{"id":313399,"date":"2024-02-08T13:00:46","date_gmt":"2024-02-08T07:30:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=313399"},"modified":"2024-02-12T17:50:50","modified_gmt":"2024-02-12T12:20:50","slug":"cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Director\u2019s liability without company\u2019s inclusion is unlawful\u2019; Calcutta High Court quashes criminal proceedings due to violation of Section 46B of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Calcutta High Court:<\/span> In a revision application seeking quashment of prosecution report and criminal proceedings arising out of raid on the petitioner&#8217;s company&#8217;s marketing office resulted in the seizure of 292 bottles of foreign liquor due to alleged non-payment of duty on overseas foreign liquor, a single-judge bench comprising of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Shampa Dutt (Paul),* J.<\/span>, held that the company must be made an accused for the director to be held criminally liable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001681181\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">46-B<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000735305\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bengal Excise Act, 1909<\/a>. The Court quashed the prosecution report arising out criminal proceedings and orders connected thereto pending for adjudication before the Chief Judicial Magistrate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Factual Matrix<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the petitioner, a retired Army Officer, established Duomo Distribution Private Limited in 2017 to import foreign liquor brands to the Indian market. The company is the sole importer and marketing entity for renowned liquor brands owned by Polini Group Italia SRL, Italy. The petitioner, serving as an executive director, was responsible for marketing the imported products. On 31-10-2018, a raid by the Bidhannagar Excise Department at the company&#8217;s marketing office led to the seizure of 292 bottles of foreign liquor allegedly unregistered and non-duty paid. The petitioner was arrested on the same day but was later granted bail.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner preferred the present revisional application seeking to quash the prosecution report dated 26.04.2019 arising out case registered under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001681135\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">10<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001681137\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">12<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001681141\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">16<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001681143\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">18(1)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000735305\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bengal Excise Act, 1909<\/a> read with Rule 118 of West Bengal (Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1998 and punishable under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001681180\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">46A(c)(e)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001681190\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">52<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000735305\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bengal Excise Act, 1909<\/a>, the criminal proceedings and orders connected thereto, pending for adjudication before the Chief Judicial Magistrate. The petitioner contended that the seized liquor was intended for marketing and sales promotion, not for sale, supported by documentation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Moot Point<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p>Whether the petitioner, a director of Duomo Distribution Private Limited, be held criminally liable for the alleged offenses under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000735305\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bengal Excise Act, 1909<\/a>, in the absence of the company being made an accused?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether the prosecution report and proceedings against the petitioner in Complaint Case, including the seizure of foreign liquor bottles, be quashed?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Parties&#8217; Contentions<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner argued that the prosecution violated regulations and that there is no vicarious liability for individuals unless the company is a party to the proceedings. The petitioner asserted that the seized liquor was not for sale, as confirmed by declarations from Polini, and, therefore, should not be subject to registration. The petitioner claimed bias in investigation and challenged the legality of the prosecution report.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The State argued that the petitioner, as a director, can be held criminally liable even if the company is not made an accused. The prosecution argued that the seized items were unlawfully introduced into the market, posing a threat to government revenue.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#8217;s Assessment<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Dayle De&#8217;souza<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Govt. of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/H2fwe10t\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2021 SCC OnLine SC 1012<\/a>, emphasising that a company must be accused when an offense is committed by the company. The court noted that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;in the absence of the company being arraigned as an accused, a complaint against the petitioner is not maintainable.&#8221;<\/span> The Court stated that Section 46B of the Bengal Excise Act imposes liability on the company and its officers, requiring the company&#8217;s inclusion in the proceedings. The Court held that the in the present case the company was not made an accused, but the petitioner, a director of the company was made an accused, which is in <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;clear violation of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001681181\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">46-B<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000735305\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bengal Excise Act, 1909<\/a>.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#8217;s Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that the absence of the company as an accused is a violation of the law and an abuse of the legal process. The Court allowed the revisional application and quashed the prosecution report and proceedings against the petitioner. The interim order, if any, stands vacated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Raj Sahai<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of W.B.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/6GkiHoop\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Cal 941<\/a>, order dated 02-02-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Sabyasachi Banerjee, Mr. Nigam Ashish Chakraborty, Mr. Agniva Banerjee, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Sanjay Bardhan, Ms. Rita Dutta, Counsel for the Opposite Parties\/State<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Calcutta High Court deemed the criminal proceedings an abuse of the process of law and allowed the revisional application.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":290502,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2689,58955,39334,59921,3752,13001,65174,31012],"class_list":["post-313399","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-directors-liability","tag-excise","tag-justice-shampa-dutt-paul","tag-liquor","tag-quashment","tag-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act","tag-seizure"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Calcutta High Court quashes prosecution report and related proceedings due to violation of Section 46B of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909 | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court quashed prosecution report and related proceedings due to violation of Section 46B of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Director\u2019s liability without company\u2019s inclusion is unlawful\u2019; Calcutta High Court quashes criminal proceedings due to violation of Section 46B of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court quashed prosecution report and related proceedings due to violation of Section 46B of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-02-08T07:30:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-02-12T12:20:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Director\u2019s liability without company\u2019s inclusion is unlawful\u2019; Calcutta High Court quashes criminal proceedings due to violation of Section 46B of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog\/\",\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court quashes prosecution report and related proceedings due to violation of Section 46B of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909 | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-02-08T07:30:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-12T12:20:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court quashed prosecution report and related proceedings due to violation of Section 46B of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"calcutta high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Director\u2019s liability without company\u2019s inclusion is unlawful\u2019; Calcutta High Court quashes criminal proceedings due to violation of Section 46B of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Calcutta High Court quashes prosecution report and related proceedings due to violation of Section 46B of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909 | SCC Blog","description":"Calcutta High Court quashed prosecution report and related proceedings due to violation of Section 46B of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Director\u2019s liability without company\u2019s inclusion is unlawful\u2019; Calcutta High Court quashes criminal proceedings due to violation of Section 46B of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909","og_description":"Calcutta High Court quashed prosecution report and related proceedings due to violation of Section 46B of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-02-08T07:30:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-02-12T12:20:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Director\u2019s liability without company\u2019s inclusion is unlawful\u2019; Calcutta High Court quashes criminal proceedings due to violation of Section 46B of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog\/","name":"Calcutta High Court quashes prosecution report and related proceedings due to violation of Section 46B of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909 | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2024-02-08T07:30:46+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-12T12:20:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court quashed prosecution report and related proceedings due to violation of Section 46B of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"calcutta high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/cal-hc-quashes-prosecution-report-and-related-proceedings-due-to-violation-of-section-46b-of-the-bengal-excise-act-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Director\u2019s liability without company\u2019s inclusion is unlawful\u2019; Calcutta High Court quashes criminal proceedings due to violation of Section 46B of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":299948,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":313399,"position":0},"title":"\u201cAbsurd and improbable\u201d: Calcutta High Court sets aside maliciously instituted criminal case with no sufficient grounds for legal action","author":"Ritu","date":"August 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While quashing the criminal proceeding filed against petitioners, the Calcutta High Court held that the same is lacking with substantial evidence and is institutes with malicious intent.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298629,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/wife-leaving-matrimonial-house-with-traditional-marriage-ornaments-cannot-form-basis-for-criminal-case-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":313399,"position":1},"title":"Wife leaving matrimonial house with traditional marriage ornaments cannot form basis for criminal case: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"August 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court quashed the criminal proceeding pending before the Judicial Magistrate and all related orders.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":308371,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/cal-hc-affirms-directors-liability-under-section-32-of-industrial-disputes-act-1947-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":313399,"position":2},"title":"Calcutta High Court affirms Director\u2019s liability under Section 32 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; directs compliance of compensation order","author":"Ritu","date":"December 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 \u201cis a beneficial legislation, for the benefit of the workmen and not paying the compensation since 2007 is clearly an abuse of the process of law.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297283,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/20\/delhi-hc-dismisses-plea-pernod-ricard-renewal-liquor-licence-on-ground-non-maintainability\/","url_meta":{"origin":313399,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court dismisses plea of Pernod Ricard for renewal of its liquor licence on ground of non-maintainability","author":"Simranjeet","date":"July 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA reasoned order dated 13-4-2023 had been passed rejecting the L-1 License application of the petitioner, Pernod Ricard India (P) Ltd. on the ground that documents had been received from investigating agencies alleging the participation of the petitioner and its employees in commonly referred to as the \u2018Delhi Excise Policy\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282054,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/wife-infertility-husband-mutual-divorce-fir-cruelty-calcutta-high-court-revision-petition-quash-fir-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":313399,"position":4},"title":"Calcutta High Court | Infertility cannot be a ground for divorce","author":"Editor","date":"January 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Dismissing the revision petition filed for quashing of FIR and criminal proceeding against the petitioner\/husband, the Court held that prima facie case of a cognizable offence of cruelty can be make out against the petitioner\/husband therefore inherit power of High Court under S. 482 CrPC cannot be exercised.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image95.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":299162,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/12\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-revision-seeking-cancellation-of-bail-in-assault-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":313399,"position":5},"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses revision seeking cancellation of bail in assault case","author":"Ritu","date":"August 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court criticized the trial court for solely relying on party's submissions and not calling for injury report.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313399","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=313399"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313399\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=313399"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=313399"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=313399"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}