{"id":312759,"date":"2024-02-02T11:00:38","date_gmt":"2024-02-02T05:30:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=312759"},"modified":"2024-02-08T17:47:02","modified_gmt":"2024-02-08T12:17:02","slug":"carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Carrying forward of unfilled EWS\/DG vacancies to next class in subsequent year is valid and legal; does not infract RTE Act: Delhi High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">C. Hari Shankar, J.*<\/span>, held that the principle of carrying forward of unfilled Economically Weaker Section (&#8216;EWS&#8217;)\/Disadvantaged Group (&#8216;DG&#8217;) category vacancies in a particular class in one year, to the next class in the next year in the same school, was legal and valid. The Court opined that the carrying forward of unfilled EWS\/DG vacancies to the next class in the subsequent year did not infract the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002767705\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009<\/a> (&#8216;the RTE Act&#8217;) or any other legal provision. Admitting EWS\/DG students to the extent of at least 25% of the strength of its entry level class was the statutory obligation of every school which falls within Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001552940\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2(n)(iv)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002767705\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">RTE Act<\/a> and if any school defaulted, there was nothing illegal in directing it to make up the deficit in the next higher class in the next year.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Amitanjali, was an EWS student and had applied to the DOE for admission to a school as an EWS candidate, in 2021-2022. In a computerized draw of lots, she was found eligible for admission to Nursery\/Pre-School in Sovereign School, Respondent 2 (&#8216;the School&#8217;) in 2021, but the School denied her admission. Amitanjali again applied and was found eligible for admission to the KG\/Pre-Primary class in the School for the academic session 2022-2023 but was again denied admission by the School. Undeterred, Amitanjali again applied, in 2023-2024, and was once again found eligible for admission to the School, this time in Class 1. On her being denied admission the third time by the School, with no reasons provided whatsoever, a petition was filed before this Court by her mother-petitioner, who prayed for issuance of mandamus to the School to admit Amitanjali, as an EWS student, for the academic year 2023-2024, or to direct the DOE to secure admission, to her, in a neighbouring school at the earliest.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">By an interim order, this Court directed the School to provisionally admit Amitanjali in Class 1 in the 2023-2024 academic session as an EWS student, subject to the final outcome of the present petition and thus Amitanjali had, since, been granted provisional admission to the School in Class 1.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that if there were any unfilled EWS\/DG pre-primary\/KG vacancies of 2021-2022 in the School, the Directorate of Education (&#8216;the DOE&#8217;) could indeed legitimately have required the School to fill up the said vacancies in Class I as carry forward vacancies, in addition to the EWS\/DG vacancies which fell to its lot in Class 1 in the year 2022-2023.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001552932\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">12(1)(c)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002767705\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">RTE Act<\/a> required a school, falling under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001552940\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2(n)(iv)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002767705\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">RTE Act<\/a>, to admit, in Class 1, at least 25% of the strength of that class and the word &#8220;strength&#8221; had to be read as meaning the total number which the School was in a position to admit in that year. The Court further took note of the number of EWS\/DG admissions made by the School from 2015-2016 to 2022-2023, and thus observed that the School never fell short of 25% of the general category admissions made by it in any year, which meant that in each year from 2015-2016 to 2022-2023, the School actually admitted EWS\/DG students numbering over 25% of the strength of its class.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that unaided schools functioned on fees, and the Court could not, in its zeal to protect the interests of the student, compromise on the fees which the unaided school could legitimately earn, as such fees would be its sole source of sustenance. It was for this reason that the RTE Act envisaged 25% as the minimum quota of EWS\/DG students which an unaided school would have to admit in a year, reckoned as a percentage of the number of general category students that it admitted for that year. The Court opined that this was a statutory mandatory imperative, and if a School fell short of fulfilling this was imperative in a particular area, it could legitimately be directed to fill up the backlog in the next year in the next higher class. Where, however, there was in fact no shortage in the number of EWS\/DG candidates which the school was required to admit, to fulfil the 25% limit, in a particular year, it would be not only unfair but also illegal to regard the school as having unfilled vacancies, which could be carried forward to next year. The carry forward principle could apply, therefore, only where there was a shortage in filling of EWS\/DG vacancies in earlier years, reckoned as a percentage of the number of general category students that the school had admitted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that if a school had neither chosen to seek exemption, nor reported any error to the DOE in respect of the computation of EWS\/DG vacancies in a particular year within the time provided by the DOE in that regard, it would be bound to admit student(s) who, as per the computerized draw of lot were allocated to its rolls. It could not, then, turn round and question the computation, by the DOE, of the number of EWS students that it would have to admit that year.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the School did not acquiesce to the directives of the DOE regarding the number of EWS students that it had to admit for 2023-2024, but, instead, challenged the communications dated 13-01-2023 and 14-03-2023 of the DOE. The DOE reversed its earlier decisions and granted waiver, to the School, from the requirement of admitting any EWS student against the backlog unfilled vacancies of previous years, in view of the fact that the School had not been able to admit its full strength of General category students in previous years, and had, in fact, admitted, each year, EWS\/DG students to the extent of 25% of the General category students whom it admitted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that it would be completely opposed to the interests of Amitanjali to uproot her, mid-session, from the class in which she was presently studying and therefore held that Amitanjali should continue to study as an EWS student in Class 1 in the School till the end of the present academic year. Further, the Court held that the DOE shall ensure that Amitanjali was admitted to Class 2 in one of the neighbourhood schools in 2024-2025 as an EWS\/DG candidate and continues to receive education in the said school till the age of 14, as per the provisions of the RTE Act. The DOE shall bear the fees for education of Amitanjali in accordance with the RTE Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Siddharth International Public School<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Motor Accident Claim Tribunal<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/SearchResult.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2016 SCC OnLine Del 5272<\/a> and held that the principle of carry-forward of unfilled EWS\/DG category vacancies in a particular class in one year, to the next class in the next year in the same school, was legal and valid. The Court opined that the carrying forward of unfilled EWS\/DG vacancies to the next class in the subsequent year did not infract the RTE Act or any other legal provision. Admitting EWS\/DG students to the extent of at least 25% of the strength of its entry level class was the statutory obligation of every school which falls within Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001552940\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2(n)(iv)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002767705\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">RTE Act<\/a> and if any school defaulted, there was nothing illegal in directing it to make up the deficit in the next higher class in the next year.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that in the present case, there was actually no unfilled EWS\/DG category vacancy in the previous year, reckoned as 25% of the General Category admissions made by the School, therefore, the principle of carry forward would not apply.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Anjali Pandey v. State (NCT of Delhi), <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ItMvj5Z7\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Del 584<\/a>, decided on 29-01-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice C. Hari Shankar<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Petitioner: Aayush Agarwala, Siddham Nahata, Advocates<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Respondents: Namit Suri, Rameezueedin Raja, Purnima Singh, Tanya Sharma, Advocates<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Admitting EWS\/DG students to the extent of at least 25% of the strength of its entry level class is the statutory obligation of every school which falls within Section 2(n)(iv) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":303940,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[64931,64934,2543,54351,33134,64933,64935,35931,26314,64932,29960,64936],"class_list":["post-312759","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-carry-forward","tag-class","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-disadvantaged-group","tag-economically-weaker-section","tag-ews-dg","tag-infract","tag-right-of-children-to-free-and-compulsory-education-act","tag-rte-act","tag-unfilled","tag-vacancies","tag-valid"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Carrying forward of unfilled EWS\/DG vacancies to next class in subsequent year is valid and legal; does not infract RTE Act: Delhi HC | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that carrying forward of unfilled EWS\/DG vacancies to next class in subsequent year is valid and legal and did not infract Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Carrying forward of unfilled EWS\/DG vacancies to next class in subsequent year is valid and legal; does not infract RTE Act: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that carrying forward of unfilled EWS\/DG vacancies to next class in subsequent year is valid and legal and did not infract Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-02-02T05:30:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-02-08T12:17:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Carrying forward of unfilled EWS\/DG vacancies to next class in subsequent year is valid and legal; does not infract RTE Act: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Carrying forward of unfilled EWS\/DG vacancies to next class in subsequent year is valid and legal; does not infract RTE Act: Delhi HC | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-02-02T05:30:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-08T12:17:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court held that carrying forward of unfilled EWS\/DG vacancies to next class in subsequent year is valid and legal and did not infract Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Carrying forward of unfilled EWS\/DG vacancies to next class in subsequent year is valid and legal; does not infract RTE Act: Delhi High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Carrying forward of unfilled EWS\/DG vacancies to next class in subsequent year is valid and legal; does not infract RTE Act: Delhi HC | SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court held that carrying forward of unfilled EWS\/DG vacancies to next class in subsequent year is valid and legal and did not infract Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Carrying forward of unfilled EWS\/DG vacancies to next class in subsequent year is valid and legal; does not infract RTE Act: Delhi High Court","og_description":"Delhi High Court held that carrying forward of unfilled EWS\/DG vacancies to next class in subsequent year is valid and legal and did not infract Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-02-02T05:30:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-02-08T12:17:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Carrying forward of unfilled EWS\/DG vacancies to next class in subsequent year is valid and legal; does not infract RTE Act: Delhi High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news\/","name":"Carrying forward of unfilled EWS\/DG vacancies to next class in subsequent year is valid and legal; does not infract RTE Act: Delhi HC | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2024-02-02T05:30:38+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-08T12:17:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Delhi High Court held that carrying forward of unfilled EWS\/DG vacancies to next class in subsequent year is valid and legal and did not infract Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/carrying-forward-of-unfilled-ews-dg-vacancies-to-next-class-in-subsequent-year-does-not-infract-rte-act-dhc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Carrying forward of unfilled EWS\/DG vacancies to next class in subsequent year is valid and legal; does not infract RTE Act: Delhi High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":293701,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/03\/neighbourhood-criteria-not-to-be-followed-strictly-by-schools-for-admissions-under-ews-or-dg-category-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":312759,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Neighbourhood Criteria\u2019 not to be followed strictly by schools for admissions under EWS or DG category: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"June 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In cases of admission under the Economically Weaker Section category or Disadvantaged Group category, the schools must not insist upon following the neighbourhood criteria strictly. The Directorate of Education is directed to make endeavour, as far as possible, to allot schools which are nearest to the residence of the students.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":322695,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/dhc-student-belong-dg-in-sc-category-entitled-for-all-amenities-which-such-students-entitled\/","url_meta":{"origin":312759,"position":1},"title":"[Right to Education] Delhi High Court grants provisional admission to a Disadvantaged Group Category Student","author":"Editor","date":"May 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner\u2019s daughter is a child belonging to DG in the SC category within the meaning of Section 2(e) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (\u201cthe RTE Act\u201d) and is, therefore, entitled to free, compulsory and elementary education till its completion under Section 12(c)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":329364,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/26\/dhc-issues-directions-ensure-accessible-efficient-admission-ews-dg-students-in-private-unaided-schools\/","url_meta":{"origin":312759,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court issues directions to ensure respectful, accessible, and efficient admission process for EWS\/DG students in private unaided schools","author":"Arushi","date":"August 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"By denying the opportunity for continuous education in a school run by the same society, a pitiable situation frequently arises where, due to the two different identification numbers assigned by the DoE to the school\u2019s junior and senior wings, financial segregation of students is indirectly perpetuated.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":318603,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/28\/delhi-high-court-article21a-mandate-free-compulsory-education-14-years-no-freedom-choose-specific-school-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":312759,"position":3},"title":"Article 21A mandates free and compulsory education up to 14 years, without the freedom to choose a specific school: Delhi High Court","author":"Arunima","date":"March 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The right available under Article 21A of the Constitution or under Section 12 of the RTE Act is only to free and compulsory education till the age of fourteen, not for being provided such education in a particular school.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":329521,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/29\/delhi-hc-directs-private-school-to-allow-admission-ews-category-student-denial-of-admission-after-allotment-of-school-violative-of-rte-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":312759,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Denial of admission after allotment of school is violative of the RTE Act\u2019; Delhi HC directs private school to allow admission of EWS category student","author":"Editor","date":"August 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Asking the student to continue studying in the MCD school would be tantamount to an onslaught on his constitutional rights and the Constitutional Court would be failing in its duty to secure the fundamental rights of the young citizen.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279795,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/16\/delhi-high-court-grants-relief-economically-weaker-section-students-right-to-education-department-of-education-schools-denied-admission-to-ews-students\/","url_meta":{"origin":312759,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court | All schools to ensure that no EWS category student, recommended by the Department of Education, is denied admission","author":"Editor","date":"December 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice CD Singh echoed Swami Vivekananda's words that \u201cNow if the mountain does not come to Mohammed, Mohammed must go to the mountain. If the poor boy cannot come to education, education must go to him.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"EWS category student","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image101.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/312759","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=312759"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/312759\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/303940"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=312759"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=312759"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=312759"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}