{"id":312547,"date":"2024-01-31T12:00:49","date_gmt":"2024-01-31T06:30:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=312547"},"modified":"2024-02-05T12:07:55","modified_gmt":"2024-02-05T06:37:55","slug":"cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"Calcutta High Court directs fresh consideration of Insurance Claim due to \u2018Arbitrariness and palpable illegality in repudiation process\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Calcutta High Court:<\/span> In an writ petition challenging the repudiation of the insurance claim by the respondent as being arbitrary, a single-judge bench comprising of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya*, J.<\/span>, held that the repudiation of the petitioner&#8217;s claim by the respondent was arbitrary, considering the elaborate process involving an independent expert&#8217;s report and a subsequent Addendum Report by the surveyor, both of which were accepted by the respondent. The Court partially allowed the writ petition, and setting aside the repudiation, directed the insurer to re-evaluate the claim, considering specified reports and providing a reasoned decision by 29-02-2024.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Factual Matrix<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner, West Bengal Power Development Corporation Limited, a Public Sector Undertaking of the Government of West Bengal, possessed a Mega\/Industrial All Risk Insurance Policy with the respondent, New India Assurance Company Limited, covering its thermal power plant in Bakreswar, West Bengal. In August 2017, the plant experienced vibrations, leading to its shutdown in August 2018 for inspection. Subsequent examinations revealed damage to the Generator Rotor. The petitioner lodged an insurance claim for Rs. 32,70,96,000\/- in September 2018. The respondent&#8217;s appointed surveyor initially deemed the claim inadmissible but later assessed a gross loss of Rs. 32,53,26,000\/-. Disagreement ensued, and two sets of &#8220;Root Cause Analysis&#8221; (RCA) Reports were obtained, both indicating sudden and accidental damage. The initial surveyor&#8217;s report stated inadmissibility, but an independent agency, TCR Advanced Engineering, later supported the claim. The respondent, after multiple assessments, eventually admitted the loss payable as Rs. 30,50,15,562\/- by an email dated 20-09-2021. However, in a cryptic email on 24-01-2022, the respondent decided to maintain its earlier repudiation, prompting the petitioner to file the present writ petition challenging the decision.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Moot Point<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p>Whether the repudiation of the insurance claim by the respondent is arbitrary and without justification?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Whether the writ petition maintainable under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a> for the enforcement of an insurance claim?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether the repudiation valid in light of Regulations 15(8) and 15(9) of Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI), Protection of Policy Holders&#8217; Interest Regulations, 2017?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Parties&#8217; Contentions<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner argued that the repudiation was arbitrary and against settled principles after the surveyor&#8217;s report was rectified and a fresh report issued. It was contended that the insurance company must establish, with cogent evidence, the applicability of an exclusion clause in case of claim repudiation. The petitioner cited precedents emphasising the insurer&#8217;s duty to provide reasons and the maintainability of writ petitions for insurance claims.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The respondent contended that the surveyor&#8217;s report is not binding, and the insurer can independently decide on the claim. The respondent highlighted the technical issues, suggesting a systematic and continuous process of wear-and-tear rather than a sudden breakdown. The respondent cited precedents, including those stating the non-binding nature of surveyor reports, are invoked. It was argued that the dispute involves factual issues requiring evidence and cross-examination, unsuitable for resolution through a writ petition<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#8217;s Assessment<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court examined IRDAI regulations, emphasising the insurer&#8217;s obligation to settle or reject a claim within specified timelines. The Court criticised the insurer&#8217;s post-facto justification for repudiation, emphasising the acceptance of the expert and surveyor reports. The Court held that the repudiation lacked justification, considering the elaborate process of expert opinion and the subsequent acceptance of the claim by the surveyor. The Court held that the repudiation of the petitioner&#8217;s claim by the respondent was arbitrary.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court acknowledged the non-binding nature of the surveyor&#8217;s report but emphasised that the insurer cannot repudiate without providing cogent reasons, especially after reopening the claim and obtaining additional expert opinions. The Court held that the insurer failed to provide adequate reasons and applied the initial surveyor&#8217;s report without proper authority.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court upheld the maintainability of the writ petition under Article 226, given the challenge on grounds of arbitrariness and palpable illegality in the repudiation process. While recognizing the limitations of the Court in deciding technical details, the Court set aside the impugned repudiation and directed the insurer to reevaluate the claim, considering the second Addendum Report and the expert report. The Court instructed the respondent to communicate the reasoned decision to the petitioner by 29-02-2024. The Court refrained from deciding on the technical merits of the claim, leaving it to the insurer&#8217;s expertise.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#8217;s Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court partially allowed the writ petition, emphasising on the insurer&#8217;s obligation to provide reasoned justifications for claim repudiation. It also directed a fresh assessment of the claim based on the accepted reports. The Court refrained from delving into the merits of the claim and no order was issued regarding costs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">W.B. Power Development Corpn. Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">New India Assurance Co. Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/k5jB6Jp2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Cal 855<\/a>, order dated 29-01-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Suddhasatva Banerjee, Mr. Chayan Gupta, Mr. Shoham Sanyal and Mr. Aviroop Mitra, Counsel for the Appellant<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. S.N. Ganguly, Mr. Siddhartha Goswami and Mr. Vivekananda Das, Counsel for the Respondent<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=33\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=33\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Calcutta High Court upheld the maintainability of the writ petition under Article 226, given the challenge is on the grounds of arbitrariness and illegality in the repudiation process.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":290502,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32557,2689,2617,58555,64855,64854],"class_list":["post-312547","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitrariness","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-insurance_claim","tag-justice-sabyasachi-bhattacharyya","tag-repudiation-process","tag-w-b-power-development-corporation-ltd"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Calcutta High Court directs fresh consideration of Insurance Claim due to arbitrariness and illegality in repudiation process | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court directed fresh consideration of Insurance Claim due to arbitrariness and palpable illegality in the repudiation process.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court directs fresh consideration of Insurance Claim due to \u2018Arbitrariness and palpable illegality in repudiation process\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court directed fresh consideration of Insurance Claim due to arbitrariness and palpable illegality in the repudiation process.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-01-31T06:30:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-02-05T06:37:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court directs fresh consideration of Insurance Claim due to \u2018Arbitrariness and palpable illegality in repudiation process\u2019\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog\/\",\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court directs fresh consideration of Insurance Claim due to arbitrariness and illegality in repudiation process | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-31T06:30:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-05T06:37:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court directed fresh consideration of Insurance Claim due to arbitrariness and palpable illegality in the repudiation process.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"calcutta high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court directs fresh consideration of Insurance Claim due to \u2018Arbitrariness and palpable illegality in repudiation process\u2019\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Calcutta High Court directs fresh consideration of Insurance Claim due to arbitrariness and illegality in repudiation process | SCC Blog","description":"Calcutta High Court directed fresh consideration of Insurance Claim due to arbitrariness and palpable illegality in the repudiation process.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Calcutta High Court directs fresh consideration of Insurance Claim due to \u2018Arbitrariness and palpable illegality in repudiation process\u2019","og_description":"Calcutta High Court directed fresh consideration of Insurance Claim due to arbitrariness and palpable illegality in the repudiation process.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-01-31T06:30:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-02-05T06:37:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Calcutta High Court directs fresh consideration of Insurance Claim due to \u2018Arbitrariness and palpable illegality in repudiation process\u2019","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog\/","name":"Calcutta High Court directs fresh consideration of Insurance Claim due to arbitrariness and illegality in repudiation process | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2024-01-31T06:30:49+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-05T06:37:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court directed fresh consideration of Insurance Claim due to arbitrariness and palpable illegality in the repudiation process.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"calcutta high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/cal-hc-directs-fresh-consideration-of-insurance-claim-due-to-arbitrariness-and-illegality-in-repudiation-process-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Calcutta High Court directs fresh consideration of Insurance Claim due to \u2018Arbitrariness and palpable illegality in repudiation process\u2019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":298665,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/calcutta-hc-criticizes-authorities-cryptic-considerations-and-denial-due-process-in-rejection-obc-certificate\/","url_meta":{"origin":312547,"position":0},"title":"Calcutta High Court criticizes authorities for cryptic considerations and denial of due process in rejecting OBC certificate; orders fresh enquiry","author":"Ritu","date":"August 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court held the considerations by both the BDO as well as the Appellate Authority were extremely cryptic, and they shirked their responsibility by rejecting the petitioner's application.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":18427,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/10\/15\/repudiation-of-claim-upheld-as-complainant-failed-to-take-reasonable-steps-to-safeguard-vehicle\/","url_meta":{"origin":312547,"position":1},"title":"Repudiation of claim upheld as complainant failed to take reasonable steps to safeguard vehicle","author":"Sucheta","date":"October 15, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): NCDRC has upheld the repudiation of claim by the insurance company in a case of theft of vehicle on the ground that respondent was not having valid driving licence at the time of incident and he had also not taken ignition keys of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298180,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/01\/no-one-suffer-inaction-police-verification-document-passport-issuance-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":312547,"position":2},"title":"No one should suffer indefinitely due to inaction in police verification for passport issuance: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"August 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court decided whether the delay in issuing the passport is due to a lack of verification by the police authorities or if there are genuine concerns regarding the citizenship proof submitted by the petitioner.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":44411,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/20\/repudiation-of-insurance-claim-of-overloaded-bus-justified\/","url_meta":{"origin":312547,"position":3},"title":"Repudiation of insurance claim of overloaded bus, justified","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 20, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):\u00a0While observing that huge overloading of vehicles adversely affects the steering control and increases the chance of driver to loose control of the vehicle which may cause accident, NCDRC upheld the repudiation of insurance claim of a bus on the ground of over loading. Earlier,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":33921,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/28\/repudiation-of-policy-claim-on-the-ground-of-non-disclosure-of-material-facts-declared-improper-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":312547,"position":4},"title":"Repudiation of policy claim on the ground of non-disclosure of material facts, declared improper","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 28, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):\u00a0\u201cHypertension is a common ailment and it can be controlled by medication and it is not necessary that a person suffering from hypertension would always suffer a heart attack,\u201d observed NCDRC while rendering relief to a person whose insurance cover for Bypass Surgery was repudiated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299936,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/calcutta-hc-allows-termination-of-25-weeks-pregnancy-of-a-minor-gang-rape-survivor\/","url_meta":{"origin":312547,"position":5},"title":"Calcutta High Court allows termination of 25+ weeks pregnancy of a minor gang-rape survivor","author":"Ritu","date":"August 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court commended the cooperation from all parties involved and expressed well wishes for the minor child's future.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/312547","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=312547"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/312547\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=312547"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=312547"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=312547"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}