{"id":312271,"date":"2024-01-26T12:00:14","date_gmt":"2024-01-26T06:30:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=312271"},"modified":"2024-01-26T09:59:52","modified_gmt":"2024-01-26T04:29:52","slug":"cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"Calcutta High Court postpones decision on supplementary affidavit due to delay in production of seized electronic devices by CBI"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Calcutta High Court:<\/span> The division bench comprising of Debangsu Basak and Md. Shabbar Rashidi, JJ. has allowed a bunch of application seeking the addition of parties in a matter related to selection of the candidates who have scored less marks than the petitioners in the Selection Test, 2016 for Assistant Teachers in secondary schools. The petitioners also sought permission to rely on a supplementary affidavit affirmed by petitioner in WPA 5538 of 2022 on 24-01-2024 and the Court decided to keep the supplementary affidavit with the record, postponing the decision on its admissibility. The matters are listed for further hearing on 05-02-2024.<\/p>\n

The instant matter related to selection of the candidates who have scored less marks than the petitioners in the Selection Test, 2016 for Assistant Teachers in secondary schools. the Court vide order dated 19-01-2024 directed the CBI to produce the electronic devices seized from the ex-employee of NYSA and also to the original Certificate issued by the ex-employee of NYSA on applicants request to consider the letter dated 13-12-2023 written on behalf of the applicants to the CBI requesting for inspection of the respective OMR sheets and disclosure of the reason for inclusion of the names of applicants in the list of 907 school teachers of classes XI and XII published.<\/p>\n

The applicant filed a prayer seeking the addition of parties in WPA 25380 of 2022. The application was allowed to the extent of adding parties as requested. The application was also treated as an affidavit-in-opposition to the main writ petition. Additionally, supplementary affidavits and notes of arguments filed on behalf of the petitioners in WPA 14670 of 2022 were allowed to be taken on record.<\/p>\n

During the hearing, the petitioners also sought permission to rely on an affidavit affirmed by petitioner in WPA 5538 of 2022 on 24-01-2024. The affidavit revealed that the School Service Commission possessed the OMR sheet, and the petitioners urged the Court to direct the Commission to produce the same.<\/p>\n

Some of the applicants argued against the peacemeal introduction of material. It was contended that the introduction of materials, such as supplementary affidavits, should not be allowed during the hearing and suggested following established legal procedures. It was emphasised that no importance should be attached to the supplementary affidavit, urging the Court to conclude the hearing without allowing further evidence. Reference was made to the previous order and argued that the Evidence Act should be considered before deciding on the admissibility of evidence. The applicants stressed the importance of Section 65B of the Evidence Act.<\/p>\n

The Court noted the Deputy Solicitor General’s information that seized electronic devices were undergoing forensic examination and were expected to reach Kolkata by 29-01-2024 as the same was declined for forensic examination in Hyderabad and the Central Forensic Science Laboratory, due to the voluminous nature of the materials. The Court considered the submissions and noted that the hearing had commenced on 15-01-2024, with some counsel concluding their submissions while others were yet to address the Court. On 18-01-2024, an applicant requested inspection of the OMR sheet, leading to an order being passed in that regard. Subsequently, the petitioner sought to introduce a supplementary affidavit.<\/p>\n

The Court decided to keep the supplementary affidavit of petitioner in WPA 5538 of 2022 on 24-01-2024 with the record, postponing the decision on its admissibility. The CBI was directed to produce the seized electronic devices by the specified date, but due to logistical reasons, the devices were expected to reach Kolkata on 29-01-2024.<\/p>\n

In light of the circumstances, the Court deemed it appropriate to grant the parties one opportunity to rely upon documents\/materials in the proceeding. Parties were directed to produce the originals or evidence in their possession by 05-02-2024. The matters are listed for further hearing on 05-02-2024.<\/p>\n

[Subhamay Bhunia<\/span> v. State of W.B.<\/span>, CAN\/6\/2024 in WPA 25380 of 2022, order dated 24-01-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The instant matter is related to selection of the candidates who have scored less marks than the petitioners in the Selection Test, 2016 for Assistant Teachers in secondary schools.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":290502,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2689,10481,44839,64719,64720,34826],"class_list":["post-312271","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-cbi","tag-omr-sheet","tag-production-of-electronic-devices","tag-selection-test","tag-supplementary-affidavit"],"yoast_head":"\nCalcutta High Court postpones decision on supplementary affidavit due to delay in production of electronic devices by CBI | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court postponed decision on supplementary affidavit due to delay in production of electronic devices by CBI.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court postpones decision on supplementary affidavit due to delay in production of seized electronic devices by CBI\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court postponed decision on supplementary affidavit due to delay in production of electronic devices by CBI.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-01-26T06:30:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court postpones decision on supplementary affidavit due to delay in production of seized electronic devices by CBI\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog\/\",\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court postpones decision on supplementary affidavit due to delay in production of electronic devices by CBI | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-26T06:30:14+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court postponed decision on supplementary affidavit due to delay in production of electronic devices by CBI.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"calcutta high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court postpones decision on supplementary affidavit due to delay in production of seized electronic devices by CBI\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Calcutta High Court postpones decision on supplementary affidavit due to delay in production of electronic devices by CBI | SCC Blog","description":"Calcutta High Court postponed decision on supplementary affidavit due to delay in production of electronic devices by CBI.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Calcutta High Court postpones decision on supplementary affidavit due to delay in production of seized electronic devices by CBI","og_description":"Calcutta High Court postponed decision on supplementary affidavit due to delay in production of electronic devices by CBI.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-01-26T06:30:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Calcutta High Court postpones decision on supplementary affidavit due to delay in production of seized electronic devices by CBI","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog\/","name":"Calcutta High Court postpones decision on supplementary affidavit due to delay in production of electronic devices by CBI | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2024-01-26T06:30:14+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court postponed decision on supplementary affidavit due to delay in production of electronic devices by CBI.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"calcutta high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/cal-hc-postpones-decision-on-supplementary-affidavit-due-to-delay-in-production-of-electronic-devices-by-cbi-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Calcutta High Court postpones decision on supplementary affidavit due to delay in production of seized electronic devices by CBI"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":265291,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/11\/cbi-probe-ordered-in-government-teacher-recruitment-scam\/","url_meta":{"origin":312271,"position":0},"title":"Cal HC | CBI probe ordered in government teacher recruitment scam; false statements by advisor of the Commission to be interrogated","author":"Editor","date":"April 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: Abhijit Gangopadhyay, J. took up a writ application which was filed praying for publishing fair and transparent merit list of Assistant Teachers in 1st State Level Selection Test 2016 (classes IX and X) in terms of 2016 Rules of recruitment including the waitlist disclosing the breakup and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290937,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/west-bengal-teachers-recruitment-scam-illegality-corruption-abhishek-banerjee-kuntal-ghosh-tmc-justice-abhijit-gangopadhyay-supreme-court-special-hearing-legal-research-explainer-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":312271,"position":1},"title":"West Bengal Teachers’ Recruitment Scam| Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay versus Supreme Court: Explained","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In an interview with ABP Ananda, Justice Gangopadhyay had made remarks against TMC leader Abhishek Banerjee in relation to the West Bengal Teachers Recruitment Scam case, which was pending before him.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"justice abhijit gangopadhyay","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/justice-abhijit-gangopadhyay.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/justice-abhijit-gangopadhyay.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/justice-abhijit-gangopadhyay.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/justice-abhijit-gangopadhyay.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326385,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/12\/jhc-refers-contempt-case-to-larger-bench-for-clarification-in-procedure-to-be-adopted-in-contempt-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":312271,"position":2},"title":"Jharkhand HC refers contempt case against Advocate General and Additional Advocate General to larger bench for clarification in procedure to be adopted in contempt proceedings","author":"Arushi","date":"July 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that when a decision of a coordinate bench of the same High Court is brought in notice, it is to be respected and is binding to the Bench of such co-equal strength. For taking a different view, it is required to refer the question to the larger\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":302321,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/calcutta-hc-upheld-transfer-of-investigation-in-money-laundering-case-from-cid-to-cbi-scc-blog-legal-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":312271,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court expunges aspersions casted against CID without apparent basis in a financial scam case; upholds transfer of investigation","author":"Ritu","date":"September 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that the writ petition was not a PIL but had personal elements involving the respondents, who were directly affected by the alleged financial scam.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287070,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/arbitration-petition-calcutta-high-court-appointment-arbitrator-disqualification-section-12-seventh-schedule-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-legal-research-news-scc-online-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":312271,"position":4},"title":"All unilateral appointments of arbitrators are not invalid: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that all the unilateral appointment of arbitrators is not invalid unless the arbitrator's relationship falls within the Seventh Schedule to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298389,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/03\/calcutta-hc-upholds-bpcls-decision-to-suspend-supplies-in-lpg-distributorship-amidst-partnership-dispute\/","url_meta":{"origin":312271,"position":5},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds BPCL’s decision to suspend supplies in LPG distributorship amidst partnership dispute","author":"Ritu","date":"August 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The changes made in the supplementary partnership deed without the previous approval of BPCL are violative of Clause 21 of the distributorship agreement.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/312271","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=312271"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/312271\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=312271"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=312271"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=312271"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}