{"id":313717,"date":"2024-02-10T16:00:07","date_gmt":"2024-02-10T10:30:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=313717"},"modified":"2024-02-16T17:38:51","modified_gmt":"2024-02-16T12:08:51","slug":"date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Date of e-filing final report, not the date on which hard copy is brought before Court, to be taken as date of filing: Madras HC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Madras High Court:<\/span> In a criminal original petition filed under Section 482<\/a> of the Criminal Procedure Code<\/a> (‘CrPC’) to set aside the impugned docket order of the Trial Court, wherein the statutory bail petition filed by the petitioner was returned on the ground that the charge sheet has already been filed by the respondent, N. Anand Venkatesh,J. while refusing to interfere with the impugned order , said the date on which the hard copy is brought before the Court cannot be taken to be the date of filing and in every case, the date of filing can only be the date on which the e-filing is done and that should be incorporated as the date of filing in the official website. This practice has to be consistently followed by all the Courts in order to avoid any future confusion.<\/p>\n

The Court took note of the report given by the Special Court and noted that the final report along with all the materials was filed by the prosecution on 13-11-2023 through e-filing platform. Further, this was acted upon, and the final report was taken cognizance on 15-11-2023. Thus, it said that the accused’s expressing doubt regarding the e-filing that took place on 13-11-2023, is unfounded.<\/p>\n

Upon enquiry to the Special Court, as to why the date of filing of the final report is shown on the official website as 15-11-2023, when the e-filing was already done on 13-11-2023, the Court noted that in all cases across Tamil Nadu, the date of filing does not reflect the date on which the e-filing is done and the date of filing gets reflected only by taking into consideration the physical availability of the papers in the Court. Therefore, even though the e-filing was done on 13-11-2023, based on the physical availability of the papers before the Judge, the same is incorporated in the official website as the date of filing.<\/p>\n

The Court said that if e-filing mechanism is officially recognized as a mode of filing, the date of e-filing must be taken to be the date of filing. At the time of filing, the papers are on a soft copy mode and later, it translates into hard copy. The date on which the hard copy is brought before the Court cannot be taken to be the date of filing and in every case, the date of filing can only be the date on which the e-filing is done and that should be incorporated as the date of filing in the official website. This practice has to be consistently followed by all the Courts in order to avoid any future confusion.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court said that the e-filing was done on 13-11-2023 and the cognizance of the final report was taken on 15-11-2023 and the case was also numbered on the same day.<\/p>\n

Concerning the issue that whether the e-filing of the final report will suffice or the Court must deal with the physical papers and only then, it can be construed that the actual filing had taken place, the Court said that the e-filing platform is available to the prosecution to file the final report. This filing is officially recognized to be the date of filing of the final report. The final report along with the materials had reached the e-filing portal of the Special Court on 13-11-2023, which was a working day since it was Monday. In this digital era, it is too late in the day to claim that the e-filing of the final report cannot be construed as the date of filing and it is only the physical availability of papers that should be construed as the actual date of filing. If this interpretation is given, all the efforts that are being taken by the Higher Courts to make the entire legal proceedings digital, will be defeated.<\/p>\n

After taking note of Suresh Kumar Bhikamchand Jain<\/span> v. State of Maharashtra<\/span>, (2013) 3 SCC 77<\/a> and Serious Fraud Investigation Office<\/span> v. Rahul Modi<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 153<\/a>, wherein it was held that as per the scheme of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (‘CrPC’) once the charge sheet is filed before the Court within the statutory period, that must be taken to be sufficient compliance with the provision under Section 167<\/a> of CrPC<\/a>. It is immaterial as to whether cognizance of that final report was taken or not within the statutory period.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court refused to interfere with the written endorsement made by the Court below on 15-11-2023, returning the statutory bail application filed by the petitioner.<\/p>\n

Moreoever, the Court remarked that Special Courts must get rid of the practice of dealing with the extension petition and the statutory bail petition together. The scope of both these petitions are very different.<\/p>\n

The Court directed to circulate a copy of this order to all the Principal District Judges, across Tamil Nadu. It also allowed the petitioner to seek for a regular bail before the Court below.<\/p>\n

[Varun v State, 2024 SCC OnLine Mad 162<\/a>, Order dated 01-02-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For Petitioner<\/span>: Advocate P.Kritika Kamal<\/p>\n

For Respondent<\/span>: Additional Public Prosecutor A.Damodaran<\/p>\n

Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Code<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“In this digital era, it is too late in the day to claim that the e-filing of the final report cannot be construed as the date of filing and it is only the physical availability of papers that should be construed as the actual date of filing.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":298865,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2664,65248,65247,65249,2567,48635,65250],"class_list":["post-313717","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bail","tag-date-of-filing","tag-e-filing-final-report","tag-extension-petition","tag-Madras_High_Court","tag-statutory-bail","tag-statutory-bail-petition"],"yoast_head":"\nDate of e-filing final report to be taken as date of filing, not the date on which hard copy is brought before Court: Madras HC | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Madras HC held that date of e-filing final report to be taken as date of filing, not the date on which hard copy is brought before Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Date of e-filing final report, not the date on which hard copy is brought before Court, to be taken as date of filing: Madras HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madras HC held that date of e-filing final report to be taken as date of filing, not the date on which hard copy is brought before Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-02-10T10:30:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-02-16T12:08:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Date of e-filing final report, not the date on which hard copy is brought before Court, to be taken as date of filing: Madras HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Date of e-filing final report to be taken as date of filing, not the date on which hard copy is brought before Court: Madras HC | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-02-10T10:30:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-16T12:08:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"Madras HC held that date of e-filing final report to be taken as date of filing, not the date on which hard copy is brought before Court\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"madras high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Date of e-filing final report, not the date on which hard copy is brought before Court, to be taken as date of filing: Madras HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Date of e-filing final report to be taken as date of filing, not the date on which hard copy is brought before Court: Madras HC | SCC Blog","description":"Madras HC held that date of e-filing final report to be taken as date of filing, not the date on which hard copy is brought before Court","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Date of e-filing final report, not the date on which hard copy is brought before Court, to be taken as date of filing: Madras HC","og_description":"Madras HC held that date of e-filing final report to be taken as date of filing, not the date on which hard copy is brought before Court","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-02-10T10:30:07+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-02-16T12:08:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Date of e-filing final report, not the date on which hard copy is brought before Court, to be taken as date of filing: Madras HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc\/","name":"Date of e-filing final report to be taken as date of filing, not the date on which hard copy is brought before Court: Madras HC | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2024-02-10T10:30:07+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-16T12:08:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"Madras HC held that date of e-filing final report to be taken as date of filing, not the date on which hard copy is brought before Court","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"madras high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/date-e-filing-final-report-taken-as-date-of-filing-not-date-which-hard-copy-brought-before-court-mad-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Date of e-filing final report, not the date on which hard copy is brought before Court, to be taken as date of filing: Madras HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":276127,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/25\/madras-high-court-shiv-shanker-baba-limitation-sexual-harassment-self-styled-sexual-abuse-godman-fir-condonation-of-delay-ipc-crpc-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":313717,"position":0},"title":"Absence of application to condone delay barred by limitation; Madras High Court quashes FIR against self-styled Godman Shiva Sankar Baba","author":"Editor","date":"October 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Madras High Court: In a criminal original petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) for quashing of First Information Report (FIR) registered under Section 354 of the Penal Code, 1860 (\u2018IPC\u2019) and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261865,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/17\/filing-of-the-charge-sheet-within-stipulated-period-is-sufficient-compliance-u-s-167-of-crpc-sc-rejects-default-bail-plea-of-rahul-modi-md-of-adarsh-group\/","url_meta":{"origin":313717,"position":1},"title":"\u201cFiling of the charge-sheet within stipulated period is sufficient compliance u\/s 167 of CrPC\u201d, SC rejects default bail plea of Rahul Modi, MD of Adarsh Group","author":"Editor","date":"February 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a loan default case, the Division Bench of L. Nageswara Rao* and B.R. Gavai, JJ., rejected pleas of Rahul Modi of Adarsh Group and Rahul Kothari of Rotomac Global for default bail on the ground that the Trial Court failed to take cognizance within stipulated 60\/90 days\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-85.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-85.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-85.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-85.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-85.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":251555,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/21\/right-of-default-bail\/","url_meta":{"origin":313717,"position":2},"title":"Chh HC | Right of default bail under S. 167(2) CrPC cannot be defeated by subsequent filing of charge-sheet on same day","author":"Editor","date":"July 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Narendra Kumar Vyas J. allowed the petition and set aside the impugned order. The facts of the case are such that the petitioner was found in possession of 145 strips of Spasmo Proxyvon Plus total of 1160 capsules and 90 strips total 720 capsules of Spasmo Proxyvon\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":280983,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/04\/madras-high-court-directs-tamil-nadu-judicial-academy-to-conduct-a-refresher-course-to-the-judicial-officers-focusing-on-the-special-enactments-making-them-aware-of-the-proce\/","url_meta":{"origin":313717,"position":3},"title":"Madras High Court directs Tamil Nadu Judicial Academy to conduct a refresher course for the judicial officers, focusing on the special enactments, making them aware of the procedure","author":"Editor","date":"January 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While quoting \u201cCan the blind lead the blind? Will they not fall into a pit?\u201d, the Madras High Court said that the first blind person in this case is the Sessions Judge, who was guiding the Magistrate, who was also blind, due to ignorance of the legal position and ultimately,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Madras-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":294940,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/19\/no-extension-of-time-for-investigation-should-be-prayed-for-at-the-last-moment-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":313717,"position":4},"title":"\u2018No extension of time for Investigation should be prayed for at the last moment\u2019; holds SC in an eye-opening case for NIA, State Police","author":"Editor","date":"June 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court also reiterated that the grant of sanction is nowhere contemplated under Section 167 of the CrPC.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"extension of time for investigation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/extension-of-time-for-investigation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/extension-of-time-for-investigation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/extension-of-time-for-investigation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/extension-of-time-for-investigation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295890,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/04\/pp-to-ensure-final-report-filed-in-an-effective-manner-madras-hc-reiterates\/","url_meta":{"origin":313717,"position":5},"title":"Sensitise all PPs across the State to deal with final reports, placed before them for scrutiny, at the earliest; Madras HC directs Director of Prosecution","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The final report placed for scrutiny before the Public Prosecutor is not for the purpose of getting an opinion from the Public Prosecutor","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313717","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=313717"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313717\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/298865"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=313717"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=313717"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=313717"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}