{"id":312150,"date":"2024-01-25T10:00:20","date_gmt":"2024-01-25T04:30:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=312150"},"modified":"2024-02-02T14:29:06","modified_gmt":"2024-02-02T08:59:06","slug":"chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/25\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Complaint\/FIR filed by second wife for offence u\/s 498A of IPC against husband or in-laws will not be tenable: Chhattisgarh High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Chhattisgarh High Court:<\/span> In a case, wherein the question arose that whether the complaint\/FIR filed by the second wife for commission of punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">498-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;) would be tenable or not, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sanjay K. Agrawal*<\/span> and Sachin Singh Rajput, JJ, relied on the principles laid down in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shivcharan Lal Verma<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Madhya Pradesh<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=SlRYVC0wMDAwMDM5MDk4JiYmJiY0MCYmJiYmU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmdWxsc2NyZWVuJiYmJiZmYWxzZSYmJiYmKDIwMDcpIDE1IFNDQyAzNjkmJiYmJlBocmFzZSYmJiYmRmluZEJ5Q2l0YXRpb24mJiYmJmZhbHNl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2007 15 SCC 369<\/a> and opined that the complaint\/FIR lodged by second wife for commission of offence punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">498-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>&#8220;) would not be tenable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an instant case,Respondent 3 filed a written complaint against the co-accused and the present petitioners and alleged that she was married to the co-accused on 19-07-2018, who was already married to Petitioner 1. It was further alleged that immediately after her marriage, the petitioners and the co-accused started harassing and treated her with cruelty. As a result, Respondent 3 filed a written complaint for the offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">498-A<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> against the petitioners and the co-accused.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the petitioners sought to quash the charges against them by filing the present petition under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;the CrPC&#8217;).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, during the course of hearing in the present petition, the Single Judge found conflict with the decisions rendered in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shivcharan Lal Verma<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Madhya Pradesh (&#8216;Shivcharan Lal Verma case&#8217;)<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=SlRYVC0wMDAwMDM5MDk4JiYmJiY0MCYmJiYmU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmdWxsc2NyZWVuJiYmJiZmYWxzZSYmJiYmKDIwMDcpIDE1IFNDQyAzNjkmJiYmJlBocmFzZSYmJiYmRmluZEJ5Q2l0YXRpb24mJiYmJmZhbHNl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2007) 15 SCC 369<\/a> and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rajinder Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Punjab<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=SlRYVC0wMDAwMDUxMjk4JiYmJiY0MCYmJiYmU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmdWxsc2NyZWVuJiYmJiZmYWxzZSYmJiYmKDIwMTUpIDYgU0NDIDQ3NyYmJiYmUGhyYXNlJiYmJiZGaW5kQnlDaXRhdGlvbiYmJiYmZmFsc2U=\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2015) 6 SCC 477<\/a> (&#8216;Rajinder Singh case&#8217;). Therefore, the matter was referred to the Division Bench on the question that whether the complaint or FIR lodged by the second wife for commission of offence punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">498-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> would be tenable or not.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to Shivcharan Lal Verma case, wherein it was clearly held that the appellant&#8217;s second marriage, during the subsistence of a valid marriage was null and void and consequently, quashed the appellant&#8217;s conviction under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">498-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>, and opined that the principles of law laid down in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shivcharan Lal Verma case<\/span> (supra), was recently followed in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">P Sivakumar<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=SlRYVC05MDAxODY5MTY3JiYmJiY0MCYmJiYmU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmdWxsc2NyZWVuJiYmJiZ0cnVlJiYmJiZQLiBzaXZha3VtYXIgdi4gc3RhdGUmJiYmJkFsbFdvcmRzJiYmJiZnU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmYWxzZQ==\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) SCC OnLine SC 1737<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thereafter, the Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rajinder Singh case<\/span>(supra), and opined that this case was with regard to applicability of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546432\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808049\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961<\/a>, and did not deal with the issue as to whether prosecution under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">498-A<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> was maintainable at the instance of the second wife.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that there was no apparent conflict with the decision rendered by the three judges bench of the Supreme Court in Shivcharan Lal Verma case and Rajinder Singh Case, however, even if there was any conflict, it had been held in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union Territory of Ladakh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Jammu &amp; Kashmir National Conference<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=SlRYVC05MDAxNjE0MTYzJiYmJiY0MCYmJiYmU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmdWxsc2NyZWVuJiYmJiZ0cnVlJiYmJiYyMDIzIFNDQyBPbkxpbmUgU0MgMTE0MCYmJiYmQWxsV29yZHMmJiYmJmdTZWFyY2gmJiYmJmZhbHNl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) SCC OnLine SC 1140<\/a> that in case of conflicting judgements by benches of equal strength of the Supreme Court , the earlier one had to be followed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court relied on Shivcharan Lal Verma case, and opined that the complaint or FIR filed by second wife for commission of offence punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">498-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> would not be tenable and directed the matter to be placed before Single Judge for deciding the petition under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> in light of the principle observed in this case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Suman Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/854kzUZn\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Chh 416<\/a>, decided on 18-01-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by- Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioners:<\/span> Sabyasachi Bhaduri and Khulesh Sahu, Advocates<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> Ashish Tiwari, Govt. Advocate and Malay Shrivastava, Advocate<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;It is vividly clear that when there are conflicting judgments of the Supreme Court of benches of equal strength, it is the earlier one which is to be followed by this Court.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":299942,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30591,6881,2570,3067,64681,64680,14261,30908,56730],"class_list":["post-312150","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-chhattisgarh-high-court","tag-complaint","tag-Cruelty","tag-FIR","tag-justice-sachin-singh-rajput","tag-justice-sanjay-k-agrawal","tag-penal-code","tag-second-marriage","tag-section-498a-of-ipc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Complaint filed by second wife for offence u\/s 498A of IPC against husband will not be tenable: Chhattisgarh HC| SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Chhattisgarh High Court opined that the complaint or FIR filed by second wife for commission of offence punishable under Section 498A of the IPC would not be tenable.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/25\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Complaint\/FIR filed by second wife for offence u\/s 498A of IPC against husband or in-laws will not be tenable: Chhattisgarh High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Chhattisgarh High Court opined that the complaint or FIR filed by second wife for commission of offence punishable under Section 498A of the IPC would not be tenable.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/25\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-01-25T04:30:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-02-02T08:59:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Complaint\/FIR filed by second wife for offence u\/s 498A of IPC against husband or in-laws will not be tenable: Chhattisgarh High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/25\\\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/25\\\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"headline\":\"Complaint\\\/FIR filed by second wife for offence u\\\/s 498A of IPC against husband or in-laws will not be tenable: Chhattisgarh High Court\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-25T04:30:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-02T08:59:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/25\\\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":626,\"commentCount\":1,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/25\\\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Chhattisgarh High Court\",\"complaint\",\"Cruelty\",\"FIR\",\"Justice Sachin Singh Rajput\",\"Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal\",\"Penal Code\",\"second marriage\",\"Section 498A of IPC\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/25\\\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/25\\\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/25\\\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\\\/\",\"name\":\"Complaint filed by second wife for offence u\\\/s 498A of IPC against husband will not be tenable: Chhattisgarh HC| SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/25\\\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/25\\\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-25T04:30:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-02T08:59:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Chhattisgarh High Court opined that the complaint or FIR filed by second wife for commission of offence punishable under Section 498A of the IPC would not be tenable.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/25\\\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/25\\\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/25\\\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"chhattisgarh high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/25\\\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Complaint\\\/FIR filed by second wife for offence u\\\/s 498A of IPC against husband or in-laws will not be tenable: Chhattisgarh High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/arushi\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Complaint filed by second wife for offence u\/s 498A of IPC against husband will not be tenable: Chhattisgarh HC| SCC Blog","description":"Chhattisgarh High Court opined that the complaint or FIR filed by second wife for commission of offence punishable under Section 498A of the IPC would not be tenable.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/25\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Complaint\/FIR filed by second wife for offence u\/s 498A of IPC against husband or in-laws will not be tenable: Chhattisgarh High Court","og_description":"Chhattisgarh High Court opined that the complaint or FIR filed by second wife for commission of offence punishable under Section 498A of the IPC would not be tenable.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/25\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-01-25T04:30:20+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-02-02T08:59:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Complaint\/FIR filed by second wife for offence u\/s 498A of IPC against husband or in-laws will not be tenable: Chhattisgarh High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/25\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/25\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\/"},"author":{"name":"Arushi","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"headline":"Complaint\/FIR filed by second wife for offence u\/s 498A of IPC against husband or in-laws will not be tenable: Chhattisgarh High Court","datePublished":"2024-01-25T04:30:20+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-02T08:59:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/25\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\/"},"wordCount":626,"commentCount":1,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/25\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp","keywords":["Chhattisgarh High Court","complaint","Cruelty","FIR","Justice Sachin Singh Rajput","Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal","Penal Code","second marriage","Section 498A of IPC"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/25\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/25\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/25\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\/","name":"Complaint filed by second wife for offence u\/s 498A of IPC against husband will not be tenable: Chhattisgarh HC| SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/25\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/25\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2024-01-25T04:30:20+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-02T08:59:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Chhattisgarh High Court opined that the complaint or FIR filed by second wife for commission of offence punishable under Section 498A of the IPC would not be tenable.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/25\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/25\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/25\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"chhattisgarh high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/25\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Complaint\/FIR filed by second wife for offence u\/s 498A of IPC against husband or in-laws will not be tenable: Chhattisgarh High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/312150","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=312150"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/312150\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/299942"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=312150"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=312150"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=312150"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}