{"id":312526,"date":"2024-01-31T10:00:21","date_gmt":"2024-01-31T04:30:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=312526"},"modified":"2024-02-05T12:10:24","modified_gmt":"2024-02-05T06:40:24","slug":"delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Gag orders should be passed to prevent substantial risk to fair trial; Delhi High Court imposes cost of Rs. 10,000 on a man seeking gag order against newspapers"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition seeking to direct Dainik Jagran, Respondent 2 and Hindustan Times, Respondent 3 to conceal the petitioner&#8217;s identity while circulating news or any article that was carried out by them, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Subramonium Prasad, J.*<\/span>, opined that merely because a publication was related to a Court proceeding, it could not be concluded that the publication tended to impair the Court&#8217;s impartiality or affected the Court&#8217;s ability to determine the true facts. One had to carefully see the nature of the publication and find out as to the content of the publication would cause prejudice to the trial of a case or not. The Court opined that it could not be concluded that the guidelines laid down in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sahara India Real Estate Corpn. Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">SEBI<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=KDIwMTIpIDEwIFNDQyA2MDMmJiYmJjQwJiYmJiZTZWFyY2hQYWdl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2012) 10 SCC 603<\/a> was not violated, as it was well settled that the gag orders should be passed only when it was necessary and to prevent substantial risk to fairness of a trial. Thus, the Court directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 10,000 to the Armed Forces Battle Casualty Welfare Fund for wasting the judicial time of this Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an instant case, it was stated that the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Respondent 4, was a close associate of a land mafia and had an eye on the petitioner&#8217;s property. It was alleged that there was a constant threat to the petitioner and his family members from enjoying their property. Subsequently, a writ petition was filed by the petitioner&#8217;s mother to curb the procedural overreach of Respondent 4.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner stated that only with the sole motive to jeopardize the petitioner&#8217;s mother&#8217;s case and to misguide the court from inquiring the procedural overreach carried out by Respondent 4, Respondent 4 briefed Respondent 2 and Respondent 3, regarding a case which was pending adjudication before Consumer Forum, Lucknow.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the petitioner approached the present Court seeking to direct Respondent 2 and Respondent 3 to conceal identity of the petitioner while circulating news or any article that was carried out by them, wherein the petitioner&#8217;s name appeared. The petitioner also prayed for a direction of Union of India to ensure strict compliance of <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">PUCL<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=SlRYVC0wMDAwMDQ5MTMzJiYmJiY0MCYmJiYmU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmdWxsc2NyZWVuJiYmJiZmYWxzZSYmJiYmKDIwMTQpIDEwIFNDQyA2MzUmJiYmJlBocmFzZSYmJiYmRmluZEJ5Q2l0YXRpb24mJiYmJmZhbHNl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2014) 10 SCC 635<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the petitioner approached the present Court for a gag order against Respondents 2 and 3, without bringing on record all relevant facts and material and opined that the instant petition was nothing but a complete abuse of process of law by the petitioner. Further, a reading of the newspaper cuttings also did not indicate that it was any way connected to the writ petition filed by the petitioner&#8217;s mother.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that merely because a publication was related to a Court proceeding, it could not be concluded that the publication either tended to impair the Court&#8217;s impartiality or affected the ability of the Court to determine the true facts. One had to carefully see the nature of the publication and find out as to the content of the publication would cause prejudice to the trial of a case or not. Prejudice by a publication could be of two categories, one which impaired the courts impartiality and the other with prejudiced the Court&#8217;s ability to determine the true facts. The Court opined that the petitioner had not revealed the writ petition&#8217;s nature, and the prayer sought in the writ petition. Further, the petitioner also did not file anything related to the pending consumer case. Thus, the Court opined that the contents of the newspaper, did not indicate any kind of apprehension, danger or prejudice that could be caused to the petitioner or his mother.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that it could not be concluded that the guidelines laid down in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sahara India Real Estate Corpn. Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">SEBI<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=KDIwMTIpIDEwIFNDQyA2MDMmJiYmJjQwJiYmJiZTZWFyY2hQYWdl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2012) 10 SCC 603<\/a> was not violated, as it was well settled that the gag orders should be passed only when it was necessary and to prevent substantial risk to fairness of a trial. Thus, the Court directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 10,000 to the Armed Forces Battle Casualty Welfare Fund for wasting the judicial time of this Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Ajay Kumar v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/9l5GVLxT\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Del 579<\/a>, decided on 25-01-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by- Justice Subramonium Prasad<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Aditi Shivadhatri, Capt. Subedita Rani and R. R. Bharati, Advocates;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> Himanshu Pathak, Sr. Panel Counsel with Mimansak Bhardwaj, GP and Samman Kumar Singh, Advocate.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;One has to carefully see the nature of the publication and find out as to the content of the publication will cause prejudice to the trial of a case or not.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":303940,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2543,14101,64844,40957,3165],"class_list":["post-312526","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-fair-trial","tag-gag-orders","tag-newspapers","tag-publication"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi HC imposes cost on a man seeking gag order against newspapers| SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 10,000 to the Armed Forces Battle Casualty Welfare Fund for wasting the judicial time of this Court.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gag orders should be passed to prevent substantial risk to fair trial; Delhi High Court imposes cost of Rs. 10,000 on a man seeking gag order against newspapers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 10,000 to the Armed Forces Battle Casualty Welfare Fund for wasting the judicial time of this Court.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-01-31T04:30:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-02-05T06:40:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Gag orders should be passed to prevent substantial risk to fair trial; Delhi High Court imposes cost of Rs. 10,000 on a man seeking gag order against newspapers\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC imposes cost on a man seeking gag order against newspapers| SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-31T04:30:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-05T06:40:24+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 10,000 to the Armed Forces Battle Casualty Welfare Fund for wasting the judicial time of this Court.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gag orders should be passed to prevent substantial risk to fair trial; Delhi High Court imposes cost of Rs. 10,000 on a man seeking gag order against newspapers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC imposes cost on a man seeking gag order against newspapers| SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 10,000 to the Armed Forces Battle Casualty Welfare Fund for wasting the judicial time of this Court.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gag orders should be passed to prevent substantial risk to fair trial; Delhi High Court imposes cost of Rs. 10,000 on a man seeking gag order against newspapers","og_description":"Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 10,000 to the Armed Forces Battle Casualty Welfare Fund for wasting the judicial time of this Court.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-01-31T04:30:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-02-05T06:40:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Gag orders should be passed to prevent substantial risk to fair trial; Delhi High Court imposes cost of Rs. 10,000 on a man seeking gag order against newspapers","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news\/","name":"Delhi HC imposes cost on a man seeking gag order against newspapers| SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2024-01-31T04:30:21+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-05T06:40:24+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 10,000 to the Armed Forces Battle Casualty Welfare Fund for wasting the judicial time of this Court.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/delhi-hc-imposes-cost-on-a-man-seeking-gag-order-against-newspapers-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gag orders should be passed to prevent substantial risk to fair trial; Delhi High Court imposes cost of Rs. 10,000 on a man seeking gag order against newspapers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":350207,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/09\/telangana-hc-quashes-gag-order-passed-against-the-news-minute\/","url_meta":{"origin":312526,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Injunction granted without adhering to established legal principles\u2019; Telangana HC quashes gag order passed against The News Minute in MEIL defamation case","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"June 9, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe ad-interim ex-parte injunction is not only unreasoned but also does not specify the time period during which it would be in force.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Telangana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":184164,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/25\/bombay-hc-quashes-gag-order-sohrabuddin-sheikh-fake-encounter-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":312526,"position":1},"title":"Bombay HC quashes gag order in\u00a0Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter case","author":"Saba","date":"January 25, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The ban on media reporting of the trial of the Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter case ordered by the special CBI Court was cancelled by the Bench of\u00a0Justice Revati Mohite-Dere.\u00a0\"Justice must not only be done but must be seen to be done, which is the purpose of an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288266,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/31\/delhi-high-court-quashes-summons-issued-to-the-wire-editors-in-a-criminal-defamation-case-filed-by-a-former-jnu-professor-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":312526,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court quashes summons issued to \u201cThe Wire\u201d editors in a criminal defamation case filed by a former JNU Professor","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 31, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court quashes and sets aside summons issued to the editor and deputy editor of \u201cThe Wire\u201d in a criminal defamation case filed by the former Professor of Jawaharlal Nehru University.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":332709,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":312526,"position":3},"title":"Bar Council of India cannot ostensibly pass any gag order which takes away an Advocate\u2019s fundamental right: Karnataka HC","author":"Sucheta","date":"October 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court further stated that power of the Courts either competent Civil Court or Constitutional Court cannot be permitted to be usurped by the Chairman of the Bar Council of India, as was done in the instant case.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270652,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/26\/criminal-jutice-machinery-relentlessly-employed-against-zubair-bail-granted-no-bar-from-tweeting-supreme-court-legal-news-report-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":312526,"position":4},"title":"Criminal justice machinery relentlessly employed against Zubair; process itself has become a punishment: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court refused to bar Mohd Zubair from tweeting as it would amount to an unjustified violation of the freedom of speech and expression, and the freedom to practice his profession","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Criminal-justice-machinery-relentlessly-employed-against-Zubair-process-itself-has-become-a-punishment.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Criminal-justice-machinery-relentlessly-employed-against-Zubair-process-itself-has-become-a-punishment.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Criminal-justice-machinery-relentlessly-employed-against-Zubair-process-itself-has-become-a-punishment.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Criminal-justice-machinery-relentlessly-employed-against-Zubair-process-itself-has-become-a-punishment.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Criminal-justice-machinery-relentlessly-employed-against-Zubair-process-itself-has-become-a-punishment.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296648,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/12\/delhi-hc-sentences-veer-singh-for-simple-imprisonment-for-contempt-of-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":312526,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court sentences Veer Singh, son of Max Group founder for three months simple imprisonment for contempt of court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"July 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court directed the SHO, Tilak Marg to issue warrants of arrest against Veer Singh and shall also get the Look Out circular issued against him as he was not willing to comply with the orders of this Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/312526","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=312526"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/312526\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/303940"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=312526"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=312526"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=312526"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}