejection-of-section-311-crpc-application-due-to-bar-on-criminal-revision-under-section-3972-crpc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":313728,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court affirms rejection of Section 311 CrPC application due to bar on criminal revision under Section 397(2) CrPC","author":"Ritu","date":"February 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court observed that Section 311 of the CrPC provides wide discretionary powers to courts for summoning, examining, or recalling witnesses if their evidence is essential to a just decision.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313264,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/06\/calcutta-high-court-modifies-the-special-referees-report-determines-mesne-profits-and-monthly-rents-based-on-cost-inflation-index-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":313728,"position":4},"title":"Calcutta High Court modifies Special Referee\u2019s report; determines Mesne profits and monthly rents based on Cost Inflation Index","author":"Ritu","date":"February 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that based on the Lease Deed, the defendant's possession after the original term was an extension, not a renewal, and a new lease document was not required.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300216,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/28\/writ-court-should-not-intervene-permit-activities-like-puja-amid-property-title-dispute-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":313728,"position":5},"title":"Writ Court should not intervene to permit activities like Puja amid property title dispute: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"August 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court suggested the respondent committee to approach the Civil Court through an appropriate interlocutory application for permissions related to puja.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313728","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=313728"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313728\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=313728"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=313728"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=313728"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}